CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05275023OCTOPUS-1Updated Apr 25, 2025Results posted

An Efficacy and Safety Study of a Combination of JNJ-73763989, Nucleos(t)Ide Analogs (NA), and a Programmed Cell Death Protein Receptor-1 (PD-1) Inhibitor in Chronic Hepatitis B Participants

A Phase 2 interventional study of JNJ-73763989 and PD-1 inhibitor in Hepatitis B, Chronic, sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Completed at 26 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-25.

Sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
37
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy of the study intervention, based on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels at follow-up (FU) Week 24.

Read the detailed description

JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) is a small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) targeting all hepatitis B virus (HBV) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNAs). The programmed cell death protein receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor aims at preventing the interaction of PD-1 with its ligands. The purpose of this study to determine whether at least one of the combination regimens of JNJ-3989 + PD-1 inhibitor + Nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) is more efficacious than JNJ-3989 + NA treatment. This study will be conducted in 3 periods: screening period, treatment period and follow-up (FU) period. Safety assessments will include adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, clinical safety laboratory tests, electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs, and physical examinations. Total duration of individual participation will be up to 78 weeks (including screening period).

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Hepatitis A

2,709 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis A; 142 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 37 is below the median of 100 across 1,886 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis A.

Browse Hepatitis A studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC is the lead sponsor of 912 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 278 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 131 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must have chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection
  • Participants must have fibroscan liver stiffness measurement less than or equal to (\<=) 9.0 kilopascal (kPa) or a liver biopsy result classified as metavir F0-F2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with evidence of hepatitis A virus infection (hepatitis A antibody immunoglobulin IgM), hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (HCV antibody), hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection (HDV antibody), hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection (hepatitis E antibody IgM), or human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) or human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection (laboratory confirmed) at screening
  • History or evidence of clinical signs or symptoms of hepatic decompensation, including but not limited to portal hypertension, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, esophageal varices
  • Participants with history or signs of cirrhosis or portal hypertension or signs of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or clinically relevant renal abnormalities
  • Participants with personal/familial history/indicative of immune-mediated disease risk
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
37 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 + PD-1 Inhibitor + Nucleos(t)ide analog (NA)

    Participants will receive JNJ-73763989 subcutaneous (SC) injections and single dose of programmed cell death protein receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor as intravenous (IV) infusion. Participants will also receive background treatment with NA (either tenofovir disoproxil, tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\] or entecavir \[ETV\]).

    Drug: JNJ-73763989 · Drug: PD-1 inhibitor · Drug: Tenofovir Disoproxil · Drug: Tenofovir Alafenamide · Drug: Entecavir

  • Experimental
    Arm 2: JNJ-73763989 + PD-1 Inhibitor + NA

    Participants will receive JNJ-73763989 SC injections and multiple doses of PD-1 inhibitor as IV infusion. Participants will also receive background treatment with NA (either tenofovir disoproxil, TAF or ETV).

    Drug: JNJ-73763989 · Drug: PD-1 inhibitor · Drug: Tenofovir Disoproxil · Drug: Tenofovir Alafenamide · Drug: Entecavir

Interventions

  • DrugJNJ-73763989

    JNJ-73763989 will be administered subcutaneously.

    Also known as: JNJ-3989

  • DrugPD-1 inhibitor

    PD-1 inhibitor will be administered as IV infusion.

  • DrugTenofovir Disoproxil

    Tenofovir disoproxil film-coated tablets will be administered orally.

  • DrugTenofovir Alafenamide

    TAF film-coated tablets will be administered orally.

  • DrugEntecavir

    ETV film-coated tablets will be administered orally.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Seroclearance at Follow-up (FU) Week 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved HBsAg seroclearance at FU Week 24 were reported. Seroclearance of HBsAg was defined as a (quantitative) HBsAg level less than (\<) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (0.05 international unit per milliliters \[IU/mL\]).

    Time frame: At FU Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) of Special Interest

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily had a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention was considered to be treatment emergent. AEs of interest were significant AEs that are judged to be of special interest because of clinical importance, known class effects or based on nonclinical signals.

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

  2. Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity

    Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention was considered to be treatment emergent. Severity of AE were graded by using Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) grading scale that ranges from Grade 1 to Grade 5. Grade 1 indicates a mild event, Grade 2 indicates a moderate event, Grade 3 indicates a severe event, Grade 4 indicated a potentially life-threatening event, Grade 5 indicated death.

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

  3. Number of Participants With Immune Related TEAEs

    Number of participants with immune related TEAEs were reported. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/ biological agent under study. Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention was considered to be treatment emergent. Immune-related AEs (irAEs) were alanine aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (ALT/AST) elevations including immune-related hepatic AEs, infusion-related reaction (IRRs) and other irAEs (including gastrointestinal AEs, neurological AEs, pulmonary AEs, renal AEs, endocrinopathies, rash, uveitis and visual complaints, lipase/amylase elevations, and infection), hematological abnormalities and injection site reactions.

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

  4. Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital Signs

    Number of participants with abnormalities in vital signs measurements (including pulse rate: abnormally low: less than or equal to \[\<=\] 45 beats per minute \[bpm\], abnormally high: greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 120 bpm; diastolic blood pressure \[BP\]: abnormally low: \<=50 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\], mild: \>90 to \<100 mmHg, moderate: \>=100 to \<110 mmHg, and severe: \>=110 mmHg; systolic BP: abnormally low: \<=90 mmHg, mild: \>140 to \<160 mmHg, moderate: \>=160 to \<180 mmHg, and severe: \>=180 mmHg) were reported.

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

  5. Number of Participants With Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECGs)

    Number of participants with abnormalities in 12-lead ECGs: heart rate (abnormally low: \<45 beats per minute \[bpm\], abnormally high: greater than or equal \[\>=\] 120 bpm), PR interval (abnormally high: greater than \[\>\] 220 millisecond \[msec\]), QRS interval (abnormally high: \>=120 msec), QTc interval Fridericia (Borderline prolonged QT: 450\< QTc \<=480 msec; Prolonged QT: 480 \< QTc \<=500; Pathologically prolonged QT: QTc \>500) were reported.

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

  6. Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical Examinations

    Number of participants with abnormalities in physical examinations were reported.

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

  7. Percentage of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology

    Percentage of participants with abnormalities in hematology parameters (including basophils/Leukocytes high, erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume high, erythrocytes high and low, lymphocytes/leukocytes high and low, monocytes/leukocytes high and low, neutrophils, segmented+band form high and low, reticulocytes/erythrocytes high and low, basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils/leukocytes high, erythrocyte mean corpuscular hemoglobin low, reticulocytes/erythrocytes high and low, lymphocytes atypical/leukocytes high, lymphocytes atypical high, hematocrit high, monocytes low and high) were reported. Abnormalities with at least 1 participant is included. Low and high categorization depend on investigator's discretion.

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

  8. Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Clinical Chemistry

    Number of participants with abnormalities in clinical chemistry parameters (including C reactive protein high, cystatin C low and high, gamma glutamyl transferase low, high density lipoprotein \[HDL\] cholesterol low and high, indirect bilirubin high, lactate dehydrogenase high, protein high, thyrotropin low and high, free thyroxine high, free triiodothyronine low and high, and urea nitrogen high) were reported. Abnormalities with at least 1 participant is included. Low and high categorization depend on investigator's discretion.

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

  9. Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urinalysis

    Number of participants with abnormalities in clinical laboratory parameters (including specific gravity high and urine hyaline casts high) were reported. Abnormalities with at least 1 participant is included. Low and high categorization depend on investigator's discretion.

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

  10. Change From Baseline in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Levels

    Change from baseline in HBsAg levels were reported. International units per milliliters=IU/mL. End of Study Intervention (EOSI) was the last post-baseline visit in study intervention period. End of study (EOS) was the last visit in the study.

    Time frame: IP: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and End of Study Intervention (EOSI; Week 24); FU Phase: FU Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and EOS (last visit at FU Week 48)

  11. Percentage of Participants With Change in HBsAg Levels Below/Above Different Cut-offs Over Time

    Percentage of participants with change in HBsAg levels below/above different cut-offs (\<0.05 IU/mL, \<1 U/mL, \<10 IU/mL, \<100 IU/mL , \<1000 IU/mL) over time were reported. EOSI was the last post-baseline visit in study intervention period. EOS was the last visit in the study.

    Time frame: IP: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and EOSI (Week 24); FU Phase: FU Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and EOS (last visit at FU Week 48)

  12. Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroclearance

    Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroclearance were reported. Seroclearance of HBsAg was defined as a HBsAg level \<lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (0.05 IU/mL).

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

  13. Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion

    Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroconversion were reported. Seroconversion of HBsAg was defined as having achieved HBsAg seroclearance and appearance of anti-HBs antibodies (baseline anti-HBs antibodies \<LLOQ and a post-baseline assessment \>=LLOQ).

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

  14. Time to Achieve HBsAg Seroclearance

    Time to achieve HBsAg seroclearance was reported. Seroclearance of HBsAg was defined as a (quantitative) HBsAg level \<LLOQ (0.05 IU/mL).

    Time frame: Week 0 up to FU Week 48 (up to Week 72)

  15. Time to Achieve HBsAg Seroconversion

    Time to achieve HBsAg seroconversion were reported. Seroconversion of HBsAg was defined as having achieved HBsAg seroclearance and appearance of anti-HBs antibodies (baseline anti-HBs antibodies \<LLOQ and a post-baseline assessment \>=LLOQ).

    Time frame: Week 0 up to FU Week 48 (up to Week 72)

  16. Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels Over Time

    HBV DNA levels over time were reported. EOSI was the last post-baseline visit in study intervention period. EOS was the last visit in the study.

    Time frame: IP: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and EOSI (Week 24); FU Phase: FU Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and EOS (last visit at FU Week 48)

  17. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus Deoxyribonucleic Acid (HBV DNA) Level Below/Above Different Cut-offs Over Time

    Percentage of participants with HBV DNA level below/above different cut-offs over time were reported. HBV DNA cut offs: \<LLOQ target detected (TD): that is, traces of HBV DNA were detected/found but were too low to be quantified; \<LLOQ target not detected (TND): that is, no traces of HBV DNA were detected/found. EOSI was the last post-baseline visit in study intervention period. EOS was the last visit in the study. The LLOQ for HBV DNA was 20 IU/mL. As indicated in the data table, the sum of percentage values of each sub-categories within the specific timepoints "IP: Week 2" and "FU Phase: Week 4", shows a slight deviation from 100% due to rounding.

    Time frame: IP: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and EOSI (Week 24); FU Phase: FU Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and EOS (last visit at FU Week 48)

  18. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Level Below/Above Different Cut-offs Over Time

    Percentage of participants with HBeAg level below/above different cut-offs over time were reported. HBeAg cut-offs: \<LLOQ (0.11 IU/mL). EOSI was the last post-baseline visit in study intervention period. EOS was the last visit in the study.

    Time frame: IP: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, and EOSI (Week 24); FU Phase: FU Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and EOS (last visit at FU Week 48)

  19. Percentage of Participants With Virologic Breakthrough

    Percentage of participants with virologic breakthrough (confirmed on-treatment HBV DNA increase by \>1 log10 IU/mL from nadir in participants who did not have on-treatment HBV DNA level below LLOQ or a confirmed on-treatment HBV DNA level \>200 IU/mL in participants who had on-treatment HBV DNA level below LLOQ) were reported.

    Time frame: IP: Week 0 to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48

07

Results

Posted Feb 10, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Per protocol amendment 2 (28 Mar 2023), due to difficulties in recruitment, further participants enrollment was stopped. Hence, pharmacokinetic assessments were not performed due to change in planned analysis.

Participant flow

Intervention Phase: Week 0 to Week 24
Participant flow — Intervention Phase: Week 0 to Week 24
MilestoneJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)JNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
Started1819
Completed1819
Not completed00
FU Phase: FU Week 1 to FU Week 48
Participant flow — FU Phase: FU Week 1 to FU Week 48
MilestoneJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)JNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
Started1819
Completed1819
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Seroclearance at Follow-up (FU) Week 24

Percentage of participants who achieved HBsAg seroclearance at FU Week 24 were reported. Seroclearance of HBsAg was defined as a (quantitative) HBsAg level less than (\<) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (0.05 international unit per milliliters \[IU/mL\]).

Time frame:
At FU Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Seroclearance at Follow-up (FU) Week 24
Percentage of participantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Seroclearance at Follow-up (FU) Week 2400
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) of Special Interest

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily had a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention was considered to be treatment emergent. AEs of interest were significant AEs that are judged to be of special interest because of clinical importance, known class effects or based on nonclinical signals.

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) of Special Interest
Percentage of participantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP11.15.3
FU Phase05.3
SecondaryNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Severity

Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention was considered to be treatment emergent. Severity of AE were graded by using Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) grading scale that ranges from Grade 1 to Grade 5. Grade 1 indicates a mild event, Grade 2 indicates a moderate event, Grade 3 indicates a severe event, Grade 4 indicated a potentially life-threatening event, Grade 5 indicated death.

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity
ParticipantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP: Grade 157
IP: Grade 215
IP: Grade 300
IP: Grade 400
IP: Grade 500
FU Phase: Grade 176
FU Phase: Grade 212
FU Phase: Grade 300
FU Phase: Grade 400
FU Phase: Grade 500
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Immune Related TEAEs

Number of participants with immune related TEAEs were reported. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/ biological agent under study. Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention was considered to be treatment emergent. Immune-related AEs (irAEs) were alanine aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (ALT/AST) elevations including immune-related hepatic AEs, infusion-related reaction (IRRs) and other irAEs (including gastrointestinal AEs, neurological AEs, pulmonary AEs, renal AEs, endocrinopathies, rash, uveitis and visual complaints, lipase/amylase elevations, and infection), hematological abnormalities and injection site reactions.

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Immune Related TEAEs
ParticipantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP00
FU Phase01
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital Signs

Number of participants with abnormalities in vital signs measurements (including pulse rate: abnormally low: less than or equal to \[\<=\] 45 beats per minute \[bpm\], abnormally high: greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 120 bpm; diastolic blood pressure \[BP\]: abnormally low: \<=50 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\], mild: \>90 to \<100 mmHg, moderate: \>=100 to \<110 mmHg, and severe: \>=110 mmHg; systolic BP: abnormally low: \<=90 mmHg, mild: \>140 to \<160 mmHg, moderate: \>=160 to \<180 mmHg, and severe: \>=180 mmHg) were reported.

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital Signs
ParticipantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP: Pulse: Abnormally Low00
IP: Pulse: Abnormally High00
IP: Diastolic BP: Abnormally Low00
IP: Diastolic BP: Mild01
IP: Diastolic BP: Moderate01
IP: Diastolic BP: Severe01
IP: Systolic BP: Abnormally low22
IP: Systolic BP: Mild21
IP: Systolic BP: Moderate01
IP: Systolic BP: Severe00
FU Phase: Pulse: Abnormally low00
FU Phase: Pulse: Abnormally high00
FU Phase: Diastolic BP: Abnormally low01
FU Phase: Diastolic BP: Mild11
FU Phase: Diastolic BP: Moderate01
FU Phase: Diastolic BP: Severe00
FU Phase: Systolic BP: Abnormally low00
FU Phase: Systolic BP: Mild22
FU Phase: Systolic BP: Moderate00
FU Phase: Systolic BP: Severe00
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECGs)

Number of participants with abnormalities in 12-lead ECGs: heart rate (abnormally low: \<45 beats per minute \[bpm\], abnormally high: greater than or equal \[\>=\] 120 bpm), PR interval (abnormally high: greater than \[\>\] 220 millisecond \[msec\]), QRS interval (abnormally high: \>=120 msec), QTc interval Fridericia (Borderline prolonged QT: 450\< QTc \<=480 msec; Prolonged QT: 480 \< QTc \<=500; Pathologically prolonged QT: QTc \>500) were reported.

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECGs)
ParticipantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP: Heart rate: Abnormally low00
IP: Heart rate: Abnormally high00
IP: PR interval: Abnormally high10
IP: QRS interval: Abnormally high00
IP: QTc interval: Borderline prolonged QT01
IP: QTc interval: prolonged QT00
IP: QTc interval: Pathologically prolonged QT00
FU Phase: Heart rate: Abnormally low00
FU Phase: Heart rate: Abnormally high00
FU Phase: PR interval: Abnormally high00
FU Phase: QRS interval: Abnormally high00
FU Phase: QTc interval Borderline prolonged QT01
FU Phase: QTc interval: prolonged QT00
FU Phase:QTc interval: Pathologically prolonged QT00
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical Examinations

Number of participants with abnormalities in physical examinations were reported.

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Physical Examinations
ParticipantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP02
FU Phase21
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology

Percentage of participants with abnormalities in hematology parameters (including basophils/Leukocytes high, erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume high, erythrocytes high and low, lymphocytes/leukocytes high and low, monocytes/leukocytes high and low, neutrophils, segmented+band form high and low, reticulocytes/erythrocytes high and low, basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils/leukocytes high, erythrocyte mean corpuscular hemoglobin low, reticulocytes/erythrocytes high and low, lymphocytes atypical/leukocytes high, lymphocytes atypical high, hematocrit high, monocytes low and high) were reported. Abnormalities with at least 1 participant is included. Low and high categorization depend on investigator's discretion.

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology
Percentage of participantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)JNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP: Basophils/Leukocytes: High11.142.1
IP: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume: High16.70
IP: Erythrocytes: Low16.726.3
IP: Erythrocytes: High05.3
IP: Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: Low05.3
IP: Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: High11.15.3
IP: Monocytes/Leukocytes: Low05.3
IP: Monocytes/Leukocytes: High05.3
IP: Neutrophils, Segmented+Band Form: Low22.226.3
IP: Neutrophils, Segmented+Band Form: High11.110.5
IP: Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes: Low010.5
IP: Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes: High010.5
FU Phase: Basophils/Leukocytes: High11.15.3
FU Phase: Eosinophils/Leukocytes: High015.8
FU Phase: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin: Low5.60
FU Phase: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume: High27.815.8
FU Phase: Erythrocyte: Low11.121.1
FU Phase: Erythrocyte: High05.3
FU Phase: Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: Low11.15.3
FU Phase: Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: High22.25.3
FU Phase: Monocytes/Leukocytes: Low010.5
FU Phase: Monocytes/Leukocytes: High5.615.8
FU Phase: Neutrophils, Segmented + Band Form: Low38.931.6
FU Phase: Neutrophils, Segmented + Band Form: High11.10
FU Phase: Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes: Low16.742.1
FU Phase: Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes: High05.3
FU Phase: Lymphocytes Atypical/Leukocytes: High—100
FU Phase: Lymphocytes Atypical: High—100
FU Phase: Hematocrit: High5.60
FU Phase: Monocytes: Low5.610.5
FU Phase: Monocytes: High5.60
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Clinical Chemistry

Number of participants with abnormalities in clinical chemistry parameters (including C reactive protein high, cystatin C low and high, gamma glutamyl transferase low, high density lipoprotein \[HDL\] cholesterol low and high, indirect bilirubin high, lactate dehydrogenase high, protein high, thyrotropin low and high, free thyroxine high, free triiodothyronine low and high, and urea nitrogen high) were reported. Abnormalities with at least 1 participant is included. Low and high categorization depend on investigator's discretion.

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Clinical Chemistry
ParticipantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP: C Reactive Protein: High32
IP: Cystatin C: Low21
IP: Cystatin C: High11
IP: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: Low44
IP: HDL Cholesterol: Low63
IP: HDL Cholesterol: High34
IP: Indirect Bilirubin: High10
IP: Lactate Dehydrogenase: High22
IP: Protein: High10
IP: Thyrotropin: Low20
IP: Thyrotropin: High10
IP: Free Thyroxine: High31
IP: Triiodothyronine, Free: Low01
IP: Triiodothyronine, Free: High54
IP: Urea Nitrogen: High12
FU Phase: C Reactive Protein: High20
FU Phase: Chloride: Low01
FU Phase: Cystatin C: Low10
FU Phase: Cystatin C: High23
FU Phase: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: Low01
FU Phase: HDL Cholesterol: Low62
FU Phase: HDL Cholesterol: High24
FU Phase: Indirect Bilirubin: High10
FU Phase: Lactate Dehydrogenase: High22
FU Phase: Protein: High11
FU Phase: Thyrotropin: Low10
FU Phase: Thyrotropin: High11
FU Phase: Free Thyroxine: Low11
FU Phase: Free Thyroxine: High20
FU Phase: Free Triiodothyronine: High63
FU Phase: Urea Nitrogen: High11
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urinalysis

Number of participants with abnormalities in clinical laboratory parameters (including specific gravity high and urine hyaline casts high) were reported. Abnormalities with at least 1 participant is included. Low and high categorization depend on investigator's discretion.

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urinalysis
ParticipantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP: Specific Gravity: High20
IP: Urine Hyaline Casts: High11
FU Phase: Specific Gravity: High11
FU Phase: Urine Hyaline Casts: High22
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Levels

Change from baseline in HBsAg levels were reported. International units per milliliters=IU/mL. End of Study Intervention (EOSI) was the last post-baseline visit in study intervention period. End of study (EOS) was the last visit in the study.

Time frame:
IP: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and End of Study Intervention (EOSI; Week 24); FU Phase: FU Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and EOS (last visit at FU Week 48)
Reported as:
Mean · log10 IU/mL
Change From Baseline in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Levels
log10 IU/mLJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP: Baseline3.25 ± 0.4723.14 ± 0.542
IP: Week 1-0.19 ± 0.185-0.17 ± 0.135
IP: Week 2-0.26 ± 0.293-0.31 ± 0.330
IP: Week 3-0.34 ± 0.335-0.44 ± 0.405
IP: Week 4-0.40 ± 0.400-0.52 ± 0.525
IP: Week 8-0.80 ± 0.576-0.87 ± 0.695
IP: Week 12-1.32 ± 0.513-1.41 ± 0.687
IP: Week 16-1.77 ± 0.361-1.84 ± 0.548
IP: Week 20-1.97 ± 0.376-2.07 ± 0.549
IP: EOSI (Week 24)-2.01 ± 0.385-2.10 ± 0.563
FU Phase: Week 4-1.93 ± 0.515-1.98 ± 0.590
FU Phase: Week 8-1.99 ± 0.417-2.12 ± 0.613
FU Phase: Week 12-1.93 ± 0.393-1.99 ± 0.574
FU Phase: Week 16-1.85 ± 0.420-2.01 ± 0.648
FU Phase: Week 20-1.77 ± 0.418-2.02 ± 0.584
FU Phase: Week 24-1.70 ± 0.507-1.85 ± 0.616
FU Phase: Week 32-1.64 ± 0.616-1.75 ± 0.606
FU Phase: Week 40-1.38 ± 0.568-1.69 ± 0.904
FU Phase: Week 48-1.23 ± 0.527-1.54 ± 0.929
FU Phase: EOS-1.26 ± 0.530-1.54 ± 0.929
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Change in HBsAg Levels Below/Above Different Cut-offs Over Time

Percentage of participants with change in HBsAg levels below/above different cut-offs (\<0.05 IU/mL, \<1 U/mL, \<10 IU/mL, \<100 IU/mL , \<1000 IU/mL) over time were reported. EOSI was the last post-baseline visit in study intervention period. EOS was the last visit in the study.

Time frame:
IP: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and EOSI (Week 24); FU Phase: FU Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and EOS (last visit at FU Week 48)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Change in HBsAg Levels Below/Above Different Cut-offs Over Time
Percentage of participantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP: Baseline: HBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL00
IP: Baseline: HBsAg <1 IU/mL00
IP: Baseline: HBsAg <10 IU/mL00
IP: Baseline: HBsAg <100 IU/mL00
IP: Baseline: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL38.942.1
IP: Week 1: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
IP: Week 1: HBsAg <1 IU/mL00
IP: Week 1: HBsAg <10 IU/mL00
IP: Week 1: HBsAg <100 IU/mL010.5
IP: Week 1: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL44.457.9
IP: Week 2: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
IP: Week 2: HBsAg <1 IU/mL00
IP: Week 2: HBsAg <10 IU/mL00
IP: Week 2: HBsAg <100 IU/mL5.615.8
IP: Week 2: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL38.963.2
IP: Week 3: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
IP: Week 3: HBsAg <1 IU/mL00
IP: Week 3: HBsAg <10 IU/mL00
IP: Week 3: HBsAg <100 IU/mL11.115.8
IP: Week 3: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL50.063.2
IP: Week 4: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
IP: Week 4: HBsAg <1 IU/mL00
IP: Week 4: HBsAg <10 IU/mL00
IP: Week 4: HBsAg <100 IU/mL11.115.8
IP: Week 4: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL61.173.7
IP: Week 8: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
IP: Week 8: HBsAg <1 IU/mL00
IP: Week 8: HBsAg <10 IU/mL010.5
IP: Week 8: HBsAg <100 IU/mL27.842.1
IP: Week 8: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL66.778.9
IP: Week 12: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
IP: Week 12: HBsAg <1 IU/mL05.3
IP: Week 12: HBsAg <10 IU/mL11.115.8
IP: Week 12: HBsAg <100 IU/mL55.668.4
IP: Week 12: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL100.094.7
IP: Week 16: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
IP: Week 16: HBsAg <1 IU/mL05.3
IP: Week 16: HBsAg <10 IU/mL16.721.1
IP: Week 16: HBsAg <100 IU/mL83.389.5
IP: Week 16: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL100.0100.0
IP: Week 20: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
IP: Week 20: HBsAg <1 IU/mL05.3
IP: Week 20: HBsAg <10 IU/mL22.242.1
IP: Week 20: HBsAg <100 IU/mL83.394.7
IP: Week 20: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL100.0100.0
IP: EOSI (Week 24): HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
IP: EOSI (Week 24): HBsAg <1 IU/mL05.3
IP: EOSI (Week 24): HBsAg <10 IU/mL33.352.6
IP: EOSI (Week 24): HBsAg <100 IU/mL88.994.7
IP: EOSI (Week 24): HBsAg <1000 IU/mL100.0100.0
FU Phase: Week 4: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
FU Phase: Week 4: HBsAg <1 IU/mL00
FU Phase: Week 4: HBsAg <10 IU/mL16.757.1
FU Phase: Week 4: HBsAg <100 IU/mL83.385.7
FU Phase: Week 4: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL100.0100.0
FU Phase: Week 8: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
FU Phase: Week 8: HBsAg <1 IU/mL010.5
FU Phase: Week 8: HBsAg <10 IU/mL33.352.6
FU Phase: Week 8: HBsAg <100 IU/mL88.994.7
FU Phase: Week 8: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL100.0100.0
FU Phase: Week 12: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
FU Phase: Week 12: HBsAg <1 IU/mL00
FU Phase: Week 12: HBsAg <10 IU/mL29.450.0
FU Phase: Week 12: HBsAg <100 IU/mL88.293.8
FU Phase: Week 12: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL100.0100.0
FU Phase: Week 16: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
FU Phase: Week 16: HBsAg <1 IU/mL05.3
FU Phase: Week 16: HBsAg <10 IU/mL22.247.4
FU Phase: Week 16: HBsAg <100 IU/mL83.394.7
FU Phase: Week 16: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL100.0100.0
FU Phase: Week 20: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
FU Phase: Week 20: HBsAg <1 IU/mL00
FU Phase: Week 20: HBsAg <10 IU/mL22.252.9
FU Phase: Week 20: HBsAg <100 IU/mL83.3100.0
FU Phase: Week 20: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL94.4100.0
FU Phase: Week 24: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
FU Phase: Week 24: HBsAg <1 IU/mL00
FU Phase: Week 24: HBsAg <10 IU/mL16.742.1
FU Phase: Week 24: HBsAg <100 IU/mL72.284.2
FU Phase: Week 24: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL88.994.7
FU Phase: Week 32: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL00
FU Phase: Week 32: HBsAg <1 IU/mL5.60
FU Phase: Week 32: HBsAg <10 IU/mL16.726.3
FU Phase: Week 32: HBsAg <100 IU/mL72.278.9
FU Phase: Week 32: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL88.994.7
FU Phase: Week 40: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL05.3
FU Phase: Week 40: HBsAg <1 IU/mL05.3
FU Phase: Week 40: HBsAg <10 IU/mL11.115.8
FU Phase: Week 40: HBsAg <100 IU/mL66.778.9
FU Phase: Week 40: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL88.989.5
FU Phase: Week 48: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL05.3
FU Phase: Week 48: HBsAg <1 IU/mL05.3
FU Phase: Week 48: HBsAg <10 IU/mL11.815.8
FU Phase: Week 48: HBsAg <100 IU/mL64.778.9
FU Phase: Week 48: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL82.489.5
FU Phase: EOS: HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL05.3
FU Phase: EOS: HBsAg <1 IU/mL05.3
FU Phase: EOS: HBsAg <10 IU/mL11.115.8
FU Phase: EOS: HBsAg <100 IU/mL66.778.9
FU Phase: EOS: HBsAg <1000 IU/mL83.389.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroclearance

Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroclearance were reported. Seroclearance of HBsAg was defined as a HBsAg level \<lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (0.05 IU/mL).

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroclearance
Percentage of participantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP00
FU Phase05.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion

Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroconversion were reported. Seroconversion of HBsAg was defined as having achieved HBsAg seroclearance and appearance of anti-HBs antibodies (baseline anti-HBs antibodies \<LLOQ and a post-baseline assessment \>=LLOQ).

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion
Percentage of participantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP Phase00
FU Phase05.6
SecondaryTime to Achieve HBsAg Seroclearance

Time to achieve HBsAg seroclearance was reported. Seroclearance of HBsAg was defined as a (quantitative) HBsAg level \<LLOQ (0.05 IU/mL).

Time frame:
Week 0 up to FU Week 48 (up to Week 72)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to Achieve HBsAg Seroclearance
DaysJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
Time to Achieve HBsAg Seroclearance—NA (450 to NA)
SecondaryTime to Achieve HBsAg Seroconversion

Time to achieve HBsAg seroconversion were reported. Seroconversion of HBsAg was defined as having achieved HBsAg seroclearance and appearance of anti-HBs antibodies (baseline anti-HBs antibodies \<LLOQ and a post-baseline assessment \>=LLOQ).

Time frame:
Week 0 up to FU Week 48 (up to Week 72)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to Achieve HBsAg Seroconversion
DaysJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
Time to Achieve HBsAg Seroconversion—NA (505 to NA)
SecondaryHepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels Over Time

HBV DNA levels over time were reported. EOSI was the last post-baseline visit in study intervention period. EOS was the last visit in the study.

Time frame:
IP: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and EOSI (Week 24); FU Phase: FU Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and EOS (last visit at FU Week 48)
Reported as:
Mean · log10 IU/mL
Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels Over Time
log10 IU/mLJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP: Baseline0.83 ± 0.2200.80 ± 0.200
IP: Week 20.87 ± 0.2600.72 ± 0.109
IP: Week 40.83 ± 0.2200.85 ± 0.228
IP: Week 80.88 ± 0.2390.82 ± 0.216
IP: Week 120.88 ± 0.2390.82 ± 0.216
IP: Week 160.91 ± 0.2440.82 ± 0.216
IP: Week 200.86 ± 0.2310.80 ± 0.200
IP: EOSI (Week 24)0.96 ± 0.2810.77 ± 0.179
FU Phase: Week 40.83 ± 0.2200.90 ± 0.288
FU Phase: Week 80.83 ± 0.2200.80 ± 0.200
FU Phase: Week 120.93 ± 0.2570.91 ± 0.244
FU Phase: Week 160.78 ± 0.1830.85 ± 0.228
FU Phase: Week 200.86 ± 0.2310.90 ± 0.242
FU Phase: Week 240.86 ± 0.2310.87 ± 0.236
FU Phase: Week 320.88 ± 0.2390.75 ± 0.150
FU Phase: Week 400.91 ± 0.2440.85 ± 0.228
FU Phase: Week 480.84 ± 0.2240.82 ± 0.216
FU Phase: EOS0.83 ± 0.2200.82 ± 0.216
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus Deoxyribonucleic Acid (HBV DNA) Level Below/Above Different Cut-offs Over Time

Percentage of participants with HBV DNA level below/above different cut-offs over time were reported. HBV DNA cut offs: \<LLOQ target detected (TD): that is, traces of HBV DNA were detected/found but were too low to be quantified; \<LLOQ target not detected (TND): that is, no traces of HBV DNA were detected/found. EOSI was the last post-baseline visit in study intervention period. EOS was the last visit in the study. The LLOQ for HBV DNA was 20 IU/mL. As indicated in the data table, the sum of percentage values of each sub-categories within the specific timepoints "IP: Week 2" and "FU Phase: Week 4", shows a slight deviation from 100% due to rounding.

Time frame:
IP: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and EOSI (Week 24); FU Phase: FU Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and EOS (last visit at FU Week 48)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus Deoxyribonucleic Acid (HBV DNA) Level Below/Above Different Cut-offs Over Time
Percentage of participantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP: Baseline: HBV DNA < LLOQ TND72.278.9
IP: Baseline: HBV DNA < LLOQ TD27.821.1
IP: Week 2: HBV DNA < LLOQ TND66.794.7
IP: Week 2: HBV DNA < LLOQ TD27.85.3
IP: Week 2: HBV DNA > LLOQ5.60
IP: Week 4: HBV DNA < LLOQ TND72.268.4
IP: Week 4: HBV DNA < LLOQ TD27.831.6
IP: Week 8: HBV DNA < LLOQ TND61.173.7
IP: Week 8: HBV DNA < LLOQ TD38.926.3
IP: Week 12: HBV DNA < LLOQ TND61.173.7
IP: Week 12: HBV DNA < LLOQ TD38.926.3
IP: Week 16: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND55.673.7
IP: Week 16: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD44.426.3
IP: Week 20: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND66.778.9
IP: Week 20: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD33.321.1
IP: EOSI(Week 24): HBV DNA <LLOQ TND50.084.2
IP: EOSI(Week 24): HBV DNA <LLOQ TD38.915.8
IP: EOSI(Week 24): HBV DNA > LLOQ11.10
FU Phase: Week 4: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND72.263.2
FU Phase: Week 4: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD27.831.6
FU Phase: Week 4: HBV DNA > LLOQ05.3
FU Phase: Week 8: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND72.278.9
FU Phase: Week 8: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD27.821.1
FU Phase: Week 12: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND52.955.6
FU Phase: Week 12: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD41.244.4
FU Phase: Week 12: HBV DNA > LLOQ5.90
FU Phase: Week 16: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND83.368.4
FU Phase: Week 16: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD16.731.6
FU Phase: Week 20: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND66.758.8
FU Phase: Week 20: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD33.341.2
FU Phase: Week 24: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND66.763.2
FU Phase: Week 24: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD33.336.8
FU Phase: Week 32: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND61.189.5
FU Phase: Week 32: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD38.910.5
FU Phase: Week 40: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND55.668.4
FU Phase: Week 40: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD44.431.6
FU Phase: Week 48: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND70.673.7
FU Phase: Week 48: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD29.426.3
FU Phase: EOS: HBV DNA <LLOQ TND72.273.7
FU Phase: EOS: HBV DNA <LLOQ TD27.826.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Level Below/Above Different Cut-offs Over Time

Percentage of participants with HBeAg level below/above different cut-offs over time were reported. HBeAg cut-offs: \<LLOQ (0.11 IU/mL). EOSI was the last post-baseline visit in study intervention period. EOS was the last visit in the study.

Time frame:
IP: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, and EOSI (Week 24); FU Phase: FU Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, and EOS (last visit at FU Week 48)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Level Below/Above Different Cut-offs Over Time
Percentage of participantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP: Baseline100.094.7
IP: Week 2—100
IP: Week 4—100.0
IP: Week 8—100.0
IP: Week 12100.0100.0
IP: Week 20—100.0
IP: EOSI (Week 24)100.0100.0
FU Phase: Week 12100.0100.0
FU Phase: Week 16—100.0
FU Phase: Week 24100.0100.0
FU Phase: Week 32—100.0
FU Phase: Week 40100.0—
FU Phase: Week 4894.1100.0
FU Phase: EOS94.4100.0
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Virologic Breakthrough

Percentage of participants with virologic breakthrough (confirmed on-treatment HBV DNA increase by \>1 log10 IU/mL from nadir in participants who did not have on-treatment HBV DNA level below LLOQ or a confirmed on-treatment HBV DNA level \>200 IU/mL in participants who had on-treatment HBV DNA level below LLOQ) were reported.

Time frame:
IP: Week 0 to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Breakthrough
Percentage of participantsJNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
IP00
FU Phase00

Adverse events

Collected over IP: Week 0 up to Week 24; FU Phase: FU Week 1 up to FU Week 48. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
IP: JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NA0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)6/18 (33.3%)
IP: JNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)12/19 (63.2%)
FU: JNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NA0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)8/18 (44.4%)
FU: JNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)8/19 (42.1%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 62
Most frequent other events
EventIP: JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAIP: JNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NAFU: JNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAFU: JNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NA
Covid-19Infections and infestations1/183/191/180/19
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations2/180/190/180/19
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders0/181/190/182/19
HyperthyroidismEndocrine disorders1/180/190/180/19
Abdominal TendernessGastrointestinal disorders0/180/191/180/19
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/180/190/181/19
ToothacheGastrointestinal disorders1/180/190/180/19
FatigueGeneral disorders1/181/190/180/19
Injection Site ErythemaGeneral disorders1/180/190/180/19
Drug HypersensitivityImmune system disorders1/180/190/180/19

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NATotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years181937
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NATotal
Female347
Male151530
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NATotal
Hispanic or Latino055
Not Hispanic or Latino181432
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NATotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian7714
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White111122
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NATotal
CANADA325
FRANCE022
ITALY325
SPAIN257
TAIWAN347
TURKEY639
UNITED KINGDOM112
AgeContinuous
AgeContinuous(years)JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989) + Nivolumab (1 Infusion) + NAJNJ-3989 + Nivolumab (3 Infusions) + NATotal
Mean40.7 ± 7.7547.9 ± 5.0544.4 ± 7.38
08

Study locations

26 sites
  • Toronto General Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
  • Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove
    Hradec Kralove, 500 05, Czechia
  • IKEM
    Prague 4, 140 21, Czechia
  • Hopital Beaujon
    Clichy, 92110, France
  • Hopital Saint Joseph
    Marseille, 13008, France
  • Chu Rennes Hopital Pontchaillou
    Rennes, 35000, France
  • CHRU Nancy Brabois
    Vandoeuvre-les-nancy, 54500, France
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Policlinico Di Milano
    Milano, 20122, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
    Pisa, 56124, Italy
  • Universita degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza' - Umberto I Policlinico di Roma
    Rome, 00161, Italy
  • Hosp Univ Vall D Hebron
    Barcelona, 8035, Spain
  • Hosp. Univ. Pta. de Hierro Majadahonda
    Madrid, 28222, Spain
  • Hosp. Montecelo
    Pontevedra, 36071, Spain
  • Hosp. Gral. Univ. Valencia
    Valencia, 46014, Spain
  • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung Ho Memorial Hospital
    Kaohsiung, 80756, Taiwan
  • E-DA Hospital
    Kaohsiung, 824, Taiwan
  • China Medical University Hospital
    Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
  • Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan
  • Hacettepe University Medical Faculty
    Ankara, 06230, Turkey
  • Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty
    Istanbul, 34098, Turkey
  • Ege University Medical Faculty
    Izmir, 35040, Turkey
  • Kocaeli University Medical Faculty
    Kocaeli, 41001, Turkey
  • Karadeniz Teknik University Medical Faculty
    Trabzon, 61080, Turkey
  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary
    Glasgow, G31 2ER, United Kingdom
  • Kings College Hospital
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
  • Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
    London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 30, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jun 10, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05275023
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 11, 2022
Start date
Jun 30, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 12, 2023
Completion
May 31, 2024
Results posted
Feb 10, 2025
Last update
Apr 25, 2025

Study contacts

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion