CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05178628imPaCT-PROUpdated Mar 29, 2022

The Impact of Thromboprophylaxis on Progression Free Survival of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of Innohep and Chemotherapy: Gemcitabine + Nab-Paclitaxel in Pancreatic Cancer and Thromboembolism, sponsored by Michalis Karamouzis. Status unknown at 2 sites in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-29.

Sponsored by Michalis Karamouzis · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
450
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded-endpoint Phase III clinical trial to investigate the impact of thromboprophylaxis using innohep, beyond anticoagulation in the improvement of the clinical outcomes in active pancreatic cancer patients receiving systemic anti-neoplasmatic treatment. The number of patients that will be enrolled is 450. The enrollment period is 24 months and the follow up period is 10 months.

Read the detailed description

Pancreatic cancer (PC) has the worst prognosis of any malignancy. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in 1:5 PC patients and is associated with significantly reduced progression-free survival (PFS). Phase III randomised controlled trials concluded that targeted thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) resulted in an 82% reduction in the relative risk of VTE without increasing major bleeding events, and that 11 patients were needed to be treated to prevent one VTE during chemotherapy. The benefits observed in the many of reported studies could not be accounted for by VTE prevention alone. Numerous experimental studies have demonstrated the antitumour, anti-metastatic and chemo-resistance reversal effect of LMWH.

The vast majority of the so far published evidence assessing the efficacy and safety of VTE prevention in ambulatory cancer patients is based on mixed patient populations with various types of cancers. Thus, current studies do not allow to estimate the real effect of long-term prophylaxis on clinical outcomes in selected homogeneous high-thrombotic risk patients.

An approach more specific to PC and restricted to advanced or metastatic patients is a modern and attractive strategy to assess the benefit of thromboprophylaxis in VTE prevention and beyond anticoagulation.

The objective of the imPaCT-PRO trial is to investigate the impact of thromboprophylaxis beyond anticoagulation in the improvement of the clinical outcomes in active PC patients receiving systemic anti-neoplasmatic treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Thromboembolism

Keywords

  • Thromboprophylaxis
  • Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,235 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 899 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 450 is above the median of 46 across 2,424 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Michalis Karamouzis as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Advanced or metastatic PC (confirmed by the recommended histological and imaging methods).
  2. Age ≥ 18 years.
  3. Planning to start 1st line chemotherapy with NabG.
  4. Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) 0-2.
  5. Life expectancy >6 months.
  6. Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with contraindication to receive anticoagulant:

    1. Any hypersensitivity to anticoagulant or excipients.
    2. History of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II).
    3. Active major bleeding or pre-diathesis for major bleeding
    4. Septic endocarditis.
  2. Creatinine clearance \<20 mL/min according to Cockcroft-Gault formula.
  3. Platelet count \< 50 G/L at inclusion.
  4. Hepatic dysfunction defined as at least one of the following: AST and/or ALT > 5 x ULN, bilirubin > 2 x ULN.
  5. Recent (\< 1 month) oncological surgery, major abdominal or thoracic surgery, major orthopedic surgery, vascular surgery.
  6. Recent (\< 1 month) acute coronary syndrome or any other arterial thrombosis, thrombotic or hemorrhagic stroke.
  7. Patients on chronic anticoagulation or on dual anti-platelet treatment.
  8. Pregnancy/lactation or insufficient contraception during the study and up to 3 months after the study.
  9. Severe concomitant disease that as per investigator's judgement is not compatible with participation in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
450 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients treated with Innohep® and chemotherapy

    The patients in this arm will receive Innohep and chemotherapy with Gemcitabine + Nab-Paclitaxel (NabG) as per clinical practice.

    Drug: Innohep

  • Active comparator
    Patients treated with chemotherapy

    The patients in this arm will receive chemotherapy with Gemcitabine + Nab-Paclitaxel (NabG) as per clinical practice.

    Drug: Chemotherapy: Gemcitabine + Nab-Paclitaxel

Interventions

  • DrugInnohep

    Patients will receive Tinzaparin sodium 20.000 Anti-Xa IU/ml in prefilled syringes. Administered at 175 Anti-Xa IU/Kgr of body weight, subcutaneously, once daily

    Also known as: Tinzaparin sodium

  • DrugChemotherapy: Gemcitabine + Nab-Paclitaxel

    All patients will receive chemotherapy per clinical practice

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PFS of patients

    PFS of patients receiving thromboprophylaxis with tinzaparin, in comparison with the PFS of patients not receiving such prevention

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. The number of VTE events during the trial

    All objectively confirmed VTE events during the study per treatment arm including symptomatic distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), symptomatic or incidental proximal DVT (including iliac and cava thrombosis), symptomatic or incidental pulmonary embolism (PE) or both DVT and PE (co-primary endpoint) or fatal PE or vein thrombosis of rare localisation (i.e., splanchnic vein or cerebral vein thrombosis).

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. % of patients experiencing at least one major bleeding event

    % of patients experiencing at least one major bleeding event, according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria during the study per treatment arm.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  2. % of patients experiencing any bleeding event

    % of patients experiencing any bleeding event, including major, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and minor bleeding events during the study per treatment arm.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  3. VTE events

    Incidence of VTE events, per event type, during the study per treatment arm

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  4. Patients with complete or partial response

    ORR, defined as the percentage of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST criteria

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  5. Change from baseline in QoL

    Change from baseline in QoL at 4 months and 10 months per treatment arm. QoL will be determined with the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0. and EORTC QOL-PAN26 questionnaires according to the corresponding scoring manual

    Time frame: at 4 and 10 months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Institute of Molecular Medicine and Biomedical Research
    Athens, Attiki 10678, Greece
    • Michalis Karamouzis, Prof · Contact · info@imibe.org · +30 213 0237967
    Recruiting
  • Eygenideio Hospital, Oncology Department
    Athens, Attiki, Greece
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 29, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05178628
Lead sponsor
Michalis Karamouzis
Responsible party
Michalis Karamouzis (Prof. Michalis Karamouzis, Institute of Molecular Medicine and Biomedical Research) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 5, 2022
Start date
Feb 10, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 29, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion