ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05343455MVOR-2Updated Dec 3, 2024Results posted

A Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Oral DFD-29 Capsules for the Treatment of Rosacea (MVOR-2)

A Phase 3 interventional study of DFD-29 and Doxycycline in Papulopustular Rosacea, sponsored by Journey Medical Corporation. Completed at 24 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-03.

Sponsored by Journey Medical Corporation · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
330
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled study. After assessing eligibility during a screening period of up to 30 days, approximately 320 subjects at least 18 years old who are diagnosed with moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea will be randomized in a 3:3:2 ratio to DFD-29 (40 mg), Doxycycline capsules 40 mg, or Placebo once daily for 16 weeks. Of the 320 subjects, approximately 160 subjects are planned to be enrolled at 15 sites in the US, while the remaining subjects are to be enrolled at 14 sites in the EU.

Read the detailed description

This is a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled study. After assessing eligibility during a screening period of up to 30 days, approximately 320 subjects at least 18 years old who are diagnosed with moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea will be randomized in a 3:3:2 ratio to DFD-29 (40 mg), Doxycycline capsules 40 mg, or Placebo once daily for 16 weeks.

Subject visits are scheduled at Screening, Baseline (Day 1), and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16. Clinical assessments of efficacy will be conducted based on Investigator's Global Assessment modified scale without erythema (IGA), Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), and total inflammatory lesion count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 compared to Baseline.

Laboratory assessments of blood (hematology and biochemistry) and urine (routine tests) will be conducted at Screening and Week 16 (end of study [EOS] or early termination) to assess for any changes in the safety parameters. Other safety assessments include vital signs, physical examination, urine pregnancy tests (for females of childbearing potential), and collection of AE data.

The impact of the treatment on the quality of life (QoL) of the subjects will be assessed using the rosacea-specific tool RosaQoL in addition to the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16.

02

Conditions studied

  • Papulopustular Rosacea

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rosacea

233 studies on the registry are indexed under Rosacea; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 330 is above the median of 61 across 200 interventional studies indexed under Rosacea.

Browse Rosacea studies →

Lead sponsor

Journey Medical Corporation is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female subjects aged 18 years and above.
  • Subjects must be in good general health as determined by the investigator and supported by the medical history.
  • Subjects must have a clinical diagnosis of papulopustular rosacea with IGA grade 3 (moderate) or IGA grade 4 (severe) at Baseline.
  • Subjects must have 15 to 60 (both inclusive) inflammatory lesions (papules and pustules) of rosacea over the face at Baseline.
  • Subjects must have not more than 2 nodules or cysts at Baseline.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female subjects who are pregnant or nursing or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Male subjects whose female partner is planning to conceive a child.
  • abnormal laboratory test results that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the subject's safety or ability to participate in the trial.
  • History of organ transplant requiring , , or other immune compromised state.
  • History of lupus-like syndrome, hepatitis, vasculitis, or serum sickness.
  • Any clinically significant condition or situation other than the condition being studied that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study evaluations or optimal participation in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
330 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DFD-29

    DFD-29 (40 mg) extended release capsules

    Drug: DFD-29

  • Active comparator
    Doxycycline 40 mg

    Doxycycline 40 mg modified release capsules

    Drug: Doxycycline

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo capsules matching DFD-29

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugDFD-29

    DFD-29 (40 mg) extended release capsules

  • Doxycycline 40 mg capsules

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo capsules

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Treatment Success Compared to Placebo.

    Proportion of subjects with IGA (modified scale without erythema) 'treatment success' - Grade 0 or 1 at Week 16 with at least 2 grade reduction from Baseline to Week 16, in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo. The modified IGA scale is a 5-point scale from Grade 0 to Grade 4, wherein Grade 0 is Clear, Grade 1 is Near Clear, Grade 2 is Mild, Grade 3 is Moderate and Grade 4 is Severe Rosacea. A lowering of the score with treatment indicates an improvement in the disease condition and a beneficial outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

  2. Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Placebo.

    Total inflammatory lesion count (sum of papules, pustules, and nodules) change from Baseline to Week 16, in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16.

Secondary outcomes

  1. IGA Treatment Success Compared to Doxycycline.

    Proportion of subjects with IGA treatment success at week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Doxycycline capsules 40 mg. The IGA is a 5-point scale ranging from '0'-Clear to '4' Severe, in which lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16.

  2. Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Doxycycline.

    Total inflammatory lesion count change from Baseline to week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Doxycycline capsules 40 mg.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16.

  3. Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Change Compared to Placebo.

    Proportion of subjects with at least 2-grade reduction in CEA score from Baseline to Week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo. The CEA is a 5-point scale ranging from '0' - No Redness to '4' - Fiery Redness, in which lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16.

07

Results

Posted Dec 3, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDFD-29Doxycycline 40 mgPlacebo
Started12312582
Completed11511368
Not completed81214
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject497
Withdrew: Adverse event212
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up113
Withdrew: Pregnancy100
Withdrew: Physician decision001
Withdrew: Protocol violation011

Outcome measures

PrimaryInvestigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Treatment Success Compared to Placebo.

Proportion of subjects with IGA (modified scale without erythema) 'treatment success' - Grade 0 or 1 at Week 16 with at least 2 grade reduction from Baseline to Week 16, in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo. The modified IGA scale is a 5-point scale from Grade 0 to Grade 4, wherein Grade 0 is Clear, Grade 1 is Near Clear, Grade 2 is Mild, Grade 3 is Moderate and Grade 4 is Severe Rosacea. A lowering of the score with treatment indicates an improvement in the disease condition and a beneficial outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Treatment Success Compared to Placebo.
ParticipantsDFD-29Placebo
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Treatment Success Compared to Placebo.7422
PrimaryChange in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Placebo.

Total inflammatory lesion count (sum of papules, pustules, and nodules) change from Baseline to Week 16, in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · lesions
Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Placebo.
lesionsDFD-29Placebo
Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Placebo.-18.1 ± 0.66-11.2 ± 0.86
SecondaryIGA Treatment Success Compared to Doxycycline.

Proportion of subjects with IGA treatment success at week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Doxycycline capsules 40 mg. The IGA is a 5-point scale ranging from '0'-Clear to '4' Severe, in which lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
IGA Treatment Success Compared to Doxycycline.
ParticipantsDFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg
IGA Treatment Success Compared to Doxycycline.7439
SecondaryChange in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Doxycycline.

Total inflammatory lesion count change from Baseline to week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Doxycycline capsules 40 mg.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · lesions
Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Doxycycline.
lesionsDFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg
Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Doxycycline.-18.1 ± 0.71-14.6 ± 0.71
SecondaryClinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Change Compared to Placebo.

Proportion of subjects with at least 2-grade reduction in CEA score from Baseline to Week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo. The CEA is a 5-point scale ranging from '0' - No Redness to '4' - Fiery Redness, in which lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Change Compared to Placebo.
ParticipantsDFD-29Placebo
Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Change Compared to Placebo.3010

Adverse events

Collected over From the signing of informed consent up to 16 weeks of study treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DFD-290/122 (0%)2/122 (1.6%)48/122 (39.3%)
Doxycycline 40 mg0/121 (0%)0/121 (0%)37/121 (30.6%)
Placebo0/82 (0%)1/82 (1.2%)27/82 (32.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDFD-29Doxycycline 40 mgPlacebo
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders0/1220/1211/82
Ankle fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1220/1210/82
Mouth injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1220/1210/82
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent other events
EventDFD-29Doxycycline 40 mgPlacebo
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations13/12210/12113/82
COVID-19Infections and infestations7/1228/1215/82
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/1226/1211/82
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders3/1223/1213/82
InfluenzaInfections and infestations3/1221/1211/82
Gastroenteritis viralInfections and infestations3/1220/1211/82
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders3/1222/1210/82
Burning sensationNervous system disorders0/1220/1212/82
Gastrooesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disorders2/1222/1210/82
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1222/1210/82

Baseline characteristics

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Subjects

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean49.7 ± 13.8753.6 ± 14.0551.2 ± 13.6651.6 ± 13.95
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mgPlaceboTotal
Female1018464249
Male22411881
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mgPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian1416
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American5218
White11611880314
More than one race1102
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mgPlaceboTotal
United States838047210
Germany32332186
Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) grade
Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) grade(Participants)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mgPlaceboTotal
Moderate11011177298
Severe1314532
Total inflammatory lesion counts
Total inflammatory lesion counts(Lesion count)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean24.1 ± 7.6625.0 ± 9.0924.2 ± 7.8724.5 ± 8.27
Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Score
Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Score(Participants)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mgPlaceboTotal
0 = None1102
1 = Mild73414
2 = Moderate415033124
3 = Significant575633146
4 = Severe17151244
08

Study locations

24 sites
  • Clinical Trial Site 15
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 01
    Doral, Florida 33178, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 02
    Miami, Florida 33173, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 14
    Miami, Florida 33175, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 05
    Miramar, Florida 33027, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 08
    Clarksville, Indiana 47129, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 16
    Plainfield, Indiana 46168, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 10
    Louisville, Kentucky 40241, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 11
    Saint Joseph, Missouri 64506, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 09
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45246, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 04
    Dublin, Ohio 43016, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 06
    Anderson, South Carolina 29621, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 12
    Austin, Texas 78759, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 03
    Houston, Texas 77056, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 07
    Pflugerville, Texas 78660, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 17
    Bad Bentheim, 48455, Germany
  • Clinical Trial Site 24
    Berlin, 10247, Germany
  • Clinical Trial Site 22
    Bochum, 44793, Germany
  • Clinical Trial Site 20
    Darmstadt, 64283, Germany
  • Clinical Trial Site 25
    Dülmen, 48249, Germany
  • Clinical Trial Site 19
    Hamburg, 22391, Germany
  • Clinical Trial Site 21
    Langenau, 89129, Germany
  • Clinical Trial Site 23
    Merzig, 66663, Germany
  • Clinical Trial Site 18
    Wuppertal, 42287, Germany
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05343455
Lead sponsor
Journey Medical Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 25, 2022
Start date
Mar 29, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 30, 2023
Results posted
Dec 3, 2024
Last update
Dec 3, 2024

Study contacts

Srinivas R Sidgiddi, M.D.
study director · Journey Medical Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: DFD-29

Start the discussion