CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05193825REMOTEUpdated Aug 29, 2025

Evaluation of Remote DBS Programming.

An interventional study of Remote Programming and Standard Programming in Deep Brain Stimulation, Telemedicine and Parkinson Disease, sponsored by Thomas Köglsperger. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-29.

Sponsored by Thomas Köglsperger · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Dec 2024, 1 year 9 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents the treatment of choice for advanced stages of Parkinson's disease (PD). Currently, adaptive closed-loop stimulation systems that apply disease-specific biomarkers, such as local field potentials (LFPs), are being actively examined to facilitate DBS programming. However, the most suitable feedback signal, still remains to be determined. The investigators previously tested the usefulness of the patient's subjective rating on a visual analogue scale (VAS) as a potential feedback signal for DBS adjustment and found that VAS-based programming lead to similar results as our standard approach. One of the practical advantages of using VAS-based programming strategies - in addition to saving time - is the principal applicability of such an approach to a remote programming setting, although a validation of such an approach is required. Within the scope of a prospective, randomized multicenter clinical trial (the REMOTE Trial), the investigators will examine the effectiveness and safety of VAS-based remote DBS programming in PD by using a novel and recently introduced software platform (Abbott NeurosphereTM Virtual Clinic) that allows for the programming through a smartphone-based video connection with the patient. Therefore, n = 50 PD patients undergoing STN-DBS surgery will be randomized and subsequent to surgery will have their IPG settings adjusted either during regular visits at the hospital or alternatively be programmed remotely through a VAS-based approach. Prior to surgery and after a 90 days follow-up period, we will assess specific clinical (MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale = UPDRS, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 sum index = PDQ-39 SI, Beck Depression Inventory = BDI, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale = MOCA) parameters to determine the effectivity and safety of the two different strategies on the patient outcome and to correlate it with VAS ratings and MRI data. The results will support the examination of remote-based DBS programming and evaluate the patient's subjective judgment as a valid feedback signal.

02

Conditions studied

  • Deep Brain Stimulation
  • Telemedicine
  • Parkinson Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Deep Brain Stimulation
  • Telemedicine
  • Parkinson's Disease (PD)
  • Subthalamic Nucleus (STN)
  • Remote
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is above the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Thomas Köglsperger as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 35 and 80 yrs.
  • Ability to communicate with the study physician and to understand the requirements of the study
  • Idiopathic Parkinson's Syndrome; IPS (according to MDS-Criteria)
  • Implantation of a DBS device for the stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) to treat PD.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any inability to communicate with the study physician and to understand the requirements of the study
  • Exclusion criteria of an idiopathic Parkinson's syndrome (IPS)
  • Fulfills the criteria of dementia (according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A

    Patients in Group A (active comparator) will have their internal pulse generator (IPG) adjusted by conventional procedures, i.e. by regular visits at their caregivers hospital.

    Device: Standard Programming

  • Experimental
    Group B

    Patients in Group B (experimental) will have their internal pulse generator (IPG) adjusted by using a novel software (Abbot NeurosphereTM Virtual Clinics) that allows for remote IPG programming and with the aid of a visual analogue scale (VAS).

    Device: Remote Programming

Interventions

  • DeviceRemote Programming

    Patients in the experimental group (Group B) will have their internal pulse generators (IPGs) adjusted through a novel software that allows for remote DBS programming (NeurosphereTM Virtual Clinic)

  • DeviceStandard Programming

    Patients in the active comparator group (Group A) will have their internal pulse generators (IPGs) adjusted through a standard procedure at their caregivers institution.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in UPDRS-III (Stimulation ON/Medication ON = STIM-ON/MED-ON)

    Part III of the MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (Range 0-128 pts. with high values indicating a more severe disease symptoms)

    Time frame: Assessed at Day 90

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in UPDRS-I

    Part I of the MDS-Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (Range 0-52 pts. with high values indicating more severe disease symptoms)

    Time frame: Assessed at day -1 and +90 (day 0 = implantation of DBS electrodes)

  2. Change in UPDRS-II

    Part II of the MDS-Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (Range 0-52 pts. with high values indicating more severe disease symptoms)

    Time frame: Assessed at day -1 and +90 (day 0 = implantation of DBS electrodes)

  3. Change in UPDRS-IV

    Part IV of the MDS-Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (Range 0-24 pts. with high values indicating more severe disease symptoms)

    Time frame: Assessed at day -1 and +90 (day 0 = implantation of DBS electrodes)

  4. Change in PDQ-39-SI

    Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 Sum Index (Range 0-100 pts. with high values indicating more severe disease symptoms)

    Time frame: Assessed at day -1 and +90 (day 0 = implantation of DBS electrodes)

  5. Change in Patient Rating (Patient Diary)

    Number of hours spent with bothersome dyskinesia or in a reduced mobility state (OFF)

    Time frame: Assessed on a weekly basis by the patient between day +5 and +90 (day 0 = implantation of DBS electrodes)

  6. Number of visits at the the hospital or remotely

    Number of doctor-patient contacts either in person at the hospital (Group A) or remotely (Group B)

    Time frame: Assessed at day +90 (day 0 = implantation of DBS electrodes)

  7. Change in TEED

    Total Electrical Energy Delivered by the IPG; TEED (1s) = (voltage2 × frequency × pulsewidth) / impedance (1s)

    Time frame: Assessed at day +5 and +90 (day 0 = implantation of DBS electrodes)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital
    Munich, Bavaria 81377, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05193825
Lead sponsor
Thomas Köglsperger
Collaborators
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Hospital Muenster
Responsible party
Thomas Köglsperger (Resident Physician; Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 18, 2022
Start date
Mar 22, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2024
Completion
Jul 30, 2025
Last update
Aug 29, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion