CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05197192Updated Aug 20, 2026

A Phase-3-trial of Acalabrutinib, Obinutuzumab & Venetoclax Compared to Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Patients With High Risk CLL

A Phase 3 interventional study of Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, sponsored by German CLL Study Group. Recruiting at 30 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Sponsored by German CLL Study Group · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2022; still recruiting 4 years 5 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
202
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 120 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, superiority phase 3 study is designed to demonstrate that treatment with a triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GAVe) prolong the progression-free survival (PFS) as compared to treatment with the combination of obinutuzumab and venetoclax (GVe) in pa-tients with high risk CLL (defined as having at least one of the follow-ing risk factors: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation, complex karyotype or an unmutated IGHV-gene status).

Read the detailed description

CLL is the most frequent leukemia in industrialized countries. International guidelines agree on diagnosis and management of this disease. The clinical course of CLL is highly variable and can be predicted by clinical staging (according to Rai and Binet) as well as genetic, serum markers and risk models. This study is designed for a randomized comparison of two different, non-chemotherapeutic and fixed-duration modalities for patients with high risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and addresses a high medical need, since high risk-CLL represents a so far incurable, aggressive cancer. The high risk-group of CLL patients can be identified by molecular characteristics, allowing the inclusion of a clearly described group of patients: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation and/or complex karyotype.TP53 defects are the strongest prognostic factors for non-response to chemotherapy. Patients harboring TP53 defects should be treated with chemotherapy-free regimens. Complex karyotype (CKT), defined as the presence of three or more chromosomal aberrations in two or more metaphases is associated with a poorer outcome in various hematologic malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In CLL, CKT is one of several well established adverse prognostic factors, comparable to 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation or unmutated IGHV status. Depending on age and prior exposure to chemotherapy, 10-30% of patients with CLL exhibit CKT. A broad body of evidence has suggested a predictive prognostic value of CKT. Despite considerable advances with chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of frontline as well as relapsed/refractory (r/r) CLL, outcome of patients with CKT remains poor. To date, a randomized comparison to optimize the treatment of patients with high risk disease defined as either the presence of TP53 aberrations or CKT, by novel agents has not been performed. Patients with high risk CLL (TP53-defects and/or CKT) have a poor outcome with chemoimmunotherapy and do not benefit to the same extent from approved regimen such as continuous treatment of ibrutinib or 12 months treatment with obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. Monotherapy with BTK-inhibitor is less effective in those patients as compared with patients without high risk disease. Venetoclax combined with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab offers a highly effective fixed-duration treatment option with a manageable toxicity profile. The recent results of the CLL14 study define a new standard of a fixed 12-months treatment with obinutuzumab and venetoclax in previously untreated patients yielding a major benefit also for patients with high risk disease as compared to chemoimmunotherapy. However, high risk patients appear to progress earlier than low risk patients and the therapy is not clearly curative so far. Acalabrutinib is a second generation, selective BTK inhibitor which has shown promising overall response rates in patients with relapsed CLL or patients intolerant to ibrutinib. The development of acalabrutinib focussed on minimization of off-target activity. Results of a three-arm study investigating the combination of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus acalabrutinib alone versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (NCT02475681) showed a substantial improvement of PFS for the combination arm and the monotherapy versus the standard chemoimmunotherapy regimen. The addition of a BTK-inhibitor, such as acalabrutinib to obinutuzumab and venetoclax has the potential to result in a better outcome, because synergistic effects have been reported between BTK inhibitors and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors or for BCL-2 inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Synergistic effects, which are expected to reduce early progressions or insufficient responses, are in particular important for this high risk population. The triple combination of acalabrutinib, obinutuzumab (or rituximab) and venetoclax has been investigated in a phase 1 b- study and had a tolerable safety profile with minimal to no drug-drug interactions, results of a phase 2 trial studying the same combination showed that the triple combination was highly active with 78% undetectable MRD levels in the bone marrow . Currently, the GCLLSG conducts phase 2 studies, investigating a triple combination consisting of BTK- and Bcl2-inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies (CLL2GIVe: NCT02758665; CLL2BAAG: NCT03787264) and a large phase 3 trial with one experimental arm with a triple combination (CLL13, NCT02950051) but results are not yet published. Acalabrutinib, venetoclax and obinutuzumab is now being studied in a registrational phase 3 trial CL-311 (NCT03836261) against the current standard of chemoimmunotherapy (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR), bendamustine/rituximab (BR) in patients without 17p-deletion or TP53-mutation. Acalabrutinib is indicated in Germany as monotherapy or in combination with obinutuzumab for the treatment of adult patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Keywords

  • CLL
  • high risk
  • tp53 aberration
  • complex karyotype
  • unmutated IGHV gene status
03

In context

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell

1,603 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; 243 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 202 is above the median of 40 across 1,325 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell.

Browse Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

German CLL Study Group is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 120 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Documented CLL/SLL requiring treatment according to iwCLL criteria
  • Age at least 18 years
  • At least one of the following risk factors: 17p-deletion, TP53-mutation, complex karyotype (defined as defined as the presence of 3 or more chromosomal aberrations in 2 or more metaphases) or an unmutated IGHV gene status.
  • Life expectancy ≥ six months
  • Adequate bone marrow function indicated by a platelet count >30 x10\^9/l
  • Creatinine clearance ≥ 30ml/min
  • Adequate liver function as indicated by a total bilirubin ≤ 2 x, AST/ ALT ≤ 2.5 x the institutional ULN value, unless directly attributable to the patient's CLL or to Gilbert's Syndrome
  • Negative testing for hepatitis B (HbsAg negative and anti-HBc negative; patients positive for anti-HBc may be included if PCR for HBV DNA is negative and HBV-DNA PCR is performed every month until 12 months after last treatment cycle),or hepatitis C (negative testing for hepatitis C RNA within 6 wee
  • ks prior to registration for study screening (i.e. PCR only required when serology was positive))
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status) status 0-2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior CLL-specific therapies (except corticosteroid treatment administered due to necessary immediate intervention; within the last 10 days before start of study treatment, only dose equivalents up to 20 mg prednisolone are permitted)
  • Absence of high risk disease (17p-deletion, TP53-mutation complex karyotype
  • An individual organ/system impairment score of 4 as assessed by the CIRS definition (e.g. advanced cardiac disease (NYHA class 3 or 4) limiting the ability to receive the study treatment or any other life-threatening illness, medical condition or organ system dysfunction that, in the investigator´s opinion, could compromise the patients safety or interfere with the absorption or metabolism of the study drugs (e.g. inability to swallow tablets or impaired resorption in the gastrointestinal tract)
  • Transformation of CLL (Richter transformation)
  • Malignancies other than CLL currently requiring systemic therapies
  • Uncontrolled or active infection of HIV/PML or any other active infection
  • Anticoagulant therapy with warfarin or phenoprocoumon
  • Pregnant women and nursing mothers
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
202 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GAVe-Arm

    Acalabrutinib plus Venetoclax plus Obinutuzumab plus (GAVe)

    Drug: Obinutuzumab · Drug: Venetoclax · Drug: Acalabrutinib

  • Experimental
    GVe-Arm

    Obinutuzumab plus Venetoclax (GVe)

    Drug: Obinutuzumab · Drug: Venetoclax

Interventions

  • DrugObinutuzumab

    Obinutuzumab i.v. infusion: Cycle 1 Day 1: Obinutuzumab 100 mg i.v. Cycle 1 Day 1 (or 2): Obinutuzumab 900 mg i.v. Cycle 1 Day 8: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v. Cycle 1 Day 15: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v. Cycles 2-6: Day 1: Obinutuzumab 1000 mg i.v.

    Also known as: Gazyva, Gazyvaro

  • DrugVenetoclax

    Venetoclax p.o.: Cycle 1: Days 22-28: Venetoclax 20 mg (2 x 10 mg) Cycle 2: Days 1-7: Venetoclax 50 mg (1 x 50 mg) Cycle 2:Days 8-14: Venetoclax 100 mg (1 x 100 mg) Cycle 2:Days: 15-21: Venetoclax 200 mg (2 x 100 mg) Cycle 2:Days: 22-28: Venetoclax 400 mg (4 x 100 mg) Cycles 3-12: Days 1-28: Venetoclax 400 mg (4 x 100 mg)

    Also known as: Venclexta, Venclyxto

  • DrugAcalabrutinib

    Cycles 15-24: Days 1-28: 100 mg acalabrutinib twice daily p.o. approx. every 12 hrs (corresponding to a total daily dose of 200 mg).

    Also known as: Calquence

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free survival (PFS)

    The study is designed to demonstrate that 14 cycles of treatment with GAVe followed by up to 10 cycles maintenance with acalabrutinib for patients with detectable MRD at cycle 14 day 14 prolong PFS as compared to 12 cycles of treatment with GVe in patients with high risk CLL (defined as hav-ing at least one of the following risk factors: 17p-deletion, TP53- mutation or complex karyotype).

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

Secondary outcomes

  1. Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels

    Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in the peripheral blood (PB) and in the bone marrow (BM) at final restaging ((Staging 5) cycle 15 day 1 for patients in GVe study arm, cycle 14 day 14 for patients in GAVe study arm)

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

  2. MRD in PB at cycle 27 day 1

    MRD in PB at cycle 27 day 1 for all patients (end of maintenance for patients in GAVe study arm, who had detectable MRD levels after 14 cycles of GAVe-treatment)

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

  3. Overall response rate

    Overall response rate (ORR; as per iwCLL guidelines) at cycle 15

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

  4. Complete response rate

    Complete response rate (CRR; as per iwCLL guidelines) at cycle 15

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

  5. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

  6. Event-free survival (EFS)

    Event-free survival (EFS)

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

  7. Duration of response (DOR)

    Duration of response (DOR)

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

  8. Time to next treatment (TTNT)

    Time to next treatment (TTNT)

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

Other outcomes

  1. Correlation between MRD in PB/BM and PFS/OS

    Time-to-event analyses will be calculated accordiung to MRD levels in peripheral bloos and bone marrow respectively.

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

  2. MRD by methods other than flow cytometry (ddPCR)

    New methods of MRD measurements (ddPCR) will be compared with the standard method (flow cytometry )

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

  3. Correlation between MRD in PB and BM

    MRD levels in the peripheral blood and in the bone marrow will be statistically compared.

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

  4. Longitudinal Analysis of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC): Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) at defined timepoints

    Outcome measure: scores of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CLL17 Questionnaires at defined timepoints will be analyzed and compared to baseline level for each patient. Scoring of the QLQ-C30 is performed according to QLQ-C30 Scoring manual. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score for the functioning scales and global health status denote a better level of functioning (i.e. a better state of the patient), while higher scores on the symptom and single-item scales indicate a higher level of symptoms (i.e. a worse state of the patient)

    Time frame: 50 months after FPI

07

Study locations

30 of 30 sites recruiting
  • Helios Klinikum Bad Saarow
    Bad Saarow, 15526, Germany
    • Daniel Schöndube · Contact
    Recruiting
  • DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick
    Berlin, 12559, Germany
    • Christian Neumann · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Ev. Diakoniekrankenhaus
    Bremen, 28239, Germany
    • Ralf Ulrich Trappe · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinik Köln
    Cologne, 50937, Germany
    • Barbara Eichhorst · Contact
    Recruiting
  • St. Johannes Hospital
    Dortmund, 44137, Germany
    • Ralf Meyer · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Marien Hospital Düsseldorf
    Düsseldorf, 40479, Germany
    • Stefanie Gröpper · Contact
    Recruiting
  • St. Antonius-Hospital
    Eschweiler, 52249, Germany
    • Peter Staib · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Universitaetsklinikum Essen
    Essen, 45147, Germany
    • Julia von Tresckow · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Katholisches Krankenhaus Hagen - St. Josefs Hospital
    Hagen, 58097, Germany
    • Doris Kraemer · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Universitaetskliniken des Saarlandes
    Homburg, 66424, Germany
    • Jörg Bittenbring · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Klinikum Idar-Oberstein SHG
    Idar-Oberstein, 55743, Germany
    • Johannes Schneider · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
    Karlsruhe, 76133, Germany
    • Henriette Huber · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel
    Kiel, 24116, Germany
    • Matthias Ritgen · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Klinikum Landshut
    Landshut, 84034, Germany
    • Christian Bogner · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Klinikum Lippe-Lemgo
    Lemgo, 32657, Germany
    • Karin Heinisch · Contact
    Recruiting
  • St Vincenz Krankenhaus
    Limburg, 65549, Germany
    • Thomas Neuhaus · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Universitaetsklinikum Magdeburg
    Magdeburg, 39120, Germany
    • Ana Maria Waldleben · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Klinikum Hochsauerland - St. Walburga Krankenhaus
    Meschede, 59872, Germany
    • Mohammad Wattad · Contact
    Recruiting
  • KH Kliniken Maria Hilf
    Mönchengladbach, 41063, Germany
    • Ulrich Graeven · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Krankenhaus Muenchen-Schwabing
    Munich, 80804, Germany
    • Clemens Wendtner · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Klinikum Rechts der Isar - Technische Universitaet Muenchen
    Munich, 81675, Germany
    • Simon Heidegger · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Kliniken Ostalb, Stauferklinikum Schwäbisch Gmünd
    Mutlangen, 73557, Germany
    • Holger Hebart · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Klinikum Oldenburg
    Oldenburg, 26133, Germany
    • Andrea Renzelmann · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Brüderkrankenhaus St. Josef Paderborn
    Paderborn, 33098, Germany
    • Tobias Gaska · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinik Rostock
    Rostock, 18057, Germany
    • Sebastian Böttcher · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Caritas-Klinik St. Theresia
    Saarbrücken, 66113, Germany
    • Michael Clemens · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böbingen
    Sindelfingen, 71065, Germany
    • Markus Ritter · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Marienhospital Stuttgart
    Stuttgart, 70199, Germany
    • Claudio Denzlinger · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Universitaetsklinik Tuebingen
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
    • Stefan Wirths · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinik Ulm
    Ulm, 89081, Germany
    • Christof Schneider · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05197192
Lead sponsor
German CLL Study Group
Collaborators
AstraZeneca
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 19, 2022
Start date
Apr 19, 2022
Primary completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Study contacts

Barbara Eichhorst, MD, Prof.
Contact
barbara.eichhorst@uk-koeln.de
+4922147888220
Anna Fink, MD
Contact
anna-maria.fink@uk-koeln.de
+4922147888220
Barbara Eichhorst, MD, Prof.
principal investigator · Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion