CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT05393908Updated Nov 14, 2024

Intraoperative TAP Block After Repeat Cesarean

An interventional study of TAP Block Group in Post-operative Pain, sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester. Withdrawn. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-14.

Sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
No funding became available for this study to be feasible
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to perform a randomized trial to investigate if intraoperative surgeon administered TAP block reduces pain and use of oral and parenteral pain medications after repeat cesarean delivery. The investigators aim to compare surgeon administered TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine compared to standard treatment (i.e. no TAP block) with regard to the primary outcome of post-operative narcotic use.

Read the detailed description

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a well-described technique to provide a field block for analgesia. It has been shown to be effective in postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery. TAP blocks are commonly performed post-operatively by anesthesiologists using liposomal bupivacaine with ultrasound guidance. Liposomal bupivacaine is an FDA approved medication for post-surgical analgesia and available at UMass-Memorial Medical Center. Liposomal bupivacaine provides sustained release of medication for up to 120 hours. A recent multicenter randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of anesthesiologist administered TAP blocks using liposomal bupivacaine after cesarean delivery. Infiltration of the skin and fascia with liposomal bupivacaine after cesarean did not have an effect and this can be explained by the path that the pain fibers take through the TAP which makes them amenable to a TAP block while a superficial infiltration is ineffective.The aim of this study is to perform a randomized trial to investigate if intraoperative surgeon administered TAP block reduces pain and use of oral and parenteral pain medications after repeat cesarean delivery. The investigators aim to compare surgeon administered TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine compared to standard treatment (i.e. no TAP block) with regard to the primary outcome of post-operative narcotic use.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-operative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cesarean delivery, post-operative pain, TAP block
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,095 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Massachusetts, Worcester is the lead sponsor of 288 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women presenting for elective repeat cesarean delivery at 37-42 weeks gestational age.
  • Pregnancy and delivery care obtained at UMass Memorial Medical Center
  • Patients able to provide written informed consent
  • English, Spanish, or Portuguese-speaking patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who are under the age of 18 years
  • Active labor.
  • Baseline pain score > 6.
  • Unable to provide informed consent.
  • Prisoners will be excluded from this research.
  • Narcotic use in the 2 weeks prior to delivery.
  • Active substance abuse.
  • Inability to take narcotic analgesia.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    TAP Block Group

    Participants will receive a surgeon administered TAP block consisting of liposomal bupivacaine during their repeat cesarean delivery.

    Procedure: TAP Block Group

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care Postoperative Pain Control

    Participants will not receive a surgeon administered TAP block consisting of liposomal bupivacaine during their repeat cesarean delivery and will receive the routine standard of care for post-operative pain control.

Interventions

  • ProcedureTAP Block Group

    Participants will receive a surgeon administered TAP block.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Daily Narcotic Use in Morphine Equivalents

    Daily Narcotic Use in Morphine Equivalents

    Time frame: From time of surgery through postpartum day 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first administered narcotic (oral or parental)

    Time to first administered narcotic (oral or parental) post cesarean delivery

    Time frame: From time of surgery through postpartum day 4

  2. Daily Average Pain Score

    Daily Average Pain Score based on ten point pain scale (minimum 0, maximum 10) with higher numbers indicating worse pain

    Time frame: From time of surgery through postpartum day 4

  3. Daily Maximum Pain Score

    Daily Average Pain Score based on ten point pain scale (minimum 0, maximum 10) with higher numbers indicating worse pain

    Time frame: From time of surgery through postpartum day 4

  4. Time to First Ambulation

    Time to First Ambulation post cesarean delivery

    Time frame: From time of surgery through postpartum day 4

  5. Time to First Solid Food

    Time to First Solid Food

    Time frame: From time of surgery through postpartum day 4

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wilson RD, Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, Pettersson K, Fawcett WJ, Shalabi MM, Metcalfe A, Gramlich L, Nelson G. Guidelines for Antenatal and Preoperative care in Cesarean Delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 1). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;219(6):523.e1-523.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Sep 18. PubMed 30240657 ↗
  • Tsai HC, Yoshida T, Chuang TY, Yang SF, Chang CC, Yao HY, Tai YT, Lin JA, Chen KY. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8284363. doi: 10.1155/2017/8284363. Epub 2017 Oct 31. PubMed 29226150 ↗
  • Kupiec A, Zwierzchowski J, Kowal-Janicka J, Gozdzik W, Fuchs T, Pomorski M, Zimmer M, Kubler A. The analgesic efficiency of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after caesarean delivery. Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(8):421-424. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2018.0072. PubMed 30215460 ↗
  • Abdallah FW, Halpern SH, Margarido CB. Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;109(5):679-87. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes279. Epub 2012 Aug 19. PubMed 22907337 ↗
  • Kwikiriza A, Kiwanuka JK, Firth PG, Hoeft MA, Modest VE, Ttendo SS. The analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine in comparison with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial at a Ugandan regional referral hospital. Anaesthesia. 2019 Feb;74(2):167-173. doi: 10.1111/anae.14467. Epub 2018 Nov 1. PubMed 30383289 ↗
  • Mishriky BM, George RB, Habib AS. Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;59(8):766-78. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9729-1. Epub 2012 May 24. PubMed 22622954 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05393908
Lead sponsor
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Responsible party
Gianna Wilkie (Principal Investigator, University of Massachusetts, Worcester) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 26, 2022
Start date
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 14, 2024

Study contacts

Gianna Wilkie, MD
principal investigator · University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion