CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05250089URGENCE24Updated Aug 11, 2026

Physicians Performance After Night Shifts

An interventional study of Simulation in Performance, sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-11.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Emergency medicine is one of the professional activities integrating a night activity into working time. Concerns about the sleep deprivation that this activity generates have been growing for the past thirty years. However, at present, the pace - duration and repetition - of this activity does not yet seem to be optimized, and therefore continues to be the subject of questions in terms of safety of care and quality of life at work. One of the peculiarities of emergency medicine is that doctors have to work in a crisis situation. A situation is qualified as critical for a patient when his state of health is unstable, and with an evolution which can be rapidly pejorative. Crisis situations are at the heart of the emergency room profession, and due to their potential seriousness for the patients, it must be managed in all circumstances.

To cope with a crisis situation, a doctor needs to be efficient. However, performance calls for two types of skills: technical skills on one hand, and non-technical skills on the other.

This study therefore aims to answer the following question: are the non-technical skills of emergency physicians in the management of a crisis situation affected twenty-four hours after the end of a night shift? The study assesses the performance of emergency physicians via complex simulations at two time frames : 24h after a night shift (the post recovery performance simulation) and another time were the participant did not have night shifts in less than 3 nights (usual performance simulation).

Read the detailed description

The study compare the post-recovery performance (PRP) and the usual performance (UP) of emergency physicians in the management of a critical situation. The PRP corresponds to the performance twenty-four hours after the end of a minimum 12 hours night shift, which corresponds to the usual time when a physician go back to work. The UP is defined as the performance achieved in the absence of night shifts during the three previous nights.

Each participants realises 2 complex simulations, each simulation will focus on a trauma case involving difficult decision-making. Each simulation session lasts approximately thirty minutes. It includes a time to complete the questionnaires necessary for carrying out the study, before and / or after the simulated practice depending on the type of questionnaire, a brief interview on the simulation scenario, and the time for the simulated practice.The simulation environment of the study is as close as possible to a reception room for vital emergencies (SAUV), in order to be as close as possible to the usual professional environment of the participants.

During the simulated practice, a technician manages the progress of the scenario under the supervision of an emergency doctor controlling it. In the room, each participant is accompanied by two trained paramedics, whose roles will depend on the scenarios.

The performance is assessed via the Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale (Ottawa GRS), questionnaires and an electrocardiogram (ECG).

02

Conditions studied

  • Performance

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • emergency
  • night shift
  • efficiency
  • physicians
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • be an emergency doctor with an emergency medicine capacity,
  • work full time in the emergency medicine center of the Toulouse University Hospital
  • on call in at least one of the emergency reception services of the Toulouse University Hospital
  • to have given his non-opposition to participate and his authorization of right to his image and his voice within the framework of the research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-emergency doctor
  • emergency doctor not on call in at least one of the emergency services of the Toulouse University Hospital
  • professional with a declared personal or professional conflict with one of the members of the group
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Emergency physicians

    Each participant will have to carry out two simulation sessions. The first simulation will correspond to the "usual" evaluation, that is to say it will take place on a day that will not be preceded by night duty during the three previous nights. The second simulation will correspond to the assessment twenty-four hours after the end of a call, in the "post-recovery" period. The participant must therefore have performed a night shift the day before the day when the simulation takes place. This call must have a minimum duration of twelve hours on night shifts.

    Other: Simulation

Interventions

  • OtherSimulation

    Each simulation will focus on a trauma case deemed to be complex, that is to say one involving difficult decision-making. Each simulation session lasts approximately thirty minutes. It includes a time to complete the questionnaires necessary for carrying out the study, before and / or after the simulated practice depending on the type of questionnaire, a brief briefing on the simulation scenario, and the time for the simulated practice.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. non-technical efficiency via the Ottawa GRS

    Overall non-technical skill score assessed using the Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale (Ottawa GRS). The Ottawa GRS scale assesses the following five criteria: * leadership skills * situational awareness * communication skills * problem solving * resource management For each of the criteria, a score between 1 and 7 is attributed. The scoring is made as follows: a score of 1 corresponds to a novice performance, a score of 3 corresponds to a performance of a novice with experience in Crisis Resource Management (CRM) and resuscitation, a score of 5 corresponds to the performance of a physician with sufficient experience in CRM and resuscitation to properly manage a crisis situation, finally a score of 7 corresponds to the performance of a physician expert in CRM and resuscitation. An average score of the five scores is taken to obtain an overall proficiency score, also out of 7, which will be used to compare Post Recovery Performance and Usual Performance

    Time frame: 24 hours after a night shift

  2. non-technical efficiency via the Ottawa GRS

    Overall non-technical skill score assessed using the Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale (Ottawa GRS). The Ottawa GRS scale assesses the following five criteria: * leadership skills * situational awareness * communication skills * problem solving * resource management For each of the criteria, a score between 1 and 7 is attributed. The scoring is made as follows: a score of 1 corresponds to a performance judged to be that of a novice, a score of 3 corresponds to a performance of a novice with experience in CRM and resuscitation, a score of 5 corresponds to the performance of a physician with sufficient experience in CRM and resuscitation to properly manage a crisis situation, finally a score of 7 corresponds to the performance of a physician expert in CRM and resuscitation. An average score of the five scores is taken to obtain an overall proficiency score, also out of 7, which will be used to compare Post Recovery Performance and Usual Performance

    Time frame: after a minimum of 3 nights free of night work

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physiologic stress

    Comparison of the psychological stress of emergency physicians during a simulated critical situation, between post-recovery time frame and usual time frame. Physiological stress will be assessed via the measurement of heart rate variability, thanks to the analysis of data from a Holter ECG worn by the participant during each simulated practice (Post Recovery Performance and Usual Performance).

    Time frame: 24 hours after a night shift

  2. Physiologic stress

    Comparison of the psychological stress of emergency physicians during a simulated critical situation, between post-recovery time frame and usual time frame. Physiological stress will be assessed via the measurement of heart rate variability, thanks to the analysis of data from a Holter ECG worn by the participant during each simulated practice (Post Recovery Performance and Usual Performance).

    Time frame: after a minimum of 3 nights free of night work

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05250089
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Toulouse
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 22, 2022
Start date
Jan 16, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 16, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 16, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2026

Study contacts

Charles-Henri HOUZE-CERFON, MD
Contact
houze-cerfon.ch@chu-toulouse.fr
05-61-77-21-47
Charles-Henri HOUZE-CERFON, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Toulouse

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion