ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05349747Updated Apr 27, 2022

Outcome of Treatment of Uveitis With Biologic Drugs in Resistant Cases Vogt-koyanagi-Harada Disease

An observational study in Uveitis, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-27.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2022), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  • Reviewing the characteristics of patients with uveitis caused by Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Syndrome treated at Assiut University Hospital at the Department of Ophthalmology and Department of Rheumatology, Physical Medicine, and Rehabilitation including the ocular features in terms of uveitis location, type and complications and systemic features of those subjects who showed an inadequate response to conventional immunomodulatory drugs.
  • Assess the results of treatment with biologic drugs, including rates of failure and adverse events. This will help uveitis specialists to reach a conclusion about the best treatment protocols for Uveitis in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Syndrome in our population in terms of safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness.
Read the detailed description

Uvea (Latin for grape) is the middle vascular coat of the eyeball. Strictly speaking, uveitis is defined as inflammation of the uvea, but often the inflammatory process involves adjacent intraocular structures e.g. the anterior chamber, the vitreous humor, or the retina. Inflammation in the uvea can be due to infections, masquerades such as B-cell lymphoma, or immune-mediated diseases.

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by bilateral, chronic, diffuse granulomatous panuveitis in addition to neurological, auditory, and integumentary manifestations. These manifestations are variable and race dependent.

This inflammatory syndrome is probably the result of an autoimmune mechanism, influenced by genetic factors, and appears to be directed against melanocytes. On histopathologic examination, typical cases show non-necrotizing diffuse granulomatous panuveitis with initial sparing and late involvement of the choriocapillaris and formation of Dalen-Fuchs' nodules. Fluorescein angiography, lumbar puncture, and echography are useful adjuncts in the diagnosis and management of VKH syndrome. Patients with this syndrome are treated generally with high dose systemic corticosteroids, immunomodulatory agents such as cyclosporine, or more recently biological response modifiers which are used as steroid-sparing agents to minizeminimize side effects of long term steroid use.

Since their discovery in the 1990s, biologic drugs have been used to treat uveitis refractory to traditional immunosuppressants. Many questions on their use though have remained unanswered; particularly when to initiate therapy, which agent and at what dosage to use, and for how long the treatment should continue.

The Biologic Response Modifiers represent the future of therapy in immune-mediated uveitis. Biological anti-inflammatory agents (for example antagonists of tumor necrosis factor alpha-like Infliximab and adalimumab) are also showing very promising results.

Biologics alone or combined with conventional therapies are used in refractory cases of Uveitis. Biologics reported for use in uveitis interferon alpha 2a (IFN-α 2a); anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents-infliximab and adalimumab; anti-interleukins (IL)-tocilizumab, secukinumab (in most of the published papers, this biologic has failed to demonstrate the ability to control uveitis when compared to placebo) and gevokizumab; anti-CD20-rituximab and anti-CD 25-daclizumab.

In many cases, these agents will be seen listed as the first choice in some autoimmune diseases, depending on the patient's history, age, sex, type and severity of the inflammatory disease, etc. The interdisciplinary treatment between ophthalmologists and rheumatologist is essential to initiate and monitor these therapies. Follow-up visits of subjects with uveitis should be aimed to determine the evolution of inflammatory signs until their complete resolution, thus ensuring the least possible consequences.

The most common side effects are localized site reactions (pain, erythema, and rash). other side effects include upper respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, cough, rash, back pain, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, headache, weakness, and fever. Other noted side effects include low or high blood pressure, chest pain, difficulty breathing, rash, itching, fever, and chills.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uveitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Uveitis

345 studies on the registry are indexed under Uveitis; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 100 across 110 observational studies indexed under Uveitis.

Browse Uveitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,050 studies on the registry; 2,174 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Uveitis with clinical features of Vogt-Koyanaga-Harada Syndrome.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Uveitis with clinical features of Vogt-Koyanaga-Harada Syndrome.
  2. A follow-up and assessment at least twelve months from the start of treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion of other infectious and non-infectious uveiticuveitis etiologies that may mimic the given clinical presentation of autoimmune uveitis;
  • The presence of contraindication to treatment with biologic drugs e.g. active or latent tuberculosis, viral hepatitis and demyelinating diseases.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • BiologicalBiologic drugs

    Assess the results of treatment with biologic drugs

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. non-resolution of inflammation, or failure of complete clinical resolution of the primary lesion in cases of retinitis or choroiditis.

    Prospective

    Time frame: at 6 month

  2. Recurrence of inflammation described as a two-step increase in inflammation as defined by the SUN working group criteria for anterior and intermediate uveitis

    prospective

    Time frame: at 6 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. non-resolution of inflammation, or failure of complete clinical resolution of the primary lesion in cases of retinitis or choroiditis.

    prospective

    Time frame: at 12 month

  2. Recurrence of inflammation described as a two-step increase in inflammation as defined by the SUN working group criteria for anterior and intermediate uveitis

    prospective

    Time frame: at 12 month

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pasadhika S, Rosenbaum JT. Update on the use of systemic biologic agents in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. Biologics. 2014 Feb 15;8:67-81. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S41477. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24600203 ↗
  • Fang W, Yang P. Vogt-koyanagi-harada syndrome. Curr Eye Res. 2008 Jul;33(7):517-23. doi: 10.1080/02713680802233968. PubMed 18600484 ↗
  • Rubsamen PE, Gass JD. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. Clinical course, therapy, and long-term visual outcome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 May;109(5):682-7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080050096037. PubMed 2025171 ↗
  • Imrie FR, Dick AD. Biologics in the treatment of uveitis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;18(6):481-6. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f03d42. PubMed 18163000 ↗
  • Hatemi G, Christensen R, Bang D, Bodaghi B, Celik AF, Fortune F, Gaudric J, Gul A, Kotter I, Leccese P, Mahr A, Moots R, Ozguler Y, Richter J, Saadoun D, Salvarani C, Scuderi F, Sfikakis PP, Siva A, Stanford M, Tugal-Tutkun I, West R, Yurdakul S, Olivieri I, Yazici H. 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of Behcet's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jun;77(6):808-818. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213225. Epub 2018 Apr 6. PubMed 29625968 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05349747
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Salma Safwat Abdelhady Hafez (Assistant lecturer, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 27, 2022
Start date
Apr 30, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 27, 2022

Study contacts

salma Safwat
Contact
Salmahafez91@outlook.com
+201022691820
Salma Safwat, Master
principal investigator · Assiut University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion