An interventional study of Virtual Reality (VR) in Stroke Patients, sponsored by Sultan Qaboos University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-04.
Sponsored by Sultan Qaboos University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
To examine the effects of using a virtual reality (VR) system to improve upper limb motor function among subacute hemiparetic stroke patients. Under this aim, the investigators have two objectives: (1) to develop and test a procedure for the quantitative assessment of stroke patients in a virtual environment; and (2) to compare the outcome measures of the two groups of stroke patients (VR-intervention vs. conventional-control) on these two modes of training.
After being informed about the study and potential risks, all participants who gave written consent will undergo the study. A randomized controlled trial with pre-/post-study, of 42 stroke patients with upper limb weakness (21 patients in the control group and 21 patients in the intervention group), 18-65 years old, all are newly admitted stroke patients in the rehabilitation clinic from one hospital. Participants in the intervention group will receive 60 minutes of VR training to improve upper limb function and daily living activities. Participants in the control group will receive 60 minutes of conventional training to improve upper limb function and daily living activities. The training includes grasp, grip, pinch, gross, and finger-hand coordination movement. The training will perform 5 times/week for 4 weeks. Two outcome measures: (a) The Barthel Index and (b) The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, time spent to complete a task were used to compare two groups.
7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 42 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.
Browse Stroke studies →Sultan Qaboos University is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients in the VR group will receive VR rehabilitation training in the hospital. The content of the training is the same as the control group. The only difference is that participants in the intervention group will use VR as a training platform. The VR system will include the training materials and tasks required for the patients to perform in the 3D environment. Demographic, clinical data and treatment costs will be collected before and after the rehabilitation training.
Device: Virtual Reality (VR)
Patients in the control group will receive conventional rehabilitation training currently provided in the hospital. An instructor will assign each participant for training. Demographic, clinical data, and treatment costs will be collected before and after completing the rehabilitation training
Patients in the intervention (VR) group will receive a series of occupational and physical therapy rehabilitation training using the VR system. All training is consists of daily activities oriented by an occupational therapist, including grasp, grip, pinch, gross, and finger-hand coordination movement. Each training will take around 1 hour for one session per day 5 times per week over a maximum of 4 weeks. The training presented a one-on-one that allowed interaction between instructor (or VR system) and participant.
The Barthel Index (BI)
To evaluate upper extremity performance motor function of the stroke patients. It consists of 10 self-care activities, including feeding, Bathing, Bowels, Bladder, Toilet Use, Transfer (bed to chair, and back), Mobility (on level surfaces), stairs, etc. with a total score range from 0 to 100, the higher the score, the more independent on their daily activities; It has good validity (0.82) and reliability (0.83).
Time frame: Change from baseline scores on the Barthel index after 4 weeks training
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
To evaluate the upper limb movements, including the functions on the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand functions of the hemiparetic arm. The FMA is measured on 33 tasks with a 3-point ordinal scale (0 to 2), with a total score range from 0 to 66; the higher the score, the more functioning of the upper limb. It has good validity (0.84) and reliability (0.79).
Time frame: Change from baseline scores on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment after 4 weeks training
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Sultan Qaboos University