CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05326152Updated Apr 13, 2022

Intralesional Versus Intramuscular Hepatitis B Vaccine Immunotherapy for Warts

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of hepatitis B vaccine immunotherapy of common warts (GeneVac-B 10 ml vial, Serum Institute of India Ltd., Pune, India) and Intralesional saline in Intralesional Versus Intramuscular Hepatitis B Vaccine for Multiple Common Warts, sponsored by Zagazig University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-13.

Sponsored by Zagazig University · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2020, registered Feb 2022).
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Assessment of the effectiveness of intralesional and intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine in treatment of multiple common warts.

Read the detailed description

Recently, intralesional immunotherapy by different antigens, including Candida antigen and purified protein derivative PPD has been proved effective in the treatment of different types of warts. Hepatitis B vaccine is one of the DNA vaccines that are regarded as being potentially safer, relatively cheap and easy to produce with no special storage requirements because they are extremely stable and allow for potential simultaneous immunization against multiple antigens or pathogens via co-expression of multiple epitopes on single plasmid. Hepatitis B vaccine could be a promising immunotherapeutic vaccine in the field of intralesional immunotherapy of warts. Moreover, the efficacy of intramuscular injection of hepatitis B vaccine would be assessed and compared to its intralesional injection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intralesional Versus Intramuscular Hepatitis B Vaccine for Multiple Common Warts
03

In context

Hepatitis A

2,709 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis A; 142 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 75 is below the median of 100 across 1,886 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis A.

Browse Hepatitis A studies →

Lead sponsor

Zagazig University is the lead sponsor of 447 studies on the registry; 75 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients of both sexes with multiple (> 3 warts) common warts of various sites, sizes and duration, with or without distant warts after taking informed consent from all patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Serious systemic or anaphylactic reaction to a prior dose of the vaccine or to any of its components.
  • Allergic skin disorders such as generalized eczema and urticaria.
  • Moderate or severe acute illness with or without fever.
  • Previous wart therapy within 1 month prior to the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
75 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IntralesionaL Hepatitis B vaccine

    0.2 ml of hepatitis B vaccine injected in the largest wart and repeated every 2 weeks till clearance of warts or for a maximum of 5 sessions

    Biological: hepatitis B vaccine immunotherapy of common warts (GeneVac-B 10 ml vial, Serum Institute of India Ltd., Pune, India)

  • Experimental
    Intramuscular Hepatitis B vaccine

    0.5 ml injected in the deltoid muscle for those who were younger than 19 years at the time of study and 1 ml for those who were 20 years and older at the time of study. Three injections were done at 0, 1, and 4 months.

    Biological: hepatitis B vaccine immunotherapy of common warts (GeneVac-B 10 ml vial, Serum Institute of India Ltd., Pune, India)

  • Placebo comparator
    Intralesional saline

    0.2 ml of saline injected in the largest wart and repeated every 2 weeks till clearance of warts or for a maximum of 5 sessions

    Biological: Intralesional saline

Interventions

  • Biologicalhepatitis B vaccine immunotherapy of common warts (GeneVac-B 10 ml vial, Serum Institute of India Ltd., Pune, India)

    Randomized placebo-controlled comparative effectiveness clinical trial

  • BiologicalIntralesional saline

    Intralesional saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of intralesional versus intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine in the treatment of multiple common warts

    Percentage of patients showing complete response to intralesional hepatitis B vaccine and intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine. Complete response: complete disappearance of warts including distant warts and complete return of normal skin markings (100%). Partial response: if the warts have regressed in size by 50-99%. No response: less than 50% decrease in wart size.

    Time frame: up to 3 months after last injection

  2. Immediate adverse effects

    Time frame: up to 20 minutes after intralesional or intramuscular injection of vaccine

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of intralesional versus intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine in distant wart response

    Percentage of patients showing complete response of their distant warts to intralesional hepatitis B vaccine and intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine. Complete response: complete disappearance of distant warts and complete return of normal skin markings (100%). Partial response: if the distant warts have regressed in size by 50-99%. No response: less than 50% decrease in distant wart size.

    Time frame: up to 3 months

  2. Late adverse effects

    Time frame: up to 6 months follow-up period

  3. Recurrence

    after complete clearance of all warts

    Time frame: for 6 months-follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zagazig university
    Zagazig, Sharkia 44519, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05326152
Lead sponsor
Zagazig University
Responsible party
Basma Magdy Elkholy, MD (Clinical professor, Zagazig University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 13, 2022
Start date
Nov 25, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2021
Completion
Oct 25, 2021
Last update
Apr 13, 2022

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion