ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05337501CRPSPrognosisUpdated May 1, 2024

Prognostic Factors for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

An interventional study of Collecting data in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, sponsored by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-01.

Sponsored by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
113
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators would like to examine the role of some relevant biopsychosocial factors in the development of persistent CRPS. According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [43], the outcomes will belong to one of the three following components:

  • Body structures and functions (pain, CRPS severity score (CSS)),
  • Activities (disability)
  • Participation (return to work, quality of life). The primary aim is to assess predicting factors for chronification.

The secondary aims are:

  • to evaluate if it is possible to classify acute complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) patients into subgroups according to their risk of chronification.
  • to document the course of the disease. The main evaluation criteria will be to determine the impact of the different clinical and non-clinical variables on the course of the CRPS and on the aforementioned outcomes then, which will use as endpoints.
  • Primary endpoint: disability
  • Secondary endpoints: participation-QoL, return to work, pain, CRPS severity score.
Read the detailed description

Patients suffering from early CRPS will be invited to attend 4 medical interviews over a 1-year period. A series of clinical data will be collected during this interview. After each consultation, the patient will be asked to complete a series of questionnaires at home (paper forms or online by REDCap). These questionnaires assess various psychosocial factors well known in the chronification of pain (fear of movement, anxious or depressive traits, "general" pain sensitization, social support, cognitive strategies to cope with pain) as well as the functional impact of the pathology.

All the study (first face-to-face assessment or follow-up sessions) will take place at Institute of Neurosciences (UCLouvain, site Woluwé) and perform by Pr. Berquin or Dr. Louis. As part of the study, the patients will never be assessed in another location or by another investigator.

After having encoded the patients' details in the REDCap application, the participants will receive an automatic e-mail at every time point. It will include a link to the online survey. At any given moment of the study, they can contact the co-investigator (Dr. Louis) by e-mail or phone for any questions or help in completing the questionnaires. If necessary, the co-investigator will provide assistance by telephone

To simplify the recruitment process, the informed consent will be sent by post or e-mail and signed during the first meeting.

Five endpoints will be tested using linear mixed-effects regression models for repeated measures:

Primary endpoint: disability Secondary endpoints: participation-QoL, return to work, pain, CRPS severity score.

A latent profiles analysis will be performed to classify patients into subgroups based on variables at baseline and the risk of chronicity of profile will be computed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
03

In context

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

206 studies on the registry are indexed under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 113 is above the median of 40 across 152 interventional studies indexed under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes.

Browse Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain is the lead sponsor of 350 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged over 18,
  2. Meeting the clinical Budapest criteria,
  3. Apparition of symptoms from less than 6 months,
  4. CRPS type I or II,
  5. Capacity to understand and voluntarily sign an form in French.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Insufficient French language skills to answer questionnaires,
  2. Personal history of CRPS at the same limb,
  3. Post-stroke CRPS type I ("shoulder-hand syndrome"),
  4. Psychiatric disorders that would interfere with the participants' ability to complete study tasks,
  5. The following hormonal situations: gravidity, lactation, gender-affirming treatment,
  6. Any other reason to exclude the subject because it may interfere with the study, according to judgment by the investigator. The reason will be documented.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
113 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients group

    Other: Collecting data

Interventions

  • OtherCollecting data

    Anamnesis, clinical examination, Quantitative Sensory Testing (following DFNS, German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain, protocol), visual TOJ (Temporal Order Judgement) task

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disability

    Defined by International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), assessed by Quick DASH (0 to 100 scale) or Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) (0 to 80 scale) ; higher score means higher disability

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participation - QoL

    Defined by International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), assessed by EuroQol5D5L ; higher score in each domain means lower QoL ; lower score in visual analogic scale means lower QoL

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Return to work

    Rate of patients returning to work at 1 year (full time and / or medical part-time)

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Body function - Pain intensity

    Defined by International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), assessed by SF-BPI ; pain intensity (severity, means of 4 first items) and the impact of pain on functioning (interference, mean of the seven interference items on a 0-10 scale) ; higher scores mean higher pain (severity or interference)

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Body function - CRPS severity score

    Defined by Harden et al., signs + symptoms, 0 to 16 scale ; higher score means higher severity

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Harden RN, Maihofner C, Abousaad E, Vatine JJ, Kirsling A, Perez RSGM, Kuroda M, Brunner F, Stanton-Hicks M, Marinus J, van Hilten JJ, Mackey S, Birklein F, Schlereth T, Mailis-Gagnon A, Graciosa J, Connoly SB, Dayanim D, Massey M, Frank H, Livshitz A, Bruehl S. A prospective, multisite, international validation of the Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Severity Score. Pain. 2017 Aug;158(8):1430-1436. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000927. PubMed 28715350 ↗
  • Bean DJ, Johnson MH, Heiss-Dunlop W, Kydd RR. Extent of recovery in the first 12 months of complex regional pain syndrome type-1: A prospective study. Eur J Pain. 2016 Jul;20(6):884-94. doi: 10.1002/ejp.813. Epub 2015 Nov 2. PubMed 26524108 ↗
  • Brunner F, Bachmann LM, Perez RSGM, Marinus J, Wertli MM. Painful swelling after a noxious event and the development of complex regional pain syndrome 1: A one-year prospective study. Eur J Pain. 2017 Oct;21(9):1611-1617. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1064. Epub 2017 Jun 2. PubMed 28573699 ↗
  • Brunner F, Bachmann LM, Weber U, Kessels AG, Perez RS, Marinus J, Kissling R. Complex regional pain syndrome 1--the Swiss cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Jun 23;9:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-92. PubMed 18573212 ↗
  • Bruehl S, Maihofner C, Stanton-Hicks M, Perez RS, Vatine JJ, Brunner F, Birklein F, Schlereth T, Mackey S, Mailis-Gagnon A, Livshitz A, Harden RN. Complex regional pain syndrome: evidence for warm and cold subtypes in a large prospective clinical sample. Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1674-81. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000569. PubMed 27023422 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2024, 33 months after the start.

Of 64 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 33 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 65 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 6, 2022
First posted
Apr 20, 2022
StartActual
Mar 28, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2024
Last update
May 1, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05337501
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 20, 2022
Start date
Mar 28, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
May 1, 2024

Study contacts

Anne Berquin, PhD
principal investigator · Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion