ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05216224Updated Jan 7, 2026Results posted

ATI-450 vs Placebo in Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)

A Phase 2 interventional study of ATI-450 and Placebo oral tablet in Hidradenitis Suppurativa, sponsored by Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.. Completed at 20 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-07.

Sponsored by Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
95
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 2a study to investigate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ATI-450 vs placebo in patients with moderate to severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS).

02

Conditions studied

  • Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Keywords

  • Hidradenitis
  • Suppurativa
  • HS
  • Acne inversa
03

In context

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

284 studies on the registry are indexed under Hidradenitis Suppurativa; 87 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 95 is above the median of 45 across 199 interventional studies indexed under Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Browse Hidradenitis Suppurativa studies →

Lead sponsor

Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to comprehend and be willing to sign the Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved participant form prior to administration of any study-related procedures.
  • Participant must have stable HS.
  • Total abscesses and/or nodule (AN) count of ≥5 at Baseline visit.
  • HS lesions present in at least 2 distinct anatomical areas at Screening and Baseline.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has a history of active skin disease other than HS that could interfere with the assessment of HS.
  • Participant has an uncontrolled non-immunoinflammatory disease that may place the participant at increased risk during the study or impact the interpretation of results, e.g., previous , previous venous thromboembolism.
  • Participant has experience with >2 biologics, >1 Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, or a combination of 1 biologic experience and 1 JAK inhibitor.
  • Are currently receiving at doses greater than 10 mg per day of prednisone (or equivalent) or have been receiving an unstable dosing regimen of corticosteroids within 2 weeks of the Screening visit.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
95 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ATI-450

    ATI-450 50 milligrams (mg) oral tablet twice daily (BID)

    Drug: ATI-450

  • Experimental
    Placebo

    Placebo oral tablet BID

    Drug: Placebo oral tablet

Interventions

  • Oral, small molecule MK2 inhibitor

    Also known as: Zunsemetinib

  • DrugPlacebo oral tablet

    Placebo tablet manufactured to match ATI-450 in appearance

    Also known as: Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 12

    AN count was the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions. The least square (LS) mean change from baseline in the count at Week 12 was estimated from the Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50) at Week 12

    HiSCR50 Achiever was defined as a participant having a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase in the number of abscesses, and no increase in the number of draining fistula counts from baseline. A participant was considered an achiever only if all 3 criteria mentioned above were fulfilled. Model-based estimates and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were produced. Firth's penalized likelihood logistic regression model with fixed effects for treatment and baseline count of inflammatory abscesses and nodules was used.

    Time frame: Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS-4) at Week 12

    The IHS-4 is a validated tool used to access the HS severity and is calculated based on the clinical signs of HS: inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels (fistulas and sinuses). The IHS-4 score = (number of nodules multiplied by 1) + (number of abscesses multiplied by 2) + (number of draining tunnels \[fistulas/sinuses\] multiplied by 4). Mild HS is a score of 3 or less, moderate HS is a score of 4-10, and severe HS is a score of 11 or higher. A decrease in score means less severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving NRS30

    NRS30 Achiever was defined as participants achieving at least a 30% reduction from baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Skin Pain (PGA-SP) and at least 1 unit reduction from baseline in PGA-SP at Week 12 among participants with baseline PGA-SP ≥3. Model-based estimates and 90% CIs were produced. Firth's penalized likelihood logistic regression model with fixed effects for treatment and baseline PGA-SP was used.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Physician Global Assessment (HSPGA) at Week 12

    In the HS-PGA scale, the Investigators rated the counts of nodules (inflammatory and non-inflammatory) abscesses and fistulas (both draining and nondraining) and assigned a participant to 1 of 6 categories ranging from clear (0) to very severe (5). A decrease in score means a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  5. Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 12

    The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of HS disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of questions including a single "yes/no" question and questions with possible responses of "not at all," "a little," "a lot," or "very much." These questions evaluate the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each question was scored using a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 based on a participant's response: not at all/not relevant (0), a little (1), a lot (2) and very much (3). The total score of the DLQI ranged from 0 to 30 and was calculated by adding up the scores from each question. The higher the score, the greater the impact on a participant's QoL.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  6. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    TEAEs are defined as AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first administration of study drug and before the date of last administration of study drug + 30 days. A summary of non-serious AEs and serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AEs section.

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 115

  7. ATI-450 and Metabolite (CDD-2164) Concentrations

    Time frame: 2 hours postdose on Days 1, 8, and 85

07

Results

Posted Jan 7, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneATI-450Placebo
Started4847
Received at least 1 dose of study drug4847
Completed2532
Not completed2315
Withdrew: Adverse event63
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up86
Withdrew: Protocol violation11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject65
Withdrew: Other than specified10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 12

AN count was the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions. The least square (LS) mean change from baseline in the count at Week 12 was estimated from the Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · AN count
Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 12
AN countATI-450Placebo
Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 12-2.93 (-3.99 to -1.87)-5.94 (-7.01 to -4.87)
Statistical analysis
  • ATI-450 vs Placebo · MMRM · p = >0.999 (Significance level of 0.05) · Ls mean difference: 3.01 · 90% CI 1.50 to 4.52Fixed effect terms for treatment, study visit, treatment by visit interaction and baseline count of inflammatory abscesses and nodules as a covariate.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50) at Week 12

HiSCR50 Achiever was defined as a participant having a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase in the number of abscesses, and no increase in the number of draining fistula counts from baseline. A participant was considered an achiever only if all 3 criteria mentioned above were fulfilled. Model-based estimates and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were produced. Firth's penalized likelihood logistic regression model with fixed effects for treatment and baseline count of inflammatory abscesses and nodules was used.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50) at Week 12
percentage of participantsATI-450Placebo
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50) at Week 1231.5 (21.6 to 43.4)51.4 (39.5 to 63.2)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS-4) at Week 12

The IHS-4 is a validated tool used to access the HS severity and is calculated based on the clinical signs of HS: inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels (fistulas and sinuses). The IHS-4 score = (number of nodules multiplied by 1) + (number of abscesses multiplied by 2) + (number of draining tunnels \[fistulas/sinuses\] multiplied by 4). Mild HS is a score of 3 or less, moderate HS is a score of 4-10, and severe HS is a score of 11 or higher. A decrease in score means less severity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS-4) at Week 12
units on a scaleATI-450Placebo
Change From Baseline in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS-4) at Week 12-4.01 (-6.31 to -1.71)-11.86 (-14.18 to -9.53)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving NRS30

NRS30 Achiever was defined as participants achieving at least a 30% reduction from baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Skin Pain (PGA-SP) and at least 1 unit reduction from baseline in PGA-SP at Week 12 among participants with baseline PGA-SP ≥3. Model-based estimates and 90% CIs were produced. Firth's penalized likelihood logistic regression model with fixed effects for treatment and baseline PGA-SP was used.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving NRS30
percentage of participantsATI-450Placebo
Percentage of Participants Achieving NRS3043.7 (30.9 to 57.3)57.5 (44.0 to 69.9)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Physician Global Assessment (HSPGA) at Week 12

In the HS-PGA scale, the Investigators rated the counts of nodules (inflammatory and non-inflammatory) abscesses and fistulas (both draining and nondraining) and assigned a participant to 1 of 6 categories ranging from clear (0) to very severe (5). A decrease in score means a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Physician Global Assessment (HSPGA) at Week 12
units on a scaleATI-450Placebo
Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Physician Global Assessment (HSPGA) at Week 12-0.31 (-0.48 to -0.14)-0.73 (-0.90 to -0.55)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 12

The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of HS disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of questions including a single "yes/no" question and questions with possible responses of "not at all," "a little," "a lot," or "very much." These questions evaluate the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each question was scored using a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 based on a participant's response: not at all/not relevant (0), a little (1), a lot (2) and very much (3). The total score of the DLQI ranged from 0 to 30 and was calculated by adding up the scores from each question. The higher the score, the greater the impact on a participant's QoL.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 12
units on a scaleATI-450Placebo
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 12-3.27 (-4.66 to -1.89)-4.08 (-5.48 to -2.68)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

TEAEs are defined as AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first administration of study drug and before the date of last administration of study drug + 30 days. A summary of non-serious AEs and serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AEs section.

Time frame:
Baseline through Day 115
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsATI-450Placebo
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)3526
SecondaryATI-450 and Metabolite (CDD-2164) Concentrations
Time frame:
2 hours postdose on Days 1, 8, and 85
Reported as:
Mean · Nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)
ATI-450 and Metabolite (CDD-2164) Concentrations
Nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)ATI-450Placebo
ATI-450 Day 1144.995 ± 62.77070.623 ± 1.2728
ATI-450 Day 8207.571 ± 98.03140.504 ± 1.2063
ATI-450 Day 85232.110 ± 116.30280.250 ± 0.000
CDD-2164 Day 149.741 ± 26.76620.364 ± 0.3932
CDD-2164 Day 863.632 ± 32.16820.277 ± 0.1231
CDD-2164 Day 8570.698 ± 34.09620.250 ± 0.000

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline through Day 115. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ATI-4500/48 (0%)0/48 (0%)23/48 (47.9%)
Placebo0/47 (0%)1/47 (2.1%)13/47 (27.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventATI-450Placebo
HidradenitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/481/47
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventATI-450Placebo
DizzinessNervous system disorders8/480/47
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders6/484/47
HeadacheNervous system disorders6/482/47
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/485/47
AcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders5/480/47
Blood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigations4/480/47
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/483/47
COVID-19Infections and infestations1/483/47
Mouth ulcerationGastrointestinal disorders3/480/47
FatigueGeneral disorders3/480/47

Baseline characteristics

Full analysis set (FAS) population included all participants who have been randomized and administered at least 1 dose of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ATI-450PlaceboTotal
Mean35.1 ± 9.8736.6 ± 9.3235.9 ± 9.58
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ATI-450PlaceboTotal
Female394079
Male9716
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ATI-450PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino10818
Not Hispanic or Latino383977
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ATI-450PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American182038
White282755
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported101
08

Study locations

20 sites
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35244, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Fort Smith, Arkansas 72916, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Encino, California 91436, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Thousand Oaks, California 91436, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Boca Raton, Florida 33486, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Hollywood, Florida 33021, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Sandy Springs, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Metairie, Louisiana 70006, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Fort Gratiot, Michigan 48059, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Athens, Ohio 45701, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Mason, Ohio 45040, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Anderson, South Carolina 29621, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Nashville, Tennessee 37215, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77054, United States
  • Aclaris Investigational Site
    Sugar Land, Texas 77478, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 11 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2026, 3 years after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Dec 2023.

Of 44 industry-sponsored phase 2 interventional studies under Hidradenitis Suppurativa, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 20. This study's 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 54 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 24.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 19, 2022
First posted
Jan 31, 2022
StartActual
Dec 29, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 23, 2022
CompletionActual
Jan 24, 2023
Results delay requested
Dec 20, 2023
Results first posted
Jan 7, 2026
Last update
Jan 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05216224
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2022
Start date
Dec 29, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 23, 2022
Completion
Jan 24, 2023
Results posted
Jan 7, 2026
Last update
Jan 7, 2026

Study contacts

Ajay Aggarwal
study director · Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Zunsemetinib

Start the discussion