CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05370638Updated May 11, 2022

Discharge in the AM

An interventional study of Rounding on discharging patients first in Hospitalism and Flow or Discharge, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-11.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2021, registered Apr 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As hospitals around the country continue to work to manage a high patient census, provider prioritization of discharges is one low cost mechanism to help improve patient throughput and patient length of stay. The investigators conducted a prospective randomized study to understand if this commonly utilized approach to expedite care results in earlier discharges and lower hospital lengths of stay while also understanding the impact on other patient care (such as test and consult order times on other patients that the physician is caring for).

Read the detailed description

Hospitals around the country face bottlenecks and capacity issues. When hospitals are successful at managing high capacity this allows for increased access for patients who need this higher level of care and expertise.

Unfortunately, hospital discharges frequently occur in the afternoon or evening hours and can adversely affect patient flow throughout the hospital which, in turn, can result in delays in care, medication errors, increased mortality, longer lengths of stay, higher costs, lower patient satisfaction, and decreased access to care at these facilities. While some of the delays in discharges result, appropriately, from the caring of other patients and conducting the necessary tasks and assessments for acutely ill patients, previous work also identified that providers may be able to prioritize their work in a different way in order to facilitate this throughput. The investigators aim to conduct a randomized controlled trial of physician rounding style at three institutions in order to: (1) determine if prioritizing discharging patients first will result in earlier discharges and decreased lengths of stay, (2) determine if prioritizing discharges first will cause other care delays or affect patient experience and, (3) determine factors that contribute to physician ability to prioritizing discharges first. The study is a prospective, multi-center, cluster randomized trial designed to test the effects of rounding on discharging patients first compared to usual practice and will utilize an effectiveness-implementation hybrid approach. The investigators will recruit hospitalist attending physicians from three hospitals in the US to be randomized to one of two rounding styles: (1) prioritize discharges first and (2) usual practice. The main outcome measure will be discharge order time. Secondary outcomes will be length of stay and lab/diagnostic test order time. Additionally, the investigators will study how team composition (teaching, non-teaching, teams with advanced practice providers), team census (i.e. the number of patients a provider is caring for), and number of admissions affect the ability for providers to prioritize discharges first.

Through qualitative methods the investigators will also gain an understanding from physicians as to why or why not they were able to prioritize discharges first. This study will add to the evidence to either support or negate the practice of prioritizing discharges. There have been no randomized studies to date that have addressed these issues. Additionally, the investigators aim to understand how team composition and census affect discharge times. Institutions across the country will be able to utilize these findings to help refine current rounding models. The investigators believe these findings will be pivotal for clinicians to be more willing to change their practice style. The investigators also believe this study will aid in the understanding of what factors may function as facilitators and barriers of earlier discharges.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hospitalism
  • Flow or Discharge

Keywords

  • hospitalist
  • patient flow
  • early discharge
  • discharge before noon
  • inpatient
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,499 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 89 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Physicians:

-Hospital Medicine attending-level physicians who consented to participate and patients

Patients:

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Admitted to a Medicine service and assigned by standard practice to a general medical hospitalist team including a provider who agreed to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-Patients assigned, by standard practice, to a general medical hospitalist team and on the team of providers who chose not to participate in the study

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    rounding on discharging patients first

    Rounding on discharging patients meant that the attending physician and accompanying team (i.e. if they were working with advanced practice providers or learners) would prioritize seeing any patients that were going to discharge that day.

    Other: Rounding on discharging patients first

  • No intervention
    usual practice

    Usual practice was categorized as: seeing discharging patients first, sickest patients, decompensating patients, new patients (i.e. patients admitted to their team overnight), or based on geography.

Interventions

  • OtherRounding on discharging patients first

    Rounding on discharging patients meant that the attending physician and accompanying team (i.e. if they were working with advanced practice providers or learners) would prioritize seeing any patients that were going to discharge that day. The attending could break protocol if needed for patient care purposes and this was tracked each day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Physician discharge order time

    Physician discharge order time entered into the electronic health record

    Time frame: From the midnight of the day the patient was discharged until time the patient had a discharge order placed, assessed up to 6 months from the start of the study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient discharge time

    The time the patient left their hospital bed/actually discharged from care in the hospital

    Time frame: From the midnight of the day the patient was discharged until the time the patient was discharged from the hospital, assessed up to 6 months from the start of the study.

  2. Patient length of stay

    The total length of stay in hours

    Time frame: From the time that the patient was admitted to hospital until time the patient had a discharge order placed, assessed up to 6 months from the start of the study.

  3. Average time of day of orders for imaging, consults, or procedures were entered by participating physicians into the electronic health record

    average time of day over the course of each patient's hospitalization that orders for imaging, consults, or procedures were entered by participating physicians

    Time frame: From the midnight of the day each day to the time of day each patient had an order placed for imaging, consults, or procedures, assessed up to 6 months from the start of the study.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05370638
Lead sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Collaborators
Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Johns Hopkins University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 11, 2022
Start date
Feb 9, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2021
Completion
Jul 31, 2021
Last update
May 11, 2022

Study contacts

Marisha Burden, MD
principal investigator · University of Colorado School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion