CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05284786Updated Jun 7, 2022

Ultrasonography and Electrophysiology in GBS

An observational study in Guillain-Barre Syndrome, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-07.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2022), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45
Ages
15 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Description of the time course of nerve ultrasonography changes in correlation to nerve conduction studies (NCS) and clinical course.

Read the detailed description

GBS is an acute- or subacute-onset polyradiculoneuropathy that often follows an upper or lower respiratory illness or gastroenteritis by 10 to 14 days. Approximately 70% of patients can identify a preceding illness, although it is often benign and may be minimized or forgotten by the patient.

GBS evolves over days, often beginning with numbness in the lower limbs and weakness in the same distribution. The progression of symptoms, particularly weakness, can be rapid, resulting in quadriplegia within a few days. About 50% of patients develop some degree of facial weakness. Weakness attributed to other cranial nerves includes ocular dysmotility, pupillary changes, and ptosis. Thirty percent of patients with GBS develop respiratory failure from phrenic nerve disease, requiring intubation and ventilation. Autonomic involvement is common in GBS, with the most common manifestations being tachycardia, bradycardia, hypertension and hypotension, gastric hypomotility, and urinary retention.

Evidence-based research supports the use of immunotherapy for GBS; proven therapies are IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange, which have been shown to be equally efficacious in the management of GBS.

At present, no biomarkers exist in the blood, urine, or CSF that confirm the diagnosis of GBS. Most patients with GBS will have an elevated CSF protein, but this laboratory finding may not be present until 3 weeks after the onset of the illness. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) play an important role in support GBS diagnosis and subtype classification. In the first few days of the illness, nerve conduction studies may be normal or only show subtle changes of demyelination, such as prolonged or absent F waves and H reflexes, and patchy changes in distal latencies in patients with AIDP.

More recently, there has been a rise in the use of peripheral nerve ultrasound (US) in the investigation of peripheral neuropathies. Whilst nerve conduction studies (NCS) are helpful at providing information on the function of nerves, US is able to provide information on nerve morphology. The value of nerve ultrasonography (NUS) in immune-mediated polyneuropathies is well described in the previous studies. In post-GBS patients patchy and slight enlargements have been reported. Whereas in acute stage cervical spinal nerve enlargement and hypertrophy of the vagus are probably the most obvious findings. However, only little is known about the course of nerve morphology from onset until clinical recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Guillain-Barre Syndrome
03

In context

Guillain-Barre Syndrome

84 studies on the registry are indexed under Guillain-Barre Syndrome; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 100 across 40 observational studies indexed under Guillain-Barre Syndrome.

Browse Guillain-Barre Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Each patient will be submitted to:

Clinical assessment scales, ultrasonography assessment of peripheral nerves together with nerve conduction study will performed in all patient within first two weeks of symptoms onset, after two weeks of IVIG or plasmapheresis treatment and after 3 months as follow up.

  1. Comprehensive evaluation at admission with medical history and clinical examination by neurologist.
  2. Clinical assessment scales of different variants GBS:

    1. The overall disability sum score (ODSS).
    2. The Guillain-Barré syndrome disability scale (GDS).
  3. Ultra sonographic assessment of peripheral nerves:
  4. Nerve conduction studies: NCS were performed in the corresponding nerves using a standard electro-neurophysiologic device.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients newly diagnosed as Guillain Barre Syndrome using diagnostic criteria for GBS.
  2. Patients from both sex and at any age group with recent onset of GBS.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with other possible causes of peripheral neuropathy, diabetes, renal, metabolic and others
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Devicenerve ultrasonography

    Ultrasonography of different nerves was performed using a high frequency 18 MHz probe (esaote Ultrasound systems). Each nerve was scanned in axial plane, and the cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured at standardized anatomical points, in brief: median nerve in upper arm, elbow, forearm; ulnar nerve in upper arm and forearm; tibial nerve in popliteal and ankle; peroneal nerve in popliteal fossa, sural nerve in the calf and the vagus nerve.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. significance of ultrasonography nerve assessement in follow up of course of the disease

    Uses of ultrasonography as an investigatory tool for assessment of changes occur in the nerves over course of disease. Changes in nerves detected by ultrasonography might be an early marker in GBS and support diagnosis of disease in early phase. Also, there are some characteristic differences in ultra-sonographic nerve changes between GBS and CIDP and as known about 15-20% of cases of CIDP are presented with acute onset similar to GBS making an ultrasound can be used as prognostic tool in identification of cases with acute onset CIDP that presented with similar picture of GBS

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Esposito S, Longo MR. Guillain-Barre syndrome. Autoimmun Rev. 2017 Jan;16(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.09.022. Epub 2016 Sep 23. PubMed 27666816 ↗
  • van den Berg B, Walgaard C, Drenthen J, Fokke C, Jacobs BC, van Doorn PA. Guillain-Barre syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Aug;10(8):469-82. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.121. Epub 2014 Jul 15. PubMed 25023340 ↗
  • Willison HJ, Jacobs BC, van Doorn PA. Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet. 2016 Aug 13;388(10045):717-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00339-1. Epub 2016 Mar 2. PubMed 26948435 ↗
  • Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1990;27 Suppl:S21-4. doi: 10.1002/ana.410270707. PubMed 2194422 ↗
  • Hadden RD, Cornblath DR, Hughes RA, Zielasek J, Hartung HP, Toyka KV, Swan AV. Electrophysiological classification of Guillain-Barre syndrome: clinical associations and outcome. Plasma Exchange/Sandoglobulin Guillain-Barre Syndrome Trial Group. Ann Neurol. 1998 Nov;44(5):780-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.410440512. PubMed 9818934 ↗
  • Uncini A, Kuwabara S. The electrodiagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome subtypes: Where do we stand? Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Dec;129(12):2586-2593. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.09.025. Epub 2018 Oct 28. PubMed 30419502 ↗
  • Rajabally YA, Hiew FL, Winer JB. Influence of timing on electrodiagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the first six weeks: a retrospective study. J Neurol Sci. 2015 Oct 15;357(1-2):143-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.07.018. Epub 2015 Jul 14. PubMed 26194045 ↗
  • Gallardo E, Noto Y, Simon NG. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy: structure meets function in the neuromuscular clinic. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;86(10):1066-74. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309599. Epub 2015 Feb 4. PubMed 25653385 ↗
  • Gallardo E, Sedano MJ, Orizaola P, Sanchez-Juan P, Gonzalez-Suarez A, Garcia A, Teran-Villagra N, Ruiz-Soto M, Alvaro RL, Berciano MT, Lafarga M, Berciano J. Spinal nerve involvement in early Guillain-Barre syndrome: a clinico-electrophysiological, ultrasonographic and pathological study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr;126(4):810-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.06.051. Epub 2014 Aug 21. PubMed 25213352 ↗
  • Kerasnoudis A, Pitarokoili K, Behrendt V, Gold R, Yoon MS. Correlation of nerve ultrasound, electrophysiological, and clinical findings in post Guillain-Barre syndrome. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2013 Sep;18(3):232-40. doi: 10.1111/jns5.12037. PubMed 24028191 ↗
  • Kerasnoudis A, Pitarokoili K, Behrendt V, Gold R, Yoon MS. Nerve ultrasound score in distinguishing chronic from acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Mar;125(3):635-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Sep 23. PubMed 24070674 ↗
  • Scheidl E, Bohm J, Simo M, Bereznai B, Bereczki D, Aranyi Z. Different patterns of nerve enlargement in polyneuropathy subtypes as detected by ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Jun;40(6):1138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.12.020. Epub 2014 Mar 5. PubMed 24613217 ↗
  • Zaidman CM, Al-Lozi M, Pestronk A. Peripheral nerve size in normals and patients with polyneuropathy: an ultrasound study. Muscle Nerve. 2009 Dec;40(6):960-6. doi: 10.1002/mus.21431. PubMed 19697380 ↗
  • Grimm A, Decard BF, Axer H. Ultrasonography of the peripheral nervous system in the early stage of Guillain-Barre syndrome. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2014 Sep;19(3):234-41. doi: 10.1111/jns.12091. PubMed 25418824 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 7, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05284786
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Amr Mohammed Galal (specialist, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 17, 2022
Start date
Jul 1, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 7, 2022

Study contacts

Amr Galal, specialist
Contact
amrgalal866@yahoo.com
01027494997
Mohamed Mustafa, lecturer
Contact
Mma202022@yahoo.com
01002271947

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion