ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05345951Updated Jul 23, 2026

Project e-PBI+ - Parent Intervention to Reduce College Student Drinking and Cannabis Use

An interventional study of e-PBI+ and e-PBI in Underage Drinking, Cannabis Use and Drinking, Teen, sponsored by Penn State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 19 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-23.

Sponsored by Penn State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,980
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 19 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

College students' risky drinking and cannabis use are major public health problems. The harms associated with risky drinking have been well-documented (such as deaths, blackouts, injuries, assaults, arrests, sexual consequences, academic consequences). Both college health administrators and parents have requested electronic parent-based interventions (e-PBIs) with additional content on cannabis. Parents have demonstrated ample motivation to communicate with their teens. The proposed research will attempt to enhance an existing effective e-PBI, curb the alarming trends noted in the literature, and move the field forward by conducting a randomized controlled trial testing a modified version of the e-PBI that includes updated content including the most up-to-date scientific information from cannabis studies (e-PBI+).

Read the detailed description

College is a high-risk window for alcohol and cannabis use, with almost 80% of college students reporting consuming alcohol in the past year and more than 1 in 3 reporting heavy episodic drinking in the past month. A recent National College Health survey indicated that about 30% of students reported using cannabis weekly or more often. This is concerning considering present-day cannabis has an increased potency with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) levels in cannabis in the US increasing over 200% since 1990. Additionally, availability has increased due to increased legalization in the US. Cannabis use is associated with a number of negative outcomes such as impaired memory and concentration, reduced impulse control, poor class attendance and lower academic performance, increased anxiety/depression, and increased impaired driving. Additionally, a number of studies have shown an increase in co-use of alcohol and cannabis (use of both substances in the same day) or simultaneously so their effects overlap, and studies show that these combined behaviors results in much greater harm than alcohol-only use. The proposed research will attempt to curb the alarming trends associated with alcohol and cannabis use by conducting a randomized controlled trial testing a modified version of the Turrisi and associates efficacious brief Parent-Based Intervention (e-PBI) that includes additional data-driven content for parents to have broader discussions about cannabis use (e-PBI+).

The design is a 3-arm (e-PBI+, e-PBI, Attention-Matched control) randomized controlled trial with 4 waves of data collection. The study will enroll an ethnically diverse sample of 900 parent-student dyads (N at final follow-up). Students will complete assessments of all the primary, secondary, and tertiary outcomes at five times: pre-intervention baseline, and 3-month, 6-month, and 9-month follow-ups as well as provide urine samples at 6-month to corroborate cannabis use reported on the timeline followback. Parents will complete a baseline and 3-month follow-up survey.

02

Conditions studied

  • Underage Drinking
  • Cannabis Use
  • Drinking, Teen
  • Drinking, College
  • College Drinking
  • Teen Drinking
03

In context

Underage Drinking

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Underage Drinking; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,980 is above the median of 360 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Underage Drinking.

Browse Underage Drinking studies →

Lead sponsor

Penn State University is the lead sponsor of 270 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Of its 15 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 11 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 19 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parent and teen both consent and complete baseline (forming a dyad testing unit)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Outside of the teen age range; both parent and teen do not consent and complete baseline
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
1,980 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    e-PBI+

    The e-PBI+ is an electronic handbook developed by the PI to guide parents in discussing drinking, behaviors, and consequences with their teens, with additional content on cannabis use.

    Behavioral: e-PBI+

  • Experimental
    e-PBI

    the e-PBI is an electronic handbook developed by the PI to guide parents in discussing drinking, behaviors, and consequences with their teens.

    Behavioral: e-PBI

  • No intervention
    e-AC

    The e-AC is the attention matched control. They will receive general university-related materials to read, sections on parent and family resources (e.g., message from administrators, getting involved, academic calendar), advising, money matters, financial aid, campus life (arts, entertainment, housing, etc.), health and safety (health, counseling services, alcohol and drug laws). It is equivalent to the e-PBI+ and e-PBI on length of content and time to read. This group will not receive an intervention.

Interventions

  • Behaviorale-PBI+

    The e-PBI+ is a preventive parent-based intervention emphasizing parent-teen communication on drinking/risks of alcohol abuse, with the addition of data-driven cannabis content to guide parent communications with their students (e.g., cannabis content focusing on the endocannabinoid system; acute and chronic cannabis use effects on the brain, cognition, and development; THC potency in present-day cannabis; cannabis use effects on mental and physical health, including psychosis, depression, and anxiety; respiratory/cardiovascular/sleep problems; cannabidiol (CBD) content, myths; and cannabis effects on psychosocial function). Together the goals are to reduce alcohol and cannabis use in college students.

  • Behaviorale-PBI

    The e-PBI is currently a model prevention resource at NIAAA's College Alcohol Intervention Matrix and the research was discussed in the most recent Surgeon General's Report as one of two prevention approaches that met the rigorous criteria to be considered "efficacious". The first section of the e-PBI provides an introduction to the problem of substance use. The second section focuses on specific skill building strategies that parents can use to improve communication channels with their teen. Third is a section that addresses peer influence and provides strategies for developing assertiveness. The fourth section is an in-depth discussion of underage drinking, physiological and psychological effects, mixing alcohol with other drugs, motives for why students drink and don't drink, warning signs, risky binge-type drinking, impaired driving, riding with impaired drivers, alcohol and sexual assault, and how to communicate about parents' experiences when they were young.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Examine Changes in Alcohol Use

    A standard drink definition will be provided, indicating that a standard drink consists of 12 oz. of beer or wine cooler, 8.5 oz. of malt liquor, 4 oz. of wine, or 1.5 oz. of hard liquor. Using the Timeline Followback (TLFB; Sobell \& Sobell, 1996), participants will indicate how many drinks they consumed on each day of the past three months. For days alcohol was consumed, participants will also note the number of hours spent drinking.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  2. Examine Changes in Cannabis Use

    Self-reported measures of retrospective cannabis use will be collected via the TLFB calendar with modifications that incorporate current methods of consumption (e.g., joint, blunt, pipe/bowl, bong, edible, vaporizer cartridges, concentrate \[including wax, oil, rosin, capsules, and tinctures\], and other) and amount (e.g., in grams/mg).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Examine Changes in Consequences of Alcohol Use

    Alcohol-related consequences (e.g., said or done embarrassing things, blackout) from the past three months will be measured using the established Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (BYAACQ; Read, Kahler, Strong, \& Colder, 2006). Response options will be measured on a 7-point scale ranging from (0) no, not in the past 3 months to (6) 11 or more times in the past 3 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  2. Examine Changes in Consequences of Cannabis Use

    Participants will be asked to report on the frequency of experiencing a variety of cannabis-related consequences (e.g., neglected obligations, driven a car high) within the past three months using the Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire (MACQ; Simons, Dvorak, Merrill, \& Read, 2012). Response options will be measured on a 7-point scale ranging from (0) no, not in the past 3 months to (6) 11 or more times in the past 3 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  3. Examine Changes in Co-Use of Alcohol and Cannabis Use

    Days on the TLFB when participants report using both alcohol and cannabis will be identified as co-use days.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

Other outcomes

  1. Examine Changes in Parental Communication

    Parental communication about alcohol, cannabis, and consequences of using alcohol and cannabis will be assessed separately for mothers and fathers. Participants will be asked how often their parent discussed these topics with them within the past three months. Response options will be measured on a 5-point scale ranging from (0) not at all to (4) a great deal.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  2. Examine Changes in General Parental Practices

    General communication (e.g., my mother/father is there for me when I want to talk) will be assessed separately for mothers and fathers based on level of agreement on a 7-point scale ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (7) strongly agree.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  3. Examine Changes in Alcohol Use Motives

    Motives will be assessed for using alcohol (e.g., to be sociable; Cooper, 1994). Response options range from (1) almost never/never to (5) almost always/always.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  4. Examine Changes in Cannabis Use Motives

    Motives will be assessed for using cannabis (e.g., to relieve boredom; Lee et al., 2009). Response options range from (1) Almost never/never to (5) Almost always/always.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  5. Examine Changes in Alcohol Use Expectancies

    Expectancies for using alcohol (e.g., I will feel badly about myself because of my drinking) will be measured. Response options range from (1) strongly disagree to (7) strongly agree.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  6. Examine Changes in Cannabis Use Expectancies

    Expectancies for using cannabis (e.g., I won't be as sharp mentally because of my cannabis use) will be measured. Response options range from (1) strongly disagree to (7) strongly agree.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  7. Examine Changes in Alcohol Use Willingness

    Willingness to use alcohol will be measured to assess participants' willingness to: 1) drink once or twice in two hours; 2) drink 3-4 times in two hours; and 3) drink 5+ times in two hours. Response options will be on a 7-point scale ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (7) strongly agree.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  8. Examine Changes in Cannabis Use Willingness

    Willingness to use cannabis will be assessed with four items: occasionally, regularly, weekly, and daily. Response options range from (1) strongly disagree to (7) strongly agree.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  9. Examine Changes in Peer Descriptive Norms of Alcohol Use

    Perceived peer descriptive norms of drinking for the past three months will be measured using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ; Collins, Parks, \& Marlatt, 1985).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  10. Examine Changes in Peer Descriptive Norms of Cannabis Use

    Perceived peer descriptive norms of cannabis use for the past three months will be captured by asking how often their closest friends used cannabis in the past 3 months, (0) never to (6) 40 or more times.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  11. Examine Changes in Peer Injunctive Norms of Alcohol Use

    To assess peer injunctive norms of alcohol use, participants will be asked to indicate how acceptable their closest friends would find a list of situations (e.g., drinking enough alcohol to pass out) using a (1) strongly disapprove to (7) strongly approve scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  12. Examine Changes in Peer Injunctive Norms of Cannabis Use

    To assess peer injunctive norms of cannabis use, participants will be asked to indicate how acceptable their closest friends would find a list of situations (e.g., using cannabis occasionally) using a (1) strongly disapprove to (7) strongly approve scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  13. Examine Changes in Parental Injunctive Norms of Alcohol Use

    To assess parental injunctive norms of alcohol use, participants will be asked to indicate how acceptable their parents would find a list of situations (e.g., drinking alone) using a (1) strongly disapprove to (7) strongly approve scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  14. Examine Changes in Parental Injunctive Norms of Cannabis Use

    To assess parental injunctive norms of cannabis use, participants will be asked to indicate how acceptable their parents would find a list of situations (e.g., using cannabis occasionally) using a (1) strongly disapprove to (7) strongly approve scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  15. Examine Changes in Self Regulation

    To assess self-regulation, participants will be asked to indicate how much a list of statement apply to them (e.g., When I'm bored I fidget or can't sit still; I can calm myself down when I'm excited or all wound up) using a (1) not at all true for me to (5) really true for me scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

  16. Examine Changes in Goal Setting

    To assess goal setting, participants will be asked to indicate to what extent the goal is important to them (e.g., To be around friends; To be admired by many) using a (1) not at all true for me to (5) really true for me scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Penn State University
    University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2023 to primary completion in May 2026, 34 months.

Of 34 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Underage Drinking, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 38. This study's 34 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 36 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 20, 2022
First posted
Apr 26, 2022
StartActual
Jul 13, 2023
Primary completionActual
May 31, 2026
CompletionActual
May 31, 2026
Last update
Jul 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05345951
Responsible party
Robert Turrisi (Professor of Biobehavioral Health, Penn State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 26, 2022
Start date
Jul 13, 2023
Primary completion
May 31, 2026
Completion
May 31, 2026
Last update
Jul 23, 2026

Study contacts

Robert Turrisi, PhD
principal investigator · Penn State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion