CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05233787GRECCAR17Updated May 16, 2024

Trial Evaluating the Tailored Versus the Systematic Use of Defunctioning Stoma After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer (GRECCAR17)

An interventional study of Tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME and Systematic use of defunctioning stoma in Rectal Cancer and Ileostomy; Functional Disturbance, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Recruiting at 28 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-16.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2022; still recruiting 4 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
212
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

GRECCAR 17 will be the first prospective and randomized trial to assess a tailored policy in the use of defunctioning stoma after TME according to the personalized risk of anastomotic leakage. The tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME for rectal cancer should improve both the quality of life of patients and the anorectal function, without any impact on anastomotic leakage. Moreover, for the healthcare system, this new approach could be a cost-effective strategy, leading to a decrease in healthcare expenses.

The main objective is to compare the impact of tailored defunctioning stoma after TME for rectal cancer versus the systematic use of defunctioning stoma on the evolution of the specific Quality Of Life (QLQC30) during the 12 months after surgery.

Read the detailed description

The introduction of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) as the surgical procedure of choice for low and mid rectal cancer has led to decrease local recurrence and improved oncological results. Postoperative morbidity remains a major issue, and the most feared complication is anastomotic leakage. The systematic use of a defunctioning stoma during 3 months to protect low colorectal anastomosis (below than 7 cm from the anal verge) is the standard of practice after TME surgery in order to decrease risks of anastomotic leakage and urgent re-operations.

However, there have been a lot of controversies surrounding the role of defunctioning stoma mainly due to stoma-related complications, ranked from 20% to 60%, which may lead to prolonged inpatient care, urgent re-operation and devastating effects on quality of life (QOL) and healthcare expenses. Moreover, it has been reported that patients either without defunctioning stoma, or with early stoma closure (days 8-12 after TME) have a better functional outcomes than patients with systematic defunctioning stoma for 3 months.

The experimental arm (arm A) will benefit from a tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME based on a 2-step process: i) to perform or not a defunctioning stoma according to the personalized risk of anastomotic leakage (defunctioning stoma only if Anastomotic Failure Observed Risk Score=[2-6]), ii) to perform an early stoma closure at day 8-12, according to clinical (fever), biological (CRP level days 2 and 4 postoperatively) and radiological postoperative assessment (CT-scan with colonic contrast retrograde enema day 7-8 postoperatively). The control arm (arm B) will benefit from systematic use of defunctioning stoma for 2-3 months after TME, according to French national and international guidelines.

Patients will be followed at 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after surgery, with chest, abdominal and pelvic scan and tumour markers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer
  • Ileostomy; Functional Disturbance

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Rectal Cancer
  • Defunctioning stoma
  • Quality of life
  • Pelvic sepsis
  • Functional outcomes
03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

1,762 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 518 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 212 is above the median of 65 across 1,298 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-80 years;
  • Rectal adenocarcinoma (histologically proven)
  • No metastasis or medical history of colorectal metastasis (M0)
  • Patients with rectal cancer \< 12 cm from the anal verge (determined by rectal examination or MRI)
  • Patients operated on by mini-invasive TME (laparoscopic, robotic or TaTME);
  • With or without neo adjuvant treatment
  • Realize a stapling anastomosis \< 7 cm from the anal verge (determined by rectal examination or MRI)
  • Patients with expected defunctioning ileostomy
  • Appropriate hematologic function: hemoglobin ≥ 10.5 g/dL, leukocytes > 4000/mm3, blood platelets > 100,000/mm3);
  • Appropriate renal function (serum creatinine \< 15 mg/dL);
  • Effective contraception of childbearing age : Male patients and premenopausal women should agree to use two medically validated contraceptive methods (one for the patient et one for the partner) during the study
  • Patient affiliated or beneficiary to a health security system;
  • Patient and doctor have signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with rectal cancer requiring TME surgery with handsewn anastomosis;
  • Patients operated on by open approach;
  • Previous pelvic irradiation for reasons other than rectal cancer
  • Concomitant cancer or medical history of cancer within 5 years other than cancers treated in situ (cervical carcinoma or basocellular carcinoma or spinocellular carcinoma)
  • Patients with expected defunctioning colostomy;
  • Patients with perforated rectal cancer or preoperative pelvic sepsis;
  • Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and/or bowel obstruction,
  • Patients operated on in emergency;
  • Patients with poor nutrition (Albumin \< 34 g/L, pre-Alb \< 0.14 g/L)
  • Patients with extended-TME or pelvic exenteration (prostate);
  • Patients with history of heart or vascular ischemia;
  • Severe heart disease or congestive heart disease;
  • Patients with immunodeficiency and/or under corticotherapy;
  • Severe lung disease or respiratory failure;
  • Severe kidney disease;
  • Previous disease or disability expected to influence the assessment of postoperative QOL;
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding;
  • Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship (curatorship or tutorship) or incapable of giving consent;
  • Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol or follow-up scheduled.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
212 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm A: Tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME

    The tailored use of defunctioning stoma includes two steps: * Firstly, the decision to use or not a defunctioning stoma will be based on the personalized risk of anastomotic leakage (according to AFOR score). This score is ranked from 0 to 6, and includes gender, Body Mass Index, smoking, diabetes, tumor size and preoperative radiotherapy. * Patients with AFORS equal to 0 or 1 (risk of anastomotic leakage less than 10%) will not have defunctioning stoma; * Patients with AFORS equal to or between 2 and 6 (risk of anastomotic leakage more than 20%) will have a defunctioning stoma. * Secondly, in patients with a defunctioning stoma, an early closure will be performed day 8-12 after TME if: * No fever postoperatively (≤ 38°C), * CRP at day 2 lower than 115mg/L (+/- 10 mg/L), decreasing at day 4, * CT-scan with colonic contrast retrograde enema showing no anastomotic leakage.

    Procedure: Tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME

  • Active comparator
    Arm B: Systematic use of defunctioning stoma

    Systematic use of defunctioning stoma for 3 months after TME according to French national guidelines

    Procedure: Systematic use of defunctioning stoma

Interventions

  • ProcedureTailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME

    Tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME based on a 2-step process: i) to perform or not a defunctioning stoma according to the personalized risk of anastomotic leakage (defunctioning stoma only if Anastomotic Failure Observed Risk Score=\[2-6\]), ii) to perform an early stoma closure at day 8-12, according to clinical (fever), biological (CRP level days 2 and 4 postoperatively) and radiological postoperative assessment (CT-scan with colonic contrast retrograde enema day 7-8 postoperatively)

  • ProcedureSystematic use of defunctioning stoma

    Systematic use of defunctioning stoma for 2-3 months after TME, according to French national and international guidelines

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of life over the 12 months after surgery

    The QLQ-C30 is a patient self-rating questionnaire (30 questions) that measures physical, role, social, emotional, and cognitive functions as well as overall QoL. Scores can be linearly transformed to provide a score from 0 to 100 REF. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales. The area under the quality of life curve will be measured over the 12 months after rectal surgery, with measurement time points at 1, 4, 8 and 12 months.

    Time frame: At 1, 4, 8, and 12 months of follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of anastomotic leakage

    Proportion of patients with an anastomotic leakage will be assessed by a clinical exam (with a rectal examination) at 1 month and with a clinical exam (with a rectal examination) and a CT scan at 4 months after rectal surgery

    Time frame: At 1 and 4 months after the rectal surgery

  2. The PF, RF, CF, EF, SF, FA, PA, NV, QL Dimensions of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire

    1. 9 dimensions will be assessed with: * PF : Physical Functioning * RF : Role Functioning * CF : Cognitive Functioning * EF : Emotional Functioning * SF: Social Functioning * FA : Fatigue * PA : Pain * NV : Nausea and Vomiting * QL : Global health status 2- The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. This is a patients self-rating questionnaire that measures five functional scales (physical, role, social, emotional, and cognitive) three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting) A global health status / QoL scale, and a number of single items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation and diarrhea) and perceived financial impact of the disease. Scores can be linearly transformed to provide a score from 0 to 100 REF. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales.

