ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05296629MVOR-1Updated Dec 3, 2024Results posted

A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Oral DFD-29 Capsules for the Treatment of Rosacea.

A Phase 3 interventional study of DFD-29 and Doxycycline in Papulopustular Rosacea, sponsored by Journey Medical Corporation. Completed at 27 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-03.

Sponsored by Journey Medical Corporation · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
323
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled study. After assessing eligibility during a screening period of up to 30 days, approximately 320 subjects at least 18 years old who are diagnosed with moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea will be randomized in a 3:3:2 ratio to DFD-29 (40 mg), Doxycycline capsules 40 mg, or Placebo once daily for 16 weeks.

Read the detailed description

This is a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled study. After assessing eligibility during a screening period of up to 30 days, approximately 320 subjects at least 18 years old who are diagnosed with moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea will be randomized in a 3:3:2 ratio to DFD-29 (40 mg), Doxycycline capsules 40 mg, or Placebo once daily for 16 weeks.

Subject visits are scheduled at Screening, Baseline (Day 1), and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16. Clinical assessments of efficacy will be conducted based on Investigator's Global Assessment modified scale without erythema (IGA), Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), and total inflammatory lesion count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 compared to Baseline.

Laboratory assessments of blood (hematology and biochemistry) and urine (routine tests) will be conducted at Screening and Week 16 (end of study [EOS] or early termination) to assess for any changes in the safety parameters. Other safety assessments include vital signs, physical examination, urine pregnancy tests (for females of childbearing potential), and collection of AE data.

The impact of the treatment on the quality of life (QoL) of the subjects will be assessed using the rosacea-specific tool RosaQoL in addition to the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16.

02

Conditions studied

  • Papulopustular Rosacea

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rosacea

233 studies on the registry are indexed under Rosacea; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 323 is above the median of 61 across 200 interventional studies indexed under Rosacea.

Browse Rosacea studies →

Lead sponsor

Journey Medical Corporation is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female subjects aged 18 years and above.
  • Subjects must be in good general health as determined by the investigator and supported by the medical history.
  • Subjects must have a clinical diagnosis of papulopustular rosacea with IGA grade 3 (moderate) or IGA grade 4 (severe) at Baseline.
  • Subjects must have 15 to 60 (both inclusive) inflammatory lesions (papules and pustules) of rosacea over the face at Baseline.
  • Subjects must have not more than 2 nodules or cysts at Baseline.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female subjects who are pregnant or nursing or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Male subjects whose female partner is planning to conceive a child.
  • abnormal laboratory test results that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the subject's safety or ability to participate in the trial.
  • History of organ transplant requiring , , or other immune compromised state.
  • History of lupus-like syndrome, hepatitis, vasculitis, or serum sickness.
  • Any clinically significant condition or situation other than the condition being studied that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study evaluations or optimal participation in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
323 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DFD-29

    DFD-29 (40 mg) extended release capsules

    Drug: DFD-29

  • Active comparator
    Doxycycline 40 mg

    Doxycycline 40 mg modified release capsules

    Drug: Doxycycline

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo capsules matching DFD-29

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugDFD-29

    DFD-29 (40 mg) extended release capsules

  • Doxycycline 40 mg capsules

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo capsules

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Treatment Success Compared to Placebo.

    Proportion of subjects with IGA (modified scale without erythema) 'treatment success' - Grade 0 or 1 at Week 16 with at least 2 grade reduction from Baseline to Week 16, in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo. The modified IGA scale is a 5-point scale from Grade 0 to Grade 4, wherein Grade 0 is Clear, Grade 1 is Near Clear, Grade 2 is Mild, Grade 3 is Moderate and Grade 4 is Severe Rosacea. A lowering of the score with treatment indicates an improvement in the disease condition and a beneficial outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16.

  2. Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Placebo.

    Total inflammatory lesion count (sum of papules, pustules, and nodules) change from Baseline to Week 16, in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16.

Secondary outcomes

  1. IGA Treatment Success Compared to Doxycycline.

    Proportion of subjects with IGA treatment success at week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Doxycycline capsules 40 mg.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16.

  2. Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Doxycycline.

    Total inflammatory lesion count change from Baseline to week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Doxycycline capsules 40 mg.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16.

  3. Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Compared to Placebo.

    Proportion of subjects with at least 2-grade reduction in CEA score from Baseline to Week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16.

07

Results

Posted Dec 3, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg CapsulePlacebo
Started12212180
Completed1179873
Not completed5237
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3104
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up271
Withdrew: Adverse event042
Withdrew: Protocol violation020

Outcome measures

PrimaryInvestigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Treatment Success Compared to Placebo.

Proportion of subjects with IGA (modified scale without erythema) 'treatment success' - Grade 0 or 1 at Week 16 with at least 2 grade reduction from Baseline to Week 16, in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo. The modified IGA scale is a 5-point scale from Grade 0 to Grade 4, wherein Grade 0 is Clear, Grade 1 is Near Clear, Grade 2 is Mild, Grade 3 is Moderate and Grade 4 is Severe Rosacea. A lowering of the score with treatment indicates an improvement in the disease condition and a beneficial outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Treatment Success Compared to Placebo.
ParticipantsDFD-29Placebo
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Treatment Success Compared to Placebo.7925
PrimaryChange in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Placebo.

Total inflammatory lesion count (sum of papules, pustules, and nodules) change from Baseline to Week 16, in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · lesions
Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Placebo.
lesionsDFD-29Placebo
Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Placebo.-20.6 ± 0.77-11.4 ± 0.97
SecondaryIGA Treatment Success Compared to Doxycycline.

Proportion of subjects with IGA treatment success at week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Doxycycline capsules 40 mg.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
IGA Treatment Success Compared to Doxycycline.
ParticipantsDFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg
IGA Treatment Success Compared to Doxycycline.7956
SecondaryChange in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Doxycycline.

Total inflammatory lesion count change from Baseline to week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Doxycycline capsules 40 mg.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · lesions
Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Doxycycline.
lesionsDFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg
Change in Total Inflammatory Lesion Count Compared to Doxycycline.-20.6 ± 0.69-15.6 ± 0.73
SecondaryClinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Compared to Placebo.

Proportion of subjects with at least 2-grade reduction in CEA score from Baseline to Week 16 in the DFD-29 group compared to Placebo.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Compared to Placebo.
ParticipantsDFD-29Placebo
Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Compared to Placebo.3911

Adverse events

Collected over From the signing of informed consent up to 16 weeks of study treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DFD-290/121 (0%)0/121 (0%)17/121 (14%)
Doxycycline 40 mg0/116 (0%)0/116 (0%)19/116 (16.4%)
Placebo0/76 (0%)0/76 (0%)18/76 (23.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDFD-29Doxycycline 40 mgPlacebo
COVID-19Infections and infestations4/1213/1164/76
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations4/1212/1163/76
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders2/1212/1163/76
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/1212/1163/76
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/1214/1162/76
Dry SkinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/1210/1162/76
Vulvovaginal mycotic infectionsInfections and infestations2/1212/1160/76
HypertensionVascular disorders1/1212/1161/76
GoutMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/1212/1160/76

Baseline characteristics

ITT Subjects

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg CapsulePlaceboTotal
Mean47.7 ± 13.1646.7 ± 14.1147.2 ± 14.0947.2 ± 13.72
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg CapsulePlaceboTotal
Female949063247
Male28311776
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg CapsulePlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0022
Asian65617
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American1304
White11311171295
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported2215
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg CapsulePlaceboTotal
United States12212180323
Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) grade
Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) grade(Participants)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg CapsulePlaceboTotal
Moderate10111068279
Severe21111244
Total Inflammatory Lesion Count
Total Inflammatory Lesion Count(Lesion count)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg CapsulePlaceboTotal
Mean26.4 ± 10.4623.8 ± 8.7525.9 ± 8.8425.3 ± 9.50
Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) score
Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) score(Participants)DFD-29Doxycycline 40 mg CapsulePlaceboTotal
0 = None0000
1 = Mild3227
2 = Moderate504532127
3 = Significant576137155
4 = Severe1213934
08

Study locations

27 sites
  • Clinical Trial Site 05
    Rogers, Arkansas 72758, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 10
    Cerritos, California 90703, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 03
    Fremont, California 94538, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 25
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 29
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 11
    Clearwater, Florida 33761, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 08
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 22
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 02
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 27
    Overland Park, Kansas 66210, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 09
    Brighton, Massachusetts 02135, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 18
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 28
    Warren, Michigan 48088, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 21
    New Brighton, Minnesota 55112, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 15
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89148, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 24
    New York, New York 10019, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 17
    High Point, North Carolina 27262, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 04
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28405, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 06
    Beachwood, Ohio 44122, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 01
    Sugarloaf, Pennsylvania 18249, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 19
    East Greenwich, Rhode Island 02818, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 23
    Nashville, Tennessee 37215, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 20
    College Station, Texas 77845, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 13
    Houston, Texas 77055, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 07
    Plano, Texas 75093, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 26
    San Antonio, Texas 78213, United States
  • Clinical Trial Site 12
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05296629
Lead sponsor
Journey Medical Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 25, 2022
Start date
Mar 14, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 30, 2023
Results posted
Dec 3, 2024
Last update
Dec 3, 2024

Study contacts

Srinivas R Sidgiddi, M.D.
study director · Journey Medical Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: DFD-29

Start the discussion