CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05405907Updated Jun 6, 2022

Evaluation of the Haemostatic Agent Purabond in ENT TORS

An observational study in Hemorrhage, sponsored by University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-06.

Sponsored by University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
12
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the use of Purabond in ENT TORS for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Consecutive patients enrolled retrospectively via case note review. Outcome measures - primary and secondary haemorrhage, swallowing outcomes, need for nasogastric tube or tracheostomy, readmission.

Read the detailed description

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has been increasingly utilised in ear, nose and throat (ENT) Surgery over the past 20 years offering unprecedented 3-dimensional (3-D) views and enabling access to traditionally 'difficult-to-reach' tumours. It is now becoming a viable first line treatment option for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) compared to chemoradiotherapy. One of the main concerns is serious haemorrhage that can lead to death. PuraBond® (also known as PuraStat ®; 3D Matrix Ltd, Tokyo, Japan), which consists of the RADA16 family of synthetic peptides. PuraBond® is a self-assembling viscous solution that once applied on the surgical bed, it forms a transparent hydrogel 3-D matrix to achieve local haemostasis. Its transparent nature allows visualisation of the surgical field, permitting real-time assessment of intraoperative haemostasis. There are some studies demonstrating that it can promote healing. We aimed to assess the effect of Purabond in ENT TORS for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures such as oropharyngectomy and tongue base mucosectomy. Patients were enrolled from a single tertiary university hospital trust in the United Kingdom (University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust). Case notes for all patients were analysed retrospectively. Data extracted included patient demographics (age, sex, smoking history), procedure details (date, indication for surgery and type of TORS procedure) and tumour details (histopathology including p16 status and stage). The primary outcome measure was post-operative haemorrhage rate (primary; within 24 hours of surgery, and secondary; between 1-30 days post-surgery). Secondary outcome measures included, length of hospital stay (LOS), post-operative swallowing complications, in particular whether feeding tube insertion or tracheostomy was performed either prior to or within 30 days of surgery, hospital re- readmission rate within 30 days of surgery, and surgeon-reported ease of PuraBond® application. Descriptive statistical analysis was undertaken where applicable (mean, median, standard deviation) using Microsoft Excel® version 16.31.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemorrhage

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All consecutive patients undergoing ENT transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with Purabond application between August 2021 - May 2022 at a single centre teaching university hospital National Health Service trust

Inclusion criteria

  • all consecutive patients undergoing ENT transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with Purabond application between August 2021 - May 2022 at a single centre teaching university hospital NHS trust

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Purabond not applied
  • incomplete case notes
04

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherPuraBond haemostatic agent

    Application of Purabond to surgical field

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary haemorrhage

    Haemorrhage

    Time frame: 24 hours post operatively

  2. Secondary haemorrhage

    Haemorrhage

    Time frame: Day 1 to day 30 post operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Readmission

    Hospital readmission

    Time frame: Within 30 days post operatively

  2. Feeding tube

    Nasogastric tube insertion

    Time frame: Within 30 days post operatively

  3. Tracheostomy tube

    Tracheostomy tube insertion

    Time frame: Within 30 days post operatively

06

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust
    Birmingham, B15 2TH, United Kingdom
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05405907
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Keshav Gupta (ENT Registrar, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 6, 2022
Start date
Aug 1, 2021
Primary completion
May 1, 2022
Completion
May 1, 2022
Last update
Jun 6, 2022

Study contacts

Keshav Gupta, MBBS
principal investigator · ENT registrar

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion