An observational study in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, sponsored by Roberto Tonelli. Active, not recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-25.
Sponsored by Roberto Tonelli · Observational
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a life-threatening lung disease characterized by progressive deterioration of lung function and a median survival time of 3-5 years from diagnosis. The onset of an acute deterioration (AE) of respiratory function, the so called acute exacerbation of IPF (AE-IPF), may lead to severe hypoxemia, further worsening prognosis. During these events, the typical usual interstitial pneumonia pattern (UIP) - the radiologic and histologic hallmark of IPF- is overlapped with diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), sharing similarities with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and often requiring respiratory assistance. Several studies show that the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) is associated with high mortality in IPF patients, probably due to the pathophysiological properties of UIP-like fibrotic lung (i.e. collapse induration areas, elevated lung elastance, high inhomogeneity) that make it more susceptible to ventilatory-induced lung injury (VILI). It has been theorized that the application of PEEP on a UIP-like lung pattern can determine the protrusion of the most distensible areas through a dense anelastic fibrotic tissue circles, causing increased rigidity, worsening compliance, and thus enabling tissue breakdown. In this scenario, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) may therefore represent an alternative option to assist these patients, although no specific recommendations have been made so far. In patients with ARDS, the efficacy of NIV in reducing the patient's inspiratory effort early after its application has been related to a favorable clinical outcome. Indeed, the mitigation of respiratory drive might have resulted in a lower risk for the self-inflicted lung injury (SILI) during spontaneous breathing, whose onset is very likely to worse outcomes of patients undergoing acute respiratory failure (ARF).
To date no data available on the inspiratory effort and the lung mechanics in patients with AE-IPF either during unassisted of assisted spontaneous breathing. Aim of this study was then to compare respiratory mechanics, at baseline and 2-h following NIV application, in AE-IPF and ARDS patients matched for severity.
680 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Fibrosis; 119 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 130 across 229 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Browse Pulmonary Fibrosis studies →This is the only study on the registry with Roberto Tonelli as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients with IPF developing AE consecutively admitted to the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit and the Intensive Care Unit of the University Hospital of Modena over the period August 1st, 2016 to January 1th, 2022 were prospectively considered eligible for enrollment.
previously established diagnosis of IPF; occurring acute exacerbation of IPF as defined by an acute, clinically significant respiratory deterioration characterized by evidence of new widespread alveolar abnormality on chest CT scan (12); age >18 years; presence of ARF with PaO2/FiO2 ratio \<200 mmHg despite HFNC (set with at least 60 L/min and FiO2 higher than 0.6); suitability for a NIV trial according to the attending staff; consent to measure esophageal pressure.
Exclusion Criteria:
Inspiratory effort in IPF patients
Assessment of esophageal pressure swing in IPF patients during acute exacerbation of disease as compared to ARDS
Time frame: On respiratory intensive care unit admission
Respiratory mechanics change after NIV application in IPF patients acute exacerbation
Respiratory mechanics change after NIV application in IPF patients acute exacerbation as compared to ARDS
Time frame: 2 hours
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.