ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05291975Updated Aug 13, 2025Results posted

Clinical Efficacy and Human Factors Validation Testing of the Erchonia EVRL for Providing Temporary Relief of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Foot Pain

An interventional study of Erchonia® EVRL™ and Placebo Laser in Neuropathy, Diabetic, Neuropathy;Peripheral and Neuropathy, Painful, sponsored by Erchonia Corporation. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-13.

Sponsored by Erchonia Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to determine the effectiveness of the Erchonia® EVRL™, manufactured by Erchonia Corporation (the Company), in providing prescription home use application for temporary relief of diabetic neuropathy foot pain in individuals diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy by a suitably qualified and licensed health professional.

Read the detailed description

Human Factors Validation Testing will initially be conducted to valuate a lay person's ability to understand and apply as applicable the information contained in the EVRL™ Use Device Proper Use Reference Guide, and device packaging and labeling materials to correctly, safely, and successfully activate and operate the EVRL™ to administer the treatment; and to identify any and all use difficulties, problems and errors, including those pertaining to critical tasks and close calls demonstrated by the lay person during device operation, and to subsequently mitigate each identified instance of use error through device and/or materials modification, and to subsequently evaluate the effectiveness of each modification, as applicable

Phase Two will commence following the successful completion of Phase One. Phase Two comprises the performance of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical study of the efficacy of the Erchonia® EVRL™, manufactured by Erchonia Corporation (the Sponsor), for prescription home use application in providing temporary relief of diabetic peripheral neuropathy foot pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuropathy, Diabetic
  • Neuropathy;Peripheral
  • Neuropathy, Painful
03

In context

Diabetic Neuropathies

538 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Neuropathies; 80 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is close to the median of 68 across 448 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Neuropathies.

Browse Diabetic Neuropathies studies →

Lead sponsor

Erchonia Corporation is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Previously diagnosed with diabetes induced peripheral neuropathy by a suitably qualified and licensed health professional within the past 6 months
  • Over the age of 18 years of age
  • Able to read and write English.
  • Constant feet pain on-going over at least the past 3 months.
  • If using analgesics (pain medication), you must be on a stable analgesic regimen (i.e., no changes to the prescribed analgesic regimen) over a period of at least 14 days prior to enrollment; and willing and able to not have planned upward dose titration of analgesics during the study period. You may elect to decrease analgesic use during the study. Cannabis prescribed for medicinal purposes would qualify as an analgesic in this context.
  • Willing and able to refrain from engaging in any non-study procedure therapies for the management of foot pain throughout the course of study participation, including conventional therapies such as physical therapy, occupational therapy and hot or cold packs, as well as alternative therapies such as chiropractic care and acupuncture.
  • Agrees to refrain from taking a dosage of analgesic (pain medication) for at least 6 hours before a scheduled VAS foot pain rating is to be recorded.
  • Subjects' degree of foot pain on the 0-100 VAS, with "0" being no pain and "100" being worst pain imaginable, is 50 or greater.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or think you might be pregnant.
  • Open wounds (sores, cuts, ulcers, etc) around the feet
  • Cancerous growths around the feet
  • Difficulty with hand dexterity sufficient to impact ability to administer treatments with the laser such as from severe arthritis in the hands, Multiple Sclerosis, Cerebral Palsy, Parkinson's Disease, Huntington's Disease, etc.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Erchonia® EVRL™

    The Erchonia® EVRL™ is made up of (1) 635 nanometers red laser diode and (1) 405 nanometers violet laser diode mounted in a portable handheld device.

    Device: Erchonia® EVRL™

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Laser

    The Placebo Laser has the same appearance as the Erchonia® EVRL™ but does not emit any therapeutic light.

    Device: Placebo Laser

Interventions

  • DeviceErchonia® EVRL™

    The Erchonia® EVRL™ is made up of (1) 635 nanometers red laser diode and (1) 405 nanometers violet laser diode mounted in a portable handheld device. The diodes are positioned approximately 3 to 6 inches from the top of the foot. The treatments will be self-administered by the subject at his or her's place of residence, two times per day for 21 days. Each procedure administration lasts 5 minutes per foot, for a total of 10 minutes.

  • DevicePlacebo Laser

    The Placebo Laser has the same appearance as the Erchonia® EVRL™ but does not emit any therapeutic light. The diodes are positioned approximately 3 to 6 inches from the top of the foot. The treatments will be self-administered by the subject at his or her's place of residence, two times per day for 21 days. Each procedure administration lasts 5 minutes per foot, for a total of 10 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With a 30% or Greater Change in Pain Rating on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from baseline to endpoint (6 weeks) measurement is calculated for each subject. Individual subject success is defined as a 30% or greater change in VAS pain scores across the evaluation period. A negative (-) percent change indicates a decrease in pain level and is positive for individual subject success. A lower Visual Analog Scale pain score from baseline to study endpoint represents a better outcome, whereas a higher score from baseline to study endpoint represents a worse outcome. For the primary study outcome, the overall study success is defined as a 35% or greater difference between the proportion (number) of individual successes in each treatment group.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction With Study Outcome

    At treatment endpoint, the subject was asked to rate how satisfied he or she was with any overall change in foot pain attained following the procedure administration phase with the Erchonia EVRL Laser, using the following five-point scale: Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied Not Very Satisfied Not at All Satisfied Results are reported as the number of subjects who reported being 'Very Satisfied' or 'Somewhat Satisfied' with the study outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 weeks

  2. Four Weeks Post Procedure Change in Foot Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

    The VAS is a straight line scale that is marked on one end with a '0' for 'no pain' and at the other end with '100' for 'worse pain imaginable.' A higher score on the VAS indicates a greater level of pain, and a lower score indicates a lower level of pain.A decrease in the VAS pain rating indicates a reduction in foot pain and is positive for study success. An increase in the VAS pain rating indicates a worsening of foot pain and is negative for study success. The mean change in foot pain score recorded on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from baseline to 4 weeks post treatment was calculated for each treatment group.

    Time frame: Baseline and 7 Weeks

07

Results

Posted Aug 13, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneErchonia® EVRL™Placebo Laser
Started3331
Completed3327
Not completed04

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With a 30% or Greater Change in Pain Rating on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from baseline to endpoint (6 weeks) measurement is calculated for each subject. Individual subject success is defined as a 30% or greater change in VAS pain scores across the evaluation period. A negative (-) percent change indicates a decrease in pain level and is positive for individual subject success. A lower Visual Analog Scale pain score from baseline to study endpoint represents a better outcome, whereas a higher score from baseline to study endpoint represents a worse outcome. For the primary study outcome, the overall study success is defined as a 35% or greater difference between the proportion (number) of individual successes in each treatment group.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With a 30% or Greater Change in Pain Rating on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
participantsErchonia® EVRL™Placebo Laser
Number of Participants With a 30% or Greater Change in Pain Rating on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)249
SecondarySatisfaction With Study Outcome

At treatment endpoint, the subject was asked to rate how satisfied he or she was with any overall change in foot pain attained following the procedure administration phase with the Erchonia EVRL Laser, using the following five-point scale: Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied Not Very Satisfied Not at All Satisfied Results are reported as the number of subjects who reported being 'Very Satisfied' or 'Somewhat Satisfied' with the study outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Satisfaction With Study Outcome
participantsErchonia® EVRL™Placebo Laser
Satisfaction With Study Outcome208
SecondaryFour Weeks Post Procedure Change in Foot Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

The VAS is a straight line scale that is marked on one end with a '0' for 'no pain' and at the other end with '100' for 'worse pain imaginable.' A higher score on the VAS indicates a greater level of pain, and a lower score indicates a lower level of pain.A decrease in the VAS pain rating indicates a reduction in foot pain and is positive for study success. An increase in the VAS pain rating indicates a worsening of foot pain and is negative for study success. The mean change in foot pain score recorded on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from baseline to 4 weeks post treatment was calculated for each treatment group.

Time frame:
Baseline and 7 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Four Weeks Post Procedure Change in Foot Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
units on a scaleErchonia® EVRL™Placebo Laser
Four Weeks Post Procedure Change in Foot Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score-34.32 ± 33.61-13.41 ± 28.07

Adverse events

Collected over 7 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Erchonia® EVRL™0/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)
Placebo Laser0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Erchonia® EVRL™Placebo LaserTotal
Mean67.39 ± 8.3564.74 ± 9.0866.10 ± 8.67
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Erchonia® EVRL™Placebo LaserTotal
Female151530
Male181634
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Erchonia® EVRL™Placebo LaserTotal
Caucasian191736
Hispanic8715
African American268
Asian / Pacific Islander112
Other303
Duration Since Onset of Foot Pain
Duration Since Onset of Foot Pain(months)Erchonia® EVRL™Placebo LaserTotal
Mean93.33 ± 89.9479.52 ± 97.6386.64 ± 92.52
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • CiC Foot & Ankle
    Phoenix, Arizona 85028, United States
  • Laser Chiropractic
    West Covina, California 91790, United States
  • Cesar A. Lara M.D. Weight Loss & Wellness
    Dunedin, Florida 34698, United States
  • FRANCO & CO Podiatric Medicine & Surgery
    Miramar, Florida 33025, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2022 to primary completion in Oct 2024, 31 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2025, 9 months after primary completion.

Of 152 interventional studies with no phase under Diabetic Neuropathies, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 28. This study's 31 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 14, 2022
First posted
Mar 23, 2022
StartActual
Feb 17, 2022
Primary completionActual
Oct 16, 2024
CompletionActual
Dec 12, 2024
Results first posted
Aug 13, 2025
Last update
Aug 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05291975
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 23, 2022
Start date
Feb 17, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 16, 2024
Completion
Dec 12, 2024
Results posted
Aug 13, 2025
Last update
Aug 13, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion