ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05344755Updated Sep 28, 2023

Effects of Plantar Sensory Training in Individuals With Hallux Valgus.

An interventional study of Plantar Sensorial Training and Control Group in Hallux Valgus, Pain and Balance; Distorted, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-28.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2020, registered Mar 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 11 studies in Hallux Valgus with a site in Turkey — 4 open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. Hallux Valgus · Turkey.

Started
2020
the only one that year
No phase
7 of 11
3 open now
Registered
1st of 11
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 11
Hacettepe University

Among the 11 studies in Hallux Valgus with a site in Turkey, this one is the only one that started in 2020, is one of 7 with no phase, and was the 1st registered.

Hallux Valgus

157 studies on the registry are indexed under Hallux Valgus; 36 are open to participants now.

Browse Hallux Valgus studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 11 studies in Hallux Valgus with a site in Turkey are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 4 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Turkey have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Turkey →

Who these studies take

Of the 21 Hallux Valgus studies recruiting now, 10 (48%) set no upper age limit and 7 (33%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 4 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 11 studies in Hallux Valgus with a site in Turkey, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Hallux valgus is a forefoot deformity with a high prevalence, which can progress to lateral deviation of the big toe, medial deviation of the first metatarsal, and subluxation of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in the future. It has been reported in studies that changes in the load distribution of the foot in hallux valgus patients, hyperkeratosis, especially first-line pain, and sensory receptors on the sole of the foot may result in the effect of sensory receptors on the sole of the foot, and thus the balance may be negatively affected, poor postural stability and an increase in the risk of falling. It is thought that increased sensitivity to the senses coming from the feet with sensory training can improve the balance and reduce the risk of falling as a result of better perception of foot orientation and position.

Read the detailed description

Achieving balance depends on the visual, vestibular and somatosensory systems working together and in interaction. One of the important components of the somatosensory system is the cutaneous receptors. Merkel discs, Paccini corpuscles, Meissner corpuscles and Ruffini endings are located on the plantar surface of the foot, which makes contact with the ground. Plantar cutaneous receptors are sensitive to pressure during ground contact and provide site-specific information for cortical mapping and may affect postural responses. It is recommended that sensory training of the sole of the foot, rough insoles and transcutaneous electrical stimulation applications should be added to rehabilitation in order to increase the afferent sensory feedback from the sole of the foot in patients with multiple sclerosis, starting from the early stages of the disease. It has been reported in studies that the sensory input of different foot regions has an important role in the transition and timing of the stance and swing phase in gait. It has been suggested that cutaneous reflexes in the foot can provide functional locomotion and modulation of lower extremity flexor and extensor muscle activity. It has been reported in studies that changes in the load distribution of the foot in hallux valgus patients, hyperkeratosis, especially first-line pain, and sensory receptors on the sole of the foot may result in the effect of sensory receptors on the sole of the foot, and thus the balance may be negatively affected, poor postural stability and an increase in the risk of falling. It is thought that increased sensitivity to the senses coming from the feet with sensory training can improve the balance and reduce the risk of falling as a result of better perception of foot orientation and position. Therefore, the aim of our study; It was determined as the examination of the effect of plantar sensory training on pain, foot posture, functional activities, gait and balance parameters in individuals with hallux valgus.

03

Conditions studied

  • Hallux Valgus
  • Pain
  • Balance; Distorted

Keywords

  • hallux valgus
  • pain
  • sensory training
  • plantar sensory
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being diagnosed with mild or moderate hallux valgus;
  • Volunteer to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having pathologies that may cause sensory problems such as diabetes, multiple sclerosis, myelomeningocele, severe disc herniation,
  • Having an orthopedic, rheumatological or neurological disease other than hallux valgus that will prevent participation in the exercise program
  • Having previous foot surgery,
  • Having a cooperation problem at a level that cannot understand and apply the exercises.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Plantar Sensorial Training

    In addition to hallux valgus mobilization, active thumb abduction, strengthening of the muscles around the feet, hallux valgus taping and hallux valgus night splint, sensory training (using deep plantar massage, brushing, dipping techniques) will be performed.

    Other: Plantar Sensorial Training

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Routine hallux valgus physiotherapy approaches such as: hallux valgus mobilization, active thumb abduction, strengthening of the muscles around the feet, hallux valgus taping and hallux valgus night splint.

    Other: Control Group

Interventions

  • OtherPlantar Sensorial Training

    In addition to the routine treatment, plantar sensorial training will be added.

  • OtherControl Group

    Routine physiotherapy management of the Hallux valgus

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Foot-Related pain assessment

    Visual Analogue Scale will be used to evaluate the pain severity of individuals. Participants will be asked to mark their pain at rest and activity on a horizontal line of 100 millimeters, with 100 indicating maximum pain and 0 indicating no pain.

    Time frame: change from baseline pain severity at 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Light touch sensation

    The light touch sense of the sole of the foot will be evaluated with the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test. This test is widely used to evaluate light touch and pressure sense. The response to touch is tested with monofilaments of varying thickness and diameter, and the value that the patient feels is recorded.

    Time frame: change from baseline light touch sensation at 6 weeks

  2. Change in foot function

    The AOFAS Hallux-Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale created by the American Foot and Ankle Foundation (AOFAS) will also be used to evaluate foot function. In this scale, which is a 100-point scoring system that evaluates pain, function, and alignment, 90-100 points are excellent, 75-89 points are good, 50-74 points are good, and less than 50 points indicate poor status.

    Time frame: change from baseline foot function at 6 weeks

  3. Change in lower extremity functional level

    The Lower Extremity Functionality Scale (LEFS), which is used in individuals with lower extremity problems, will be used to classify the functional status of individuals. AEFS is a 5-point Likert scale consisting of 20 questions. High scores in this scale, which has been adapted to Turkish and whose scoring ranges from 0 to 80, represent a better functional situation

    Time frame: change from baseline Lower extremity functional level at 6 weeks

  4. Change in gait parameters

    Individuals' gait will be assessed using the GAITRite® computerized walking path (CIR System INC. Clifton, NJ 07012). Data from the system, which has 18,432 sensors, is obtained by pressure-activated sensors at a rate of 60-120 Hz. In order to eliminate the learning effect, the subjects will be asked to walk at the pace they choose after three attempts are made. Rest breaks will be given between assessments and the average of three repetitions of the walk will be recorded

    Time frame: change from baseline temporo-spatial gait parameters at 6 weeks

  5. Change in balance

    Stability limits of individuals will be evaluated with Bertec Balance Check Trainer. Participants will be asked to lie on this device in the front, back, right and left directions as far as they can go without losing their balance and without lifting the soles of their feet off the platform, and the measurement results will be recorded by the system. Also, Postural sway of individuals will be evaluated and recorded with the Bertec Balance Check Trainer. It will be evaluated in four different conditions: flat ground with eyes open, flat ground with eyes closed, soft ground with eyes open and soft ground with eyes closed. Individuals will be asked to stand upright for 10 seconds for each situation, and the results will be recorded in centimeters by the system (Force plate AM, Bertec, Columbus, OH).

    Time frame: change from baseline postural sway and limits of stability at 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hacettepe University
    Ankara, 06100, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2020 to primary completion in Oct 2022, 24 months.

Of 51 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hallux Valgus, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 55. This study's 24 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 56 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 55.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 26, 2022
First posted
Apr 25, 2022
StartActual
Oct 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Oct 27, 2022
CompletionActual
Nov 15, 2022
Last update
Sep 28, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05344755
Responsible party
Elif Kırdı (Principal İnvestigator, Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 25, 2022
Start date
Oct 1, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 27, 2022
Completion
Nov 15, 2022
Last update
Sep 28, 2023

Study contacts

Gul Yazicioglu, Prof
study director · Hacettepe University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion