CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05366387AEROPERCUpdated Dec 1, 2025

Effect of Intrapulmonary Percussion Ventilation on Deposition of Inhaled Aerosols in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

An interventional study of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation and delivery of 99mTc-DTPA aerosol in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, sponsored by University Hospital, Tours. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-01.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Tours · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This protocol aims to evaluate the feasibility and benefit of Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation (IPV) to improve deposition of inhaled radiolabelled aerosols in fibrotic lung regions of patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF).

Phase 1 of the protocol aims to identify the highest IPV pressure that is tolerated by individual patients. Secondary endpoints explore safety of IPV in IPF patients.

Phase 2 of the protocol is a crossover randomized trial where patients will inhale 99mTc-labelled DiethyleneTriamine PentaAcetate (DTPA) aerosols with or without IPV. Aerosol deposition in HRCT-defined fibrotic regions of interest (ROI) is described by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT).

02

Conditions studied

  • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Keywords

  • aerosol
  • deposition
  • Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation
03

In context

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

551 studies on the registry are indexed under Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis; 117 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 54 across 376 interventional studies indexed under Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Browse Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Tours is the lead sponsor of 304 studies on the registry; 78 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of IPF according to 2018 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines
  • Affiliation to health insurance
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other chronic lung disease
  • Airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC\<0.7)
  • History of congestive heart failure
  • History of IPF exacerbation
  • History of lung cancer
  • Chronic cough precluding aerosol delivery and radioprotection
  • Claustrophobia
  • 24h/24 oxygen therapy
  • Any acute lung disease
  • Any potentially transmissible lung infection
  • Current or possible pregnancy and breastfeeding
  • Contra-indications to IPV : Emphysema, recent barotrauma, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum
  • History of pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum
  • Patient unable to hold a mouthpiece tightly
  • Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship)
  • Contraindication to the administration of Technescan DTPA
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Aerosol delivery without intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (Control condition)

    A radiolabelled 99mTc-DTPA aerosol is generated with a jet nebuliser and is inhaled by the subject through a device (connecting tubes, filters) connecting the nebuliser with 1) a mouthpiece and 2) an intrapulmonary percussive ventilation device which is turned off. Aerosol deposition in fibrotic lung regions is characterized by SPECT imaging.

    Radiation: delivery of 99mTc-DTPA aerosol

  • Active comparator
    Aerosol delivery with intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV condition)

    A radiolabelled 99mTc-DTPA aerosol is generated with a jet nebuliser and is inhaled by the subject through a device (connecting tubes, filters) connecting the nebuliser with 1) a mouthpiece and 2) an intrapulmonary percussive ventilation device which is turned on (frequency=1 Hz, pressure to be determined in phase 1 for each patient, in the 5-40 cm H2O range). Aerosol deposition in fibrotic lung regions is characterized by SPECT imaging.

    Device: intrapulmonary percussive ventilation · Radiation: delivery of 99mTc-DTPA aerosol

Interventions

  • Deviceintrapulmonary percussive ventilation

    Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation is a non invasive ventilation technique where small boli or air are delivered, at adjustable frequency and pressure, to the upper airways though a mouthpiece. IPV is currently used in the clinic to aid with airway clearance in neuromuscular and airway diseases.

  • Radiationdelivery of 99mTc-DTPA aerosol

    A 99mTc-DTPA aerosol (500 MBq+/-20%, 3 ml volume) is generated with a jet nebuliser (MMAD 4 µm). The aerosol is inhaled by the study subject and lung deposition is imaged by SPECT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Phase 1: Discomfort during IPV

    IPV is delivered at increasing pressure (from 5 cm H2O to 40 cm H2O maximum pressure) and discomfort is assessed by a 5-level Likert scale ranging from "no discomfort" to "untolerable discomfort". IPV is stopped when discomfort is rated as "difficult to tolerate" whatever the pressure.

    Time frame: immediately after IPV (visit V1)

  2. Phase 2: Change between Control and IPV condition in amount of 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol deposited in fibrotic lung regions, reported to loaded dose

    Following aerosol delivery, chest imaging is done with a SPECT device. SPECT images are fused to high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images. Fibrotic lung regions regions of interest (ROI) are defined by analysis of HRCT images. SPECT signal in fibrotic ROI is reported to the radioactive dose that was loaded in the nebulizer Endpoint is radioactive signal in fibrotic ROI / loaded dose

    Time frame: After delivery of radiolabelled aerosol under both Control and IPV condition (Visit 4/5) i.e. up to 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phase 1: Sensations associated with IPV in patients with IPF

    5-levels Likert scales ranging from "not at all" to "Very much" are used to answer the following questions : "I have trouble breathing" "This thumps to much" "This is scary"

    Time frame: immediately after IPV (Visit 1)

  2. Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in dyspnea

    Dyspnea-12 scale

    Time frame: Before IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)

  3. Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in cough

    Leicester Cough Questionnaire

    Time frame: Before IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)

  4. Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in Forced Vital Capacity

    Spirometry Forced vital capacity is expressed in liters

    Time frame: Before IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)

  5. Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in Carbon monoxide transfer factor (DLCO)

    Single breath test DLCO is expressed in mL/min/mmHg

    Time frame: Before IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)

  6. Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in 5 Hz respiratory reactance

    Impulse oscillometry 5 Hz reactance is expressed as kPa.s/L

    Time frame: Before IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)

  7. Phase 1: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    Symptomatic pneumothorax Acute exacerbation of IPF requiring hospitalization

    Time frame: immediately after IPV (Visit 1) until 15 days after IPV (V2)

  8. Phase 2 : Change between Control and IPV condition in total lung deposition of the 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol

    Ratio of SPECT in total lung / loaded dose

    Time frame: After delivery of radiolabelled aerosol under both Control and IPV condition (Visit 5)

  9. Phase 2: Ratio of deposition of the 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol in fibrotic lung versus normal lung

    ROI for normally-appearing lung are defined by HRCT. Endpoint is SPECT signal in fibrotic lung ROI / SPECT signal in normally-appearing lung ROI

    Time frame: After aerosol delivery in the Control condition

  10. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events one month after treatment

    Telephone interview to assess for : Symptomatic pneumothorax Acute exacerbation of IPF requiring hospitalization

    Time frame: 1-month after the last aerosol delivery (V6)

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory endpoint : Impact of specific lung lesions on pulmonary ventilation and deposition of the 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol

    Additional ROI are defined on HRCT to define predominant lung lesions as either "ground glass opacities", "reticulations", or "bronchiectasis". The impact of these lesions on pulmonary ventilation and aerosol deposition is described as : * pulmonary ventilation : Fusion of HRCT images with 88mKr-ventilation SPECT images. * aerosol deposition : Fusion of HRCT images with 99mTc-DTPA aerosol deposition images.

    Time frame: After aerosol delivery under the Control condition (Visit 4 or 5 according to randomization) i.e. up to 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pulmonology Department, University Hospital, Tours
    Tours, 37044, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05366387
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Tours
Collaborators
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 9, 2022
Start date
Nov 23, 2022
Primary completion
Feb 12, 2025
Completion
Feb 12, 2025
Last update
Dec 1, 2025

Study contacts

Laurent PLANTIER, MD-PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Tours

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion