CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05275920BETTER CARE-HFUpdated Oct 9, 2024Results posted

Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce CArdiovascular REcommendations - Heart Failure (BETTER CARE-HF)

An interventional study of Best Practice Alert (BPA) and In-Basket Message in Heart Failure and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, sponsored by NYU Langone Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-09.

Sponsored by NYU Langone Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,211
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce CArdiovascular REcommendations - Heart Failure (BETTER CARE-HF) is a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, three-arm intervention trial that will compare the effectiveness of two targeted clinical decision support (CDS) intervention tools (best practice alert (BPA) and automated in-basket massage) to inform providers when a patient with heart failure and reduce ejection fraction (HFrEF) is not on appropriate medical therapy, as compared to usual care.

Read the detailed description

An estimated 68,000 deaths per year nationwide can be attributed to gaps in care for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with the majority being due to lack of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). Despite proven benefits in randomized trials, class I guideline recommendations, and published clinical performance measures, patients with HFrEF are often not on guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). While successful interventions for improvement in prescription of GDMT have often included multidisciplinary approaches with dedicated staff, the relatively high cost of hiring additional personnel has led to an interest in electronic health record (EHR)-based interventions. Prior studies on EHR-based interventions in this arena have mainly been conducted in the inpatient setting, which is limited to one encounter during acute hospitalization, a setting often complicated by renal dysfunction or hypotension that can limit prescription of MRA. The development and study of outpatient EHR-based alerts for HFrEF GDMT are needed. Two types of outpatient EHR-based interventions include best practice alerts (BPA) and automated in-basket messages. Both of these methods have limited data, with some studies showing benefit and others demonstrating provider fatigue and burnout. To our knowledge, there is no study that has directly compared these different types of EHR-based interventions.

BETTER CARE - HF is a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, three-arm intervention trail that will compare the effectiveness of two targeted CDS intervention tools (BPA and automated in-basket message) as compared to usual care on the primary outcome of MRA prescription at end of study period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Best Practice Alert [BPA]
  • In-Basket message
  • Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists [MRA]
  • guideline-directed medical therapy [GDMT]
  • Clinical decision support
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,211 is above the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

NYU Langone Health is the lead sponsor of 1,391 studies on the registry; 254 are open to participants now.

Of its 227 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 191 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Cardiologist visit
  • Transthoracic echocardiogram with the most recent EF >= 40%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypotension: SBP \< 95
  • Hyperkalemia: most recent K > 5.1, or any K >5.5
  • Renal dysfunction: eGFR \< 30
  • Ventricular assist device
  • Hospice care
  • Cardiac amyloid
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,211 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Best Practice Alert group

    Providers will receive a BPA at the time of visit for patients with HFrEF who are not on MRA (and who do not have contraindication to MRA). This alert will display the patient's current HFrEF therapies, EF, blood pressure, potassium, and glomerular filtration rate. The alert will give access to an outpatient heart failure order set, and also provide links to the most recent guidelines.

    Other: Best Practice Alert (BPA)

  • Experimental
    In-Basket Message group

    Providers will receive a monthly in-basket messages linking to a list of patients who have been seen in the past 2 months or will be seen in the upcoming month with HFrEF who are not on MRA (and who do not have contraindication to MRA). This list will display each patient's current hFrEF therapies, EF, blood pressure, potassium, glomerular filtration rate, date of last visit, and date of next visit. From the list, providers can access the patient's chart, order medications, and document communication with the patient.

    Other: In-Basket Message

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Patients who will receive the current standard practice of care (no BPA or in-basket message)

Interventions

  • OtherBest Practice Alert (BPA)

    A BPA will fire in the EHR reminding care providers of the best practice when prescribing medical therapies for heart failure patients.

  • OtherIn-Basket Message

    An In-Basket message will be sent biweekly to care providers with a reminder of the best practice when prescribing medical therapies for heart failure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Prescribed Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA) During Study

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Prescribed to Beta-blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor, Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB), or Angiotensin Receptor/Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) During Study

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

07

Results

Posted Oct 9, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBest Practice Alert GroupIn-Basket Message GroupControl Group
Started755812644
Completed755812644
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Prescribed Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA) During Study
Time frame:
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Prescribed Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA) During Study
ParticipantsBest Practice Alert GroupIn-Basket Message GroupControl Group
Number of Participants Prescribed Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA) During Study22412775
SecondaryNumber of Participants Prescribed to Beta-blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor, Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB), or Angiotensin Receptor/Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) During Study
Time frame:
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Prescribed to Beta-blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor, Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB), or Angiotensin Receptor/Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) During Study
ParticipantsBest Practice Alert GroupIn-Basket Message GroupControl Group
Number of Participants Prescribed to Beta-blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor, Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB), or Angiotensin Receptor/Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) During Study879485

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 90 days after intervention completion, an average of 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Best Practice Alert Group - Prescribed MRA2/224 (0.9%)0/224 (0%)35/224 (15.6%)
In-Basket Message Group - Prescribed MRA0/127 (0%)0/127 (0%)12/127 (9.4%)
Control Group - Prescribed MRA0/75 (0%)0/75 (0%)8/75 (10.7%)
Best Practice Alert Group - Not Prescribed MRA0/531 (0%)0/531 (0%)37/531 (7%)
In-Basket Message Group - Not Prescribed MRA5/685 (0.7%)0/685 (0%)44/685 (6.4%)
Control Group - Not Prescribed MRA5/569 (0.9%)0/569 (0%)31/569 (5.4%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBest Practice Alert Group - Prescribed MRAIn-Basket Message Group - Prescribed MRAControl Group - Prescribed MRABest Practice Alert Group - Not Prescribed MRAIn-Basket Message Group - Not Prescribed MRAControl Group - Not Prescribed MRA
HyperkalemiaRenal and urinary disorders30/22412/1278/7537/53143/68531/569
Significant HyperkalemiaRenal and urinary disorders12/2248/1273/7514/53115/68512/569
Newly documented adverse reaction/intolerance to MRAGeneral disorders6/2240/1270/750/5311/6850/569

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Best Practice Alert GroupIn-Basket Message GroupControl GroupTotal
Median73.0 (64.0 to 81.0)73.0 (65.0 to 83.0)74.0 (63.0 to 81.0)73.0 (64.0 to 82.0)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Best Practice Alert GroupIn-Basket Message GroupControl GroupTotal
Female220209204633
Male5356034401578
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Best Practice Alert GroupIn-Basket Message GroupControl GroupTotal
Hispanic or Latino1038266251
Not Hispanic or Latino6006685321800
Unknown or Not Reported526246160
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Best Practice Alert GroupIn-Basket Message GroupControl GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native1034
Asian28282783
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander2024
Black or African American785756191
White4905864481524
More than one race757546196
Unknown or Not Reported816662209
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Best Practice Alert GroupIn-Basket Message GroupControl GroupTotal
United States7558126442211
08

Study locations

1 site
  • NYU Langone Health
    New York, New York 10016, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 14, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05275920
Lead sponsor
NYU Langone Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 11, 2022
Start date
Apr 28, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 26, 2022
Completion
Oct 26, 2022
Results posted
Oct 9, 2024
Last update
Oct 9, 2024

Study contacts

Amrita Mukhopadhyay, MD
principal investigator · NYU Langone Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion