An interventional study of a proprioception protocol associated with vaginal palpation and feedback and a proprioception protocol associated with biofeedback in Urinary Incontinence, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-22.
Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is the first line treatment of urinary incontinence (UI), anal incontinence (AI) and mild/moderate pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women. However, 25 to 40% of women with pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms are unable to voluntarily contract their pelvic floor muscle (PFM) and PFM proprioception of this population is specially reduced. Literature is scarce about methods to facilitate a voluntary PFM contraction and improve PFM proprioception therefore, a specific protocol structured to teach PFM contraction is needed. The use of biofeedback could facilitate women´s capacity to voluntary contract their PFM.
Randomised, parallel (two arm), trial comparing biofeedback (experimental arm) versus vaginal palpation (active control, i.e. usual practice) to achieve a correct voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction in women who cannot perform a correct contraction (i.e. grade 0, 1 or 2 on the Modified Oxford Scale). The trial hypothesis is that there is no difference between the two trial arms in the proportion of women achieving a correct voluntary contract (grade 3 or better).
The training protocol will be the same for both groups and will vary according to PFM function assessed at 0, 3, 6 and 9-week timepoint. The resting time after each contraction will be the double of the contraction duration, therefore if it is performed a 3-second contraction, it will be a 6-second rest. The first session will aim to improve some skills as understanding, searching, and finding PFM, the educational component of this session was structured considering Health Belief Model and will be conducted with the following information: 1) General information (female genital anatomy, female intern organs, pelvic floor muscle anatomy, pelvic floor muscle function), 2) specific information about urinary incontinence (definition of urinary incontinence, predictors of risk for urinary incontinence, impact on quality of life), 3) the relation between PFM and urinary incontinence, 4) pelvic floor muscle training as first line treatment for urinary incontinence, 5) how to include PFM proprioception protocol into daily life. It will be used as educational materials images and draws of the region and an educational booklet will be delivered to them. It will be shown to then a video of a PFM contraction emphasizing how the correct PFM contraction is supposed to be. The other sessions will focus will vary according to PFM function accessed at each timepoint:
The resting time after each set will be 3 minutes and the protocol will evolve as following:
The two groups will receive a booklet and guidance to perform the training protocol at home on alternate days and a diary to register their adherence to the program. The guided protocol will be the same used during the supervised training on that specific week. Women will be oriented to choose the position to practice unsupervised sessions (i.e. supine,lateral, sitting and/or standing).
1,363 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 228 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 66 across 1,011 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.
Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,005 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
It will not be included in this study:
Exclusion Criteria:
The participants of CG will be placed in the supine position with flexion of the hip and knee and feet supported on the stretcher. Vaginal palpation will be used as a proprioceptive resource to facilitate PFM voluntary contraction. The physiotherapist responsible for conducting the treatment, wearing gloves, will perform a one or two-finger vaginal palpation, depending on participant's vaginal canal. Positive reinforcements will be verbalized after each PFM contraction. The training protocol will be tailored, and the evolution will be the same for CG and BPFMT.
Other: a proprioception protocol associated with vaginal palpation and feedback
The participants of BG will receive the same protocol of CG but associated with biofeedback with an electromyographic sensor through the Miotol equipment (Miotec, Brazil). The participants of the BG will also be positioned in the same position described to CG. The electromyographic sensor will be covered with neutral gel and inserted into the participant's vaginal canal. Participants will see the visual response of the contraction on the computer screen. The software has five different interfaces for visualize PFM contraction and each participant will be able to choose the one that she prefers at each session. The training protocol will be tailored, and the evolution will be the same for CG and BG. During the first session, it will be explained what is biofeedback and what means everything that appears on the software interface.
Other: a proprioception protocol associated with biofeedback
A total of 13 previously established examples of voice commands can be used by the physiotherapists to help women understand how to perform a PFM contraction.
The software has five different interfaces for visualize PFM contraction: sign itself and signal transformed into the movement of a balloon; an airplane; a fairy; or a bird. Positive reinforcements will be verbalized after each PFM contraction using one of 4 previously established examples of voice commands.
change in ability to perform a voluntary PFM contraction
be to gain the ability to perform a voluntary PFM contraction assessed by vaginal palpation and classified by the modified oxford scale (MOS). Women able to perform PFM contraction with both occlusion of the vaginal opening and inward movement will be considered able to perform a voluntary PFM contraction, this is the description of MOS grade 3.
Time frame: At baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks
Urinary incontinence (UI)
The presence of UI, its severity and impact on quality of life will be assessed by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF)
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks
self-perception of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction
Self-perception of PFM contraction will be a self-reported measure classified according to Modified oxford scale (MOS). MOS is a categorical variable with 6 possible answers ranging from 0 to 5.
Time frame: At baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks
adherence to treatment
Adherence to supervised and unsupervised treatment will be assessed with physiotherapist registration of sessions and participants' exercise diary respectively. This is a descriptive variable that will range from 0 to 12 sessions (supervised treatment) and from 0 - 36 days (unsupervised treatment).
Time frame: weekly up to 12 weeks
adverse effects
Adverse effects will be assessed using the following question "Did you experienced any discomfort or warm during supervised treatment?" at the lest assessment timepoint.
Time frame: 12 weeks
satisfaction with treatment
Satisfaction with treatment will be assessed using a numerical scale (0-10).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Sao Paulo