An interventional study of Cognitive training and Usual Care in Heart Failure, sponsored by Louis Bherer. Recruiting at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-14.
Sponsored by Louis Bherer · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The SYNAPSE trial is designed to study the effects of an individualized home-based cognitive training program on cognitive functions in heart-failure patients.
The purpose of the SYNAPSE study is to evaluate the effects of an individualized home-based training program aimed to improve cognitive functions and well-being in heart failure patients. Heart failure is characterized by the inability of the heart to pump blood efficiently through the body. Nearly half of patients with heart failure present with cognitive deficits. Memory and executive functions that allow us to perform complex tasks are mainly affected. These cognitive deficits are linked to an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality, in addition to decreasing patients' well-being and ability to care for themselves. Although rehabilitation programs that include physical activity and counseling help reduce heart and brain health risks, these programs are unpopular. Among the few who enroll, between 24% and 50% drop out before the completion of the program. Offering alternative options such as cognitive training would help to reach this proportion of patients. The literature has shown that cognitive training is effective in preventing or reducing cognitive deficits in older adults with or without cognitive loss. Although still understudied in patients with heart failure, a better understanding of the association between heart failure and changes in cognition would allow better adaptation of patient care to their situations and needs.
5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 54 is below the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.
Browse Heart Failure studies →Louis Bherer is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Usual care and cognitive training for 6 weeks, followed by usual care (only) for 6 weeks.
Other: Cognitive training · Other: Usual Care
Usual care (only) for 6 weeks, followed by cognitive training and usual care for 6 weeks.
Other: Cognitive training · Other: Usual Care
A cognitive training program will be individually developed for each participant based on baseline neuropsychological tests. It will include: Computerized cognitive training: this training include: the Dual-Task, the Stroop and the N-Back task. The tasks are accompanied by feedback based on the participant's responses (e.g., progress graph, feedback, etc.). In order to promote participants' learning, the level of difficulty of the tasks increased as training sessions progressed. Two sets of stimuli will be used to maximize the generalization of learning. Memory training: This training is adapted from the MEMO+ training program (Belleville et al., 2018). These sessions, also home-based, will be done through online video and are covering a variety of topics: memory (normal aging, mnemonic strategies), attention, aging, etc. Each week, participants will be asked to complete the equivalent of 6 training sessions of 15 minutes each, for a total of 1h30 per week.
Participants will be asked to continue the care and follow-up as usually planned with the attending cardiologist. Apart from weekly follow-ups with the research team member, no changes will be made to the participant's medical care.
Changes in performance on trained computerized cognitive tasks
Trained version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Reaction time (ms)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on trained computerized cognitive tasks
Trained version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Accuracy (%)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on transfer computerized cognitive tasks
Transfer version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Reaction time (ms)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on transfer computerized cognitive tasks
Transfer version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Accuracy (%)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in general cognitive functioning
Remote version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. (0-28 score, with a higher score indicating a better cognitive functioning.)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Remote version of validated neuropsychological test Memory capacity -Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (z-score change)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Remote version of validated neuropsychological test Processing speed -Trail making test Part A (z-score change)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Remote version of validated neuropsychological test Executive functions * Trail making test Part B * Verbal fluency test * Digit span test (z-score change)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in quality of life
36-Items Short form health Survey (SF-36) (Score ranges from 0-100, with a higher score indicating more favorable health status.)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in self-care behavior
European Heart-Failure Self-care Behavior Scale-9 (EHFsB-9) (The minimal score is 9 while the maximal score is 45. The higher the score, the less the patient performs self-care behaviors.)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in depressive symptomatology
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Score ranges from 0 to 27, with a higher score indicating a more severe depression state.)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in anxiety
General Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7) (Total score ranges from 0 to 21, with an increasing score on the scale is indicating a worse anxiety state.)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in perceived stress
Perceived Stress Scale questionnaire (PSS-10) (Score ranges from 0-40, with a higher score indicating a worse sleep quality)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in quality of sleep
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire (PSQI) (19 self-assessment questions are grouped into seven components. The scores for the seven components are summed to give an overall score that ranges from 0 to 21 points, with "0" indicating no difficulty and "21" indicating severe difficulty in all components. A score higher than 5 indicates problematic sleep in one or more components)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in Risk of sleep apnea
Berlin Questionnaire (Participants are classified into a high or a low risk of sleep apnea based their responses to the individual items and their overall scores in the symptom categories. A High Risk represent 2 or more categories where the score is positive. A low risk represents 1 or no category where the score is positive.)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in self-reported physical activity
Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly Questionnaire (PASE) (The overall score ranges from 0 to 400, with a higher score indicating a better level of physical activity)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in Walking test speed
4-meter walking test (m/s)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in functional mobility
Timed up and Go test (s)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in balance performance
Timed one-leg standing test (s)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in lower limb muscles strength
Timed Sit-to-Stand test (s)
Time frame: Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Cognitive Reserve
Rami and colleagues' cognitive reserve questionnaire (Scale ranges from 0-26, with a higher score indicating a greater cognitive reserve)
Time frame: Baseline
Self-reported masculinity and femininity traits
Short Form BEM Sex-Role Inventory questionnaire (30 items questionnaire with 10 items assessing the femininity traits, 10 items assessing the masculinity traits and 10 items neutral, not scored. Two scores, rage from 10-70, are calculated for femininity and masculinity, respectively. A higher score is indicating a higher trait.)
Time frame: Baseline
Dietary patterns
Short Diet Questionnaire (Score ranges from 15-45 points, with a score between 15-29 categorized as unhealthy, 30-37 as somewhat unhealthy and 38 or more as a healthy diet.)
Time frame: Baseline
Plan to share: No
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Louis Bherer