ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05226286TITAN 2Updated Nov 21, 2025Results posted

Evaluation of Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation Pivotal Study (TITAN 2)

An interventional study of Medtronic Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation (TNM) System in Overactive Bladder, sponsored by MedtronicNeuro. Completed at 29 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-21.

Sponsored by MedtronicNeuro (part of Medtronic) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
188
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this prospective, multicenter study is to assess the safety and efficacy of tibial neuromodulation using the Medtronic Tibial Neuromodulation (TNM) system.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

858 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 188 is above the median of 70 across 649 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

MedtronicNeuro is the lead sponsor of 74 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 21 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subjects 18 years of age or older
  2. Qualifying voiding diary
  3. Have a diagnosis of UUI for at least 6 months
  4. Failed and/or are not a candidate for conservative therapies.
  5. Willing and able to accurately complete study diaries, questionnaires, attend visits, operate the system, and comply with the study protocol
  6. Willing and able to provide signed and dated

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have primary stress incontinence
  2. History of a prior implantable tibial neuromodulation system
  3. Anatomical defects, edema or previous surgeries which precludes use of the device
  4. Previous pelvic floor surgery in the last 6 months
  5. Women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study
  6. Characteristics indicating a poor understanding of the study or characteristics that indicate the subject may have poor compliance with the study protocol requirements.
  7. Concurrent participation in another clinical study that may add additional safety risks and/or confound study results.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
188 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • DeviceMedtronic Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation (TNM) System

    Stimulation of the tibial nerve using Medtronic's tibial neuromodulation device.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. UUI Responder

    Proportion of TNM subjects experiencing a reduction of 50% or more in daily urinary urge incontinence (UUI) episodes (UUI responder rate) at 6 months after device implant.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. UUI Change From Baseline

    Change in UUI episodes at 6 months compared to baseline in subjects with UUI at baseline.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. UF Change From Baseline

    Change in daily UF episodes at 6 months compared to baseline in subjects with UF at baseline.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. UPS Change at 6 Months

    Change in urinary urgency assessed through the UPS at 6 months compared to baseline. The UPS (Urgency Perception Scale) was developed to assess urgency associated with overactive bladder (OAB). The UPS is a single question assessed at each visit and has 3 options for responses: 1, 'I am usually not able to hold urine'; 2, 'I am usually able to hold urine until I reach the toilet if I go immediately'; and 3, 'I am usually able to finish what I am doing before going to the toilet'. Change from baseline is calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the follow-up value. Therefore, the change can range from -2 to 2 (with positive change indicating an improvement).

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. OAB-q Change From Baseline

    Change in Overactive Bladder Quality of Life Questionnaire (OAB-q) health related quality of life (HRQL) Total Score at 6 months compared to baseline. Details related to OAB-Q HRQL: OAB-q HRQL minimum value total score: 33 OAB-q HRQL maximum value total score:198 A positive change in OAB-q HRQL score represents an improvement.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Nov 21, 2025

Participant flow

Eligible subjects who signed the study-specific informed consent form (ICF) were considered enrolled in the study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEnrolled Subjects
Started188
Implanted126
Day 7126
Month 1125
Month 2125
Month 3125
Month 6125
Month 12120
Month 24104
Completed104
Not completed84
Withdrew: Screen failures prior to implant62
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject13
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3
Withdrew: Physician decision1
Withdrew: Adverse event1
Withdrew: Death1
Withdrew: Device explant with no planned replacement1
Withdrew: Planned surgery with an implanted metal material closer than allowed in research protocol1
Withdrew: Transitioned to urethral catheter/suprapubic tube1

Outcome measures

PrimaryUUI Responder

Proportion of TNM subjects experiencing a reduction of 50% or more in daily urinary urge incontinence (UUI) episodes (UUI responder rate) at 6 months after device implant.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
UUI Responder
ParticipantsImplanted Subjects
UUI Responder72
SecondaryUUI Change From Baseline

Change in UUI episodes at 6 months compared to baseline in subjects with UUI at baseline.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · UUI episodes (per day)
UUI Change From Baseline
UUI episodes (per day)Implanted Subjects
UUI Change From Baseline-2.8 ± 3.12
SecondaryUF Change From Baseline

Change in daily UF episodes at 6 months compared to baseline in subjects with UF at baseline.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · UF episodes (per day)
UF Change From Baseline
UF episodes (per day)Subjects With Baseline UF
UF Change From Baseline-2.6 ± 2.94
SecondaryUPS Change at 6 Months

Change in urinary urgency assessed through the UPS at 6 months compared to baseline. The UPS (Urgency Perception Scale) was developed to assess urgency associated with overactive bladder (OAB). The UPS is a single question assessed at each visit and has 3 options for responses: 1, 'I am usually not able to hold urine'; 2, 'I am usually able to hold urine until I reach the toilet if I go immediately'; and 3, 'I am usually able to finish what I am doing before going to the toilet'. Change from baseline is calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the follow-up value. Therefore, the change can range from -2 to 2 (with positive change indicating an improvement).

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Score on Urgency Perception Scale
UPS Change at 6 Months
Score on Urgency Perception ScaleImplanted Subjects
UPS Change at 6 Months0.4 ± 0.74
SecondaryOAB-q Change From Baseline

Change in Overactive Bladder Quality of Life Questionnaire (OAB-q) health related quality of life (HRQL) Total Score at 6 months compared to baseline. Details related to OAB-Q HRQL: OAB-q HRQL minimum value total score: 33 OAB-q HRQL maximum value total score:198 A positive change in OAB-q HRQL score represents an improvement.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · OAB-q HRQL Total Score
OAB-q Change From Baseline
OAB-q HRQL Total ScoreImplanted Subjects
OAB-q Change From Baseline27.1 ± 25.79

Adverse events

Collected over AEs were collected throughout the study once the informed consent form was signed. This results section is showing the AEs that happened at or after implant through 24-month follow-up visit.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Implanted Subjects1/126 (0.8%)35/126 (27.8%)81/126 (64.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 62
Most frequent serious events
EventImplanted Subjects
PyelonephritisInfections and infestations3/126
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders3/126
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/126
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/126
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/126
BronchitisInfections and infestations1/126
COVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestations1/126
Clostridium difficile colitisInfections and infestations1/126
Escherichia bacteraemiaInfections and infestations1/126
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations1/126
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventImplanted Subjects
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations36/126
COVID-19Infections and infestations30/126
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders15/126
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders11/126
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders11/126
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations9/126
ConjunctivitisInfections and infestations8/126
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications8/126
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders7/126

Baseline characteristics

All Implanted analysis set: Includes subjects who were implanted.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Implanted Subjects
Mean62.6 ± 13.68
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Implanted Subjects
Female120
Male6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Implanted Subjects
Hispanic or Latino5
Not Hispanic or Latino120
Unknown or Not Reported1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Implanted Subjects
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American16
White108
More than one race1
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Implanted Subjects
United States126
BMI
BMI(kg/m2)Implanted Subjects
Mean34.8 ± 8.61
08

Study locations

29 sites
  • Urology Centers of Alabama
    Homewood, Alabama 35209, United States
  • Georgia Urology
    Cartersville, Georgia 30120, United States
  • Northwestern Medicine
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Providea Health Partners
    Evergreen Park, Illinois 60805, United States
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70006, United States
  • Chesapeake Urology Associates
    Towson, Maryland 21204, United States
  • Henry Ford Health System
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Mercy Health Saint Mary's
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • Michigan Institute of Urology
    Troy, Michigan 48084, United States
  • Minnesota Urology
    Plymouth, Minnesota 55441, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Urology
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Summit Health Englewood
    Englewood, New Jersey 07631, United States
  • Summit Health Voorhees
    Voorhees Township, New Jersey 08043, United States
  • Stony Brook University Hospital
    Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
  • Associated Medical Professionals
    Syracuse, New York 13210, United States
  • Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, United States
  • Alliance Urology Specialists
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27403, United States
  • FirstHealth Urogynecology
    Hamlet, North Carolina 28345, United States
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Wright State Physicians
    Fairborn, Ohio 45234, United States
  • Central Ohio Urology Group
    Gahanna, Ohio 43230, United States
  • Urology Surgeons of Oklahoma
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120, United States
  • Prisma Health
    Greenville, South Carolina 29605, United States
  • Sanford Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery Clinic
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57105, United States
  • Urology Partners of North Texas Research Institute
    Arlington, Texas 46017, United States
  • University of Texas Medical Branch
    Galveston, Texas 77555, United States
  • Virginia Mason Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98101, United States
  • Ascension Columbia St. Mary's
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53211, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05226286
Lead sponsor
MedtronicNeuro
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 7, 2022
Start date
Jan 31, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 10, 2023
Completion
May 30, 2025
Results posted
Nov 21, 2025
Last update
Nov 21, 2025

Study contacts

Mylene Champs
study director · Medtronic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion