An observational study in Telemedicine, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 and Children, Only, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Status unknown. Open to participants aged Up to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-27.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Observational
Assessment of the proportion of pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes with access to remote monitoring
In the follow-up of type 1 diabetes in children, contact with families besides the appointements with medical et paramedic staff (paediatrician, diabetologist, nurses) is very common but not well coded, start from telehealth hubs (like myDiabby), to less unofficial contact by phone or email. This is even more so widespread since generalization of continuous glucometer (freestyle, dexcom,...), which allowed a quick data transfer to the medical staff.
Some studies had shown that telemedicine in diabetes allowed a better glycemic control and a higher implication in the desease. Indeed, in 1999 already, HbA1c significant improvement was shown when patients was regularly called by a nurse (Thompson et al.). Same finding was demonstrated in Schiaffini and al. clinical trial in 2016. This trial also shown a better adhesion to the follow up into the telemedicine group. Despite all of this studies, in France, remote monitoring isn't standardised and financed, except the national experimentation ETAPES which promotes and financially supports the deployment of remote monitoring projects around the territory.
10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 4,800 is above the median of 233 across 2,220 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.
Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →University Hospital, Grenoble is the lead sponsor of 815 studies on the registry; 205 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Children aged 0 to 17 years with type 1 diabetes
Exclusion Criteria:
Assessment of the proportion of pediatric patients with access to remote monitoring
Proportion of pediatric patients with access to remote monitoring
Time frame: 1 day
Description of the different means and modalities of remote monitoring for patients
Proportion of patients in the different modalities of remote monitoring
Time frame: 1 day
Description of the different means and modalities of remote monitoring for patients
Proportion of patients in the different objectives of remote monitoring
Time frame: 1 day
Evaluation of patients' (and parents') perception of telemonitoring using a scale
Perceived importance of this remote monitoring score using a scale from 1 (mean no importance, I could do without) to 10 (mean it's very important, I think it's essential)
Time frame: 1 day
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Grenoble