An observational study in Leadership in Early Care and Education Centers, sponsored by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-18.
Sponsored by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. · Observational
Mathematica and the Institute for Early Education Leadership and Innovation at the University of Massachusetts Boston, conducted a descriptive study within the Early Care and Education Leadership Study (ExCELS). ExCELS is funded by the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation within the Administration for Children and Families in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The goal of the descriptive study is to develop a new measure of early care and education (ECE) leadership that has strong psychometric properties and examines associations among key constructs and outcomes on how ECE leadership could support quality improvements. In early 2022, the study team recruited 132 ECE centers serving children whose ages range from birth to age 5 (but who are not yet in kindergarten) and supported by Head Start grants or Child Care Development Fund subsidies. In spring 2022, the study team conducted phone interviews to collect center characteristics and learn about the center's staffing structure and leadership positions, and distributed surveys to center managers and teaching staff in recruited centers.
Leadership is widely recognized as an essential driver of organizational performance and improvement, but little is known about its role in driving the quality of care and education centers provide and outcomes for staff, children, and families. ExCELS seeks to fill the definitional and measurement gaps to help the early childhood field understand how effective leaders can improve quality experiences for children in early care and education (ECE) settings.
The ExCELS descriptive study includes a purposive sample of 132 ECE centers from four states. These selected four states vary on administrator qualifications; quality rating and improvement system (QRIS) participation levels; licensing requirements to reflect the regulatory environment; funding sources (e.g., Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) or Head Start funding) to support access and quality; and geographic diversity. Within each selected state, centers were selected to achieve variability in funding sources, center size, and geography. The study includes ECE centers serving children whose ages range from birth to age 5 (but who are not yet in kindergarten) who receive at least 20 percent of their funding from Head Start grants or CCDF subsidies.
The study team conducted the following activities with the recruited centers:
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Center-based early care and education settings that receive at least 20 percent of its funding from Head Start or the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) and serve children whose ages range from birth to age 5 (not yet in kindergarten). Data collection included interviews with each center's primary site leader (the person in the building who is responsible for oversight of all that happens in the center on a daily basis) and surveys for select center managers and all teaching staff.
Exclusion Criteria:
Job Satisfaction
Study-developed survey on job commitment (intention to continue to work at center); and satisfaction (enjoy job, make a difference, choose career again)
Time frame: 5 months
Staff well-being and mental health
Job stress; four-item scale with response options from strongly disagree to strongly agree with the stronger agreement indicating more job stress (Institute of Behavioral Research. (2005). TCU Survey of Organizational Functioning (TCU SOF). Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research. Available at ibr.tcu.edu.)
Time frame: 5 months
Staff retention
Study-developed survey on teaching staff turnover over past 12 months
Time frame: 5 months
Teaching staff report of family involvement
Parent involvement measure from Essential 0-5 Survey (Ehrlich, Stacy B., Debra M. Pacchiano, Amanda G. Stein, Maureen R. Wagner, Stuart Luppescu, Sangyoon Park, Elizabeth Frank, Holly Lewandowski, and Christopher Young. "Organizing Early Education for Improvement: Testing a New Survey Tool." Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research and the Ounce of Prevention Fund, 2018.)
Time frame: 5 months
Plan to share: Yes — The study team plans to archive a restricted-use data file at the Child and Family Data Archive for secondary analysis by qualified researchers. The study team will implement procedures to ensure that data are prepared in accordance with archive requirements, removing all linkable identifiers and geographic details as well as all open-ended text and verbatim responses from all data files.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.