CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05188521Updated Jun 11, 2024Results posted

Baricitinib (LY3009104) in the Treatment of Cutaneous Lichen Planus

A Phase 2 interventional study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) 2 mg and Baricitinib (LY3009104) 4 mg in Cutaneous Lichen Planus, sponsored by Aaron R. Mangold. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-11.

Sponsored by Aaron R. Mangold · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This research study is evaluating the safety and efficacy of Baricitinib in treating Cutaneous Lichen Planus (LP).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cutaneous Lichen Planus

Browse trials for

03

In context

Lichen Planus

171 studies on the registry are indexed under Lichen Planus; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 30 across 122 interventional studies indexed under Lichen Planus.

Browse Lichen Planus studies →

Lead sponsor

Aaron R. Mangold is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must be able to understand and comply with the requirements of the study and communicate with the investigator. Subjects must give written, signed, and dated informed consent before any study related activity is performed. When appropriate, a legal representative will sign the informed consent according to local laws and regulation
  • Both men and women must be at least 18 years of age at the time of screening
  • Subjects must have clinical and histological features of LP
  • LP requiring systemic treatment
  • Subjects must have treatment naïve cutaneous LP or treatment refractory disease, as defined by failure of at least one established treatment for LP. Failure of prior therapy: topical treatment, systemic immunosuppressant, oral metronidazole, oral sulfasalazine, oral retinoid

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • On excluded therapies, not on a stable dose of a therapy, or incompletely washed out for a therapy
  • Known hypersensitivity or other adverse reaction to Baricitinib (LY3009104)
  • Variants of LP deemed by the investigators to be inappropriate for Baricitinib (LY3009104) including but not limited to:

    o Drug-induced LP: Predominant non-cutaneous variants of LP, note that individuals can have disease in non-cutaneous areas; however, they must also have cutaneous disease Lichen Planopilaris or Oral Lichen planus

  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women (pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) laboratory test)
  • Women of childbearing potential [Post-menopausal or not of child-bearing potential is defined by 1 year of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea or surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least 6 weeks ago. Oophorectomy alone must be confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment to be considered not of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using basic methods of contraception which includes:

    • Total abstinence (Periodic abstinence and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception)
    • Female sterilization (bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy, or tubal ligation at least 6 weeks before taking study treatment. Oophorectomy alone requires follow up hormone level assessment for fertility.
    • Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). The vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that subject.
    • Barrier methods of contraception: condom or occlusive cap.
    • Use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or other forms or hormonal contraception that have complete efficacy (failure \<1%). (The dose of the contraceptive should be stable for 3 months)
  • Active ongoing inflammatory diseases of the skin other than LP that might confound the evaluation of the benefit of Baricitinib (LY3009104)
  • Underlying condition (including, but not limited to metabolic, hematologic, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, neurologic, endocrine, cardiac, infectious or gastrointestinal conditions) which, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly immunocompromises the subject and/or places the subject at unacceptable risk for receiving an immunomodulatory therapy
  • Moderate-to-severe renal impairment including patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2
  • Active systemic infections during the 2 weeks prior to randomization (common cold viruses excluded) or any infection that reoccurs on a regular basis
  • Current severe progressive or uncontrolled disease which the investigator renders the subject unsuitable for the trial or puts the subject at increased risk
  • Have had any major surgery within 8 weeks prior to screening or will require major surgery during the study that, in the opinion of the investigator would pose an unacceptable risk to the patient.
  • Have experienced any of the following within 12 weeks of screening: VTE (DVT/pulmonary embolism [PE]), myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, stroke, or New York Heart Association Stage III/IV heart failure.
  • Have a history of recurrent (≥ 2) VTE (DVT/PE).
  • Have a history of lymphoproliferative disease; have signs or symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly; have active primary or recurrent malignant disease; or have been in remission from clinically significant malignancy for \<5 years prior to randomization.
  • Have had symptomatic herpes zoster infection within 12 weeks prior to randomization.
  • Have a history of disseminated/complicated herpes zoster (for example, ophthalmic zoster or CNS involvement).
  • ALT or AST >2 x upper limits of normal (ULN); alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥2 x ULN; total bilirubin ≥1.5 x ULN; hemoglobin \<10 g/dL (100.0 g/L); total white blood cell count \<3000 cells/μL (\<3.00 x 103/μL or \<3.00 billion/L); neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] \<1500 cells/μL) (\<1.50 x 103/μL or \<1.50 billion/L); lymphopenia (lymphocyte count \<1000 cells/μL) (\<1.00 x 103/μL or \<1.00 billion/L); thrombocytopenia (platelets \<100,000 cells/μL) (\<100 x 103/μL or \<100 billion/L) Note: Patients who are HBcAb-positive and HBV DNA-negative may be enrolled in the study but will require additional HBV DNA monitoring during the study.
  • Have a positive test for hepatitis B virus (HBV) defined as positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or positive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) and positive for hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA). Note: Patients who are HBcAb-positive and HBV DNA-negative may be enrolled in the study but will require additional HBV DNA monitoring during the study.
  • Have hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (hepatitis C antibody-positive and HCV ribonucleic acid [RNA]-positive).

Note: Patients who have documented anti-HCV treatment for a past HCV infection AND are HCV RNA-negative may be enrolled in the study.

  • Have evidence of HIV infection and/or positive HIV antibodies.
  • Have had household contact with a person with active TB and did not receive appropriate and documented prophylaxis for TB.
  • Have evidence of active TB or latent TB
  • Have evidence of active TB, defined in this study as the following:

    • Positive purified protein derivative (PPD) test (≥5 mm induration between approximately 2 and 3 days after application, regardless of vaccination history), medical history, clinical features, and abnormal chest x-ray at screening.
    • QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or T-SPOT®.TB test (as available and if compliant with local TB guidelines) may be used instead of the PPD test. Patients are excluded from the study if the test is not negative and there is clinical evidence of active TB. Exception: patients with a history of active TB who have documented evidence of appropriate treatment, have no history of re-exposure since their treatment was completed, have no clinical features of active TB, and have a screening chest x-ray with no evidence of active TB may be enrolled if other entry criteria met. Such patients would not be required to undergo the protocol-specific TB testing for PPD, QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test, or T-SPOT®.TB test but must have a chest x-ray at screening (i.e., chest imaging performed within the past 6 months will not be accepted).
  • Have evidence of untreated/inadequately or inappropriately treated latent TB, defined in this study as the following:

    • Positive PPD test, no clinical features consistent with active TB, and a chest x-ray with no evidence of active TB at screening; or
    • If the PPD test is positive and the patient has no medical history or chest x-ray findings consistent with active TB, the patient may have a QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or T-SPOT®.TB test (as available and if compliant with local TB guidelines). If the test results are not negative, the patient will be considered to have latent TB (for purposes of this study); or
    • QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or T- SPOT®.TB test (as available and if compliant with local TB guidelines) may be used instead of the PPD test. If the test results are positive, the patient will be considered to have latent TB. If the test is not negative, the test may be repeated once within approximately 2 weeks of the initial value. If the repeat test results are again not negative, the patient will be considered to have latent TB (for purposes of this study).
  • Have been exposed to a live vaccine within 12 weeks of randomization or are expected to need/receive a live vaccine during the course of the study (with the exception of herpes zoster vaccination).
  • Have donated more than a single unit of blood within 4 weeks prior to screening or intend to donate blood during the course of the study.
  • Have a history of intravenous drug abuse, other illicit drug abuse, or chronic alcohol abuse within the 2 years prior to screening or are concurrently using, or expected to use during the study, illicit drugs (including marijuana).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cutaneous LP

    Subjects with a diagnosis of cutaneous LP will receive Baricitinib (LY3009104) for a 16 weeks treatment period

    Drug: Baricitinib (LY3009104) 2 mg

  • Experimental
    Dose Escalation Extension Group

    Subject that demonstrate a response to the 16 weeks of treatment with 2 mg of Baricitinib (LY3009104), but have not achieved a PGA 0 will receive 4 mg of Baricitinib (LY3009104) for 12 weeks

    Drug: Baricitinib (LY3009104) 4 mg

Interventions

  • DrugBaricitinib (LY3009104) 2 mg

    2 mg orally administered once daily for 16 weeks

  • DrugBaricitinib (LY3009104) 4 mg

    4 mg orally administered once daily for 12 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Skin Overall Response

    Measured by Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of skin by grade. The assessment ranges from Grade 0 (completely clear with no evidence of disease; 100% improvement) to Grade 6 (worse than at baseline evaluation by ≥25%; more progressive disease).

    Time frame: Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Modified CAILS Score of the Cutaneous Index Treatment

    Measured by Modified CAILS-Clinical Assessment Scale of Severity for Index Lesion Signs and Symptoms (mCAILS). The area of the lesion is measured with digital planimetry. Lesion size by square centimeter is graded on a scale of 0 to 18, where 0 is no measurable area and 18 is greater than 300 centimeters. The higher the score the larger the lesion.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  2. Change in Modified CAILS Score of the Cutaneous Index Treatment

    Measured by Modified CAILS-Clinical Assessment Scale of Severity for Index Lesion Signs and Symptoms (mCAILS). The area of the lesion is measured with digital planimetry. Lesion size by square centimeter is graded on a scale of 0 to 18, where 0 is no measurable area and 18 is greater than 300 centimeters. The higher the score the larger the lesion.

    Time frame: Week 16, Week 28

  3. Change in Skin Lesion Count

    Change in the number of subject's skin lesions from baseline to Week 16.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  4. Change in Skin Lesion Count

    Change in the number of subject's skin lesions from Week 16 to Week 28.

    Time frame: Week 16, Week 28

  5. Change in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    The Pruritus NRS is self-reported single question that asks "how severe itching has been over the last 24 hours". The response uses a scale of 0 (no itching) to 10 (severe itching). The higher the score, the worse the itching.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  6. Change in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    The Pruritus NRS is self-reported single question that asks "how severe itching has been over the last 24 hours". The response uses a scale of 0 (no itching) to 10 (severe itching). The higher the score, the worse the itching.

    Time frame: Week 16, Week 28

  7. Change in Overall Skindex-16 Assessment

    This validated questionnaire is a 16-item, participant-reported survey used to assess quality of life impacts due to the participant's skin condition. Scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 is never bothered by the skin condition and 6 is always bothered by the skin condition. Results are summed to produce an overall score, ranging from 0 to 96, where lower scores indicated a higher level of quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  8. Change in Overall Skindex-16 Assessment

    This validated questionnaire is a 16-item, participant-reported survey used to assess quality of life impacts due to the participant's skin condition. Scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 is never bothered by the skin condition and 6 is always bothered by the skin condition. Results are summed to produce an overall score, ranging from 0 to 96, where lower scores indicated a higher level of quality of life.

    Time frame: Week 16, Week 28

07

Results

Posted Jun 11, 2024

Participant flow

Of the 11 participants that concluded the initial 16 weeks of treatment, six were eligible to enroll in the dose escalation extension for an additional 12 weeks of treatment. Five of the six elected to continue with the study.

Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study
Participant flow — Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study
MilestoneCutaneous LPDose Escalation Extension Group
Started120
Completed110
Not completed10
Withdrew: Travel issues10
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study
Participant flow — Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study
MilestoneCutaneous LPDose Escalation Extension Group
Started05
Completed05
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPhysician Global Assessment (PGA) of Skin Overall Response

Measured by Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of skin by grade. The assessment ranges from Grade 0 (completely clear with no evidence of disease; 100% improvement) to Grade 6 (worse than at baseline evaluation by ≥25%; more progressive disease).

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Skin Overall Response
ParticipantsCutaneous LP
Grade 05
Grade 15
Grade 20
Grade 30
Grade 41
Grade 50
Grade 60
SecondaryChange in Modified CAILS Score of the Cutaneous Index Treatment

Measured by Modified CAILS-Clinical Assessment Scale of Severity for Index Lesion Signs and Symptoms (mCAILS). The area of the lesion is measured with digital planimetry. Lesion size by square centimeter is graded on a scale of 0 to 18, where 0 is no measurable area and 18 is greater than 300 centimeters. The higher the score the larger the lesion.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Modified CAILS Score of the Cutaneous Index Treatment
score on a scaleCutaneous LP
Change in Modified CAILS Score of the Cutaneous Index Treatment-10.6 ± 2.9
Statistical analysis
  • Cutaneous LP · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.002
SecondaryChange in Modified CAILS Score of the Cutaneous Index Treatment

Measured by Modified CAILS-Clinical Assessment Scale of Severity for Index Lesion Signs and Symptoms (mCAILS). The area of the lesion is measured with digital planimetry. Lesion size by square centimeter is graded on a scale of 0 to 18, where 0 is no measurable area and 18 is greater than 300 centimeters. The higher the score the larger the lesion.

Time frame:
Week 16, Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Modified CAILS Score of the Cutaneous Index Treatment
score on a scaleDose Escalation Extension Group
Change in Modified CAILS Score of the Cutaneous Index Treatment-1.1 ± 4.3
Statistical analysis
  • Dose Escalation Extension Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.593
SecondaryChange in Skin Lesion Count

Change in the number of subject's skin lesions from baseline to Week 16.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · number of skin lesions
Change in Skin Lesion Count
number of skin lesionsCutaneous LP
Change in Skin Lesion Count-134.8 ± 157.0
Statistical analysis
  • Cutaneous LP · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.002
SecondaryChange in Skin Lesion Count

Change in the number of subject's skin lesions from Week 16 to Week 28.

Time frame:
Week 16, Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · number of skin lesions
Change in Skin Lesion Count
number of skin lesionsDose Escalation Extension Group
Change in Skin Lesion Count-12.6 ± 17.6
Statistical analysis
  • Dose Escalation Extension Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.138
SecondaryChange in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

The Pruritus NRS is self-reported single question that asks "how severe itching has been over the last 24 hours". The response uses a scale of 0 (no itching) to 10 (severe itching). The higher the score, the worse the itching.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
score on a scaleCutaneous LP
Change in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)-5.3 ± 2.6
Statistical analysis
  • Cutaneous LP · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.003
SecondaryChange in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

The Pruritus NRS is self-reported single question that asks "how severe itching has been over the last 24 hours". The response uses a scale of 0 (no itching) to 10 (severe itching). The higher the score, the worse the itching.

Time frame:
Week 16, Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
score on a scaleDose Escalation Extension Group
Change in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)-1.0 ± 2.2
Statistical analysis
  • Dose Escalation Extension Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.357
SecondaryChange in Overall Skindex-16 Assessment

This validated questionnaire is a 16-item, participant-reported survey used to assess quality of life impacts due to the participant's skin condition. Scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 is never bothered by the skin condition and 6 is always bothered by the skin condition. Results are summed to produce an overall score, ranging from 0 to 96, where lower scores indicated a higher level of quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Overall Skindex-16 Assessment
score on a scaleCutaneous LP
Change in Overall Skindex-16 Assessment-37.3 ± 18.3
Statistical analysis
  • Cutaneous LP · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.008
SecondaryChange in Overall Skindex-16 Assessment

This validated questionnaire is a 16-item, participant-reported survey used to assess quality of life impacts due to the participant's skin condition. Scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 is never bothered by the skin condition and 6 is always bothered by the skin condition. Results are summed to produce an overall score, ranging from 0 to 96, where lower scores indicated a higher level of quality of life.

Time frame:
Week 16, Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Overall Skindex-16 Assessment
score on a scaleDose Escalation Extension Group
Change in Overall Skindex-16 Assessment4.0 ± 12.3
Statistical analysis
  • Dose Escalation Extension Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 1.000

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected for each participant from baseline to 30 days following the last administration of the study product. The Baricitinib 2mg group was followed for a total of approximately 5 months. The participants who continued in the Baricitinib 4mg extension group were followed for a total of approximately 9 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cutaneous LP0/12 (0%)1/12 (8.3%)8/12 (66.7%)
Dose Escalation Extension Group0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)4/5 (80%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCutaneous LPDose Escalation Extension Group
Hospitalization due to fallGeneral disorders1/120/5
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent other events
EventCutaneous LPDose Escalation Extension Group
Foot/leg pain/crampsGeneral disorders2/121/5
ConstipationGeneral disorders0/121/5
Night SweatsGeneral disorders0/121/5
Cold symptomsGeneral disorders1/121/5
Side painGeneral disorders0/121/5
Visual field changesGeneral disorders0/121/5
HeadacheGeneral disorders2/120/5
COVID-19General disorders1/120/5
Subconjunctival hemorrhage in left eyeGeneral disorders1/120/5
Chest pain/tendernessGeneral disorders1/120/5

Baseline characteristics

A total of twelve participants were enrolled in the overall study, which contained a dose escalation extension. Five of the twelve completed the dose escalation extension, resulting in a total of seventeen participants analyzed for the Baseline Measures overall.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Cutaneous LPDose Escalation Extension GroupTotal
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — <=18 years0—0
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — Between 18 and 65 years5—5
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — >=65 years7—7
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — <=18 years—00
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — Between 18 and 65 years—33
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — >=65 years—22
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cutaneous LPDose Escalation Extension GroupTotal
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — Female11—11
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — Male1—1
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — Female—55
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — Male—00
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cutaneous LPDose Escalation Extension GroupTotal
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — Hispanic or Latino2—2
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — Not Hispanic or Latino10—10
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — Unknown or Not Reported0—0
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — Hispanic or Latino—11
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — Not Hispanic or Latino—44
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — Unknown or Not Reported—00
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cutaneous LPDose Escalation Extension GroupTotal
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — American Indian or Alaska Native0—0
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — Asian0—0
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0—0
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — Black or African American1—1
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — White9—9
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — More than one race0—0
Baricitinib 2mg Initial Study — Unknown or Not Reported2—2
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — American Indian or Alaska Native—00
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — Asian—00
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander—00
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — Black or African American—00
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — White—44
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — More than one race—00
Baricitinib 4mg Extension Study — Unknown or Not Reported—11
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Cutaneous LPDose Escalation Extension GroupTotal
United States12—12
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Cutaneous LPDose Escalation Extension GroupTotal
United States—55
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 17, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05188521
Lead sponsor
Aaron R. Mangold
Responsible party
Aaron R. Mangold (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 12, 2022
Start date
Jan 11, 2022
Primary completion
May 17, 2023
Completion
May 17, 2023
Results posted
Jun 11, 2024
Last update
Jun 11, 2024

Study contacts

Aaron R Mangold, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion