An interventional study of Mandala coloring page in Hemodialysis, sponsored by Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University. Completed at 2 sites in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-25.
Sponsored by Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The aim of this study is to examine the effect of mandala on coping with fatigue, psychological well-being and stress in patients treated with hemodialysis
The Effect of Mandala on Coping with Fatigue, Psychological Well-Being and Stress in Patients Treated with Hemodialysis
1,860 studies on the registry are indexed under Fatigue; 376 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 54 across 1,440 interventional studies indexed under Fatigue.
Browse Fatigue studies →Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Mandala coloring page
Other: Mandala coloring page
Routine maintenance will be applied
Mandala program will be applied three days a week (30 minutes) for 8 weeks.
The fatigue severity scale
The fatigue severity scale is a measurement of fatigue impact on functioning. It is a short, nine-item self-report questionnaire. Its application is very simple and quick.. Read each statement and circle a number from 1 to 7, based on how accurately it reflects your condition. A total score of less than 36 suggests that you may not be suffering from fatigue. A total score of 36 or more suggests that you may need further evaluation by a physician.
Time frame: 1. week
The fatigue severity scale
The fatigue severity scale is a measurement of fatigue impact on functioning. It is a short, nine-item self-report questionnaire. Its application is very simple and quick.. Read each statement and circle a number from 1 to 7, based on how accurately it reflects your condition. A total score of less than 36 suggests that you may not be suffering from fatigue. A total score of 36 or more suggests that you may need further evaluation by a physician.
Time frame: 4. week
The fatigue severity scale
The fatigue severity scale is a measurement of fatigue impact on functioning. It is a short, nine-item self-report questionnaire. Its application is very simple and quick.. Read each statement and circle a number from 1 to 7, based on how accurately it reflects your condition. A total score of less than 36 suggests that you may not be suffering from fatigue. A total score of 36 or more suggests that you may need further evaluation by a physician.
Time frame: 8. week
The psychological well-being scale
The eight-item Psychological Well-Being Scale identifies important elements of human function, from positive relationships to feelings of efficacy to having a meaningful and purposeful life.This is an 8-item selfreported, 7-point Likert-type measurement scale (1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree). Higher scores indicated a higher level of psychological well-being.
Time frame: 1. week
The psychological well-being scale
The eight-item Psychological Well-Being Scale identifies important elements of human function, from positive relationships to feelings of efficacy to having a meaningful and purposeful life.This is an 8-item selfreported, 7-point Likert-type measurement scale (1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree). Higher scores indicated a higher level of psychological well-being.
Time frame: 4. week
The psychological well-being scale
The eight-item Psychological Well-Being Scale identifies important elements of human function, from positive relationships to feelings of efficacy to having a meaningful and purposeful life.This is an 8-item selfreported, 7-point Likert-type measurement scale (1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree). Higher scores indicated a higher level of psychological well-being.
Time frame: 8. week
The Ways of Coping Inventory (WCI)
The Ways of Coping Inventory (WCI) was developed by Folkman and Lazarus (1980) in order to determine the ways by which individuals cope with general or specific stress situations. The scale is a 30-item likert type scale. The answers to the items of the scale are given in four stages, moving from "does not apply or not used" (0) to "used a great deal" Higher scores in "Self-confident", "Optimistic" and "Seeking of social support" (Approach based coping) mean better coping, and higher scores in "Submissive" and "Helpless styles" (Avoidance based coping) mean worse coping.
Time frame: 1. week
The Ways of Coping Inventory (WCI)
The Ways of Coping Inventory (WCI) was developed by Folkman and Lazarus (1980) in order to determine the ways by which individuals cope with general or specific stress situations. The scale is a 30-item likert type scale. The answers to the items of the scale are given in four stages, moving from "does not apply or not used" (0) to "used a great deal" Higher scores in "Self-confident", "Optimistic" and "Seeking of social support" (Approach based coping) mean better coping, and higher scores in "Submissive" and "Helpless styles" (Avoidance based coping) mean worse coping.
Time frame: 4. week
The Ways of Coping Inventory (WCI)
The Ways of Coping Inventory (WCI) was developed by Folkman and Lazarus (1980) in order to determine the ways by which individuals cope with general or specific stress situations. The scale is a 30-item likert type scale. The answers to the items of the scale are given in four stages, moving from "does not apply or not used" (0) to "used a great deal" Higher scores in "Self-confident", "Optimistic" and "Seeking of social support" (Approach based coping) mean better coping, and higher scores in "Submissive" and "Helpless styles" (Avoidance based coping) mean worse coping.
Time frame: 8. week
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University