CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05379634SPIREAUpdated Sep 21, 2026

A Study of Nipocalimab in Participants With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

A Phase 2 interventional study of Nipocalimab and Placebo in Myositis, sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Active, not recruiting at 57 sites in 13 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nipocalimab versus placebo in participants with active idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).

02

Conditions studied

  • Myositis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Myositis

242 studies on the registry are indexed under Myositis; 103 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is above the median of 30 across 159 interventional studies indexed under Myositis.

Browse Myositis studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC is the lead sponsor of 912 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 278 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 131 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Disease classification criteria: Participant meets the diagnostic criteria of probable or definite idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) based on 2017 The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for adult IIM at least 6 weeks prior to first administration of the study intervention
  • If a participant is on regular or as needed treatment with low potency topical glucocorticoids (GC) that are allowed in the study or topical tacrolimus (TAC) to treat skin lesions, the dose and frequency should be stable for greater than or equal to (>=) 4 weeks prior to first administration of the study intervention as well as maintained at the same dose until Week 52 of the study
  • Antibody positivity criteria: Any 1 of the myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) positive: dermatomyositis (DM): anti-Mi-2 (Mi-2/nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase [NuRD] complex), anti-transcription intermediary factor 1-Gamma (TIF1-Gamma), anti- nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP-2), anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier-1 activating enzyme; anti- antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA-5) antibodies. Or immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM): anti- signal recognition particle (SRP) and anti- 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies. Or anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS): anti- histidyl- ribonucleic acid [tRNA] synthetase (Jo-1), anti- threonyl-tRNA synthetase (PL7), anti- alanyl-tRNA synthetase (PL12), anti- isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (OJ), and anti- glycyl-tRNA synthetase (EJ) antibodies. If all MSAs are negative or more than 1 MSA is positive within different subtypes (defined by the central laboratory) at screening, the tests should be repeated during the screening period. If the same results are observed at retesting, the participant should not be enrolled in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a juvenile myositis diagnosis and now >=18 years old
  • Has cancer-associated myositis defined as cancer diagnosis within 3 years of myositis diagnosis except for cervical carcinoma in situ and non-melanoma skin cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma of the skin)
  • Has comorbidities (example, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) which have required 3 or more courses of oral GC within 1 year prior to screening
  • Has a history of primary immunodeficiency or secondary immunodeficiency not related to the treatment of the participants IIM
  • Has experienced myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, or stroke within 12 weeks of screening
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nipocalimab

    Participants will receive Nipocalimab at Week 0 (Baseline) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) up to Week 50 during double-blind period. Participants on glucocorticoids (GC) at baseline will receive a stable dose of oral GC (prednisone or equivalent) from 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention to Week 0. No changes in GC doses are allowed between Week 0 and Week 24. From Week 24 to Week 44, GC doses will be tapered. No changes to GC doses will be allowed from Week 44 to Week 52. Eligible participants will enter long-term extension (LTE) period and continue receiving Nipocalimab starting from Week 52 up to Week 98 and will be followed up to Week 106.

    Drug: Nipocalimab · Drug: Glucocorticoids

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants will receive Nipocalimab matching placebo at Week 0 (Baseline) and then Q2W up to Week 50 during double-blind period. Participants on GC at baseline will receive a stable dose of oral GC (prednisone or equivalent) from 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention to Week 0. No changes in GC doses are allowed between Week 0 and Week 24. From Week 24 to Week 44, GC doses will be tapered. No changes to GC doses will be allowed from Week 44 to Week 52. Eligible participants will enter LTE period and will receive Nipocalimab treatment Q2W starting from Week 52 up to Week 98 and will be followed up to Week 106.

    Other: Placebo · Drug: Glucocorticoids

Interventions

  • DrugNipocalimab

    Nipocalimab will be administered intravenously in double-blind period and LTE period.

    Also known as: JNJ-80202135, JNJ-86507083

  • OtherPlacebo

    Nipocalimab matching placebo will be administered intravenously in double-blind period.

  • DrugGlucocorticoids

    Prednisone or equivalent will be administered orally as Glucocorticoid.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (Greater Than or Equal to [>=] 20) in IMACS TIS and on Less Than or Equal to (<=) 5 Milligrams per day (mg/day) of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52

    Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (\>=20) in IMACS TIS at Week 52 and on \<=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: physicians' global activity, patient global activity (PtGA), manual muscle testing (MMT)-8, muscle enzymes, myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT), and health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI). The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: At Week 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: At Week 24

  2. IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: At Week 52

  3. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Moderate Improvement (>=40) in IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Moderate improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=40 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: At Week 24

  4. Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)-8 at Week 52

    Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 52 will be reported. Manual muscle testing is a partially validated tool to assess muscle strength. It evaluates 8 muscle groups containing 1 axial, 5 proximal, and 2 distal muscle groups. MMT-8 score ranges from 0-150. Higher score indicates greater muscle strength, that is, less impairment of muscle.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

  5. IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: At Week 24

  6. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Moderate Improvement (>=40) in IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Moderate improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=40 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: At Week 52

  7. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Major Improvement (>=60) in IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Major improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=60 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: At Weeks 24 and 52

  8. Change From Baseline in MMT-8 at Week 24

    Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 24 will be reported. Manual Muscle Testing is a partially validated tool to assess muscle strength. It evaluates 8 muscle groups containing 1 axial, 5 proximal, and 2 distal muscle groups. MMT-8 score ranges from 0-150. Higher score indicates greater muscle strength, that is, less impairment of muscle.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  9. Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) at Weeks 24 and Week 52

    Change from baseline in PhGA at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported. Physician Global Activity is a partially validated tool to measure the global evaluation by the physician of the participant's overall disease activity at the time of assessment using a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 cm= no evidence of disease activity and 10 cm= extremely active or severe disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

  10. Change From Baseline in Extramuscular Global Assessment (Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool [MDAAT]) at Weeks 24 and 52

    Change from baseline in MDAAT score at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported. This is a validated tool which measures the degree of disease activity of extramuscular organ systems and muscle. MDAAT is scored on a 10 centimeter (cm) scale ranging from 0-10 cm where, 0 cm = absent and 10 cm = maximum disease activity. Higher score indicates more disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

  11. Change From Baseline in Serum Muscle Enzymes Levels at Weeks 24 and 52

    Change from baseline in serum muscle enzymes levels (creatine kinase \[CK\], alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\], aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\], lactate dehydrogenase \[LDH\], and aldolase) at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

  12. Percentage of Participants who Achieve Oral Glucocorticoids (GC) Reduction to 5 Milligrams per day (mg/day) of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent), Among Participants on Oral GC Greater Than (>) 5 mg/day at Baseline

    Percentage of participants who achieve oral GC reduction to 5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC \>5 mg/day at baseline will be reported.

    Time frame: From Week 44 through Week 52

  13. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS From Week 44 Through Week 52 and on Less Than or Equal to (<=) 5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52

    Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (\>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and on \<=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: From Week 44 through Week 52

  14. Percentage of Participants on <=5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52

    Percentage of participants on \<=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported.

    Time frame: From Week 44 through Week 52

  15. Percentage of Participants who Achieve At Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS and Achieve Oral GC Reduction to 5 mg/day at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >5 mg/day at Baseline

    Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (\>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and achieve oral GC reduction to 5 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC \>5 mg/day at baseline will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: From Week 44 through Week 52

  16. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS From Week 44 Through Week 52 and on <=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52

    Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (\>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and on \<=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: From Week 44 through Week 52

  17. Percentage of Participants who Achieve Oral GC Reduction to <=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >7.5 mg/day at Baseline

    Percentage of participants who achieve oral GC reduction to \<=7.5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC \>7.5 mg/day at baseline will be reported.

    Time frame: At Week 44 through Week 52

  18. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS and Achieve Oral GC Reduction to <=7.5 mg/day at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >7.5 mg/day at Baseline

    Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (\>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and achieve oral GC reduction to \<=7.5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC \>7.5 mg/day at Baseline will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: From Week 44 through Week 52

  19. IMACS TIS Over Time

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: Up to 106 weeks

  20. Change From Baseline in the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) Scale Score at Weeks 24 and 52

    The CDASI scale is a validated dermatomyositis (DM) specific instrument that systematically quantifies activity and damage in the skin of participant with DM. Disease involvement in 15 different anatomical locations is rated using three activity scales (erythema, scale, erosion/ulceration) and two damage measures (poikiloderma, calcinosis) measures. Gottron's papules/sign on the hands are also evaluated in terms of activity (erythema/ulceration) and damage (dyspigmentation or scarring). Disease activity scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

  21. Change in CDASI Scale Score Over Time

    The CDASI scale is a validated DM specific instrument that systematically quantifies activity and damage in the skin of participant with DM. Disease involvement in 15 different anatomical locations is rated using three activity scales (erythema, scale, erosion/ulceration) and two damage measures (poikiloderma, calcinosis) measures. Gottron's papules/sign on the hands are also evaluated in terms of activity (erythema/ulceration) and damage (dyspigmentation or scarring). Disease activity scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity.

    Time frame: Up to 106 Weeks

  22. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

    Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention through the safety follow-up visit will be considered as treatment-emergent. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention.

    Time frame: Up to 106 weeks

  23. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention through the safety follow-up visit will be considered as treatment-emergent. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product; is medically important.

    Time frame: Up to 106 weeks

  24. Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)- Physical Function (PF)-20

    PROMIS-PF-20 is a participant self-administered 20-item questionnaire assessing the physical function domain. It includes 14 items regarding patients' ability to conduct specific functional activities and 6 items regarding the extent to which their health limits their ability to perform a range of physical activities currently. The 5-point response options for the former items range from 1 "Unable to do" to 5 "Without any difficulty" and the latter items range from 1 "Cannot do" to 5 "Not at all" with higher scores indicating better functioning. The overall score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher score indicates better physical function.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

  25. Change From Baseline in Functional Disability Using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-disability Index (HAQ-DI)

    HAQ-DI score assess functional status of participant. It is 20 question instrument that assess degree of functional disability a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and common activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0=indicating no difficulty, to 3=indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Total HAQ score is average of the computed categories scores ranging from 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. Lower scores are indicative of better functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

  26. Serum Nipocalimab Concentration Over Time

    Serum nipocalimab concentration over time will be reported. Serum nipocalimab concentration will be derived using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling.

    Time frame: Baseline Up to Week 98

  27. Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Measured Using a Validated, Specific, and Sensitive Immunoassay Method

    Number of participants with ADA to Nipocalimab measured using a validated, specific, and sensitive immunoassay method will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline Up to Week 106

  28. Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (Nabs) to Nipocalimab Measured Using a Validated, Specific, and Sensitive Immunoassay Method

    Number of participants with Nabs to Nipocalimab measured using a validated, specific, and sensitive immunoassay method will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline Up to Week 106

07

Study locations

57 sites
  • Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research PLLC
    Phoenix, Arizona 85032, United States
  • HonorHealth Neurology
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85251, United States
  • Attune Health Autoimmune and Inflamation Care and Research
    Beverly Hills, California 90211, United States
  • University of California Irvine Medical Center
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • FM Clinical Research, LLC South Florida Neurology Associates, P. A.
    Boca Raton, Florida 33487, United States
  • Integral Rheumatology And Immunology Specialists
    Plantation, Florida 33324, United States
  • University of South Florida
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Augusta University
    Augusta, Georgia 30912, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
  • The Brigham and Women's Hospital, Inc.
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC
    Saint Clair Shores, Michigan 48081, United States
  • Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University
    Columbus, Ohio 43203, United States
  • Oregon Health and Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania - Perelman School of Medicine
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • ACME Research Arthritis and Osteoporosis Center
    Orangeburg, South Carolina 29118, United States
  • Nervie and Muscle Center of Texas
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Texas at Houston Medical School
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Lawson Health Research / London Health Sciences Center Research
    London, Ontario N6C 2R5, Canada
  • AMIR Research
    Montreal, Quebec H4A 3T2, Canada
  • Revmatologicky ustav
    Prague, 128 50, Czechia
  • Hospital Pasteur
    Nice, 06000, France
  • Hopital Pitie Salpetriere
    Paris, 75013, France
  • Nouvel Hopital Civil
    Strasbourg, 67091, France
  • Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen
    München, 80336, Germany
  • Immanuel Klinik Rudersdorf
    Rüdersdorf Bei Berlin, 15562, Germany
  • Orszagos Mozgasszervi Intezet ORFI Campus
    Budapest, 1023, Hungary
  • Debreceni Egyetem
    Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
  • A.O. Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona
    Ancona, 60126, Italy
  • IRCSS Ospedale San Raffaele Turro
    Milan, 20127, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS
    Roma, 00168, Italy
  • National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center
    Fukuoka, 810 8563, Japan
  • Fukushima Medical University Hospital
    Fukushima, 960 1295, Japan
  • St Marianna University Hospital
    Kanagawa, 216 8511, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center
    Kawachi-Nagano, 586 8521, Japan
  • Tokushukai Chiba-Nishi General Hospital
    Matsudo-shi, 270-2251, Japan
  • Shinshu University Hospital
    Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
  • Tohoku University Hospital
    Sendai, 980 8574, Japan
  • St. Luke's International Hospital
    Tokyo, 104 8560, Japan
  • Nippon Medical School Hospital
    Tokyo, 113 8603, Japan
  • Centro Integral en Reumatologia S A de C V
    Guadalajara, 44160, Mexico
  • Centro de Estudios de Investigacion Basica y Clinica, S.C.
    Guadalajara, 44690, Mexico
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
    Mexico City, 14080, Mexico
  • CITER Centro de Investigacion y Tratamiento de las Enfermedades Reumaticas S A de C V
    México, 06700, Mexico
  • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im dr Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy
    Bydgoszcz, 85 168, Poland
  • Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji im prof dr hab med Eleonory Reicher
    Warsaw, 02 637, Poland
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, 03080, South Korea
  • Ajou University Hospital
    Suwon, 16499, South Korea
  • Hosp. Univ. de Bellvitge
    Barcelona, 08907, Spain
  • Hosp. Univ. de La Paz
    Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Hosp. Univ. Marques de Valdecilla
    Santander, 39008, Spain
  • Western General Hospital
    Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
  • University College London Hospitals NHSFT
    London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
  • Salford Royal Hospital
    Salford, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing policy of Johnson \& Johnson Innovative Medicine is available at www.innovativemedicine.jnj.com/our-innovation/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05379634
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 18, 2022
Start date
Jul 5, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 4, 2025
Completion
Sep 16, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion