ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05403762PIDUpdated Mar 18, 2026Results posted

Prevention of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis

An interventional study of ESENTA™ Skin Barrier Spray (ConvaTec, UK) and Hydrophobes Basisgel DAC in Incontinence-associated Dermatitis, sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-18.

Sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
220
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is an inflammation of the skin caused by prolonged direct contact of the skin with urine and/or stool. Elderly and care-dependent people are often affected by this type of inflammation. Gentle skin cleansing and the use of skin protection products are recommended. Available skin protection products can be categorized into film-forming or lipophilic skin protectants depending on the ingredients and overall composition. There is no evidence about the superiority of one product compared to another regarding skin protection. The overall aim of this study is to compare the effects of two skin protection products compared to an untreated control group. An exploratory trial in elderly nursing home residents and geriatric patients will be conducted.

Read the detailed description

Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is an inflammation of the skin caused by prolonged and direct contact of the skin with urine and/or stool. It may occur in all age groups but elderly and care-dependent incontinent people are often affected by this type of inflammation. Promotion of continence, use of absorbent products and structured skin care are recommended to prevent and/or treat IAD. Available skin protection products can be categorized into film-forming or lipophilic skin protectants depending on the ingredients and overall composition. Currently, there is no evidence about the superiority of one product compared to another regarding skin protection. The overall aim of this study is to compare the effects of two skin protection products compared to an untreated control group. An exploratory randomized controlled trial in incontinent elderly nursing home residents and geriatric patients will be conducted. In the two intervention groups, a film-forming or a lipophilic skin protection product will be applied in addition to standardized skin care regimens. Every other day, investigators will perform skin inspections, including instrumental skin measurements to quantify erythema for a total study period of n= 14 days. IAD- related pain and itch will be assessed. A total of n= 210 nursing home residents and geriatric patients in Berlin, Germany, aged over 65 years, who are affected by urinary and faecal incontinence without signs of severe IAD will be included.

02

Conditions studied

  • Incontinence-associated Dermatitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Skin care
  • Long-term care
  • Nursing home resident
  • Erythema
  • Geriatric medicine
03

In context

Erythema

131 studies on the registry are indexed under Erythema; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 220 is above the median of 50 across 114 interventional studies indexed under Erythema.

Browse Erythema studies →

Lead sponsor

Charite University, Berlin, Germany is the lead sponsor of 857 studies on the registry; 129 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Geriatric patients or residents being incontinent of urine and stool
  • Expected minimum length of stay of 14 days at the care facility
  • Intact skin with no clinical signs of IAD OR
  • intact skin with early clinical signs of IAD (IAD category 1A)
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Residents/patients at the end of life
  • Residents/Patients with IAD category 1B, 2A, 2B and/or signs of clinical infection in the IAD area
  • Any skin condition or wounds (at areas of the skin) requiring additional treatment (e. g. pressure ulcers, intertrigo, infection)
  • Known or allergy to silicones and/or topical leave-on products
  • Topical treatments in the IAD area.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
220 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ESENTA™ Skin Barrier Spray

    In the intervention group I, standardized mild skin cleansing regimen and daily topical application of a film-forming skin protectant at the exposed skin areas will be applied by nursing staff.

    Other: ESENTA™ Skin Barrier Spray (ConvaTec, UK)

  • Experimental
    Hydrophobes Basisgel DAC

    In the intervention group II, standardized mild skin cleansing regimen and daily topical application of a hydrophobic skin protectant at the exposed skin areas will be applied by nursing staff.

    Other: Hydrophobes Basisgel DAC

  • No intervention
    Standard Care

    In the control group, standardized mild skin cleansing regimen without application of an additional skin protectant will be conducted by nursing staff.

Interventions

  • OtherESENTA™ Skin Barrier Spray (ConvaTec, UK)

    The skin protectant will be applied on clean and dry skin exposed to urine and stool. After application, the solvent evaporates leaving a silicone film on the skin surface.

    Also known as: Film-forming skin protectant

  • OtherHydrophobes Basisgel DAC

    The skin protectant will be applied on clean and dry skin. It contains 95% paraffin oil and creates a hydrophobic layer on the skin surface.

    Also known as: Hydrophobic skin protectant

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis (IAD)

    Number of subjects developing IAD of all subjects (cumulative incidence). Classification of IAD according to Ghent Global IAD Categorisation Tool (GLOBIAD) (Category 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B). The GLOBIAD categorises IAD severity based on visual inspection of the affected skin areas. Category 1A: Persistent redness without clinical signs of infection Category 1B: Persistent redness with clinical signs of infection Category 2A: Skin loss without clinical signs of infection Category 2B: Skin loss with clinical signs of infection

    Time frame: 14 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Erythema (Instrumental Measurement)

    Erythema measured with the Mexameter MX® 18 (Courage + Khazaka, Cologne, Germany). Means of two duplicate measurements per skin area are displayed in arbitrary units (AU) ranging from 0 (= no erythema) to 999 (= extreme erythema).

    Time frame: 14 Days

  2. Erythema (Visual Inspection)

    Clinical rating of erythema is conducted according to the item 'Redness' of the incontinence-associated dermatitis and its severity (IADS) instrument. The 3-Item-Scale describes 'Redness' as (1) none, (2) pink, (3) red/ bright red.

    Time frame: 14 Days

  3. Incidence of Erosion

    The presence (no or yes) of erosion is defined according to the latest International League of Dermatological Societies glossary of cutaneous lesions as a loss of either a portion of or the entire epidermis. Number of subjects developing erosions of all subjects (cumulative incidence).

    Time frame: 14 Days

  4. Incidence of Maceration

    The presence (no or yes) of maceration is defined as the result of prolonged exposure (of the skin) to moisture and causes the skin to soften and breakdown so that the connective fibres can be teased apart and the skin often exhibits a white appearance. Number of subjects developing maceration of all subjects (cumulative incidence).

    Time frame: 14 Days

  5. IAD Related Pain

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score. The NRS ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. The NRS was administered only to participants without cognitive impairment (MMSE ≥24).

    Time frame: 14 Days

  6. Incidence of IAD Related Itch

    IAD related itch will be reported directly by patients (yes or no). Number of subjects reporting itch of all subjects (cumulative incidence).

    Time frame: 14 Days

  7. Presence of Local Intolerances

    The presence of local intolerances will be assessed with the following options: (0) None; 1. homogeneous redness with scattered papules; 2. homogeneous redness and homogeneous infiltration 3. homogeneous redness and infiltration with vesicles 4. homogeneous redness and infiltration with coalescing vesicles

    Time frame: 14 Days

  8. Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    AEs and SAEs will be documented and reported according to the current regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices (MDR) Article 2.

    Time frame: 14 Days

  9. Incidents and Serious Incidents

    Incidents abd serious incidents will be documented according to the definition of the EU regulation 2017/745 MDR Article 2 and reported to the Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM).

    Time frame: 14 Days

07

Results

Posted Mar 18, 2026

Participant flow

The study was conducted in the federal state of Berlin, Germany. Recruitment and study procedures took place in 20 geriatric care units, including two inpatient wards in acute care hospitals and 18 long-term care facilities. Participant recruitment was conducted from August 2022 to January 2025, and follow-up for all study outcomes, including potential harms, was completed in February 2025.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard Care
Started575753
Per-protocol534953
Completed575753
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryIncidence of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis (IAD)

Number of subjects developing IAD of all subjects (cumulative incidence). Classification of IAD according to Ghent Global IAD Categorisation Tool (GLOBIAD) (Category 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B). The GLOBIAD categorises IAD severity based on visual inspection of the affected skin areas. Category 1A: Persistent redness without clinical signs of infection Category 1B: Persistent redness with clinical signs of infection Category 2A: Skin loss without clinical signs of infection Category 2B: Skin loss with clinical signs of infection

Time frame:
14 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis (IAD)
ParticipantsESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard Care
Incidence IAD 1 and/or 21885
Incidence IAD 2A/B532
No IAD at baseline → IAD 1A/B1565
No IAD at baseline → IAD 2A/B320
IAD 1A at baseline → IAD 2A/B212
IAD 1A at baseline → no IAD754
SecondaryErythema (Instrumental Measurement)

Erythema measured with the Mexameter MX® 18 (Courage + Khazaka, Cologne, Germany). Means of two duplicate measurements per skin area are displayed in arbitrary units (AU) ranging from 0 (= no erythema) to 999 (= extreme erythema).

Time frame:
14 Days
Reported as:
Mean · AU
Erythema (Instrumental Measurement)
AUESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard Care
Day 2258 ± 108.0266 ± 88.2267 ± 96.0
Day 4248 ± 95.8286 ± 107.0254 ± 99.8
Day 6261 ± 115.0288 ± 107.0277 ± 94.9
Day 8267 ± 86.5288 ± 87.9281 ± 97.2
Day 10265 ± 101.0276 ± 91.2255 ± 119.0
Day 12273 ± 103.0278 ± 79.4280 ± 101.0
Day 14288 ± 108.0272 ± 82.8277 ± 99.8
SecondaryErythema (Visual Inspection)

Clinical rating of erythema is conducted according to the item 'Redness' of the incontinence-associated dermatitis and its severity (IADS) instrument. The 3-Item-Scale describes 'Redness' as (1) none, (2) pink, (3) red/ bright red.

Time frame:
14 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Erythema (Visual Inspection)
ParticipantsESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard Care
Day 6 — Pink765
Day 6 — Red/Bright Red110
Day 14 — Pink131
Day 14 — Red/Bright Red210
SecondaryIncidence of Erosion

The presence (no or yes) of erosion is defined according to the latest International League of Dermatological Societies glossary of cutaneous lesions as a loss of either a portion of or the entire epidermis. Number of subjects developing erosions of all subjects (cumulative incidence).

Time frame:
14 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Erosion
ParticipantsESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard Care
Day 6200
Day 14010
SecondaryIncidence of Maceration

The presence (no or yes) of maceration is defined as the result of prolonged exposure (of the skin) to moisture and causes the skin to soften and breakdown so that the connective fibres can be teased apart and the skin often exhibits a white appearance. Number of subjects developing maceration of all subjects (cumulative incidence).

Time frame:
14 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Maceration
ParticipantsESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard Care
Day 6350
Day 14120
SecondaryIAD Related Pain

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score. The NRS ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. The NRS was administered only to participants without cognitive impairment (MMSE ≥24).

Time frame:
14 Days
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
IAD Related Pain
scores on a scaleESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard Care
Day 60.0 ± 0.0—0.0 ± 0.0
Day 140.0 ± 0.01.5 ± 2.1—
SecondaryIncidence of IAD Related Itch

IAD related itch will be reported directly by patients (yes or no). Number of subjects reporting itch of all subjects (cumulative incidence).

Time frame:
14 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of IAD Related Itch
ParticipantsESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard Care
Day 6100
Day 14000
SecondaryPresence of Local Intolerances

The presence of local intolerances will be assessed with the following options: (0) None; 1. homogeneous redness with scattered papules; 2. homogeneous redness and homogeneous infiltration 3. homogeneous redness and infiltration with vesicles 4. homogeneous redness and infiltration with coalescing vesicles

Time frame:
14 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Presence of Local Intolerances
ParticipantsESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard Care
Presence of Local Intolerances000
SecondaryAdverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AEs and SAEs will be documented and reported according to the current regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices (MDR) Article 2.

Time frame:
14 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
ParticipantsESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard Care
Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)000
SecondaryIncidents and Serious Incidents

Incidents abd serious incidents will be documented according to the definition of the EU regulation 2017/745 MDR Article 2 and reported to the Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM).

Time frame:
14 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidents and Serious Incidents
ParticipantsESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard Care
Incidents and Serious Incidents000

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment until the end of study participation (maximum 14-day follow-up).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ESENTA™ Skin Barrier Spray0/57 (0%)0/57 (0%)0/57 (0%)
Hydrophobes Basisgel DAC0/57 (0%)0/57 (0%)0/57 (0%)
Standard Care0/53 (0%)0/53 (0%)0/53 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard CareTotal
Mean82.8 ± 7.582.0 ± 9.682.5 ± 8.182.4 ± 8.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard CareTotal
Female424138121
Male15161546
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)ESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard CareTotal
Count of participants———0
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m2)ESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard CareTotal
Mean25.2 ± 6.324.8 ± 5.224.7 ± 6.324.9 ± 5.9
Care level
Care level(Participants)ESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard CareTotal
None2024
Care level 10101
Care level 225613
Care level 3197935
Care level 421252066
Care level 510171441
Unknown3227
Main Medical Diagnoses
Main Medical Diagnoses(Participants)ESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard CareTotal
Hypertension343234100
Dementia24352685
Renal failure20231760
Diabetes mellitus15131644
Heart arrhythmia17161649
Diarrhoea
Diarrhoea(Participants)ESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard CareTotal
Count of participants1315
Urinary tract infection
Urinary tract infection(Participants)ESENTA™ Skin Barrier SprayHydrophobes Basisgel DACStandard CareTotal
Count of participants3519

11 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
    Berlin, State of Berlin 10117, Germany
09

References and documents

Publications

  • El Genedy-Kalyoncu M, Fastner A, Volzer B, Raeder K, Neumann K, Lahmann NA, Kottner J. Comparison of two skin protection regimes for the Prevention of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis in geriatric care (PID): a study protocol for an exploratory randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 29;12(9):e065909. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065909. PubMed 36175092 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study Protocol will be shared as part of this trial registration.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Anonymized IPD will be made available beginning 12 months and ending 36 months after publication of trial results.

Access criteria: IPD will be shared with researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal. The proposal must clearly state the research objectives and the intended methods of analysis. It is planned to share the data with restricted access via zenodo.org.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05403762
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. Jan Kottner (Principal Investigator, Charite University, Berlin, Germany) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 3, 2022
Start date
Aug 19, 2022
Primary completion
Feb 6, 2025
Completion
Feb 6, 2025
Results posted
Mar 18, 2026
Last update
Mar 18, 2026

Study contacts

Jan Kottner, Prof.
principal investigator · Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion