An interventional study of palodent and optracontact in Class II Dental Caries, sponsored by Cairo University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-20.
Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of this study was evaluating the clinical effectiveness of the hand instrument in conjunction with sectional matrix when applying lateral forces at the contact area during curing to achieve large and tight proximal contacts in posterior teeth.
Dental caries is considered as one of the most prevalent oral infections. Initiation of dental caries is a mufti-factorial process, its risk factors includes high loads of cariogenic bacteria, increased frequency of sugar intake, insufficient exposure to fluoride and reduced salivary flow. Other factors that may influence the occurrence of caries include poor oral hygiene and socio-economic status.
Inter-proximal caries lesions develop between the contacting proximal surfaces of two adjacent teeth. Massive evolution took place in restorative techniques, composite resin materials, cavity designs and armamentarium in the past few decades. As well as drastic solutions for earlier problems of composite resins such as bonding to dentin, wear resistance, postoperative sensitivity and polymerization shrinkage. Despite all the progress noted in that area, still achieving proximal contact tightness in Class II resin composite restorations is considered one of the biggest challenges facing clinicians Proximal contact tightness is a physiological dynamic entity of multifactorial origin that is largely affected by tooth type, location, time of day, patient position, mastication and restorative procedures Failure to obtain proper proximal contact area will influence stability of dental arch and transmission of forces along long axis of teeth during mastication. Traumatic masticatory forces can lead to various problems like; rotation and displacement of the teeth, lifting forces on the teeth, deflective occlusal contacts and food impactions that would result in trauma, pain, inflammation and bleeding of the periodontium. The contact must be neither open nor too tight.
Aim of this study was evaluating the clinical effectiveness of the Optra Contact in conjunction with sectional matrix when applying lateral forces at the contact area during curing to achieve large and tight proximal contacts in posterior teeth.
1,109 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Caries; 197 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 60 across 916 interventional studies indexed under Dental Caries.
Browse Dental Caries studies →Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.
Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Testing Palodent sectional matrix system only when placing Class II resin composite restorations is to increase proximal contact tightness.
Device: palodent
A pre-contoured instrument called Optra contact (Ivoclar, Vivadent) will be used with group 2. For testing palodent matrix systems with Optracontact when placing Class II resin composite restorations is to increase proximal contact tightness with adjacent teeth when compared with group 1.
Device: palodent · Device: optracontact
innovative sectional matrix system with Nickel-Titanium rings, anatomically shaped matrix bands and adaptive self-guiding wedges that provides predictable, tight contacts and restorations that accurately replicate the natural tooth anatomy.
Also known as: sectional matrix system
The instrument is used to achieve large and tight proximal contacts in posterior teeth.
Also known as: Molar Instrument - Ivoclar Vivadent, Bifurcated Tip Instrument
Contact tightness Device used: Dental floss Scoring unit US Public Health Service
Clinical Performance Proximal contact Modified USPHS Ryge criteria
Time frame: Proximal contact tightness was measured after 6 months
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Cairo University