ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05360888BeWeLUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Suicide Intervention for Alaska Native Youth

An interventional study of Tools for Life and Tools for Life + MISN in Alaska Native Youth Aged 14 - 24, Suicide, Attempted and Suicidal Ideation, sponsored by RAND. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 24 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by RAND · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
302
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years to 24 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 149 studies in Suicide, Attempted with a site in United States — 53 open to participants now, 58 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Suicide, Attempted · United States.

Enrollment
31st of 140
302 · median 117
Started
2022
with 16 others
No phase
121 of 149
49 open now
Registered
93rd of 149
by date

Among the 149 studies in Suicide, Attempted with a site in United States, this one is the 31st largest by enrollment of the 140 interventional ones, is one of 17 that started in 2022, is one of 121 with no phase, and was the 93rd registered.

By phase

149 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study121 · 49 open
Observational7 · 2 open
Phase 17 · 1 open
Phase 24 · 0 open
Phase 2/33 · 0 open
Phase 33 · 1 open
Phase 43 · 0 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 1999; this study’s year is marked. 17 started in 2022.

Size and results

Median enrollment 117 across the 140 interventional studies, 225 across the 7 observational. Of the 87 that completed or were terminated, 30 (34%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 149 studies in Suicide, Attempted with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Two interventions will be delivered virtually to American Indian/Alaska Native youth who have been hospitalized with suicidal attempt, suicidal ideation, or associated risk behaviors, including alcohol-related injury.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial whereby Alaska Native (AN) youth who are hospitalized for suicide risk will be randomly assigned to either Qungasvik/Tools for Life or Tools for Life + Motivational Interviewing Social Network (MISN) intervention after their baseline survey, and followed up at 3-, 6-, and 12 months. All youth will receive Tools for Life and two 30-minute virtual follow-up visits (at 2- and 6-weeks post intervention) focused on connectivity to culture and obtaining support from intergenerational social networks in their home communities. Half of the youth will also receive MISN in addition to Tools for Life. Both interventions will be delivered virtually by a wellness team comprised of Alaska Native community behavioral health aides, prevention specialists and/or Elders who function in their communities as natural healers.

03

Conditions studied

  • Alaska Native Youth Aged 14 - 24
  • Suicide, Attempted
  • Suicidal Ideation
  • Alcohol Intoxication

Keywords

  • Alaska Native youth, suicide, prevention, culture
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Self-identify as Alaska Native youth
  • Between the ages of 14 and 24
  • Admitted to the hospital for suicide attempt, ideation, or associated risk behaviors including alcohol-related injury or acute intoxication

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
302 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Tools for Life

    All youth will receive the Tools for Life (Qungasvik) intervention. Tools for Life is an evidence-based, community-developed intervention focused on providing protective cultural experiences for Alaska Native youth to address suicide risk and alcohol use.

    Behavioral: Tools for Life

  • Active comparator
    Tools for Life + Motivational Interviewing Social Network intervention (MISN)

    Half of the youth will will also receive MISN in addition to the Tools for Life intervention. MISN is an evidence-based treatment that augments motivational interviewing with personal social network composition and structure visualization as a means to cultivating healthy social networks and cultural worlds.

    Behavioral: Tools for Life + MISN

Interventions

  • BehavioralTools for Life

    Tools for Life focuses on empowering youth to learn more about their culture and their identity.

  • BehavioralTools for Life + MISN

    Tools for Life focuses on empowering youth to learn more about their culture and their identity. MISN focuses on helping youth get support from their community and social networks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Suicide intent/risk

    We will use the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS) \[0 = Never, 10 = Always\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  2. Suicide intent/risk

    We will use the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS) \[0 = Never, 10 = Always\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  3. Suicide intent/risk

    We will use the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS) \[0 = Never, 10 = Always\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  4. Depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) \[0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  5. Depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) \[0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  6. Depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) \[0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  7. Anxiety

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) \[0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  8. Anxiety

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) \[0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  9. Anxiety

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) \[0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  10. Frequency of alcohol use

    Number of days used in the past 30 days. \[ 0 to 30\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  11. Frequency of alcohol use

    Number of days used in the past 30 days \[ 0 to 30\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  12. Frequency of alcohol use

    Number of days used in the past 30 days \[ 0 to 30\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  13. Alcohol use consequences

    Number of times in the past 3 months youth experience 4 different alcohol consequences \[0 = Never to 6 = 20 or more times\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  14. Alcohol use consequences

    Number of times in the past 3 months youth experience 4 different alcohol consequences \[0 = Never to 6 = 20 or more times\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  15. Alcohol use consequences

    Number of times in the past 3 months youth experience 4 different alcohol consequences \[0 = Never to 6 = 20 or more times\]

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sobriety self-efficacy

    Three items ask how sure youth are about staying sober from alcohol from 1= def drink to 5 = def not drink

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  2. Sobriety self-efficacy

    Three items ask how sure youth are about staying sober from alcohol from 1= def drink to 5 = def not drink

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  3. Sobriety self-efficacy

    Three items ask how sure youth are about staying sober from alcohol from 1= def drink to 5 = def not drink

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  4. Intentions to be sober from alcohol

    Youth report on intentions to be sober in the next 6 months from 1 = def yes to 4 = def no

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  5. Intentions to be sober from alcohol

    Youth report on intentions to be sober in the next 6 months from 1 = def yes to 4 = def no

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  6. Intentions to be sober from alcohol

    Youth report on intentions to be sober in the next 6 months from 1 = def yes to 4 = def no

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  7. Social network composition

    Participants will be asked to name 15 contacts ("alters") who are at least 18 years of age. Participants will rate each of the 15 people on the same set of questions with categorical response options (about demographics, relationship quality, likelihood to use drugs, etc.). For each participant, the selected responses will be summed across all of the network alters and divided by 15 to produce network composition percentages of the whole set of alters named by the participant (% of AI/ANs, % who engage in heavy drinking).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  8. Social network composition

    Participants will be asked to name 15 contacts ("alters") who are at least 18 years of age. Participants will rate each of the 15 people on the same set of questions with categorical response options (about demographics, relationship quality, likelihood to use drugs, etc.). For each participant, the selected responses will be summed across all of the network alters and divided by 15 to produce network composition percentages of the whole set of alters named by the participant (% of AI/ANs, % who engage in heavy drinking).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  9. Social network composition

    Participants will be asked to name 15 contacts ("alters") who are at least 18 years of age. Participants will rate each of the 15 people on the same set of questions with categorical response options (about demographics, relationship quality, likelihood to use drugs, etc.). For each participant, the selected responses will be summed across all of the network alters and divided by 15 to produce network composition percentages of the whole set of alters named by the participant (% of AI/ANs, % who engage in heavy drinking).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  10. Social network structure

    Participants will rate the relationship strength between each of the 15 named alters. For each alter pair participants will rate if the two people know each other and, if yes, have individuals connected recently. Measures of network structure (i.e., network "connectedness") will be constructed from the set of evaluations for each participant. For example, network "density" will be constructed for the network overall, which is calculated by summing the number of alter pairs who know each other and dividing by the total number of possible ties among 15 alters (105). Individual alter "centrality" will be calculated by summing the number of connections each individual alter has with other alters in the network.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  11. Social network structure

    Participants will rate the relationship strength between each of the 15 named alters. For each alter pair participants will rate if the two people know each other and, if yes, have individuals connected recently. Measures of network structure (i.e., network "connectedness") will be constructed from the set of evaluations for each participant. For example, network "density" will be constructed for the network overall, which is calculated by summing the number of alter pairs who know each other and dividing by the total number of possible ties among 15 alters (105). Individual alter "centrality" will be calculated by summing the number of connections each individual alter has with other alters in the network.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  12. Social network structure

    Participants will rate the relationship strength between each of the 15 named alters. For each alter pair participants will rate if the two people know each other and, if yes, have individuals connected recently. Measures of network structure (i.e., network "connectedness") will be constructed from the set of evaluations for each participant. For example, network "density" will be constructed for the network overall, which is calculated by summing the number of alter pairs who know each other and dividing by the total number of possible ties among 15 alters (105). Individual alter "centrality" will be calculated by summing the number of connections each individual alter has with other alters in the network.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  13. Time spent around peers who use alcohol

    Participants will report on how much time is spent around peers who drink from 0 = never to 3 = often

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  14. Time spent around peers who use alcohol

    Participants will report on how much time is spent around peers who drink from 0 = never to 3 = often

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  15. Time spent around peers who use alcohol

    Participants will report on how much time is spent around peers who drink from 0 = never to 3 = often

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  16. Awareness of connectedness

    Youth report on feelings of connectedness to community, family and environment from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  17. Awareness of connectedness

    Youth report on feelings of connectedness to community, family and environment from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  18. Awareness of connectedness

    Youth report on feelings of connectedness to community, family and environment from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  19. Community protective factors

    Youth Community Protective Factors Scale. Youth report on feelings about different protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  20. Community protective factors

    Youth Community Protective Factors Scale Youth report on feelings about different community protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  21. Community protective factors

    Youth Community Protective Factors Scale Youth report on feelings about different community protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  22. Individual protective factors

    Youth report on feelings about different individual protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  23. Individual protective factors

    Youth report on feelings about different individual protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  24. Individual protective factors

    Youth report on feelings about different individual protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  25. Reasons for life

    Brief Reasons for Life Scale from 1 not at all important to 5 very important

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  26. Reasons for life

    Brief Reasons for Life Scale from 1 not at all important to 5 very important

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  27. Reasons for life

    Brief Reasons for Life Scale from 1 not at all important to 5 very important

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

  28. Reflective processes

    The Reflective Processes scale taps a culturally patterned type of awareness and youth report from from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

  29. Reflective processes

    The Reflective Processes scale taps a culturally patterned type of awareness and youth report from from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  30. Reflective processes

    The Reflective Processes scale taps a culturally patterned type of awareness and youth report from from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation
    Bethel, Alaska 99559, United States
  • Tanana Chiefs Conference
    Fairbanks, Alaska 99559, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rasmus S, D'Amico EJ, Allen J, Nation C, John S, Joseph V, Rodriguez A, Alvarado G, Gittens AD, Palimaru AI, Brown RA, Kennedy DP, Woodward MJ, Parker J, McDonald K. A protocol for a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial of two brief interventions focused on social and cultural connectedness to reduce risk for suicide and substance misuse in young Alaska Native people. BMC Public Health. 2025 Oct 15;25(1):3503. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24710-z. PubMed 41094443 ↗
  • Rasmus S, D'Amico EJ, Allen J, Nation C, John S, Joseph V, Rodriguez A, Alvarado G, Gittens AD, Palimaru AI, Brown RA, Kennedy DP, Woodward MJ, Parker J, McDonald K. Because We Love You (BeWeL): A protocol for a randomized controlled trial of two brief interventions focused on social and cultural connectedness to reduce risk for suicide and substance misuse in young Alaska Native people. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Jan 22:rs.3.rs-3874293. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3874293/v1. PubMed 38343833 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The investigators will share only deidentified, aggregate data.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2022 to primary completion in Jan 2026, 37 months.

Of 145 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Suicide, Attempted, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 56. This study's 37 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 147 studies reached it within 37 months; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 29, 2022
First posted
May 4, 2022
StartActual
Dec 22, 2022
Primary completionActual
Jan 31, 2026
CompletionActual
Jan 31, 2026
Last update
Oct 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: identifiers, verification date and responsible party
1 update, last Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 3 other changes: identifiers, verification date and responsible party

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05360888
Lead sponsor
RAND
Collaborators
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Responsible party
Elizabeth D'Amico (MPI, RAND) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 4, 2022
Start date
Dec 22, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2026
Completion
Jan 31, 2026
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion