CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05421585Updated Sep 14, 2023

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Block in the Management of Postoperative Analgesia After Lumbar Spinal Surgery

An interventional study of observational drug study in The Effect of Two Different Block Methods on Postoperative Pain Management in Lumbar Spinal Surgery, sponsored by Samsun University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-14.

Sponsored by Samsun University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lumbar spinal surgery, one of the most common operations for the treatment of back and leg pain, is a painful postoperative procedure. Pain control is an important part of the treatment in these patients who may develop chronic pain. In patients undergoing surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), severe pain may occur in the postoperative period, especially in the operation area, and this pain may become chronic. The subject of our study is to observe the effect on the use of analgesics by randomizing the patients that we routinely block in this painful procedure. We aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of two different regional analgesia methods performed under ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery.Thoracolumbar interfacial plane (TLIP) block is a regional analgesia technique performed under US guidance, which was defined by Hand et al. in 2015 (10). Ueshima et al. retrospectively demonstrated that this technique produces effective analgesia after lumbar laminoplasty.

reported in their study (11). In the classical technique, local anesthetic infiltration is performed between the Multifidus and Longissimus muscles in the 4th Lumbar (L4) vertebral region (10). There is no study in the literature comparing classical TLIP block and QL2 block.

In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of US-guided Classic TLIP block and Posterior QLB (QL2) block for postoperative analgesia management after LDH surgery. Our primary aim is to determine the 24-hour opioid requirement, and our secondary aim is to; to compare postoperative pain scores (NRS), to evaluate side effects (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting) associated with opioid use and complications that may occur due to block.

Read the detailed description

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of US-guided Classic TLIP block and Posterior QLB (QL2) block for postoperative analgesia management after LDH surgery. Our primary aim is to determine the 24-hour opioid requirement, and our secondary aim is to; compare postoperative pain scores (NRS), to evaluate side effects (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting) associated with opioid use and complications that may occur due to block.

Content: Lumbar spinal surgery is one of the most common operations performed for the treatment of back and leg pain (1). Pain control is an important part of the treatment in these patients who may develop chronic pain. In patients undergoing surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), severe pain may occur in the postoperative period, especially in the operation area, and this pain may become chronic (2). Effective postoperative pain control reduces complications such as hospital-acquired opioids are widely used analgesic agents. Parenteral opioids are preferred for the treatment of acute postoperative pain in most patients who have surgery. Although opioids are widely used in the treatment of acute postoperative pain. They may cause opioid-related adverse events (ORAE) such as nausea, vomiting, allergic reactions, sedation, and respiratory depression (3). In order to reduce the use of systemic opioids, regional anesthesia techniques may be preferred with the increase in the use of ultrasound (US) in daily anesthesia practice (4).

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) performed under US guidance is an interfacial plane block defined by Blanco (5). This block is used in the management of analgesia after abdominal and lumbar surgery (5-9). Local anesthetic solution is injected around the quadratus lumborum muscle to block the thoracolumbar nerves. In posterior OLB (QL2) block, local anesthetic solution is injected from the posterior part of the muscle and spreads between the Quadratus lumborum and Erector spina muscles (6). Since it is performed under US guidance, it is an easy and reliable method with a low complication rate. and thromboembolism, as it provides early mobilization and early discharge.Thoracolumbar interfacial plane (TLIP) block is a regional analgesia technique performed under US guidance, which was defined by Hand et al. in 2015 (10). Ueshima et al. retrospectively demonstrated that this technique produces effective analgesia after lumbar laminoplasty.

reported in their study (11). In the classical technique, local anesthetic infiltration is performed between the Multifidus and Longissimus muscles in the 4th Lumbar (L4) vertebral region (10). There is no study in the literature comparing classical TLIP block and QL2 block.

In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of US-guided Classic TLIP block and Posterior QLB (QL2) block for postoperative analgesia management after LDH surgery. Our primary aim is to determine the 24-hour opioid requirement, and our secondary aim is to; to compare postoperative pain scores (NRS), to evaluate side effects (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting) associated with opioid use and complications that may occur due to block Material and Method Sixty patients with ASA classification I-II, aged 18-65 years, scheduled for lumbar discectomy + laminectomy under general anesthesia will be included in this prospective, randomized study. Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis, taking anticoagulant therapy, allergic or sensitive to local anesthetic and opioid drugs, patients with infection in the area to be blocked, patients who have had previous lumbar surgery, patients using gabapentinoids or corticosteroids, patients who cannot use a patient-controlled anesthesia device, patients with suspected pregnancy , pregnant or lactating mothers and patients who do not accept the procedure will be excluded from the study.

  1. General anesthesia After the patients are taken to the operating room, all patients will be premedicated with 2 mg of intravenous midazolam. In anesthesia induction, 2-2.5 mg kg-1 iv propofol, 1-1.5 mcg kg-1 iv fentanyl, 0.6 mg kg-1 iv rocuronium will be intubated. The patient will then be placed in the prone position. Anesthesia will be maintained with 1-2% sevoflurane and 50 mcg/hour remifentanil in a 50% oxygen-air mixture. Mechanical ventilator settings will be adjusted so that tidal volume is 6-8 ml/kg, maximum airway pressure is 30 cmH2 O, end tidal CO2 is 30-35mmHg. If the pulse or mean blood pressure increases by 20% from the preoperative value, a bolus of 25 mcg fentanyl and 0.1 mg kg-1 rocuronium will be administered. Lumbar discectomy + laminectomy will be performed by the same surgical team with the same routine surgical procedure. Patients will receive an analgesic regimen as described post-induction and pre-extubation. To prevent nausea and vomiting, iv 4 mg of ondansetron will be given. Patients with adequate spontaneous breathing will be taken to the postoperative recovery unit after extubating. Patients who reach 12 points in Aldrete scoring will be sent to the service. Before coming to the operating room, the patients will be randomly divided into 2 groups (Group Q= QL2 block group, Group T= Classic TLIP group) each containing 26 patients, using a sealed envelope method.
  2. Block technique The block that we use routinely, in accordance with the guidelines and valid, will be applied to the patient in the preoperative block room 30 minutes before the operation starts (5-9).

    1. Posterior QLB process; After aseptic conditions are provided, the convex US probe will be covered with a sterile sheath, and an 80-100 mm block needle will be used. After imaging the abdominal muscles with the anterior approach, the needle will be advanced in the Petit triangle and 1-2 ml of saline will be injected into the posterior border of the quadratus lumborum muscle. After the block location is confirmed, 20 ml of local anesthetic infiltration at a concentration of 0.25% will be applied. The same procedure will be applied to the other side. A total of 30 ml of local anesthetic solution will be used.
    2. Classic TLIP block: Operation after providing aseptic conditions, the high frequency linear US probe will be covered with a sterile sheath, and a 50 mm block needle will be used. The ultrasound probe will be placed vertically at the level of the L3 vertebra. After visualizing the guiding point spinous process and interspinal muscles, the probe will be moved laterally to visualize the longissimus and multifidus muscles. By using the in-plane technique, the block needle will be directed from medial to lateral, and after reaching the interfacial area between the longissimus and multifidus muscles, the block area will be confirmed by administering 5 ml of serum physiologically. Then, 20 ml of 0.25% local anesthetic will be administered. The same procedure will be applied to the other side. A total of 40 ml of local anesthetic solution will be used.
  3. Postoperative analgesia management After anesthesia induction, 1 g iv Pracetamol before surgical incision and 20 mg iv Tenoxicam iv 20 mg 30 minutes before the end of the surgical procedure will be administered for postoperative analgesia. In the postoperative period, paracetamol 3x1 gr iv will be administered to the patients and iv Morphine infusion will be performed with a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. By adding 0.5 mg/ml of morphine in the serum physiological, 1 mg bolus, 8 minutes lock time, and a maximum of 6 mg morphine per hour will be adjusted (12). Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by another non-interventional anesthetist.

Postoperative pain assessment will be made using the NRS scoring (0 = no pain, 10 = most severe pain felt). Resting and mobile NRS scores will be recorded at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours. NRS score \< 4 will be targeted.

Sedation level will be monitored on a 4-point sedation scale (0=wake, eyes open, 1=sleepy but responds to verbal stimuli, 2=sleepy and difficult to awaken, 3=sleepy, cannot be woken by shaking).

Additional analgesic need, side effects such as nausea, vomiting, itching and complications that may occur due to block will be recorded.

References:

  1. McGirt MJ et al. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 2009; 64.2: 338-345.
  2. Efthymiou CA, O'Regan DJ. Postdischarge complications: what exactly happens when the patient goes home?. Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 2011; 12.2: 130-134.
  3. Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, et al. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician 2008;11(2 Suppl l):S105.
  4. Teddy PJ, Fabinyi G, Kerr JH, Briggs M. Bupivacaine infiltration after lumbar laminectomy: Local infiltration in the control of early postoperative lumbar laminectomy pain. Anaesthesia 1998;36(4): 380-383.
  5. Dhanjal S, Tonder S. Quadratus Lumborum Block. 2020 Oct 23. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. PMID: 30725897.
  6. Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Barrington M. Quadratus Lumborum Block: Anatomical Concepts, Mechanisms, and Techniques. Anesthesiology. 2019 Feb;130(2):322-335. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002524. PMID: 30688787.
  7. Ueshima H, Otake H, Lin JA. Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2752876. doi: 10.1155/2017/2752876. Epub 2017 Jan 3. PMID: 28154824; PMCID: PMC5244003.
  8. Ueshima H, Otake H. Clinical experience of anterior quadratus lumborum block after lumber surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:131. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 9. PMID: 28235503.
  9. Ueshima H, Hiroshi O. Lumbar vertebra surgery performed with a bilateral posterior quadratus lumborum block. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Sep;41:61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 3. PMID: 28802611.
  10. Hand WR et al. Thoracolum¬bar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: a pilot study in volunteers. Can J Anaesth 2015; 62: 1196-2000
  11. Ueshima H et al. Efficacy of the thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for lumbar laminoplasty: a retrospective study. Asian spine journal 2017; 11.5: 722-725.
  12. Gürkan Y et al. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 50 (2018) 65-68
02

Conditions studied

  • The Effect of Two Different Block Methods on Postoperative Pain Management in Lumbar Spinal Surgery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lumbar spinal surgery
  • Postoperative pain
  • QL2 block
  • TLIP block
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 57 is below the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Samsun University is the lead sponsor of 81 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18-65 years old
  2. ASA 1-2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Bleeding diathesis
  2. Opioid allergy
  3. Infection in the area to be blocked
  4. Have had previous lumbar surgery
  5. Pregnant or suspected of pregnancy, breastfeeding
  6. Gabapenthinoid, corticosteroid users
  7. Those with kidney failure
  8. Those with liver failure
  9. Patients who cannot use a patient-controlled analgesia device
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    QL2 block

    Posterior QLB process After aseptic conditions are provided, the convex US probe will be covered with a sterile sheath, and an 80-100 mm block needle will be used. After imaging the abdominal muscles with the anterior approach, the needle will be advanced in the Petit triangle and 1-2 ml of saline will be injected into the posterior border of the quadratus lumborum muscle. After the block location is confirmed, 20 ml of local anesthetic infiltration at a concentration of 0.25% will be applied. The same procedure will be applied to the other side. A total of 30 ml of local anesthetic solution will be used.

    Other: observational drug study

  • Active comparator
    TLIP block

    Classic TLIP block After providing aseptic conditions, the high frequency linear US probe will be covered with a sterile sheath, and a 50 mm block needle will be used. The ultrasound probe will be placed vertically at the level of the L3 vertebra. After visualizing the guiding point spinous process and interspinal muscles, the probe will be moved laterally to visualize the longissimus and multifidus muscles. By using the in-plane technique, the block needle will be directed from medial to lateral, and after reaching the interfacial area between the longissimus and multifidus muscles, the block area will be confirmed by administering 5 ml of serum physiologically. Then, 20 ml of 0.25% local anesthetic will be administered. The same procedure will be applied to the other side. A total of 40 ml of local anesthetic solution will be used.

    Other: observational drug study

Interventions

  • Otherobservational drug study

    Postoperative opioid consumption will be evaluated by applying 2 different block methods to patients who have undergone lumbar disc surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. postoperative analgesia

    Reducing the need for opioids used in the postoperative 24 hours in patients who have undergone lumbar spinal surgery

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. opioid side effect

    To provide a lower postoperative pain score (NRS\<4) in patients who have undergone lumbar spinal surgery, to reduce the risks of allergic reaction, nausea-vomiting, itching, sedation that may develop with opioid use.

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • SAMSUN UNIVERSITY Samsun Training and research hospital
    Samsun, Ilkadım, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH, Kilic CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Nov;50:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 2. PubMed 29980005 ↗
  • McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GL, Datoo G, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery. 2009 Feb;64(2):338-44; discussion 344-5. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000337574.58662.E2. PubMed 19190461 ↗
  • Efthymiou CA, O'Regan DJ. Postdischarge complications: what exactly happens when the patient goes home? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Feb;12(2):130-4. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.249474. Epub 2010 Nov 30. PubMed 21123196 ↗
  • Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N, Glaser SE, Vallejo R. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S105-20. PubMed 18443635 ↗
  • Teddy PJ, Fabinyi GC, Kerr JH, Briggs M. Bupivacaine infiltration after lumbar laminectomy. Local infiltration in the control of early postoperative lumbar laminectomy pain. Anaesthesia. 1981 Apr;36(4):380-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1981.tb10242.x. PubMed 7018317 ↗
  • Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Barrington M. Quadratus Lumborum Block: Anatomical Concepts, Mechanisms, and Techniques. Anesthesiology. 2019 Feb;130(2):322-335. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002524. No abstract available. Erratum In: Anesthesiology. 2024 Dec 1;141(6):1226. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005221. PubMed 30688787 ↗
  • Ueshima H, Otake H, Lin JA. Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2752876. doi: 10.1155/2017/2752876. Epub 2017 Jan 3. PubMed 28154824 ↗
  • Ueshima H, Otake H. RETRACTED: Clinical experience of anterior quadratus lumborum block after lumber surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:131. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 9. No abstract available. PubMed 28235503 ↗
  • Ueshima H, Hiroshi O. RETRACTED: Lumbar vertebra surgery performed with a bilateral posterior quadratus lumborum block. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Sep;41:61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 3. No abstract available. PubMed 28802611 ↗
  • Hand WR, Taylor JM, Harvey NR, Epperson TI, Gunselman RJ, Bolin ED, Whiteley J. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: a pilot study in volunteers. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;62(11):1196-200. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0431-y. Epub 2015 Jul 7. PubMed 26149600 ↗
  • Ueshima H, Ozawa T, Toyone T, Otake H. Efficacy of the Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block for Lumbar Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Study. Asian Spine J. 2017 Oct;11(5):722-725. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.722. Epub 2017 Oct 11. PubMed 29093781 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — After the work is completed

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05421585
Lead sponsor
Samsun University
Responsible party
Senay Canikli (medical specialist (Anesthesiology and Reanimation), Samsun University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 16, 2022
Start date
Aug 15, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 8, 2023
Completion
Sep 12, 2023
Last update
Sep 14, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion