CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05258994ExCELSUpdated Sep 18, 2023

Early Care and Education Leadership Study: Descriptive Study

An observational study in Leadership in Early Care and Education Centers, sponsored by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-18.

Sponsored by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
1,164
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mathematica and the Institute for Early Education Leadership and Innovation at the University of Massachusetts Boston, conducted a descriptive study within the Early Care and Education Leadership Study (ExCELS). ExCELS is funded by the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation within the Administration for Children and Families in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The goal of the descriptive study is to develop a new measure of early care and education (ECE) leadership that has strong psychometric properties and examines associations among key constructs and outcomes on how ECE leadership could support quality improvements. In early 2022, the study team recruited 132 ECE centers serving children whose ages range from birth to age 5 (but who are not yet in kindergarten) and supported by Head Start grants or Child Care Development Fund subsidies. In spring 2022, the study team conducted phone interviews to collect center characteristics and learn about the center's staffing structure and leadership positions, and distributed surveys to center managers and teaching staff in recruited centers.

Read the detailed description

Leadership is widely recognized as an essential driver of organizational performance and improvement, but little is known about its role in driving the quality of care and education centers provide and outcomes for staff, children, and families. ExCELS seeks to fill the definitional and measurement gaps to help the early childhood field understand how effective leaders can improve quality experiences for children in early care and education (ECE) settings.

The ExCELS descriptive study includes a purposive sample of 132 ECE centers from four states. These selected four states vary on administrator qualifications; quality rating and improvement system (QRIS) participation levels; licensing requirements to reflect the regulatory environment; funding sources (e.g., Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) or Head Start funding) to support access and quality; and geographic diversity. Within each selected state, centers were selected to achieve variability in funding sources, center size, and geography. The study includes ECE centers serving children whose ages range from birth to age 5 (but who are not yet in kindergarten) who receive at least 20 percent of their funding from Head Start grants or CCDF subsidies.

The study team conducted the following activities with the recruited centers:

  1. An engagement interview with the primary site leader (the person in the building who is responsible for oversight of all that happens in the center on a daily basis) to collect center characteristics and confirm center eligibility for the study
  2. A staffing structure and leadership positions interview with the primary site leader to understand the staffing structure and formal leadership positions at the center, and
  3. Surveys of center managers and teaching staff to understand key leadership elements related to the care and education of young children (on who participates in decision-making, their values and beliefs, and what they do to support high quality practices, coordination among staff and with families, having a shared vision, along with efficient operations), the center's culture, climate, and communication (such as collaboration among staff or whether there is a culture of respect, shared growth, and learning), and outcomes for the center and staff (job satisfaction, staff well-being and mental health, and staff retention).
02

Conditions studied

  • Leadership in Early Care and Education Centers

Keywords

  • Leadership
  • Infant-toddler care
  • Early child development
  • Early childhood education
  • Head Start
  • Child care
  • Day care
  • Preschool
  • Child care and early education
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Center-based early care and education settings that receive at least 20 percent of its funding from Head Start or the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) and serve children whose ages range from birth to age 5 (not yet in kindergarten). Data collection included interviews with each center's primary site leader (the person in the building who is responsible for oversight of all that happens in the center on a daily basis) and surveys for select center managers and all teaching staff.

Inclusion criteria

  • Early care and education (ECE) centers serving children whose ages range from birth to age 5, not yet in kindergarten, who are supported by Head Start or Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) subsidies. A center is defined as a specific physical location where ECE is delivered to children whose ages range from birth to age 5 (not yet in kindergarten) with at least two classrooms.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Classrooms operated by public schools
  • Centers offering less than four hours of early childcare education each day
  • Drop-in child care settings
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
1,164 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Job Satisfaction

    Study-developed survey on job commitment (intention to continue to work at center); and satisfaction (enjoy job, make a difference, choose career again)

    Time frame: 5 months

  2. Staff well-being and mental health

    Job stress; four-item scale with response options from strongly disagree to strongly agree with the stronger agreement indicating more job stress (Institute of Behavioral Research. (2005). TCU Survey of Organizational Functioning (TCU SOF). Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research. Available at ibr.tcu.edu.)

    Time frame: 5 months

  3. Staff retention

    Study-developed survey on teaching staff turnover over past 12 months

    Time frame: 5 months

  4. Teaching staff report of family involvement

    Parent involvement measure from Essential 0-5 Survey (Ehrlich, Stacy B., Debra M. Pacchiano, Amanda G. Stein, Maureen R. Wagner, Stuart Luppescu, Sangyoon Park, Elizabeth Frank, Holly Lewandowski, and Christopher Young. "Organizing Early Education for Improvement: Testing a New Survey Tool." Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research and the Ounce of Prevention Fund, 2018.)

    Time frame: 5 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mathematica
    Washington, District of Columbia 20002, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • G. Kirby, A. Douglass, J. Lyskawa, C. Jones, and L. Malone. (2021). Understanding Leadership in Early Care and Education: A literature review. OPRE Report 2021-02. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study team plans to archive a restricted-use data file at the Child and Family Data Archive for secondary analysis by qualified researchers. The study team will implement procedures to ensure that data are prepared in accordance with archive requirements, removing all linkable identifiers and geographic details as well as all open-ended text and verbatim responses from all data files.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05258994
Lead sponsor
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
Collaborators
Department of Health and Human Services, University of Massachusetts, Boston
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 28, 2022
Start date
Mar 4, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2022
Completion
Sep 15, 2023
Last update
Sep 18, 2023

Study contacts

Gretchen Kirby, M.P.P.
study director · Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
Lizabeth Malone, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
Anne Douglass, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Massachusetts, Boston

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion