ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05349643Updated Jul 5, 2024

A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of AMB-05X Injections in Subjects With TGCT

A Phase 2 interventional study of AMB-05X in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis, TGCT and Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor, sponsored by AmMax Bio, Inc.. Completed at 6 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-05.

Sponsored by AmMax Bio, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jun 2024, 2 years 5 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

AMB-051-07 is an open-label, adaptive, dose-ranging study with long-term extension in adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumor

Read the detailed description

AMB-051-07 is an open-label, adaptive, dose-ranging study with long-term extension which will enroll up to 48 adult subjects with tenosynovial giant cell tumor for intra-articular doses over a 24-week dosing period (Part 1) with a Part 2 open-label extension of 6 treatment and/or observational cycles of 12 weeks each followed by 12 weeks of follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
  • TGCT
  • Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor

Keywords

  • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
  • Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
  • TGCT
  • PVNS
03

In context

Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular

20 studies on the registry are indexed under Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular; 2 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 36 across 17 interventional studies indexed under Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular.

Browse Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular studies →

Lead sponsor

AmMax Bio, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject ≥ 18 years
  2. TGCT with only 1 joint involvement
  3. Symptomatic of at least 1 cm based on v1.1
  4. Stable prescription of analgesic regimen
  5. Agrees to follow guidelines
  6. Women of must have a negative pregnancy test
  7. Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior drug use within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives of Baseline
  2. Previous use of therapeutics targeting CSF1 or CSF1R or oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors within 3 months prior to Baseline
  3. History of extensive or reconstructive surgery on the affected joint
  4. Active cancer (either currently or within 3 mo before Baseline) that requires/required therapy (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy)
  5. or malignant transformation of TGCT
  6. virus (HCV) or virus (HBV) or (HIV)
  7. Known active tuberculosis
  8. Significant concomitant arthropathy in the affected joint, serious illness, uncontrolled infection, or a medical or psychiatric history
  9. Women who are breastfeeding
  10. A screening Fridericia- interval (QTcF) ≥ 470 ms
  11. MRI (e.g., pacemaker, loose metallic implants)
  12. History of to any ingredient of the study drug
  13. History of drug or alcohol abuse within 3 months before baseline
  14. Any other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation/treatment or interfere with interpretation of study results and, in the Investigator's opinion, make the subject inappropriate for this study
  15. Subjects who, in the Investigator's opinion, should not participate in the study for any reason, including if there is a question about their ability to comply with study requirements
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AMB-05X

    Subjects will receive an injection of AMB-05X once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (for 6 treatments total). Based on ongoing review of the available safety, PK, PD, and efficacy data, the Sponsor may either increase or decrease the dose.

    Biological: AMB-05X

Interventions

  • BiologicalAMB-05X

    A fully human monoclonal immunoglobulin (IgG2) directed against c-fms

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate - Part 1

    Proportion of subjects who achieve an OR (objective response rate \[ORR\]) by central radiology review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  2. Treatment-emergent adverse events

    Frequency and severity of reported treatment-emergent adverse events

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24 and Part 2 Week 72

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate

    Proportion of subjects who achieve an OR (objective response rate \[ORR\]) by central radiology review per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  2. Objective Response Rate (AMB-051-01 subjects)

    Proportion of re-treated subjects who achieve an OR (objective response rate \[ORR\]) by central radiology review per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1)

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  3. Objective Response Rate (ORR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1

    Proportion of subjects who achieve an overall response (OR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  4. Objective Response Rate (ORR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1

    Proportion of subjects who achieve an overall response (OR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  5. Tumor response based on tumor volume score (TVS)

    Proportion of subjects who achieve an overall tumor response (OR) per the tumor volume score

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  6. Tumor response based on tumor volume score (TVS)

    Proportion of subjects who achieve an overall tumor response (OR) per the tumor volume score

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  7. Duration of Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

    Median duration of response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  8. Duration of Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1

    Median duration of response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  9. Duration of Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

    Median duration of response per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST)

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  10. Duration of Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

    Median duration of response per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST)

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  11. Duration of Response by tumor volume score

    Median duration of response per tumor volume score (TVS)

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  12. Duration of Response by tumor volume score

    Median duration of response per tumor volume score (TVS)

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  13. Time to Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

    Time to response (TTR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  14. Time to Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

    Time to response (TTR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  15. Time to Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

    Time to response (TTR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

    Time frame: Part 1 week 24

  16. Time to Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

    Time to response (TTR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST)

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  17. Time to Response per tumor volume score

    Time to response (TTR) per tumor volume score (TVS)

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  18. Time to Response per tumor volume score

    Time to response (TTR) per tumor volume score (TVS)

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  19. Mean change from Baseline in joint range of motion (ROM)

    Mean change in joint range of motion (ROM) will be assessed by qualified assessors. Measurements will be recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest (worst) relative value will be identified; only this plane will be used for evaluating change in ROM subsequently.

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  20. Mean change from Baseline in joint range of motion (ROM)

    Mean change in joint range of motion (ROM) will be assessed by qualified assessors. Measurements will be recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest (worst) relative value will be identified; only this plane will be used for evaluating change in ROM subsequently.

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  21. Mean change from Baseline in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function score

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a 10-question patient reported outcome instrument used to assess physical functioning based on use of the upper extremities (dexterity), lower extremities (walking or mobility), and central regions (neck, back) and on instrumental activities of daily living. Five questions address the degree to which subject's health limits activities; subjects select responses ranging from 1-cannot do to 5 - not at all. Five additional questions address the degree to which the subject is able to perform certain physical activities, and subjects select a response to each question that ranges from 1 ("cannot do") to 5 ("without any difficulty"). Raw scores are summarized, score range is 10 to 50.

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  22. Mean change from Baseline in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function score

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a 10-question patient reported outcome instrument used to assess physical functioning based on use of the upper extremities (dexterity), lower extremities (walking or mobility), and central regions (neck, back) and on instrumental activities of daily living. Five questions address the degree to which subject's health limits activities; subjects select responses ranging from 1-cannot do to 5 - not at all. Five additional questions address the degree to which the subject is able to perform certain physical activities, and subjects select a response to each question that ranges from 1 ("cannot do") to 5 ("without any difficulty"). Raw scores are summarized, score range is 10 to 50.

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  23. Mean change from Baseline in Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale score

    The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" stiffness within the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranges from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicate worst stiffness.

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  24. Mean change from Baseline in Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale score

    The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" stiffness within the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranges from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicate worst stiffness.

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  25. Mean change from Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form is a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a subject's pain and the impact of this pain on the subject's daily functioning. The subject is asked to rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity, list current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, and rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a scale from 0 ="no pain" to 10= "pain as bad as you can imagine".

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  26. Mean change from Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form is a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a subject's pain and the impact of this pain on the subject's daily functioning. The subject is asked to rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity, list current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, and rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a scale from 0 ="no pain" to 10="pain as bad as you can imagine".

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  27. Decrease of at least 30% in mean Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from Baseline

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form is a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a subject's pain and the impact of this pain on the subject's daily functioning. The subject is asked to rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity, list current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, and rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a scale from 0 ="no pain" to 10="pain as bad as you can imagine".

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  28. Decrease of at least 30% in mean Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from Baseline

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form is a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a subject's pain and the impact of this pain on the subject's daily functioning. The subject is asked to rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity, list current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, and rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a scale from 0 ="no pain" to 10="pain as bad as you can imagine".

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  29. Mean change from Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference score

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.1 Pain Interference Short Form 8a, is an 8 question instrument used to evaluate how much a subject's pain interferes with daily functioning. Subjects rate the degree to which pain interfered with their daily activity over the past 7 days on a scale of 1 to 5 (ranging from 1, "Not at all," to 5, "Very much"). Higher scores indicate greater pain interference.

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  30. Mean change from Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference score

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.1 Pain Interference Short Form 8a, is an 8 question instrument used to evaluate how much a subject's pain interferes with daily functioning. Subjects rate the degree to which pain interfered with their daily activity over the past 7 days on a scale of 1 to 5 (ranging from 1, "Not at all," to 5, "Very much"). Higher scores indicate greater pain interference.

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  31. Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in Physical Functioning for capacity to perform everyday tasks

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), also known as Subject Global Impression. For this study, subjects will rate how much their tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) has restricted their ability to perform everyday tasks, using the following scales that are based on the PGIC: PGIC Physical Functioning scale (ranging from 1 "Not at all," to 5 "Extremely" and rate their change in stiffness using the PGIC Stiffness scale (ranging from 1 "Very much improved" to 7 "Very much worse". Higher scores indicate greater restrictions.

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  32. Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in Physical Functioning for capacity to perform everyday tasks

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), also known as Subject Global Impression. For this study, subjects will rate how much their tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) has restricted their ability to perform everyday tasks, using the following scales that are based on the PGIC: PGIC Physical Functioning scale (ranging from 1, "Not at all," to 5, "Extremely" and rate their change in stiffness using the PGIC Stiffness scale (ranging from 1 "Very much improved" to 7 "Very much worse". Higher scores indicate greater restrictions.

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  33. Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in tenosynovial giant cell tumor-related stiffness score

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), also known as Subject Global Impression. For this study, subjects will rate how much their tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) has restricted their ability to perform everyday tasks, using the PGIC to rate their change in stiffness using the PGIC Stiffness scale, ranging from 1, "Very much improved" to 7, "Very much worse". Higher scores indicate greater TGCT-related levels of stiffness.

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  34. Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in tenosynovial giant cell tumor-related stiffness score

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), also known as Subject Global Impression. For this study, subjects will rate how much their TGCT has restricted their ability to perform everyday tasks, using the PGIC to rate their change in stiffness using the PGIC Stiffness scale, ranging from 1, "Very much improved" to 7, "Very much worse". Higher scores indicate greater TGCT-related levels of stiffness.

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  35. Mean change from Baseline in Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale score

    The Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is an item in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) that assesses a subject's "worst" pain in the last 24 hours. The 11-point NRS for this item ranges from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("pain as bad as you can imagine"). Higher scores indicate greater levels of pain.

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  36. Mean change from Baseline in Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale score

    The Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is an item in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) that assesses a subject's "worst" pain in the last 24 hours. The 11-point NRS for this item ranges from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("pain as bad as you can imagine"). Higher scores indicate greater levels of pain.

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

  37. EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Health Assessment

    EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a widely used quality of life instrument that includes questions in each of 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The choices include 5 levels of severity for each domain followed by a general health visual analogue scale (VAS). This instrument is a self-report survey that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a 5-level severity ranking that ranges from "no problems" through "extreme problems". Higher scores indicate a lower quality of life.

    Time frame: Part 1 Week 24

  38. EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Health Assessment

    EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a widely used quality of life instrument that includes questions in each of 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The choices include 5 levels of severity for each domain followed by a general health visual analogue scale (VAS). This instrument is a self-report survey that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a 5-level severity ranking that ranges from "no problems" through "extreme problems". Higher scores indicate a lower quality of life.

    Time frame: Part 2 Week 72

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • AmMax Bio, Clinical Site
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • AmMax Bio, Clinical Site
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • AmMax Bio, Clinical Site
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • AmMax Bio, Clinical Site
    Camperdown, Australia
  • AmMax Bio, Clinical Site
    Woolloongabba, Australia
  • AmMax Bio, Clinical Site
    Leiden, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2023 to primary completion in Jun 2024, 16 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 22, 2022
First posted
Apr 27, 2022
StartActual
Jan 26, 2023
Primary completionActual
Jun 3, 2024
CompletionActual
Jun 3, 2024
Last update
Jul 5, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05349643
Lead sponsor
AmMax Bio, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 27, 2022
Start date
Jan 26, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 3, 2024
Completion
Jun 3, 2024
Last update
Jul 5, 2024

Study contacts

Dorothy Nguyen, MD
study chair · AmMax Bio

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Anti-CSF1R Monoclonal Antibody AMB-05X

Start the discussion