CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05289271Updated Jul 29, 2024Results posted

Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Vaxelis™ in Children Previously Vaccinated With Vaxelis™ or Hexyon™ (V419-016)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Vaxelis™ in Vaccines, Combined and Hexavalent Vaccine, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Completed at 13 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 11 Months to 13 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-29.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
168
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
11 Months to 13 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a booster dose of Vaxelis™ (V419) given at \~11 to 13 months of age in healthy participants who were previously vaccinated with a 2-dose primary infant series of either Vaxelis™ or Hexyon™.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vaccines, Combined
  • Hexavalent Vaccine
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,114 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 489 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 362 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
11 Months to 13 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Has received a 2-dose infant primary series of either Vaxelis™ or Hexyon™ at approximately 2 and 4 months of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has known or suspected impaired immunological function
  • Has known or history of functional or anatomic asplenia.
  • Has a known hypersensitivity to any component of the study vaccine.
  • Has a known or suspected blood dyscrasia, leukemia, lymphoma of any type or other malignant neoplasm affecting the hematopoietic and lymphatic system
  • Has a bleeding disorder contraindicating intramuscular vaccination
  • Has a history of Hib, hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, or poliovirus infection
  • Was born to a mother with a known history of hepatitis B infection
  • Had a recent febrile illness (defined as rectal temperature ≥38.1°C [≥100.5°F] or axillary temperature ≥37.8°C [≥100.0°F]) occurring at or within 72 hours prior to receipt of study vaccine
  • Has encephalopathy of unknown etiology, occurring within 7 days following prior vaccination with a pertussis containing vaccine
  • Has an uncontrolled neurologic disorder or uncontrolled epilepsy.
  • Has a health or developmental disorder that, based on the clinical judgment of the investigator, could affect evaluation of the vaccine
  • Has received or is expected to receive an immunosuppressive agent
  • Meets corticosteroid use criteria
  • Has received any licensed, non-live vaccine within 14 days of study vaccine
  • Has received any license live vaccine within 30 days of study vaccine
  • Has received a blood transfusion or blood product within 6 months of study vaccine
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
168 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1: V, V, V

    Participants who received a 2-dose regimen of Vaxelis™ as infants prior to enrollment will receive a Vaxelis™ booster at \~11 months of age.

    Biological: Vaxelis™

  • Experimental
    Group 2: H, H, V

    Participants who received a 2-dose regimen of Hexyon™ as infants prior to enrollment will receive a Vaxelis™ booster at \~11 months of age.

    Biological: Vaxelis™

Interventions

  • BiologicalVaxelis™

    Vaxelis™ 0.5 mL sterile suspension in prefilled syringe for intramuscular administration.

    Also known as: V419

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Solicited Injection-site Adverse Event (AE)

    Solicited injection-site AEs are predefined local (at the injection/administration site) events for which the participant's legally authorized representative was specifically questioned. Participant's legally acceptable representative used a Vaccination Report Card (VRC) to report the following solicited injection-site AEs : swelling, redness (erythema), and pain/tenderness. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: Up to 5 days postvaccination

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Solicited Systemic AE

    Solicited systemic AE are predefined systemic events for which the participant's legally authorized representative was specifically questioned. Participant's legally acceptable representative used a VRC to report the following solicited systemic AEs: vomiting, drowsiness (somnolence), loss of appetite, and irritability. 95% CIs were calculated based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: Up to 5 days postvaccination

  3. Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs

    An unsolicited AE is an AE that was not solicited using a VRC and that is communicated by a participant's legally authorized representative who has signed the informed consent. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. 95% CIs were calculated based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: Up to 15 days postvaccination

  4. Percentage of Participants With a Serious AE (SAE)

    An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongs existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is another important medical event. 95% CIs were calculated based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: Up to 40 days postvaccination

  5. Percentage of Participants With Diphtheria Toxoid Antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL

    Human antibodies to diphtheria toxoid were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for diphtheria antibody of 0.005 IU/mL. The percentage of participants with diphtheria toxoid antibodies ≥0.1 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: 30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)

  6. Percentage of Participants With Tetanus Toxoid Antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL

    Human antibodies to tetanus toxoid were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with a LLOQ for tetanus antibody of 0.01 IU/mL. The percentage of participants with tetanus toxoid antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: 30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)

  7. Percentage of Participants With Pertussis Toxoid (PT) Vaccine Response

    Human antibodies to pertussis toxoid were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with a LLOQ for pertussis antibody of 2.00 EU/mL. The percentage of participants meeting response criteria for PT is based on pre-vaccination level of PT is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: 30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)

  8. Percentage of Participants With Filamentous Hemagglutinin (FHA) Vaccine Response

    Human antibodies to FHA were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with a LLOQ for FHA antibody of 2.00 EU/mL. The percentage of participants meeting response criteria for FHA response will be based on pre-vaccination level of FHA. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: 30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)

  9. Percentage of Participants With Haemophilus Influenzae Type b Polyribosylribitol Phosphate (Hib-PRP) Antibodies ≥1.0 µg/mL

    Human antibodies to Hib-PRP were quantified using the Vacczyme™ Human Anti-Haemophilus influenzae Type b Enzyme Immunoassay Kit. Levels of anti-Hib IgG were quantified by interpolation from a standard curve that has been calibrated to the FDA lot 1983 reference serum. The percentage of participants with Hib-PRP antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: 30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)

  10. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Antibodies ≥10 mIU/mL

    Human antibodies to HBsAg were quantified using an Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECi) assay, with the hepatitis B WHO International reference standard at 10 mIU/mL as a control in every assay, and the LLOQ of the assay is 5 mIU/mL. The percentage of participants with HBsAg antibodies ≥10 milli-international per liter (mIU/mL) one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: 30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)

  11. Percentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 1 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution

    Human antibodies to poliovirus serotype 1 were quantified with a neutralization assay by utilizing Vero cells and wild type poliovirus strain 1 as the challenge virus. The Karber method was used to determine the serum dilution that neutralized 50% of the challenge virus, with results expressed as titers (1:dilution), and the LLOQ was 1:4. dilution. The percentage of participants with poliovirus serotype 1 Nab ≥1:8 dilution one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: 30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)

  12. Percentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 2 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution

    Human antibodies to poliovirus serotype 2 were quantified with a neutralization assay by utilizing Vero cells and wild type poliovirus strain 2 as the challenge virus. The Karber method was used to determine the serum dilution that neutralized 50% of the challenge virus, with results expressed as titers (1:dilution), and the LLOQ was 1:4. dilution. The percentage of participants with poliovirus serotype 2 Nab ≥1:8 dilution one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: 30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)

  13. Percentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 3 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution

    Human antibodies to poliovirus serotype 3 were quantified with a neutralization assay by utilizing Vero cells and wild type poliovirus strain 3 as the challenge virus. The Karber method was used to determine the serum dilution that neutralized 50% of the challenge virus, with results expressed as titers (1:dilution), and the LLOQ was 1:4. dilution. The percentage of participants with poliovirus serotype 3 Nab ≥1:8 dilution one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: 30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Pertactin (PRN) Vaccine Response

    Human antibodies to PRN were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with a LLOQ for PRN of 2.00 EU/mL.The percentage of participants meeting response criteria for PRN was based on pre-vaccination level of PRN. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: 30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Fimbriae 2/3 (FIM 2/3) Vaccine Response

    Human antibodies to FIM 2/3 were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with a LLOQ for pertussis antibody of 2.00 EU/mL. The percentage of participants meeting response criteria for FIM 2/3 was based on pre-vaccination level of FIM 2/3. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

    Time frame: 30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)

07

Results

Posted Sep 6, 2023

Participant flow

Healthy participants approximately 11 to 13 months of age, (≥327 days to ≤396 days inclusive).were enrolled in this study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Started8682
Treated8582
Completed8582
Not completed10
Withdrew: Mistakenly allocated, untreated10

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Solicited Injection-site Adverse Event (AE)

Solicited injection-site AEs are predefined local (at the injection/administration site) events for which the participant's legally authorized representative was specifically questioned. Participant's legally acceptable representative used a Vaccination Report Card (VRC) to report the following solicited injection-site AEs : swelling, redness (erythema), and pain/tenderness. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
Up to 5 days postvaccination
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Solicited Injection-site Adverse Event (AE)
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Injection site erythema52.9 (41.8 to 63.9)50.0 (38.7 to 61.3)
Injection site pain74.1 (63.5 to 83.0)56.1 (44.7 to 67.0)
Injection site swelling52.9 (41.8 to 63.9)40.2 (29.6 to 51.7)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Solicited Systemic AE

Solicited systemic AE are predefined systemic events for which the participant's legally authorized representative was specifically questioned. Participant's legally acceptable representative used a VRC to report the following solicited systemic AEs: vomiting, drowsiness (somnolence), loss of appetite, and irritability. 95% CIs were calculated based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
Up to 5 days postvaccination
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Solicited Systemic AE
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Decreased appetite43.5 (32.8 to 54.7)36.6 (26.2 to 48.0)
Irritability77.6 (67.3 to 86.0)58.5 (47.1 to 69.3)
Somnolence64.7 (53.6 to 74.8)47.6 (36.4 to 58.9)
Vomiting3.5 (0.7 to 10.0)8.5 (3.5 to 16.8)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs

An unsolicited AE is an AE that was not solicited using a VRC and that is communicated by a participant's legally authorized representative who has signed the informed consent. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. 95% CIs were calculated based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
Up to 15 days postvaccination
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs97.6 (91.8 to 99.7)92.7 (84.8 to 97.3)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Serious AE (SAE)

An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongs existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is another important medical event. 95% CIs were calculated based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
Up to 40 days postvaccination
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Serious AE (SAE)
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With a Serious AE (SAE)0.0 (0.0 to 4.2)1.2 (0.0 to 6.6)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Diphtheria Toxoid Antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL

Human antibodies to diphtheria toxoid were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for diphtheria antibody of 0.005 IU/mL. The percentage of participants with diphtheria toxoid antibodies ≥0.1 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Diphtheria Toxoid Antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Diphtheria Toxoid Antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL100.0 (94.8 to 100.0)98.6 (92.7 to 100.0)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Tetanus Toxoid Antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL

Human antibodies to tetanus toxoid were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with a LLOQ for tetanus antibody of 0.01 IU/mL. The percentage of participants with tetanus toxoid antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Tetanus Toxoid Antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Tetanus Toxoid Antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL98.6 (92.2 to 100.0)98.6 (92.7 to 100.0)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Pertussis Toxoid (PT) Vaccine Response

Human antibodies to pertussis toxoid were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with a LLOQ for pertussis antibody of 2.00 EU/mL. The percentage of participants meeting response criteria for PT is based on pre-vaccination level of PT is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Pertussis Toxoid (PT) Vaccine Response
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Pertussis Toxoid (PT) Vaccine Response98.4 (91.6 to 100.0)94.4 (86.2 to 98.4)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Filamentous Hemagglutinin (FHA) Vaccine Response

Human antibodies to FHA were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with a LLOQ for FHA antibody of 2.00 EU/mL. The percentage of participants meeting response criteria for FHA response will be based on pre-vaccination level of FHA. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Filamentous Hemagglutinin (FHA) Vaccine Response
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Filamentous Hemagglutinin (FHA) Vaccine Response98.4 (91.6 to 100.0)90.1 (80.7 to 95.9)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Haemophilus Influenzae Type b Polyribosylribitol Phosphate (Hib-PRP) Antibodies ≥1.0 µg/mL

Human antibodies to Hib-PRP were quantified using the Vacczyme™ Human Anti-Haemophilus influenzae Type b Enzyme Immunoassay Kit. Levels of anti-Hib IgG were quantified by interpolation from a standard curve that has been calibrated to the FDA lot 1983 reference serum. The percentage of participants with Hib-PRP antibodies ≥0.1 IU/mL one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Haemophilus Influenzae Type b Polyribosylribitol Phosphate (Hib-PRP) Antibodies ≥1.0 µg/mL
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Haemophilus Influenzae Type b Polyribosylribitol Phosphate (Hib-PRP) Antibodies ≥1.0 µg/mL89.0 (79.5 to 95.1)90.8 (81.9 to 96.2)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Antibodies ≥10 mIU/mL

Human antibodies to HBsAg were quantified using an Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECi) assay, with the hepatitis B WHO International reference standard at 10 mIU/mL as a control in every assay, and the LLOQ of the assay is 5 mIU/mL. The percentage of participants with HBsAg antibodies ≥10 milli-international per liter (mIU/mL) one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Antibodies ≥10 mIU/mL
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Antibodies ≥10 mIU/mL100.0 (93.6 to 100.0)94.2 (85.8 to 98.4)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 1 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution

Human antibodies to poliovirus serotype 1 were quantified with a neutralization assay by utilizing Vero cells and wild type poliovirus strain 1 as the challenge virus. The Karber method was used to determine the serum dilution that neutralized 50% of the challenge virus, with results expressed as titers (1:dilution), and the LLOQ was 1:4. dilution. The percentage of participants with poliovirus serotype 1 Nab ≥1:8 dilution one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 1 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 1 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution100.0 (94.6 to 100.0)95.7 (87.8 to 99.1)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 2 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution

Human antibodies to poliovirus serotype 2 were quantified with a neutralization assay by utilizing Vero cells and wild type poliovirus strain 2 as the challenge virus. The Karber method was used to determine the serum dilution that neutralized 50% of the challenge virus, with results expressed as titers (1:dilution), and the LLOQ was 1:4. dilution. The percentage of participants with poliovirus serotype 2 Nab ≥1:8 dilution one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 2 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 2 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution100.0 (94.6 to 100.0)100.0 (94.8 to 100.0)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 3 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution

Human antibodies to poliovirus serotype 3 were quantified with a neutralization assay by utilizing Vero cells and wild type poliovirus strain 3 as the challenge virus. The Karber method was used to determine the serum dilution that neutralized 50% of the challenge virus, with results expressed as titers (1:dilution), and the LLOQ was 1:4. dilution. The percentage of participants with poliovirus serotype 3 Nab ≥1:8 dilution one month after Vaxelis™ as the 3rd dose of a vaccination series is presented. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 3 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Poliovirus Serotype 3 Neutralizing Antibodies (Nab) ≥1:8 Dilution97.0 (89.5 to 99.6)100.0 (94.8 to 100.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Pertactin (PRN) Vaccine Response

Human antibodies to PRN were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with a LLOQ for PRN of 2.00 EU/mL.The percentage of participants meeting response criteria for PRN was based on pre-vaccination level of PRN. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Pertactin (PRN) Vaccine Response
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Pertactin (PRN) Vaccine Response92.2 (82.7 to 97.4)22.5 (13.5 to 34.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Fimbriae 2/3 (FIM 2/3) Vaccine Response

Human antibodies to FIM 2/3 were quantified using the Meso Scale Discovery Electrochemiluminescence serological assay based on an established reference standard sample curve with a LLOQ for pertussis antibody of 2.00 EU/mL. The percentage of participants meeting response criteria for FIM 2/3 was based on pre-vaccination level of FIM 2/3. The 95% CIs are based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame:
30 days postvaccination (at ~12 months of age)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Fimbriae 2/3 (FIM 2/3) Vaccine Response
Percentage of participantsGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Percentage of Participants With Fimbriae 2/3 (FIM 2/3) Vaccine Response95.3 (86.9 to 99.0)69.0 (56.9 to 79.5)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs): from vaccination up to 40 days post-vaccination; All-cause mortality (ACM): From allocation up to 40 days post-vaccination. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 1: V, V, V0/86 (0%)0/85 (0%)83/85 (97.6%)
Group 2: H, H, V0/82 (0%)1/82 (1.2%)75/82 (91.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
Gastroenteritis adenovirusInfections and infestations0/851/82
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventGroup 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, V
IrritabilityPsychiatric disorders66/8548/82
Injection site painGeneral disorders63/8546/82
SomnolenceNervous system disorders55/8539/82
Injection site erythemaGeneral disorders45/8541/82
Injection site swellingGeneral disorders45/8533/82
PyrexiaGeneral disorders34/8540/82
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders37/8530/82
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders5/858/82
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/856/82
Injection site indurationGeneral disorders0/856/82

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Days)Group 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, VTotal
Mean348.8 ± 18.8344.7 ± 16.4346.8 ± 17.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, VTotal
Female443377
Male424991
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, VTotal
Hispanic or Latino4560105
Not Hispanic or Latino342155
Unknown or Not Reported718
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group 1: V, V, VGroup 2: H, H, VTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White8582167
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

13 sites
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis Dres. Adelt, Mettlich-Lambrecht und Denneberg ( Site 0053)
    Bramsche, Niedersachsen 49565, Germany
  • Kinderärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis ( Site 0057)
    Wolfsburg, Niedersachsen 38448, Germany
  • Private Practice - Dr. Petri, Kinderarztpraxis ( Site 0056)
    Huerth, Nordrhein-Westfalen 50354, Germany
  • Kinder- und Jugendärzte Hürth-Park ( Site 0054)
    Hürth, Nordrhein-Westfalen 50354, Germany
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis Matthias Donner & Dr. Martin Lüchtrath ( Site 0052)
    Mönchengladbach, Nordrhein-Westfalen 41236, Germany
  • Kinderärzte im Recker Park ( Site 0058)
    Würselen, Nordrhein-Westfalen 52146, Germany
  • A.O.U.C. Policlinico di Bari-Hygiene ( Site 0105)
    Bari, Puglia 70124, Italy
  • A.O.U. Policlinico Paolo Giaccone ( Site 0102)
    Palermo, Sicilia 90127, Italy
  • CHUS - Hospital Clinico Universitario-Servicio de Pediatría ( Site 0001)
    Santiago de Compostela, La Coruna 15706, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz-Pediatria y Enfermedades Infecciosas ( Site 0011)
    Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad De 28046, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur-Pediatrics ( Site 0005)
    Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad De 28938, Spain
  • Hospital Antequera-Pediatrics Unit ( Site 0004)
    Antequera, Malaga 29200, Spain
  • Instituto Hispalense de Pediatria- IHP1 ( Site 0006)
    Seville, Sevilla 41014, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Guerra A, Costantino C, Martinon-Torres F, Westerholt S, Lambeth C, Chen Z, Lumley J, Marcek T, Johnson D, Wilck M. A phase 4, open-label study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib in children previously vaccinated with DTaP2-HBV-IPV-Hib or DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib (V419-016). Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2310900. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2310900. Epub 2024 Feb 8. PubMed 38327239 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 8, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05289271
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 21, 2022
Start date
Mar 25, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2022
Completion
Aug 30, 2022
Results posted
Sep 6, 2023
Last update
Jul 29, 2024

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion