ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05356793SCH1TAICUpdated Apr 14, 2026Results posted

The Efficacy Of SCH1 In The Treatment Of Acute Infectious Conjunctivitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of SCH-1 and Placebo in Acute Infectious Conjunctivitis (Disorder), sponsored by Sacsh. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-14.

Sponsored by Sacsh · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2021, registered Apr 2022).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Sasch1, a novel anti-infective eyedrop, in the treatment of acute infectious conjunctivitis.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase II single-center, double-masked, placebo controlled, randomized study of SCH1 for the treatment of infectious conjunctivitis. Approximately 30 subjects will be enrolled, who will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between SCH1and placebo. Subjects will be assessed at day 1, day 3, and day 5 for efficacy and safety.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Infectious Conjunctivitis (Disorder)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Conjunctivitis
  • Eye
03

In context

Conjunctivitis

85 studies on the registry are indexed under Conjunctivitis; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 156 across 63 interventional studies indexed under Conjunctivitis.

Browse Conjunctivitis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Sacsh as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Conjunctivitis (as defined below) within 72 hours of initial ocular symptoms.
  • At least 18 years of age.
  • Subjects capable of understanding the purpose and risks of the study, and able to give .
  • Conjunctivitis diagnosis defined as presence of the two cardinal signs of acute conjunctivitis- 1) bulbar conjunctival injection and 2) conjunctival discharge/exudates.
  • A three-point rating scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) will be employed to grade conjunctival discharge/exudates.
  • All patients will require a rating of 1(mild) or greater for conjunctival discharge/exudates.
  • Patients will require a rating of 1 (mild) for bulbar conjunctival injection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conjunctivitis greater than 72 hours after initial ocular symptoms
  • Corneal ulcer, endophthalmitis, or any other confounding infection of the eye
  • Patients taking topical anti-inflammatory medications on a chronic basis
  • Known glaucoma responders
  • Active herpes ocular infection
  • Pregnant women
  • Known allergy to chlorhexidine
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment

    Active treatment with SCH-1

    Drug: SCH-1

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Vehicle minus active components

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugSCH-1

    Novel anti-infective eyedrop

  • DrugPlacebo

    SCH-1 vehicle minus active components eyedrop

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete Clinical Resolution

    Clinical score of 0 (zero) for both Conjunctival Injection (Minimum score: 0, maximum score: 3, 0 is best outcome) and Conjunctival Discharge (minimum score: 0, maximum score 3, 0 is best outcome).

    Time frame: Day 5

07

Results

Posted Apr 14, 2026
Limitations and caveats
Caveat: While designed to evaluate efficacy in any type of infectious conjunctivitis, the majority of patients recruited turned out to have viral conjunctivitis.

Participant flow

March 1, 2021 to March 28, 2022, Single Private Practice Clinical Site

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatmentPlacebo
Started1614
Completed1614
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryComplete Clinical Resolution

Clinical score of 0 (zero) for both Conjunctival Injection (Minimum score: 0, maximum score: 3, 0 is best outcome) and Conjunctival Discharge (minimum score: 0, maximum score 3, 0 is best outcome).

Time frame:
Day 5
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Complete Clinical Resolution
ParticipantsTreatmentPlacebo
Complete Clinical Resolution90

Adverse events

Collected over 5 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)8/16 (50%)
Placebo0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)4/14 (28.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTreatmentPlacebo
Discomfort upon instillation of dropEye disorders8/164/14

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)TreatmentPlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years2810
>=65 years14620
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TreatmentPlaceboTotal
Mean74.2 ± 8.866.1 ± 7.470.4 ± 9.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TreatmentPlaceboTotal
Female13821
Male369
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)TreatmentPlaceboTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)TreatmentPlaceboTotal
United States161430
Conjunctival injection score of 2 or greater
Conjunctival injection score of 2 or greater(Participants)TreatmentPlaceboTotal
Count of participants161430
Conjunctival discharge score of 2 or greater
Conjunctival discharge score of 2 or greater(Participants)TreatmentPlaceboTotal
Count of participants161430
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Jacqueline Dauhajre, MD
    Jackson Heights, New York 11372, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2021 to primary completion in Mar 2022, 12 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2026, 4 years after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 10, 2022
First posted
May 2, 2022
StartActual
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Mar 28, 2022
CompletionActual
Mar 28, 2022
Results first posted
Apr 14, 2026
Last update
Apr 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05356793
Lead sponsor
Sacsh
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 2, 2022
Start date
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 28, 2022
Completion
Mar 28, 2022
Results posted
Apr 14, 2026
Last update
Apr 14, 2026

Study contacts

David Ritterband, MD
principal investigator · Sacsh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion