CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05193240SwaLOUpdated Feb 17, 2026

Predictive Value of a Preliminary Swallowing Test Compared to Postoperative Nasofibroscopy to Identify Vocal Cord Paralysis After Pulmonary Resection

An interventional study of preliminary swallowing test in Adults Patients Undergoing Major Lung Resection in the Context of Lung Cancer, sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-17.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The literature describes recurrent nerve damage during thoracic surgery as a fairly complication (5 to 31% of patients). This nerve damage leads to paresis or paralysis of the ipsilateral vocal cord. This cord dysfunction no longer ensures the protective role of the airways during swallowing. This postoperative dysphagia is associated with complications such as aspiration pneumonia, the use of nasogastric tube feeding (adding difficulty to swallowing), delayed oral refeeding (risk of undernutrition, dehydration, decrease in the quality of life), and an increase in the length of hospitalization and mortality.

Identifying these patients at risk is essential to limit complications (pneumonia, reintubation, inadequate refeeding, etc.). The benchmark test to objectify vocal cord palsy is to perform a nasofibroscopy requiring equipment and the intervention of an ENT doctor or thoracic surgeon.

A physiotherapist can also perform a preliminary swallowing test by evaluating several criteria.

The aim of this study is to compare the concordance of results between nasofibroscopy and that by preliminary swallowing test, two procedures performed in the screening of vocal cord paralysis in a surgical intensive care unit and a thoracic surgery ward.

Patients will be included before the surgery. During this inclusion visit, we will perform a preoperative swallowing test.

Immediately after surgery (H2-H24 after extubation), we will perform a preliminary swallowing test, an ultrasound examination of the vocal cords and a nasofibroscopy to determine the mobility of the vocal cords. A physiotherapist will carry out the first two assessments. An ENT physician will perform the nasofibroscopy. The ENT physician performing the nasofibroscopy will not know the conclusions of the tests carried out by the physiotherapist immediately after the operation.

At last, on day 4 after extubation, we will repeat the preliminary swallowing test and the ultrasound examination to measure the evolution of cord mobility.

Initial evaluation and secondary evaluation (day 4) will be performed by two different physiotherapists in order to allow blinding between the two stages of the procedure.

45 days after the surgery, we will realize a follow-up on medical file and mark the end of the research.

We want to include 72 patients over an 18 months period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adults Patients Undergoing Major Lung Resection in the Context of Lung Cancer
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Rouen is the lead sponsor of 410 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (≥ 18 years old)
  • Patient who is scheduled for a major left lung resection surgery (segmentectomy, lobectomy, pneumonectomy) or a right lung resection with upper lymph node dissection in the context of lung cancer
  • Patient who capable to read and understand the patient information and consent.
  • Patient capable to read and sign the consent form
  • Patient with social insurance
  • Woman of childbearing age with effective contraception (see WHO definition), postmenopausal woman (≥ 12 months of amenorrhea not induced by therapy)
  • Negative urine pregnancy test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of swallowing or eating disorders,
  • Neurological history with known sequelae or cognitive disorders
  • Preoperative nasogastric tube feeding
  • Person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision or person placed under judicial protection, under guardianship or curatorship,
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patient participating in another clinical trial with the same primary outcome
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    preliminary swallowing test

    compared as nasofibroscopy and ultrasound examination of vocal cords

    Diagnostic Test: preliminary swallowing test

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testpreliminary swallowing test

    Patients will be included before the surgery. During this inclusion visit, we will perform a preoperative swallowing test. Immediately after surgery (H2-H24 after extubation), we will perform a preliminary swallowing test, an ultrasound examination of the vocal cords and a nasofibroscopy to determine the mobility of the vocal cords. A physiotherapist will carry out the first two assessments. An ENT physician will perform the nasofibroscopy. The ENT physician performing the nasofibroscopy will not know the conclusions of the tests carried out by the physiotherapist immediately after the operation. At last, on day 4 after extubation, we will repeat the preliminary swallowing test and the ultrasound examination to measure the evolution of cord mobility. 30 days after the surgery, we will realize a follow-up on medical file and mark the end of the research.

    Also known as: nasofibroscopy, ultrasound examination of the vocal cords

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. discreapancies between preliminary swallowing test and nasofibroscopy

    the number of discrepancies between the two test, namely the times when the two tests do not reach the same conclusion after the patients's extubation

    Time frame: 2 hours after extubation to 24 hours after extubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of swallowing disorders pre-existing to planned surgery,

    established according to the results of the swallowing test carried out by a physiotherapist

    Time frame: inclusion

  2. performance of the preliminary swallowing test

    * Sensitivity: The number of patients for whom the two tests reach the same conclusion among those with disorders according to the nasofibroscopy test * Specificity: The number of patients for whom the two tests reach the same conclusion among those who have no disorder according to the nasofibroscopy test

    Time frame: 2 hours after extubation to 24 hours after extubation

  3. Performance of the ultrasound examination

    * Sensitivity: The number of patients for whom the two tests reach the same conclusion among those with disorders according to the nasofibroscopy test * Specificity: The number of patients for whom the two tests reach the same conclusion among those who have no disorder according to the nasofibroscopy test

    Time frame: 2 hours after extubation to 24 hours after extubation

  4. - Proportion of patients for whom the score of the preliminary swallowing test on day 4 is different than that obtained for the same test carried out immediately postoperatively

    \- Proportion of patients for whom the score of the preliminary swallowing test on day 4 is different than that obtained for the same test carried out immediately postoperatively

    Time frame: Between (2 hours after extubation to 24 hours after extubation) and Day 4

  5. Proportion of patients for whom the score of the ultrasound examination of the vocal cords on day 4 is different than that obtained for the same test carried out immediately postoperatively

    Proportion of patients for whom the score of the ultrasound examination of the vocal cords on day 4 is different than that obtained for the same test carried out immediately postoperatively

    Time frame: Between (2 hours after extubation to 24 hours after extubation) and Day 4

  6. Assessment of the discomfort felt during the 3 tests

    Assessment of the discomfort felt during the 3 tests carried out using a numerical scale from 0 to 10

    Time frame: 2 hours after extubation to 24 hours after extubation

  7. Prevalence of postoperative complications according to the grade of the Clavien-Dindo classification

    Prevalence of postoperative complications according to the grade of the Clavien-Dindo classification (within 30 days after surgery). The national database EpiThor provides this information.

    Time frame: 30 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05193240
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Rouen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 14, 2022
Start date
Sep 11, 2024
Primary completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 17, 2026

Study contacts

Baptiste MICHAUX, physiotherapist
principal investigator · University Hospital, Rouen

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion