An interventional study of The BSM Intervention and Attention Control in Breastfeeding, Exclusive, Pain, Acute and Maternal Distress, sponsored by University of Connecticut. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-28.
Sponsored by University of Connecticut · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Every year, 1 million women cease breastfeeding (BF) before 6 months, the minimum time required for optimal maternal and infant health, development, and well-being. The highest rate of BF cessation occurs within 3 weeks after birth, with 30% of women ceasing BF due to acute breast and nipple pain (BNP). BNP is a complex and understudied biobehavioral phenomenon involving nociceptive signaling that stimulates multiple pain pathways. Women who experience BNP beyond BF initiation report lower BF self-efficacy, a key predictor of BF at 6 months and increased maternal distress symptoms contributing to differences in early BF cessation rates. The investigators developed and tested their 6-week nurse-led and participant-informed, Breastfeeding and Breast and Nipple Pain Self-Management (BSM) intervention guided by the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory. Aligned with the needs and preferences elicited from BF participants, the investigators used a cloud-based platform to deliver BF knowledge and skills and provided support through nurse-led text-based communication to decrease BNP, increase BF self-efficacy, decrease burdensome face-to-face visits, and increase adaptive coping behaviors. Participants in the BSM intervention group reported significantly reduced BNP intensity at 1 and 2 weeks which predicted increased BF self-efficacy and decreased anxiety at 6 weeks. Based on these promising results, the investigators propose to examine the efficacy of the BSM intervention in an R56NR020041 Randomized Control Trial (RCT), Promoting Self-Management of Breast and Nipple Pain Using Technology (PROMPT) for Breastfeeding Women to decrease BNP intensity and interference and increase BF exclusivity. The study will reproduce and extend the pilot findings by exploring in a diverse population of BF participants how participants' pain sensitivity affects BNP. The study will explore the moderating role of BNP, and maternal well-being symptoms of fatigue, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep, pain, pain coping, and maternal self-efficacy, on BF exclusivity. Participants (N = 222) intending to breastfeed will be randomized to the BSM intervention or the attention control group with assessments performed at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Study results will advance knowledge on the BSM intervention, with direct implications for nurse-designed and lead self-management interventions in clinical settings or health care systems.
In response to the critical gap that exists in identifying effective biobehavioral self-management interventions for participants during BF initiation who experience breast and nipple pain (BNP), the investigators developed a patient-informed Breastfeeding and BNP Self-Management (BSM) intervention based on the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory. The investigators propose to test the effectiveness of the BSM intervention on BNP severity, pain interference with daily life, and BF outcomes over time in this R56NR020041 Randomized Control Trial, Promoting Self-Management of Breast and Nipple Pain with Technology (PROMPT) for Breastfeeding Women. Participants (N=222) intending to BF will be randomized either to receive the BSM intervention or be in the attention control group, with assessments performed after birth at the hospital (baseline). After screening and informed consent, participants will be asked to complete study measures, undergo quantitative sensory testing using a standardized protocol, and access a secure electronic survey site via participants' smartphone or study-provided smartphone text links or email before discharge home. During the first week home, all participants will receive bi-weekly texts with links to BSM intervention BF modules or for the attention control group, educational modules on postpartum recovery and infant care. All participants at 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, and 18 weeks will receive a text or email for ongoing assessments of BNP and BF measures of the exclusivity (breast, breast milk, or formula), the number of feedings each day, and how long (days/weeks/months) infants were breastfed (duration). In addition, the study occurs via mobile technology during an acute period of pain when the rate of BF cessation is the highest. At 6- and 24-weeks participants will repeat the study measures and quantitative sensory testing.
The PROMPT study is the first to target self-management for BNP using cloud-based educational modules and user-preferred text-based smartphone intervention during the critical weeks of BF initiation, when support for BF is most desired, face-to-face visits are most burdensome, and places the mother-infant dyads at risk for illness, such as COVID-19. The study will describe how many participants experience BNP from BF initiation to 24 weeks as participants return to work and who may be at risk for chronic pain, which has not been examined. The study also replicates and expands on how the presence of pain sensitivity affects BNP and BF outcomes. The results from this study hold great promise to 1) support a diverse population of BF participants by identifying the risk factors of BNP; 2) target personal interventions for participants experiencing BNP based on unique moderating factors of pain sensitivity, nonpharmacological interventions, BF self-efficacy, pain coping, maternal self-efficacy and maternal well-being (anxiety, depression, stress, and fatigue); and 3) to develop easily accessible strategies for participants BF within clinical settings that allow for large-scale translation in health care systems or public health settings.
Participant Recruitment will begin by active and passive methods successfully used in the pilot study with the addition of prenatal recruitment in the clinical site. Passive methods include (1) advertisements via Facebook pages (Connecticut Breastfeeding Coalition and the School of Nursing Center for the Advancement of Management of Pain (CAMP)) and Instagram ads, targeting participants in Connecticut who intend to BF, (2) flyers posted at clinical partners offices, (3) flyers given by the clinical partners to participants expressing interest in BF during routine prenatal care and referring participants to the peer counselors, research assistants, or lactation consultants team members on the inpatient hospital units, (4) flyers included in discharge educational packets at both recruitment sites, (5) flyers posted in hospital (HH, University of Connecticut Medical Center (UConn Health) common areas.
Active methods include screening the inpatient unit census two to three times per week by the clinical partners for participants who meet inclusion or exclusion criteria. Participants who agree to speak with a member of the research team about the study will be approached. A HIPAA consent will be obtained for the research team to ask initial screening questions via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). REDCap is a secure web application and database storage for creating and managing online data collection with highly customizable data types (including 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21 Part 11, Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA), and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant environments). If eligible, informed consent will be obtained by a member of the research team trained in obtaining informed consent and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
The investigators will recruit participants after birth, with data collection to occur before discharge from the hospital and take approximately 60 minutes. To decrease participant burden, recruitment will begin during the antenatal care so participants may anticipate participating in data collection after delivery. In BSM pilot study, the retention rate was 94% of participants at 6 weeks, and as the primary aim is the effectiveness of the intervention during the first 3 weeks, the sample size calculations account for the possibility of loss-to-follow-up as high as 5% at 3 weeks. Additionally, the investigators anticipate the possibility of a 25% attrition rate at 24 weeks, a level somewhat larger than the 15-20% rate observed in many longitudinal intervention trials.
After informed consent and prior to the start of data collection, participants will be randomized to the BSM intervention or the attention control group and be assigned a unique participant identification number. Participants will be shown how to access the REDCap modules on participants' or a study-provided smartphone. An alternative contact person's information will be requested to reduce the likelihood of attrition. A randomization schedule created in REDCap will ensure that the two groups remain balanced with respect to age, race, BF experience, antenatal plan for BF duration, route of delivery, and intent to return to work. The randomization assignment will be known to data management graduate assistant with experience in clinical trials, intervention monitoring, IRB compliance. The PI will be blinded to the randomization assignment of participants. The graduate assistant will not be involved in data collection but will administer and monitor the interventions and missing data.
After discharge, both groups will receive an encrypted text via REDCap with embedded links from Twilio, a cloud communications platform, and a backup archive feature to secure participant's privacy and confidentiality, from the nurse on the research team. The follow-up measures at 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, and 18 weeks (Figure 4, see research plan) include the participants weekly BNP, pain coping, BF exclusivity, ongoing BF assessment, BF algorithm, and maternal assessment of infant BF behaviors, self-efficacy scales (pain, BF, and maternal), maternal well-being assessments, and perceived well-being scales. The completion of the measures will take about 30 minutes. Weekly meetings will identify any missing data and contact participants to complete the surveys. At 6 and 24 weeks, participants will complete the above measures and quantitative sensory testing at the clinical locations. The completion of the measures will take about 60 minutes.
Intervention Administration. Each group will receive a link to the eight video modules that address a different topic within a 15-minute interval. During the first week, the appropriate link to the first video to the BSM intervention and attention control group will be sent. Intervention fidelity will be addressed using continual assessment of design, training, delivery, receipt, enactment throughout the study duration. Design fidelity is applied through a standardized intervention with scheduled interactive texts, text-based daily BF journals and links to modules. Dr. Lucas will routinely assess the training of the interventionist(s) through simulated scenarios and practice sessions using texting and phone scripts. Evidence of treatment will include participant's response to bi-weekly texts and targeted lactation support based on galactogenesis and lactation milestones. The investigation team will monitor intervention fidelity by using the REDCap feature that allows the study team to view the date, time, length, and the number of times the participant accesses each module and completes the daily BF journal. The Project Manager will coordinate the study team to send participants text and follow-up phone calls at 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, and 18 weeks at a prescheduled time to encourage completion of the modules and for BSM intervention, address any BF concerns. After the first week, phone calls and encrypted text messages, depending on the participant preference, will be made by the research team to encourage BF data completion.
Participant Retention At enrollment, participants will be informed that payment will occur after each data collection point completion and if all data points are completed will receive a study completion bonus. To maintain contact and trust, the participants in both groups will receive monthly text links at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks, to modules highlighting normal infant development and age-appropriate play.
The sample size objective for the study is to recruit N = 222 participants who will be randomly assigned to the BSM or attention control study groups at a 1:1 ratio (111 per group). This objective provides 80 percent power (α =0.05, two-sided) to detect a standardized mean difference (Cohens d) of 0.39 or more between the BSM and attention control groups. It also provides 80 percent power to detect an odds ratio of 2.5 or more in exclusive BF between the two groups, assuming that the exclusive BF rate of the control group will be 10 percent higher than the national population rate in 2017 at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. These calculations account for "loss to follow-up" as high as 5% at 3 weeks and 25% at 24 weeks. The calculations reflect a conservative approach relative to the attrition rate of 6% that occurred at the 6-week time point in the pilot study and the 15-20% rate observed in many longitudinal intervention trials. In the pilot study, repeated measures ANCOVAs (with the baseline value of a measure as the covariate) revealed standardized mean differences larger than d = 0.39 for the main effect of the intervention on BNP intensity (d = 0.45), pain severity (d = 0.60), cumulative pain (d = 0.64), and BF self-efficacy (d = 0.48) cross the 1, 2, and 6 week time points. For BNP interference, the value of d was 0.39 at week 1, but smaller at weeks 2 and 6. Furthermore, the odds of exclusive BF in the intervention group is 2.9 times higher than the control group at 6 weeks, which is also higher than the hypothesized OR = 2.5. Therefore, the investigators are confident that the sample size goal will be sufficiently powered to detect intervention effects on key variables for study aims 1 and 2.
Finally, the sample size estimate does not reflect the investigators' plans to conduct analyses based on repeated measurement of outcome variables at the 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 week time points (due to the dearth of information regarding 24-week outcomes). Generally, the inclusion of data for an outcome variable across additional time points marginally enhances statistical power, especially for testing main and interaction effects of intervention and time.
262 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Feeding; 112 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 250 is above the median of 95 across 210 interventional studies indexed under Breast Feeding.
Browse Breast Feeding studies →University of Connecticut is the lead sponsor of 133 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Please reformat the Eligibility Criteria. The preferred format includes lists of inclusion and exclusion criteria as shown below.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Guided by the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory, the Lucas team developed the Breastfeeding and BNP Self-Management (BSM) intervention. The BSM intervention uses a cloud-based platform, links to educational modules, and daily journaling, to provide women uniform best practice knowledge and skills for BF and BNP self-management. Strategies include guided imagery, therapeutic breathing, mindfulness, relaxation, non-pharmacological interventions that are integrated within the self-management process such as goal-setting, self-monitoring, problem-solving, and social support through texting.
Behavioral: The BSM Intervention
Attention control participants will receive equivalent attention as the BSM group. The fourth-trimester care based on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HEAR HER campaign and infant health information modules will be provided through the REDCap link.
Behavioral: Attention Control
The BSM intervention entailed a daily electronic journal for monitoring BF and BNP with feedings, bi-weekly texting for 6 weeks from a research nurse for informational support and to promote personalized goal-setting and problem-solving, and hyperlinks to eight uniform BNP educational modules (knowledge and skills) and online resources. 1. Fundamentals of BF (FBF), 2. Deep breathing (DB), 3. BNP non-pharmacological strategies (BNPS), 4. Guided imagery (GI), 5. Pain neurophysiology specifically related to BF (PN-BF), 6. Catastrophizing, 7. Stress reactivity, and 8. Common pumping issues and interventions (CPI).
The Attention Control and Intervention groups both receive fourth-trimester care videos. The educational modules are the following: Urgent maternal warning signs, caring for the maternal body after birth; infant care; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and infant health prevention; maternal and infant immunization; infant safety in the home; maternal and infant dietary recommendations; and national and health resources to support BF in the workplace
Visual Analogue Scale for Breast and Nipple Pain Severity
Visual analogue scale (0-100) uses an unlabeled line with scores further to the right indicating higher scores and increased pain
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Scale
The Brief Pain Inventory pain intensity sum score of 4 items (3, 4, 5, and 6). Each item is scored 0-10, the pain intensity sum score ranges from 0-40. The higher the score the worse the pain. A composite score of the average is sometimes reported. Factor analysis verified the two separate factors, pain intensity and interference, found in the previous study. Internal stability (Cronbach alpha) was also examined in this study. Alphas showed good internal consistency, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 for the four pain intensity items.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale
The Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference score is the average sum score of 7 items 9a - 9g. Each item is scored 0-5, with a total score of 0-35. Higher scores mean worse pain. A composite score of the average is sometimes reported. Factor analysis verified the two separate factors, pain intensity and interference, found in the previous study. Internal stability (Cronbach alpha) was also examined in this study. Alphas showed good internal consistency, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 for the seven interference item.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks.
Cumulative Breast and Nipple Pain Scores
Each weekly score uses the visual analogue score of 0-100. Cumulative Breast and Nipple Pain (BNP) is calculated each week as a summed additive score. Participants' cumulative BNP (baseline +1 week, + 2 weeks, + 3 weeks, + 6 weeks, + 9 weeks, + 12 weeks, +18 weeks, 24 weeks, 0 - 900). Higher cumulative scores represent greater BNP severity. Only individuals who remain in the study scores are reported.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Breastfeeding Exclusivity Participation Rate
The number of participants who self-reported breastfeeding exclusivity (providing only breast milk and no formula) their infant.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale
Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale is a 14 item scale with 5-point Likert scale (1-5). Score Range: 14-70, with higher scores (\>50) indicate greater breastfeeding self-efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Anxiety Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 6a
The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 6a is a 6-item Likert Scale (1-5, never - always). Total raw score range from 6-30. Raw scores are converted to a T-score. The T-score of 50 is the population mean and the average for the US population with a standard deviation of 10. The T-score of 60 is indicative of sub-clinical or elevated levels of anxiety. PROMIS Anxiety shows moderate to strong correlations with Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is a 10-item questionnaire with a 0-3 Likert scale and a total score range from 0 to 30. A score of 10 or more may indicate possible depression and a score of 13 or higher may be used to identify women with higher depression levels.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Fatigue Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 6a
The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 6a is a 6-item Likert Scale (1-5, never - always). Total raw score ranges from 6-30. Raw scores are converted to a T-score. The T-score of 50 is the population mean and the average for the US population with a standard deviation of 10. The T-score of 60 is indicative of elevated levels of fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Perceived Stress Scale10 Form V.09/16/13
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a 10-item questionnaire is a 10-item Likert Scale from 0 ("Never") to 4 ("Very Often"). The total scores range from 0-40. To calculate a total PSS score, responses to the four positively stated items (items 4, 5, 7 and 8) first need to be reversed (i.e. 0 =\> 4; 1 =\> 3; 2 =\> 2; 3 =\> 1; 4 =\> 0). Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stress.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Sleep Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 6a
The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 6a is a 6-item Likert Scale (1-5, never - always). Total raw score ranges from 6-30. Raw scores are converted to a T-score. The T-score of 50 is the population mean and the average for the US population with a standard deviation of 10. The T-score of 60 is indicative of increase sleep disturbances.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Recruitment began March 2022 and completed in June 2023. The recruitment sites were two academic medical centers maternity units.
| Milestone | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 122 | 128 |
| Completed | 77 | 97 |
| Not completed | 45 | 31 |
Visual analogue scale (0-100) uses an unlabeled line with scores further to the right indicating higher scores and increased pain
| units on a scale | Attention Control | The BSM Intervention |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 39.43 ± 25.28 | 36.55 ± 25.05 |
| Week 1 | 44.31 ± 25.34 | 36.93 ± 27.61 |
| Week 2 | 33.8 ± 26.26 | 25.68 ± 25.79 |
| Week 3 | 31.42 ± 24.7 | 18.26 ± 21.19 |
| Week 6 | 17.2 ± 22.1 | 8.86 ± 18.49 |
| Week 9 | 12.21 ± 19.19 | 5.86 ± 14.86 |
| Week 12 | 7.96 ± 14.53 | 6.22 ± 14.72 |
| Week 18 | 4.33 ± 11.23 | 7.68 ± 17.52 |
| Week 24 | 6.54 ± 13.75 | 5.75 ± 15.14 |
The Brief Pain Inventory pain intensity sum score of 4 items (3, 4, 5, and 6). Each item is scored 0-10, the pain intensity sum score ranges from 0-40. The higher the score the worse the pain. A composite score of the average is sometimes reported. Factor analysis verified the two separate factors, pain intensity and interference, found in the previous study. Internal stability (Cronbach alpha) was also examined in this study. Alphas showed good internal consistency, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 for the four pain intensity items.
| score on a scale | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 3.88 ± 1.96 | 3.79 ± 2.04 |
| Week 1 | 3.56 ± 2.07 | 3.72 ± 1.81 |
| Week 2 | 2.89 ± 1.92 | 3.24 ± 1.92 |
| Week 3 | 2.52 ± 1.77 | 2.83 ± 1.89 |
| Week 6 | 2.38 ± 1.75 | 2.19 ± 1.56 |
| Week 9 | 2.00 ± 1.52 | 1.93 ± 1.46 |
| Week 12 | 1.64 ± 1.06 | 1.86 ± 1.44 |
| Week 18 | 1.89 ± 1.24 | 1.84 ± 1.42 |
| Week 24 | 1.81 ± 1.33 | 1.76 ± 1.19 |
The Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference score is the average sum score of 7 items 9a - 9g. Each item is scored 0-5, with a total score of 0-35. Higher scores mean worse pain. A composite score of the average is sometimes reported. Factor analysis verified the two separate factors, pain intensity and interference, found in the previous study. Internal stability (Cronbach alpha) was also examined in this study. Alphas showed good internal consistency, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 for the seven interference item.
| score on a scale | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 3.38 ± 2.40 | 3.55 ± 2.54 |
| Week 1 | 2.27 ± 2.34 | 2.46 ± 2.27 |
| Week 2 | 1.92 ± 2.47 | 2.00 ± 2.40 |
| Week 3 | 1.25 ± 2.06 | 1.36 ± 2.02 |
| Week 6 | 1.29 ± 2.42 | 1.11 ± 2.31 |
| Week 9 | 1.09 ± 2.42 | 0.95 ± 2.11 |
| Week 12 | 1.15 ± 2.7 | 0.89 ± 2.01 |
| Week 18 | 1.18 ± 2.60 | 0.63 ± 1.5 |
| Week 24 | 1.11 ± 2.47 | 0.92 ± 2.19 |
Each weekly score uses the visual analogue score of 0-100. Cumulative Breast and Nipple Pain (BNP) is calculated each week as a summed additive score. Participants' cumulative BNP (baseline +1 week, + 2 weeks, + 3 weeks, + 6 weeks, + 9 weeks, + 12 weeks, +18 weeks, 24 weeks, 0 - 900). Higher cumulative scores represent greater BNP severity. Only individuals who remain in the study scores are reported.
| units on a scale | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 36.55 ± 25.05 | 39.43 ± 25.28 |
| 1 Week | 72.47 ± 46.17 | 84.36 ± 45.1 |
| 2 Weeks | 98.57 ± 62.22 | 117.64 ± 63.76 |
| 3 Weeks | 115.63 ± 77.25 | 148.94 ± 80.14 |
| 6 Weeks | 126.59 ± 87.53 | 166.58 ± 92.43 |
| 9 Weeks | 132.32 ± 92.50 | 179.78 ± 104.46 |
| 12 Weeks | 141.54 ± 101.90 | 188.78 ± 111.35 |
| 18 Weeks | 150.85 ± 115.14 | 195.77 ± 114.62 |
| 24 Weeks | 160.37 ± 124.95 | 202.38 ± 122.25 |
The number of participants who self-reported breastfeeding exclusivity (providing only breast milk and no formula) their infant.
| Participants | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline Exclusive Breastfeeding (EBF) | 119 | 118 |
| Week 1 | 67 | 74 |
| Week 2 | 56 | 70 |
| Week 3 | 50 | 57 |
| Week 6 | 48 | 61 |
| Week 9 | 43 | 61 |
| Week 12 | 43 | 58 |
| Week 18 | 37 | 55 |
| Week 24 | 41 | 55 |
Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale is a 14 item scale with 5-point Likert scale (1-5). Score Range: 14-70, with higher scores (\>50) indicate greater breastfeeding self-efficacy.
| score on a scale | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 45.28 ± 13.71 | 45.49 ± 13.01 |
| Week 1 | 51.44 ± 13.48 | 51.26 ± 13.07 |
| Week 2 | 53.24 ± 14.04 | 51.62 ± 14.32 |
| Week 3 | 53.57 ± 14.07 | 51.90 ± 13.50 |
| Week 6 | 54.55 ± 14.84 | 54.10 ± 13.64 |
| Week 9 | 54.94 ± 14.94 | 54.91 ± 14.95 |
| Week 12 | 56.03 ± 14.54 | 55.13 ± 15.31 |
| Week 18 | 57.24 ± 13.43 | 55.80 ± 15.63 |
| Week 24 | 54.31 ± 16.57 | 54.16 ± 16.23 |
The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 6a is a 6-item Likert Scale (1-5, never - always). Total raw score range from 6-30. Raw scores are converted to a T-score. The T-score of 50 is the population mean and the average for the US population with a standard deviation of 10. The T-score of 60 is indicative of sub-clinical or elevated levels of anxiety. PROMIS Anxiety shows moderate to strong correlations with Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety.
| T-score | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 51.56 ± 9.10 | 51.27 ± 8.37 |
| Week 1 | 48.35 ± 8.71 | 49.81 ± 8.72 |
| Week 2 | 47.02 ± 8.29 | 48.36 ± 8.34 |
| Week 3 | 46.31 ± 7.55 | 48.49 ± 8.29 |
| Week 6 | 46.71 ± 7.62 | 46.58 ± 8.09 |
| Week 9 | 46.48 ± 8.31 | 46.54 ± 8.08 |
| Week 12 | 46.50 ± 7.90 | 47.45 ± 8.86 |
| Week 18 | 47.23 ± 8.59 | 47.23 ± 8.99 |
| Week 24 | 47.48 ± 8.79 | 47.63 ± 8.58 |
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is a 10-item questionnaire with a 0-3 Likert scale and a total score range from 0 to 30. A score of 10 or more may indicate possible depression and a score of 13 or higher may be used to identify women with higher depression levels.
| score on a scale | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 5.56 ± 4.62 | 6.03 ± 4.92 |
| Week 1 | 4.56 ± 3.97 | 5.76 ± 4.32 |
| Week 2 | 4.05 ± 3.81 | 4.50 ± 3.84 |
| Week 3 | 3.15 ± 3.36 | 4.34 ± 4.13 |
| Week 6 | 3.45 ± 3.40 | 3.52 ± 3.75 |
| Week 9 | 2.84 ± 3.51 | 3.34 ± 3.75 |
| Week 12 | 3.00 ± 3.22 | 3.61 ± 4.00 |
| Week 18 | 3.42 ± 3.69 | 3.34 ± 3.57 |
| Week 24 | 4.22 ± 4.73 | 3.57 ± 3.91 |
The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 6a is a 6-item Likert Scale (1-5, never - always). Total raw score ranges from 6-30. Raw scores are converted to a T-score. The T-score of 50 is the population mean and the average for the US population with a standard deviation of 10. The T-score of 60 is indicative of elevated levels of fatigue.
| T-score | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 53.99 ± 9.63 | 54.95 ± 9.26 |
| Week 1 | 51.72 ± 10.62 | 54.48 ± 9.32 |
| Week 2 | 50.98 ± 10.25 | 52.26 ± 9.42 |
| Week 3 | 49.84 ± 9.89 | 52.59 ± 8.98 |
| Week 6 | 48.46 ± 10.01 | 50.46 ± 8.92 |
| Week 9 | 47.72 ± 9.56 | 49.81 ± 9.18 |
| Week 12 | 48.86 ± 9.82 | 48.82 ± 9.12 |
| Week 18 | 48.82 ± 9.61 | 49.53 ± 9.24 |
| Week 24 | 50.06 ± 10.03 | 50.24 ± 10.01 |
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a 10-item questionnaire is a 10-item Likert Scale from 0 ("Never") to 4 ("Very Often"). The total scores range from 0-40. To calculate a total PSS score, responses to the four positively stated items (items 4, 5, 7 and 8) first need to be reversed (i.e. 0 =\> 4; 1 =\> 3; 2 =\> 2; 3 =\> 1; 4 =\> 0). Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stress.
| score on a scale | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 12.94 ± 6.66 | 12.93 ± 6.15 |
| Week 1 | 11.52 ± 6.73 | 12.68 ± 6.26 |
| Week 2 | 10.71 ± 6.09 | 11.44 ± 6.30 |
| Week 3 | 9.51 ± 6.04 | 11.60 ± 6.05 |
| Week 6 | 10.33 ± 6.16 | 10.33 ± 6.03 |
| Week 9 | 10.10 ± 6.17 | 9.88 ± 6.17 |
| Week 12 | 10.52 ± 6.38 | 10.22 ± 6.19 |
| Week 18 | 11.15 ± 6.66 | 10.96 ± 6.09 |
| Week 24 | 11.39 ± 7.18 | 11.30 ± 6.70 |
The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 6a is a 6-item Likert Scale (1-5, never - always). Total raw score ranges from 6-30. Raw scores are converted to a T-score. The T-score of 50 is the population mean and the average for the US population with a standard deviation of 10. The T-score of 60 is indicative of increase sleep disturbances.
| T-Score | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 52.35 ± 9.16 | 54.13 ± 9.09 |
| Week 1 | 49.32 ± 7.38 | 50.69 ± 8.45 |
| Week 2 | 48.10 ± 6.96 | 48.91 ± 7.86 |
| Week 3 | 47.44 ± 8.01 | 48.72 ± 8.24 |
| Week 6 | 45.41 ± 7.51 | 47.79 ± 8.27 |
| Week 9 | 45.65 ± 7.05 | 47.01 ± 8.57 |
| Week 12 | 46.10 ± 7.07 | 47.61 ± 8.81 |
| Week 18 | 47.99 ± 6.70 | 48.34 ± 8.66 |
| Week 24 | 48.49 ± 8.81 | 47.70 ± 7.77 |
Collected over Baseline to 24 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| The BSM Intervention | 0/122 (0%) | 39/122 (32%) | 33/122 (27%) |
| Attention Control | 0/128 (0%) | 36/128 (28.1%) | 44/128 (34.4%) |
| Event | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Preclampsia and HypertensionPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | 6/122 | 7/128 |
| Respiratory IllnessRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 3/122 | 7/128 |
| Mastitis and Nipple InfectionsReproductive system and breast disorders | 5/122 | 1/128 |
| Infant IllnessRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 4/122 | 1/128 |
| MusculoskeletalInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 3/122 | 4/128 |
| General illness and infectionsInfections and infestations | 3/122 | 2/128 |
| Postpartum ComplicationsPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | 3/122 | 1/128 |
| Thyroid Evaluation and SurgeryEndocrine disorders | 1/122 | 3/128 |
| Abdominal Pain and HemorrhoidsGastrointestinal disorders | 2/122 | 3/128 |
| Infections and AbscessInfections and infestations | 2/122 | 1/128 |
| Event | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control |
|---|---|---|
| Postnatal DepressionPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | 31/122 | 40/128 |
| Suicide ConsiderationPsychiatric disorders | 9/122 | 14/128 |
The study successfully recruited our target sample size of 222 in May 2023 and recruited an additional 28 women in June 2023, for a total of 250 participants (113%).
| Age, Continuous(years) | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 30.16 ± 4.63 | 30.32 ± 5.19 | 30.24 ± 4.91 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 122 | 128 | 250 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 35 | 36 | 71 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 87 | 92 | 179 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Asian | 5 | 8 | 13 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Black or African American | 29 | 27 | 56 |
| White | 74 | 85 | 159 |
| More than one race | 11 | 5 | 16 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 122 | 128 | 250 |
| Visual Analogue Scale for Breast and Nipple Pain Severity(units on a scale) | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 36.55 ± 25.05 | 39.43 ± 25.28 | 38.03 ± 25.16 |
| Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Intensity Scale(units on a scale) | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 3.88 ± 1.96 | 3.79 ± 2.04 | 3.83 ± 2.00 |
| Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale(units on a scale) | The BSM Intervention | Attention Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 3.38 ± 2.4 | 3.55 ± 2.54 | 3.46 ± 2.47 |
7 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — The final research data will be a computerized dataset consisting of participant data, BF exclusivity, BNP, and pain sensitivity. All data will be shared and published in a de-identified manner and free of identifiers that would permit linkages or variables that may lead to deductive disclosure of the identity of the individual participants. Data generated from the proposed study will be shared with and available to the participating study investigators. We also intend to make results available upon request to the community of scientists interested in BF and BNP.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Connecticut