CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05219097Updated Jan 19, 2023

The Specificity, Sensitivity and Clinical Correlation of CBA, RIPA and ELISA in Detecting AChR and MuSK IgG of Myasthenia Gravis

An observational study in Detection Autoantibody of Myasthenia Gravis, sponsored by Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-19.

Sponsored by Tianjin Medical University General Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,663
Ages
1 Year to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorder mediated by autoantibodies against AChR, MuSK or other autoantigens located at the post synaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. Presence of autoantibodies specific for AChR or MuSK can establish diagnosis in conjunction with clinical presentations. In most established guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis, determination of AChR and MuSK antibodies has been recommended. Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and cell-based assay (CBA) are all commercially available and have been adopted for autoantibody detection by most referring neurologists. At present, specificity and sensitivity of these methods have not been compared in large cohorts within a context of stringent quality control. As a consequence, there are no national or international consensus regarding selection of methods and interpretation of results, resulting in challenges to neurologists managing these patients. To this end, the investigators proposed to conduct a multicenter, double-blind, prospective study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of CBA, RIPA and ELISA assays to detect AChR and MuSK antibodies.

Read the detailed description

Participants: patients with suspected MG

Aim: the specificity, sensitivity, and clinical correlation of AChR and MuSK IgG detection through the CBA, ELISA, and RIPA methods.

Study design: A multicenter, double-blind, prospective study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of CBA, RIPA, and ELISA assays in detecting AChR and MuSK antibodies.

Total enrollment: 3000 patients with suspected MG will be enrolled.

Time frame: The enrollment time of this trial is 21 months, and the entire study period is about 24 months.

Reagent resource: 1. Acetylcholine receptor autoantibody RIA kit: RSR limited, recommended cut-off value=0.5 nmol/L.

  1. Acetylcholine receptor autoantibody CBA kit: Tianjin New Terrain Biological Technology Co., Ltd; recommended cut-off value =1:10.
  1. Acetylcholine receptor autoantibody ELISA kit: RSR limited; recommended cut-off value=0.45 nmol/L.
  1. Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase RIA kit: RSR limited, recommended cut-off value =0.05 nmol/L.
  1. Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase CBA kit: Tianjin New Terrain Biological Technology Co., Ltd; recommended cut-off value =1:10.
  1. Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase ELISA kit: IBL, recommended cut-off value=0.4 U/ml.

Groups: The samples were divided into 3 groups according to the detected methods: CBA group, RIPA group and ELISA group.

Study protocol: 1. When patients suspected of MG matched up with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the serum sample of each patient would be divided into equal aliquots and randomly assigned to the CBA, ELISA, and RIPA testing laboratories for detection.

  1. All patient's information will be masked and monitored by members of ethics committees. Serum specimens from participants will be renumbered without any clinical information before doing the tests to be investigated. According to the standard procedure of kits, the operator in laboratories to perform the CBA, ELISA, or RIPA will complete the detection of AChR and MuSK antibodies of the enrolled participants' serum, and record the original value, control, or reference value.
  1. Each MG center will provide the clinical diagnosis results of the enrolled patients, treatment and follow up information of the participants. The diagnosis of MG and the tests to be investigated will be double blindly done.
  1. The data statistics, analysis, and summary of the project are operated by an independent third-party statistic team.

Evaluation indicators: Evaluate the specificity, sensitivity, and clinical correlation of AChR and MuSK IgG detection through the CBA, ELISA, and RIPA methods.

02

Conditions studied

  • Detection Autoantibody of Myasthenia Gravis

Keywords

  • Cell-based assay
  • Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA)
  • Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
  • Autoantibody determination
  • Myasthenia gravis
03

In context

Myasthenia Gravis

324 studies on the registry are indexed under Myasthenia Gravis; 146 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,663 is above the median of 140 across 104 observational studies indexed under Myasthenia Gravis.

Browse Myasthenia Gravis studies →

Lead sponsor

Tianjin Medical University General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 71 studies on the registry; 30 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with suspected MG, 1-90 years of age.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with compatible clinical features of weakness of skeletal muscles, including ptosis, diplopia, dysphonia, dysphagia, or limb weakness.
  • Patients need to do the diagnosis of MG, requiring serum autoantibody, electrophysiological, pharmacological neostigmine test, thymic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), etc in the diagnostic evaluation of MG.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with uncertain diagnoses or incomplete clinical data for data analysis.
  • Patients with abnormal serum samples, such as hemolysis or lipemia, which will affect the detection base value and the final interpretation of CBA, RIPA and ELISA.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,663 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
None retained

Groups and cohorts

  • Cell Based Assay (CBA)

    Use AChR/MuSK Ab CBA Kit (Tianjin New Terrain Biological Technology Co., Ltd, China) to detect AChR and MuSK Ab of myasthenia gravis

    Diagnostic Test: CBA Assay

  • RIPA Assay

    Use AChR and MuSK Ab radioimmunoassay kit (RSR Limited, UK) to detect AChR and MuSK Ab of myasthenia gravis

    Diagnostic Test: CBA Assay

  • ELISA Assay

    Use AChR Ab ELISA Kit (RSR Limited, UK) and MuSK ELISA kit (IBL Limited, Germany) to detect AChR and MuSK Ab of myasthenia gravis

    Diagnostic Test: CBA Assay

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCBA Assay

    Comparsion of specificity, sensitivity and clinical correlation of CBA, ELISA and RIPA assay in autoantibodies detection of myasthenia gravis

    Also known as: ELISA Assay, RIPA Assay

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparsion of the specificity, sensitivity and clinical correlation

    Comparsion the specificity,sensitivity and clinical correlation of CBA, RIPA and ELISA assay in autoantibodies detection of myasthenia gravis

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Beijing Tiantan Hospital
    Beijing, 100070, China
  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
    Tianjin, 30000, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 19, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05219097
Lead sponsor
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Responsible party
Fu-Dong Shi (Professor, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 1, 2022
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2022
Completion
Dec 31, 2022
Last update
Jan 19, 2023

Study contacts

Fu-Dong Shi, MD, Ph.D
study chair · Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion