An interventional study of Supportive Expressive Group Therapy in Musculoskeletal Injury and Traumatic Injury, sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.
Sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Traumatic physical injuries result in significant disability and a high proportion of survivors suffer from chronic pain and mental health disorders. A key predictor of good outcomes following trauma is "coping self-efficacy" - a person's belief that they can cope with life's challenges. Interventions that enhance coping self-efficacy post-injury are most likely to optimize recovery. However, these interventions are not standard approaches in rehabilitation settings.Our inter-disciplinary team will undertake a trial to assess the efficacy of supportive-expressive group therapy in rehabilitation inpatients who have had traumatic injuries. We wish to test whether persons who undergo the group therapy have significant improvements in coping self-efficacy compared to those receiving standard care. Sixty patients with traumatic injuries admitted to St. John's Rehab will be randomized to either supportive-expressive group therapy (n=30) or to standard rehabilitation (n=30). Additionally, up to 12 staff participants will be recruited.The goal of this project is to establish a gold standard for inpatient rehabilitation in the trauma NMSK injured population by widening the access to emotional wellbeing supports, which could translate into better physical, mental and social health in the community.
Traumatic neuromusculoskeletal (NMSK) injuries result in significant disability and a high proportion of survivors suffer from chronic pain and mental health disorders. Inpatient acute care and rehabilitation are important treatments for patients after NMSK injury, however much of the work to ensure successful community participation occurs after discharge. A key mechanism for predicting outcomes following trauma is coping self-efficacy, therefore interventions that enhance coping self-efficacy post-NMSK injury are most likely to optimize recovery. However, these interventions are not standard approaches in rehabilitation settings.
Our inter-disciplinary team will undertake a feasibility randomized control trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy of supportive-expressive group therapy (SEGT) in NMSK injury rehabilitation inpatients. It is hypothesized that persons who undergo the SEGT will yield significant improvements in coping self-efficacy compared to those receiving standard care.
A prospective feasibility RCT design will be used to evaluate SEGT for NMSK injury rehabilitation inpatients compared to the standard rehabilitation for trauma patients at St John's Rehab (SJR). Sixty patients with an NMSK injury admitted to SJR will be randomized to either SEGT (n=30) or to standard rehabilitation (n=30). Additionally, up to 12 staff participants will be recruited to complete qualitative interviews/focus groups.
A repeated measures ANOVA will be used to detect differences on the outcome measures, which will include a group, time, and groups by time interaction term. Linear regression will be used to adjust for potential covariates of interest. A thematic content analysis will be used to analyze the qualitative data.
The long-term outcomes of this project is to establish a gold standard for inpatient rehabilitation in the trauma NMSK injured population by widening the access to emotional wellbeing supports, which could translate into better physical, mental and social health in the community.
5,085 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 849 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 55 is close to the median of 52 across 3,261 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.
Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre is the lead sponsor of 582 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.
Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The SEGT is a six-module program where each session is approximately one hour, and is held twice a week over a three-week period. It is framed within social cognitive theory, whereby resilience to adversity (NMSK trauma in this instance) relies on personal enablement. Enablement serves to equip the individual with the personal resources to cultivate their self-efficacy and mastery and to select and construct environments that promote successful adaption.
Behavioral: Supportive Expressive Group Therapy
The treatment as usual group will receive standard care only (which may include an individual psychiatric consultation).
The SEGT is a six-module program where each session is approximately one hour, and is held twice a week over a three-week period. It is framed within social cognitive theory, whereby resilience to adversity (NMSK trauma in this instance) relies on personal enablement. Enablement serves to equip the individual with the personal resources to cultivate their self-efficacy and mastery and to select and construct environments that promote successful adaption.
Participant recruitment
Number of participants who are recruited into the study and are contacted for assessments at set time intervals.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Questionnaire completion rates
Number of completed assessments
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Treatment adherence
Number of participants who complete all 6 SEGT sessions
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Number of participants contacted for follow up interview
Number of participants contacted for follow up interview
Time frame: At 1 month-post discharge for SEGT group]
Participant retention
Number of participants who complete the 3 month post-discharge assessments
Time frame: At three months post-discharge for SEGT and control group
Participant Retention
Number of participants who complete 1 month post-discharge interview
Time frame: At one month post-discharge for SEGT group]
Barriers and Facilitators to Group Participation
As discussed in qualitative interviews
Time frame: At one month post-discharge for SEGT group
Change in Health-related quality of life
Short Form-36 Survey (SF-36): The SF-36 is the most widely used generic health-related QoL tool. The tool measures 8 domains including physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, social functioning, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, and vitality. The minimum score is 0, and the maximum is 100. Higher scores on the measure are indicative of less disability.
Time frame: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge
Change in coping self-efficacy
Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES): The CSES is a measures perceived self-efficacy for coping with challenges and threats. It is a 26-item measure rated using an 11-point scale with the anchors 0 (cannot do at), 5 (moderately certain can do), and 10 (certain can do). Total scores (ranging from 0-260) are calculated by summing the item scores and a higher score indicates higher coping self-efficacy.
Time frame: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge
Change in impact of traumatic life event
Impact Event Scale Revised (IES-R): The IES44 is a 15-item scale that assesses the impact of a traumatic life event, and has two subscales assessing the frequency of intrusive and avoidant cognitions associated with a specific stressor. It uses a 4-point scale, not at all to often to assess how often a respondent experienced specific symptoms during the past week. The IES was revised 45 to assess the three cluster symptoms of PTSD: intrusions, avoidance, and hyperarousal. Scores range from 0-88, with higher scores indicating more severe impact.
Time frame: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge
Change in post-traumatic stress disorder
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Civilian Version (PCL-C): The PCL-C47 is a standardized 17-item self-report rating scale for PTSD. Respondents indicate how much they have been bothered by a symptom over the past month using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating more severe levels of PTSD, and it is a well-validated measure across different populations. Scores range from a minimum of 0, to a maximum of 80.
Time frame: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge
Change in post-traumatic growth
Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI): The PTGI is a 21-item scale assessing positive outcomes reported by those who have experienced traumatic events.48 Items are scored on a 6-point scale and scores range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating greater levels of growth. It has good levels of internal consistency reliability (α=.90) and 2-month test-retest stability (r =.71).
Time frame: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge
Socio-demographics
Data will be collected on the following: age, gender, marital status, highest level of education achieved, living situation (live alone, live with spouse, live with others), smoking status, alcohol/illicit drug use (yes, no; if yes, type and frequency of use), annual income after taxes, third-party insurance (yes, no), and employment status (employed, unemployed, retired, etc.), number/type of comorbid conditions, number/type of medications used by participant.
Time frame: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline)
Injury Characteristics
The cause of injury will be obtained using the following categories: in a motor vehicle accident, hit by motor vehicle, fall, assault, stab, gunshot wound, recreational injury, and other. As well, whether the injury was unintentional, self-inflicted, assault, or cause unknown will be recorded.
Time frame: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline)
Change in Injury Severity
Injury Severity Score (ISS): ISS49 assesses trauma severity, and correlates with mortality, morbidity and hospitalization time after trauma and is used to define the term 'major trauma'. ISS scores range from 0 to 75, and a major trauma is defined as an ISS being greater than 15.
Time frame: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge
Change in experiences in close relationships
Experiences in Close Relationships inventory-Short Form (ECR-S): The 12-item ECR-S evaluates the construct of adult attachment.50 Participants rate each of the 36 statements about connection using a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). There is a minimum score of 7 and a maximum score of 42. Higher percentiles indicate more difficulty with attachment.
Time frame: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge
Change in Personality
Ten Item Personality Measure (TIPI): The TIPI assesses the Five-Factor Model of personality (agreeableness, neuroticism, conscientiousness, introversion, extraversion).52 It has adequate levels in terms of (a) convergence with widely used Big-Five measures in self, observer, and peer reports, (b) test-retest reliability, and (c) convergence between self and observer ratings.52 Each personality scale is measured on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 ( strongly agree). Personality is an important determinant of outcome following injury as certain personality types may respond better to specific types of treatment,53 and has implications for the occurrence of PTSD.54
Time frame: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge
Reintegration
Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL) Index: The RNL Index56 covers such areas as involvement in recreational and social activities, perceived ability to move within the community, and the degree of comfort people have with their relationships. It is a valid and reliable tool for assessing participation in various populations.56 Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent higher levels of participation.
Time frame: 3 months post-discharge
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre →