ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05196919Updated Jan 15, 2025Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of XT-150 for Facet Joint Osteoarthritis Pain

A Phase 2 interventional study of XT-150 and Placebo in Facet Joint Pain, Back Pain and Inflammation, sponsored by Xalud Therapeutics, Inc.. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-15.

Sponsored by Xalud Therapeutics, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 2a safety and efficacy study of XT-150 in adult participants experiencing back pain due to inflammation of the facet joint, also known as facet joint osteoarthritis (FJOA), and who are eligible for intra articular glucocorticoid injection, or radiofrequency ablation of medial branches of the primary dorsal ramus of the exiting nerve root, which innervates the adjacent facet joints.

Study drug will be administered at Day 0 and Day 90 by bilateral intra-articular (IA) injection into the facet capsule, at the affected spinal level (e.g. Lumbar [L]3-4, L4-5, or L5-Sacrum [S]1) as determined by imaging (e.g., Magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], Computed tomography [CT]), X-ray, etc.) and physical exam.

Up to 72 participants will be randomized to placebo or one of two dose treatment groups (24 participants per treatment group).

  1. 0.15 mg XT-150 (1.0 milliliter [mL] total delivered by two 0.5 mL injections)
  2. 0.45 mg XT-150 (1.0 mL total delivered by two 0.5 mL injections)
  3. Placebo (Sterile saline) (1.0 mL total delivered by two 0.5 mL injections)
02

Conditions studied

  • Facet Joint Pain
  • Back Pain
  • Inflammation

Keywords

  • FJOA
  • Facetogenic Pain
  • Intra-articular Injection
03

In context

Back Pain

728 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 109 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 75 is close to the median of 70 across 593 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Xalud Therapeutics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (40%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Participants are required to meet ALL of the following inclusion criteria:

  1. Male or female, between 18 and 90 years of age, inclusive.
  2. Sufficiently severe facet arthropathy of lumbar facets as determined by imaging (e.g., MRI, CT, X-ray, etc.) to establish an underlying basis of disease, as determined by usual bony and ligamentous signs of osteoarthritis (OA). Use of historical images permitted if obtained within the last 12 months.
  3. Complaint of nociceptive, mechanical pain of lumbar spine, in particular pain localized to paramedian axis as opposed to midline or radicular. Radicular pain as a secondary finding may be allowed if it is in addition to mechanical pain and can be clinically distinguished by participant.
  4. LBP (Low Back Pain) worsened by activity or motion of region
  5. Have had a positive diagnostic facet pain block with lidocaine; admittance if participant gains 50% relief of pain within 30 minutes of test injection
  6. Be free of local or intra-articular infection, tumor or other causes of localized LBP, for example, spondylolysis/pars defect, and adjacent vertebral body compression fracture based on imaging evaluation.
  7. Symptomatic disease because of osteoarthritis, established by imaging of facet joint and defined as a worst pain of at least 50 at the Screening Visit and the Baseline (Day 0) Visit (based on scale of 0 to 100, with 100 representing "pain as bad as you can imagine") using Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
  8. Stable analgesic regimen during the 4 weeks prior to enrollment. Participants who are not currently on any analgesics at the time of enrollment because they have discontinued prior analgesic therapy due to intolerance or lack of effect may be included. New analgesics or changes to the pre-established regimen during the study, with the exception of rescue medication use, are not permitted.
  9. Inadequate pain relief with prior therapies lasting 3 months or more.
  10. In the judgment of the Investigator, acceptable general medical condition
  11. Heterosexually active participants, male and female who are not surgically sterile or , must agree to use effective , including abstinence, for the duration of the study and for 3 months after the study is completed
  12. Have suitable facet joint anatomy for intra-articular injection
  13. Willing and able to return for the follow-up (FU) visits
  14. Able to read and understand study instructions, and willing and able to comply with all study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants must NOT meet any of the following exclusion criteria:

  1. , allergy, or significant reaction to lidocaine or any ingredient of the study drug, including double-stranded DNA, mannose, and sucrose
  2. Facet injection with in the past 6 months
  3. Lumbar medial branch nerve ablation (e.g., by radiofrequency technique) within the past 12 months
  4. Prior lumbar fusion surgery
  5. Prior or existing medial branch nerve stimulation device (e.g., Mainstay device)
  6. Scheduled surgical procedure or nerve ablation to joint within the next 6 months; participant agrees not to schedule a surgical procedure, nerve ablation, or added facet injection within 6 months of study treatment
  7. High peri-operative risks which in the judgment of the investigator preclude a safe facet joint injection procedure (e.g. extreme obesity putting injection accuracy at risk, etc.)
  8. Current treatment with (systemic corticosteroid therapy [equivalent to >10 milligrams per day {mg/day} prednisone] or other strong immunosuppressant)
  9. History of immunosuppressive therapy; high-potency systemic steroids in the last 3 months.
  10. Currently receiving systemic chemotherapy or radiation therapy for
  11. hepatic disease as indicated by clinical laboratory results ≥3 times the for any liver function test (e.g., , alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase)
  12. Severe anemia (Grade 3; \<8.0 grams per deciliter [g/dL], \<4.9 millimoles per liter [mmol/L], \<80 g/L; transfusion indicated), Grade 1 white cell counts (lymphocytes \<Lower limit of normal [LLN] - 800/cubic millimeters [mm\^3]; \<LLN - 0.8 x 10\^9/L, neutrophils \<LLN - 1500/mm\^3; \<LLN - 1.5 x 10\^9/L)
  13. Positive serology with reflex for , virus, or virus within 4 weeks of commencing the study
  14. Significant neuropsychiatric conditions, dementia, major depression, or altered mental state that in the opinion of the Investigator will interfere with study participation
  15. Current treatment with systemic antibiotics or antivirals (EXCEPTION: topical treatments)
  16. Current treatment with anticoagulants, other than low-dose aspirin. Participants, if medically feasible, can interrupt anticoagulant therapy by following local medical practice protocol for intra-articular injections for participants on anticoagulant, antiplatelet therapy.
  17. Known or suspected history of active alcohol or intravenous/oral drug abuse within 1 year before the screening visit
  18. Use of any drug or device within 1 month before enrollment or current participation in a trial that included intervention with a drug or device; or currently participating in an investigational drug or device study.
  19. Any condition that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, could compromise the safety of the participant, the participant's ability to communicate with the study staff, or the quality of the data
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(14)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
75 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    0.15mg XT-150

    0.15mg XT-150 administered in 1.0 mL total delivered by two 0.5 mL injections on Day 0 and Day 90.

    Biological: XT-150

  • Experimental
    0.45mg XT-150

    0.45mg XT-150 administered in 1.0 mL total delivered by two 0.5 mL injections on Day 0 and Day 90.

    Biological: XT-150

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo administered in 1.0 mL total delivered by two 0.5 mL injections on Day 0 and Day 90.

    Biological: Placebo

Interventions

  • BiologicalXT-150

    XT-150 is a plasmid Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) formulated in buffered, D mannose saline solution.

  • BiologicalPlacebo

    Phosphate-buffered saline for injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEs

    Adverse events were collected from the time of informed consent through the last study visit on Day 270 (9 months). Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurred from the time of study drug treatment on Day 0 through end of study (Day 270) or early termination.

    Time frame: Up to Day 270

  2. Number of Participants Reporting Abnormal Hematology and Chemistry Parameters, Physical Examination, and Vital Signs

    Hematology and chemistry samples were only collected at Screening and not retested; therefore no results are available for those assessments Abnormal clinically significant physical examination findings were reported as adverse events, as applicable, and not separately reported. Vital signs of temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure were collected at all visits throughout the study.

    Time frame: Up to Day 270

  3. Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The VAS is 0-100 scale which will be administered to participants via Electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) at each study visit. The participant will record his/her facet pain level on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). Higher scores indicate worse pain intensity.

    Time frame: Day 270

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Scores

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-item questionnaire to quantify disability for acute or chronic low back pain. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 (least amount of disability) to 5 (most severe disability). Higher scores indicate severe disability.

    Time frame: Day 270

  2. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Scores

    PGA is used to assess the current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). Higher score indicates worse symptoms.

    Time frame: Up to Day 270

  3. Change From Baseline in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ Short Form) Scores

    The globally standardized and validated IPAQ - short form is used to measure self-reported physical activity levels. Four metabolic equivalent tasks (MET) - vigorous, moderate, walking and sitting were included to obtain the physical activity levels from the participants. A higher MET value indicates a higher physical activity level.

    Time frame: Day 270

07

Results

Posted Jan 15, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150Placebo
Started252525
Completed182224
Not completed731

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEs

Adverse events were collected from the time of informed consent through the last study visit on Day 270 (9 months). Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurred from the time of study drug treatment on Day 0 through end of study (Day 270) or early termination.

Time frame:
Up to Day 270
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEs
Participants0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150Placebo
Any TEAEs — Yes111214
Any TEAEs — No141311
Related TEAEs — Yes113
Related TEAEs — No242422
Serious TEAEs — Yes110
Serious TEAEs — No242425
Related Serious TEAEs — Yes000
Related Serious TEAEs — No252525
PrimaryNumber of Participants Reporting Abnormal Hematology and Chemistry Parameters, Physical Examination, and Vital Signs

Hematology and chemistry samples were only collected at Screening and not retested; therefore no results are available for those assessments Abnormal clinically significant physical examination findings were reported as adverse events, as applicable, and not separately reported. Vital signs of temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure were collected at all visits throughout the study.

Time frame:
Up to Day 270
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Abnormal Hematology and Chemistry Parameters, Physical Examination, and Vital Signs
Participants0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150Placebo
Day 0 — Normal222423
Day 0 — Abnormal - Not Clinically Significant312
Day 0 — Abnormal Clinically Significant000
Day 0 — Not Analyzed (Missing Data)000
Day 270 — Normal151920
Day 270 — Abnormal - Not Clinically Significant010
Day 270 — Abnormal Clinically Significant000
Day 270 — Not Analyzed (Missing Data)1055
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Pain Intensity Using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The VAS is 0-100 scale which will be administered to participants via Electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) at each study visit. The participant will record his/her facet pain level on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). Higher scores indicate worse pain intensity.

Time frame:
Day 270
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
score on a scale0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150Placebo
Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-38.12 ± 6.432-34.37 ± 5.717-42.32 ± 5.811
Statistical analysis
  • 0.15mg XT-150 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 1.00 · Mean difference (final values): 4.20 · 95% CI -22.57 to 30.97
  • 0.45mg XT-150 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.99 · Mean difference (final values): 7.96 · 95% CI -17.12 to 33.03
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Scores

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-item questionnaire to quantify disability for acute or chronic low back pain. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 (least amount of disability) to 5 (most severe disability). Higher scores indicate severe disability.

Time frame:
Day 270
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Scores
score on a scale0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150Placebo
Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Scores-14.4 ± 3.43-3.11 ± 3.104-8.25 ± 3.17
Statistical analysis
  • 0.15mg XT-150 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1933 · Mean difference (final values): -6.15 · 95% CI -15.49 to 3.19
  • 0.45mg XT-150 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2511 · Mean difference (final values): 5.14 · 95% CI -3.73 to 14.00
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Scores

PGA is used to assess the current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). Higher score indicates worse symptoms.

Time frame:
Up to Day 270
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Scores
score on a scale0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150Placebo
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Scores-0.6 ± 1.55-0.7 ± 1.18-0.9 ± 0.97
SecondaryChange From Baseline in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ Short Form) Scores

The globally standardized and validated IPAQ - short form is used to measure self-reported physical activity levels. Four metabolic equivalent tasks (MET) - vigorous, moderate, walking and sitting were included to obtain the physical activity levels from the participants. A higher MET value indicates a higher physical activity level.

Time frame:
Day 270
Reported as:
Mean · days
Change From Baseline in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ Short Form) Scores
days0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150Placebo
Days vigorous physical activity during last 7 days0.7 ± 2.43-0.6 ± 1.64-0.3 ± 1.06
Days moderate physical activity during last 7 days1.5 ± 3.44-0.6 ± 3.450.2 ± 3.08
Days walking at least 10 minutes during last 7 days0.9 ± 2.64-0.8 ± 3.07-0.5 ± 3.27

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from the time of informed consent through the last study visit on Day 270 (9 months). Treatment Emergent Adverse Events occurred from the time of study drug treatment on Day 0 through end of study (Day 270) or early termination.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
0.15mg XT-1500/25 (0%)1/25 (4%)11/25 (44%)
0.45mg XT-1500/25 (0%)1/25 (4%)12/25 (48%)
Placebo0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)14/25 (56%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
Event0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150Placebo
Aortic DissectionVascular disorders1/250/250/25
Large B-cell lymphomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/251/250/25
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
Event0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150Placebo
COVID-19Infections and infestations5/251/254/25
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/255/253/25
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/253/252/25
InfluenzaInfections and infestations2/250/250/25
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations2/250/250/25
Musculoskeletal painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/250/252/25
Muscle strainInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/251/251/25
Traumatic haematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/251/251/25
LethargyNervous system disorders0/251/251/25

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150PlaceboTotal
Mean59.5 ± 9.7158.0 ± 13.1163.6 ± 13.7460.3 ± 12.37
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150PlaceboTotal
Female1381334
Male12171241
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino0336
Not Hispanic or Latino25222269
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0011
Asian1012
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American44311
White19211959
More than one race1001
Unknown or Not Reported0011
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150PlaceboTotal
United States25252575
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m2)0.15mg XT-1500.45mg XT-150PlaceboTotal
Mean31.0 ± 6.2331.0 ± 6.7727.7 ± 6.4429.9 ± 6.59
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Neurovations
    Napa, California 94558, United States
  • Source HealthCare
    Santa Monica, California 90403, United States
  • Center for Clinical Research
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2022 to primary completion in Sep 2023, 18 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2025, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 13, 2021
First posted
Jan 19, 2022
StartActual
Feb 24, 2022
Primary completionActual
Sep 20, 2023
CompletionActual
Sep 20, 2023
Results first posted
Jan 15, 2025
Last update
Jan 15, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05196919
Lead sponsor
Xalud Therapeutics, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 19, 2022
Start date
Feb 24, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 20, 2023
Completion
Sep 20, 2023
Results posted
Jan 15, 2025
Last update
Jan 15, 2025

Study contacts

Morgan Stokes
study director · Xalud Therapeutics
Howard Rutman, MD
study director · Xalud Therapeutics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: XT-150

Start the discussion