ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT05246943Updated Apr 25, 2023

The Correlation of a D-dimer Testing Protocol With Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Colorectal Patients

An observational study in Venous Thromboses, Colorectal Cancer and Diverticular Diseases, sponsored by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-25.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
No participants enrolled.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a D-dimer based protocol to screen for thrombotic events in colorectal surgical patients. This study is unique because of the multistage screening process for DVT's using a standardized D-dimer testing methodology and ultrasound that will take place throughout the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative processes. The data collected from this screening study will help establish the baseline DVT rates in UTMB's colorectal surgical patients before and after surgery. Additionally, the data from this study can help determine if a D-dimer blood test has predictive value in UTMB's colorectal surgical patient population. This study may also provide preliminary evidence for further research regarding the adjustment of D-dimer cutoff values. Specifically for patient subsets such as surgical colorectal patients with a moderate pretest probability and clinical conditions associated with low test specificity

Read the detailed description

This will be a quantitative prospective cohort study conducted at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) Galveston and League City campuses. Candidates include subjects who will have elective colorectal surgery at UTMB. This study looks to enroll 100 subjects who meet inclusion criteria. The subjects will undergo screening for DVT using a lower limb bilateral venous duplex and a plasma D-dimer assay no longer than 10 days before their operation. This data will be used to observe the point prevalence of DVT's in preoperative colorectal subjects prior to having colorectal surgery. On the day of surgery, the subject will have a D-dimer test. After the operation, for next 2 days the subjects will have a daily D-dimer test and a lower limb bilateral venous duplex on the second day only. This data will determine the incidence of DVT's that were detected by lower limb bilateral venous duplex on inpatient stay day 2 and possibly indicated by an upward trending D-dimer value during the first 2 days of the inpatient stay. Approximately 2 weeks after surgery, at the postoperative clinic appointment, the subject will have a D-dimer assay and a lower limb bilateral venous duplex. This information will be used to determine the number of DVT events in postoperative colorectal hospitalized subjects that were on the D-dimer monitoring protocol. The D-dimer assay detects the presence of fibrin degradation products, which may indicate a fibrin blood clot in the body.6 A maximum of 5 milliliters of blood will be collected for each D-dimer test. If a DVT is detected by the gold standard method which is a bilateral lower limb duplex during any point of study, the subject will be treated as per standard of care at UTMB by the colorectal surgical team

02

Conditions studied

  • Venous Thromboses
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Diverticular Diseases
  • Crohn Disease
  • Ulcerative Colitis
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis

Keywords

  • D-dimer
  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Thrombosis
  • DVT
03

In context

Venous Thrombosis

785 studies on the registry are indexed under Venous Thrombosis; 110 are open to participants now.

Browse Venous Thrombosis studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston is the lead sponsor of 257 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 26 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This will be a quantitative prospective cohort study conducted at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) Galveston and League City campuses. Candidates include subjects who will have elective colorectal surgery at UTMB.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Colorectal cancer requiring surgical intervention-elective

    a)Benign or Malignant

  2. Inflammatory colorectal conditions requiring surgical intervention-elective

    1. Diverticulitis
    2. Ulcerative Colitis
    3. Crohn's Disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Emergency procedures
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • UTMB's Colorectal Surgical Cohort

    Subjects who meet the inclusion criteria that will have colorectal surgery at UTMB

    Diagnostic Test: D-dimer and lower limb venous duplex

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testD-dimer and lower limb venous duplex

    D-dimer blood test- The D-dimer assay detects the presence of fibrin degradation products, which can indicate the breakdown of a fibrin clot Lower Limb Venous Duplex- Using an ultrasound to visually look for a clot

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Observe the point prevalence of DVT's in preoperative colorectal patients at UTMB prior to having colorectal surgery.

    The data will be used to discover the prevalence of DVT prior to surgery and to establish DVT baseline rates at UTMB.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Determine the incidence of postoperative DVT that occurred during the first 2 days of the inpatient stay that was discovered by a lower limb venous duplex

    Subjects will have a venous duplex on day two after surgery to look for a DVT

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Compare the number of DVT events in postoperative hospitalized patients that were on the D-dimer monitoring protocol.

    The data will be used to determine the number of DVT's that were discovered in the subject population and to establish baseline rates of DVT after surgery and hospital discharge

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Determine if there is a statistical difference between the D-dimer value of patients with DVT prior to surgery compared to patients who develop DVT after surgery

    This data will be used to compare the D-dimer values in subjects that had DVT prior to surgery to those who developed a postoperative DVT while inpatient or at the postoperative clinic appointment

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Compare the D-dimer results of DVT positive subjects to DVT negative subjects to identify a specific result range seen in the DVT positive subjects.

    These results will be used as preliminary evidence for future research to determine if revised D-dimer cut off values can be diagnostic in conditions known to have low test specificity

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Garg R, Mohammed A, Singh A, Regueiro M, Click B. Trends and Outcomes of Acute Diverticulitis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Propensity-matched National Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022 Jan 5;28(1):48-53. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izab017. PubMed 33528011 ↗
  • Colorectal Writing Group for Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program-Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network (SCOAP-CERTAIN) Collaborative; Nelson DW, Simianu VV, Bastawrous AL, Billingham RP, Fichera A, Florence MG, Johnson EK, Johnson MG, Thirlby RC, Flum DR, Steele SR. Thromboembolic Complications and Prophylaxis Patterns in Colorectal Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2015 Aug;150(8):712-20. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1057. PubMed 26060977 ↗
  • Rees PA, Clouston HW, Duff S, Kirwan CC. Colorectal cancer and thrombosis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jan;33(1):105-108. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2909-2. Epub 2017 Nov 10. PubMed 29127473 ↗
  • Stender MT, Frokjaer JB, Larsen TB, Lundbye-Christensen S, Thorlacius-Ussing O. Preoperative plasma D-dimer is a predictor of postoperative deep venous thrombosis in colorectal cancer patients: a clinical, prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Mar;52(3):446-51. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318197e2b2. PubMed 19333044 ↗
  • Buchberg B, Masoomi H, Lusby K, Choi J, Barleben A, Magno C, Lane J, Nguyen N, Mills S, Stamos MJ. Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery: does laparoscopy impart an advantage? Arch Surg. 2011 Jun;146(6):739-43. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.127. PubMed 21690452 ↗
  • Johnson ED, Schell JC, Rodgers GM. The D-dimer assay. Am J Hematol. 2019 Jul;94(7):833-839. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25482. Epub 2019 Apr 19. PubMed 30945756 ↗
  • Weitz JI, Fredenburgh JC, Eikelboom JW. A Test in Context: D-Dimer. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 7;70(19):2411-2420. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.024. PubMed 29096812 ↗
  • Tassiopoulos AK, Mofakham S, Rubano JA, Labropoulos N, Bannazadeh M, Drakos P, Volteas P, Cleri NA, Alkadaa LN, Asencio AA, Oganov A, Hou W, Rutigliano DN, Singer AJ, Vosswinkel J, Talamini M, Mikell CB, Kaushansky K. D-Dimer-Driven Anticoagulation Reduces Mortality in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Cohort Study With a Propensity-Matched Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 4;8:631335. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.631335. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33634153 ↗
  • Jiang Y, Li J, Liu Y, Zhang W. Diagnostic accuracy of deep vein thrombosis is increased by analysis using combined optimal cut-off values of postoperative plasma D-dimer levels. Exp Ther Med. 2016 May;11(5):1716-1720. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3125. Epub 2016 Mar 2. PubMed 27168793 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for May 2022.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 8, 2022
First posted
Feb 18, 2022
StartEst.
May 25, 2022
Primary completionActual
Nov 4, 2022
CompletionActual
Nov 4, 2022
Last update
Apr 25, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05246943
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 18, 2022
Start date
May 25, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 4, 2022
Completion
Nov 4, 2022
Last update
Apr 25, 2023

Study contacts

Uma Phatak, MD
principal investigator · University of Texas

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion