An interventional study of ABC123 Framework in Advanced Cancer, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-09.
Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Pilot study assessing the feasibility and acceptability of the ABC123 framework, as well as goal concordance between patient and clinician stated goals. Patients >60 years old with recently diagnosed advanced, incurable cancer in for a first consultation at a participating medical oncology clinic. The team will pilot test the ABC123 framework delivery by an advanced practice provider working with a medical oncologist to inform the overall care planning process. This framework will routinely incorporate and implement existing resources from these 3 transdisciplinary tenets (geriatric, oncology, and palliative medicine) into initial care planning in a patient-centered manner. The team will follow patients from initial care planning to 6 months post-intervention and assess additional stakeholder feedback on barriers and facilitators to implementation.
The ABC123 care planning framework is aimed at increasing care alignment delivered to older patients with advanced cancer by combining existing tools that represent the principles of geriatrics, oncology, and palliative care. In this pilot study, our primary goals are to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the ABC123 care planning framework and evaluate the framework's impact on the provision of care that aligns with the goals and values of patients. Participants will participate in a series of visits and follow-ups meant to implement and evaluate the ABC123 care planning framework that will take place over the course of six months. The first two visits will consist of 1) a short physical performance battery (SPPB) and estimation of potential for grade 3 chemotherapy toxicity using the Cancer and Aging Research Group chemotherapy toxicity calculator and 2) guided goals of care discussion with an Advanced Practice Provider based on the findings from visit 1. During 1, 3, and 6-month follow-up sessions, participants will complete a survey consisting of several commonly used questionnaires and an interview about experiences and goals. Care providers and institutional stakeholders will also be interviewed at 1, 2, and 3 years after initial implementation to understand experiences and assess the feasibility if the ABC123 framework.
University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,499 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.
Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 89 (64%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients over 60 years old with advanced, incurable cancer.
Behavioral: ABC123 Framework
This care planning framework aims to implement existing tools in geriatric medicine, palliative medicine, and medical oncology to aid in cancer care planning for older adults with newly diagnosed incurable advanced cancer and to test the delivery of goal-concordant care. This patient-centered intervention is the ABC123 care planning framework in parallel with usual care that includes a physical function assessment, chemotherapy toxicity estimate calculation, and a guided goals of care discussion.
Feasibility measured through recruitment
Recruitment (proportion of those approached who actually enroll)
Time frame: 3 years
Feasibility measured through retention in sessions
Retention number of those completing both clinic sessions
Time frame: baseline to visit 2
Feasibility measured through retention in follow up
Retention number of those completing both sessions, and follow up
Time frame: baseline to 6 month follow up
Plan to share: No
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Colorado, Denver