A Phase 3 interventional study of Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, sponsored by German CLL Study Group. Recruiting at 30 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.
Sponsored by German CLL Study Group · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, superiority phase 3 study is designed to demonstrate that treatment with a triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GAVe) prolong the progression-free survival (PFS) as compared to treatment with the combination of obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GVe) in pa-tients with high risk CLL (defined as having at least one of the follow-ing risk factors: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation, complex karyotype or an unmutated IGHV-gene status).
CLL is the most frequent leukemia in industrialized countries. International guidelines agree on diagnosis and management of this disease. The clinical course of CLL is highly variable and can be predicted by clinical staging (according to Rai and Binet) as well as genetic, serum markers and risk models. This study is designed for a randomized comparison of two different, non-chemotherapeutic and fixed-duration modalities for patients with high risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and addresses a high medical need, since high risk-CLL represents a so far incurable, aggressive cancer. The high risk-group of CLL patients can be identified by molecular characteristics, allowing the inclusion of a clearly described group of patients: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation and/or complex karyotype.TP53 defects are the strongest prognostic factors for non-response to chemotherapy. Patients harboring TP53 defects should be treated with chemotherapy-free regimens. Complex karyotype (CKT), defined as the presence of three or more chromosomal aberrations in two or more metaphases is associated with a poorer outcome in various hematologic malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In CLL, CKT is one of several well established adverse prognostic factors, comparable to 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation or unmutated IGHV status. Depending on age and prior exposure to chemotherapy, 10-30% of patients with CLL exhibit CKT. A broad body of evidence has suggested a predictive prognostic value of CKT. Despite considerable advances with chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of frontline as well as relapsed/refractory (r/r) CLL, outcome of patients with CKT remains poor. To date, a randomized comparison to optimize the treatment of patients with high risk disease defined as either the presence of TP53 aberrations or CKT, by novel agents has not been performed. Patients with high risk CLL (TP53-defects and/or CKT) have a poor outcome with chemoimmunotherapy and do not benefit to the same extent from approved regimen such as continuous treatment of ibrutinib or 12 months treatment with obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. Monotherapy with BTK-inhibitor is less effective in those patients as compared with patients without high risk disease. Venetoclax combined with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab offers a highly effective fixed-duration treatment option with a manageable toxicity profile. The recent results of the CLL14 study define a new standard of a fixed 12-months treatment with obinutuzumab and venetoclax in previously untreated patients yielding a major benefit also for patients with high risk disease as compared to chemoimmunotherapy. However, high risk patients appear to progress earlier than low risk patients and the therapy is not clearly curative so far. Acalabrutinib is a second generation, selective BTK inhibitor which has shown promising overall response rates in patients with relapsed CLL or patients intolerant to ibrutinib. The development of acalabrutinib focussed on minimization of off-target activity. Results of a three-arm study investigating the combination of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus acalabrutinib alone versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (NCT02475681) showed a substantial improvement of PFS for the combination arm and the monotherapy versus the standard chemoimmunotherapy regimen. The addition of a BTK-inhibitor, such as acalabrutinib to obinutuzumab and venetoclax has the potential to result in a better outcome, because synergistic effects have been reported between BTK inhibitors and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors or for BCL-2 inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Synergistic effects, which are expected to reduce early progressions or insufficient responses, are in particular important for this high risk population. The triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab (or rituximab) and venetoclax has been investigated in a phase 1 b- study and had a tolerable safety profile with minimal to no drug-drug interactions, results of a phase 2 trial studying the same combination showed that the triple combination was highly active with 78% undetectable MRD levels in the bone marrow . Currently, the GCLLSG conducts phase 2 studies, investigating a triple combination consisting of BTK- and Bcl2-inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies (CLL2GIVe: NCT02758665; CLL2BAAG: NCT03787264) and a large phase 3 trial with one experimental arm with a triple combination (CLL13, NCT02950051) but results are not yet published. Acalabrutinib, venetoclax and obinutuzumab is now being studied in a registrational phase 3 trial CL-311 (NCT03836261) against the current standard of chemoimmunotherapy (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR), bendamustine/rituximab (BR) in patients without 17p-deletion or TP53-mutation. Acalabrutinib is indicated in Germany as monotherapy or in combination with obinutuzumab for the treatment of adult patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
1,603 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; 243 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 202 is above the median of 40 across 1,325 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell.
Browse Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell studies →German CLL Study Group is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Acalabrutinib plus Venetoclax plus Obinutuzumab plus (GAVe)
Drug: Obinutuzumab · Drug: Venetoclax · Drug: Acalabrutinib
Obinutuzumab plus Venetoclax (GVe)
Drug: Obinutuzumab · Drug: Venetoclax
Obinutuzumab i.v. infusion: Cycle 1 Day 1: Obinutuzumab 100 mg i.v. Cycle 1 Day 1 (or 2): Obinutuzumab 900 mg i.v. Cycle 1 Day 8: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v. Cycle 1 Day 15: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v. Cycles 2-6: Day 1: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v.
Also known as: Gazyva, Gazyvaro
Venetoclax p.o.: Cycle 1: Days 22-28: Venetoclax 20 mg (2 x 10 mg) Cycle 2: Days 1-7: Venetoclax 50 mg (1 x 50 mg) Cycle 2:Days 8-14: Venetoclax 100 mg (1 x 100 mg) Cycle 2:Days: 15-21: Venetoclax 200 mg (2 x 100 mg) Cycle 2:Days: 22-28: Venetoclax 400 mg (4 x 100 mg) Cycles 3-12: Days 1-28: Venetoclax 400 mg (4 x 100 mg)
Also known as: Venclexta, Venclyxto
Cycles 15-24: Days 1-28: 100 mg acalabrutinib twice daily p.o. approx. every 12 hrs (corresponding to a total daily dose of 200 mg).
Also known as: Calquence
Progression-free survival (PFS)
The study is designed to demonstrate that 14 cycles of treatment with GAVe followed by up to 10 cycles maintenance with acalabrutinib for patients with detectable MRD at cycle 14 day 14 prolong PFS as compared to 12 cycles of treatment with GVe in patients with high risk CLL (defined as hav-ing at least one of the following risk factors: 17p-deletion, TP53- mutation or complex karyotype).
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels
Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in the peripheral blood (PB) and in the bone marrow (BM) at final restaging ((Staging 5) cycle 15 day 1 for patients in GVe study arm, cycle 14 day 14 for patients in GAVe study arm)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
MRD in PB at cycle 27 day 1
MRD in PB at cycle 27 day 1 for all patients (end of maintenance for patients in GAVe study arm, who had detectable MRD levels after 14 cycles of GAVe-treatment)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Overall response rate
Overall response rate (ORR; as per iwCLL guidelines) at cycle 15
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Complete response rate
Complete response rate (CRR; as per iwCLL guidelines) at cycle 15
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Event-free survival (EFS)
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Duration of response (DOR)
Duration of response (DOR)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Time to next treatment (TTNT)
Time to next treatment (TTNT)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Correlation between MRD in PB/BM and PFS/OS
Time-to-event analyses will be calculated accordiung to MRD levels in peripheral bloos and bone marrow respectively.
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
MRD by methods other than flow cytometry (ddPCR)
New methods of MRD measurements (ddPCR) will be compared with the standard method (flow cytometry )
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Correlation between MRD in PB and BM
MRD levels in the peripheral blood and in the bone marrow will be statistically compared.
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Longitudinal Analysis of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC): Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) at defined timepoints
Outcome measure: scores of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CLL17 Questionnaires at defined timepoints will be analyzed and compared to baseline level for each patient. Scoring of the QLQ-C30 is performed according to QLQ-C30 Scoring manual. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score for the functioning scales and global health status denote a better level of functioning (i.e. a better state of the patient), while higher scores on the symptom and single-item scales indicate a higher level of symptoms (i.e. a worse state of the patient)
Time frame: 50 months after FPI
Plan to share: No
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell→
German CLL Study Group