    Time frame: At 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgery

  3. The urinary frequency

    The QLQ-CR29 (Quality of life of rectal cancer patients with 29 questions) has five functional and 18 symptom scales. It contains four subscales (urinary frequency (UF), blood and mucus in stool (BMS), stool frequency (SF), and body image (BI)) and 19 single items. Urinary frequency is measured with items 1 and 2 of the questionnaire. The score can range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales.

    Time frame: At 1, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgery

  4. Blood or mucus in stools

    The QLQ-CR29 (Quality of life of rectal cancer patients with 29 questions) has five functional and 18 symptom scales. It contains four subscales (urinary frequency (UF), blood and mucus in stool (BMS), stool frequency (SF), and body image (BI)) and 19 single items. The blood or mucus in stools is measured with items 8 and 9 of the questionnaire. The score can range from 0 to 50. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales.

    Time frame: At 1, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgery

  5. Stool frequency

    Time frame: At 1, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgery

  6. Body image dimensions of the QLQ-CR29 questionnaire

    The QLQ-CR29 (Quality of life of rectal cancer patients with 29 questions) has five functional and 18 symptom scales. Scores can be linearly transformed to provide a score from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales.

    Time frame: At 1, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgery

  7. Rate of defunctioning stoma

    Proportion of patients who have a defunctioning stoma. It will be assessed at the time of the consultation at 1 month with the collection of the adverse events (AE) and the serious adverse events (SAE)

    Time frame: At 1 month after the rectal surgery

  8. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score (LARS score)

    The LARS questionnaire (low anterior resection score) evaluates bowel function. Five questions regarding incontinence for flatus and liquid stools, frequency, clustering and urgency for defecation are taken into account. The score ranges from 0 to 42 is divides into no LARS (0 to 20 points), minor LARS (21 to 29 points), and major LARS (30 to 42 points).

    Time frame: At 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgery

  9. Anal Incontinence (Wexner score)

    The WEXNER score assesses the importance of anal incontinence, it varies from 0 to 20, 20 corresponding to total anal incontinence

    Time frame: At 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgery

  10. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5

    Measured in male patients

    Time frame: At 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgery

  11. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scale scores

    Measured in female patients. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a 19-item self-report inventory designed to assess female sexual function. It comprises six domains: desire, arousal ,lubrication orgasm, satisfaction, pain. The maximum score for each domain is 6.0, obtained by summing item responses and multiplying by a correction factor. The total composite sexual function score is a sum of domain scores and ranges from 2.0 (not sexually active and no desire) to 36.0.

    Time frame: At 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgery

  12. Urinary symptom profil (USP)

    The Urinary symptom profil (USP) assesses urinary symptoms among men and women with stress, urge (from 0 to 9), overactive bladder (from 0 to 9), or urinary obstructive symptoms (from 0 to 9). The maximum corresponding to a bad result.

    Time frame: At 1, 4, 8, 12 months after the rectal surgery

  13. Postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score I-IV)

    This is a classification in order to rank a complication (surgical or medical morbidity) in an objective and reproducible manner. It consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V). The introduction of the subclasses a and b allows a contraction of the classification into 5 grades (I, II, III, IV and V) depending on the size of the population observed or the of the focus of a study. It varies from 1 to 5, 5 corresponding to the death at the patient.

    Time frame: At 1 and 4 months after the rectal surgery

  14. Postoperative mortality (Clavien-Dindo score V)

    This is a classification in order to rank a complication (surgical or medical morbidity) in an objective and reproducible manner. It consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V). The introduction of the subclasses a and b allows a contraction of the classification into 5 grades (I, II, III, IV and V) depending on the size of the population observed or the of the focus of a study. It varies from 1 to 5, 5 corresponding to the death at the patient.

    Time frame: At 1 and 4 months after the rectal surgery

  15. Proportion to work return after TME in active workers

    This endpoint is referring to the capability of active patients to resume their professional activity after surgery. In order to better describe this endpoint the investigators want to measure together the proportion of patients resuming their activity, and the time until resumption of professional activity.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  16. Time to work return after TME in active workers

    This endpoint is referring to the capability of active patients to resume their professional activity after surgery. In order to better describe this endpoint the investigators want to measure together the proportion of patients resuming their activity, and the time until resumption of professional activity.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  17. Quality of life over the 12 months after surgery

    The Quality of life of cancer contains 30 questions (QLQ-C30). This is a patients self-rating questionnaire that measures physical, role, social, emotional, and cognitive functions as well as overall QoL. Scores can be linearly transformed to provide a score from 0 to 100.Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales.

    Time frame: QLQ-C30 is assessed at 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgery

  18. Incremental cost-utility ratio defined as an incremental cost / Quality-Adjsuted Life Year (QALY) gained

    Costs will be measured through the French Health Data Hub database. QALYs will be measured using the and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.

    Time frame: From surgery to 12 months after surgery

  19. Total budgetary impact for French healthcare insurance system of spreading selective ostomy practice in France

    5-year financial model

    Time frame: From surgery to 12 months after surgery

  20. Indirect Costs (€) for French Healthcare insurance scheme of sickness leaves

    Measured through SNDS database (Système National des Données de Santé) and data from our study on sickness leaves and times to return to work

    Time frame: From surgery to 12 months after surgery

  21. Changes in microbiome composition and diversity from baseline to 1 month

    Data will be rarefied using the samples with the smallest number of reads and then subjected to alpha-diversity analysis employing Faith's phylogenetic diversity. Kruskal-Wallis will be calculated between all groups together and for pairwise comparisons. To find significant differences at the genera taxonomy level, ANCOM tests will be used to identify features that are differentially abundant across sample groups.

    Time frame: From baseline to Month 1

07

Study locations

20 of 28 sites recruiting
  • CHU Amiens-Picardie - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    Amiens, France
    Recruiting
  • CHRU de Besançon - Service de Chirurgie Générale, Digestive et Cancérologique - Unité de Transplantation Hépatique
    Besançon, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU de Bordeaux - Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne - Unité Colorectale
    Bordeaux, France
    Recruiting
  • Clinique Tivoli Ducos - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    Bordeaux, France
    Recruiting
  • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand - Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-biliaire
    Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • APHP - Hôpital Beaujon - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    Clichy, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU Grenoble Alpes - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    La Tronche, France
    Recruiting
  • APHP - Hôpital Bicêtre - Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
    Recruiting
  • CHU de Lille - Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive
    Lille, France
    Recruiting
  • Centre Lyonnais de Chirurgie Digestive
    Lyon, France
    Recruiting
  • APHM - Hôpital La Timone - Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Générale
    Marseille, France
    Recruiting
  • APHM - Hôpital Nord - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    Marseille, France
    Recruiting
  • Hôpital Européen de Marseille - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    Marseille, France
    Recruiting
  • Institut Paoli Calmette - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    Marseille, France
    Recruiting
  • Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    Montpellier, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • APHP - HEGP- Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
  • APHP - Hôpital Saint Antoine - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
  • APHP - Hôpital Saint-Louis - Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne
    Paris, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • GH Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
  • Groupe Hospitalier Paris St. Joseph - Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Obésité
    Paris, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon - Sevice de Chirurgie Digestive
    Pierre-Bénite, France
    Recruiting
  • CHU de Rennes - Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive
    Rennes, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU de Rouen - Service de Chirugie Digestive
    Rouen, France
    Recruiting
  • CHRU de Strasbourg - Service de Chirurgie Générale et
    Strasbourg, France
    Recruiting
  • CHU de Toulouse - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
    Toulouse, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • CHRU de Tours - Service de Chirurgie Digestive Oncologique et Colorectale
    Tours, France
    Recruiting
  • CHRU de Nancy - Service de Chirugie Digestive, Hépatobiliaire, endocrinienne et Cancérologique
    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
    Recruiting
  • Institut Gustave Roussy - Service de Chirurgie Viscérale Oncologique
    Villejuif, France
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05233787
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 10, 2022
Start date
Mar 24, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 16, 2024

Study contacts

Christophe LAURENT
Contact
christophe.laurent@chu-bordeaux.fr
(0)5 57 65 67 69 ext. +33
Benjamin FERNANDEZ
Contact
benjamin.fernandez@chu-bordeaux.fr
Christophe LAURENT
principal investigator · University Hospital, Bordeaux

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion