An observational study in Rectum Cancer, sponsored by Yanhong Deng. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-03.
Sponsored by Yanhong Deng · Observational
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the differences of oncological in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or transanal endoscopy radical resection. The secondary purpose is to compare the effect of two different surgical methods on prognosis.
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a new surgical procedure for total mesorectal excision (TME) by dissociating the mesorectum from the bottom through transanal endoscopic. The characteristics of TaTME are mainly summarized as transanal reverse operation, no auxiliary abdominal incision, complete mesorectal excision and specimen removal through the anus. So taTME is a natural orifice specimen extraction procedure (NOSES). However, similar to NOSES, the specific surgical approach to taTME surgery may raise oncological safety concerns. Due to the premature contact with the tumor, the squeezing of the tumor cannot be avoided during the operation. The tumor may also be squeezed when the specimen is removed through the anus, putting the tumor cells at risk of shedding into the abdominal and pelvic cavity.
Whether TaTME is safe and feasible still needs strong evidence-based medical evidence. However, there have been prospective studies related to oncological in NOSES surgery, but there is a lack of prospective clinical studies on the issue of oncological diffusion during taTME surgery. Therefore, the investigators conducted a randomized controlled study to collect the abdominal and pelvic irrigation fluids in the transanal and laparoscopic TME surgery for oncological examination, to clarify the influence of the two different surgical methods on the intraoperative oncological diffusion. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of two different surgical methods on intraoperative tumor cell proliferation, and to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of the two surgical methods, so as to provide more evidence-based medical evidence for the safety of taTME surgery.
1,762 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 518 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 192 is above the median of 160 across 413 observational studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.
Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →Yanhong Deng is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
192 rectal cancer patients will be enrolled. Patients must be older than 18 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
Different surgical methods for rectal cancer resection
Different surgical methods for rectal cancer resection
The positive rate of oncological contamination of peritoneal washings
Determination of tumor cell positive rate by tumor cell examination of peritoneal washings
Time frame: 1 years
Disease free survival
Time frame: 3 years
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Yanhong Deng