An interventional study of FFRct analysis in Chest Pain and Epicardial Plaques, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Status unknown at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.
Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Rationale: Patients with stable chest pain enter a diagnostic pathway where Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is often the first line non-invasive test to detect coronary stenosis. An anatomically significant (≥ 50% luminal narrowing) stenosis on CCTA does however not always cause cardiac ischemia (i.e. hemodynamically significant stenosis). CCTA is often followed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) to assess the hemodynamic significance of the stenosis which is the key determinant to decide on treatment (revascularization by coronary stenting or surgery). CCTA has a very high negative predictive value but the positive predictive value is moderate. Hence, anatomically significant stenoses on CCTA often turn out not to be hemodynamically significant on ICA. Fractional Flow Reserve from coronary computed tomography (FFRct) analysis is a new non-invasive technique that uses the CCTA images as a basis for complex software based calculations and modelling to provide additional functional information based on the anatomical CCTA images. Thus, FFRct is a totally non-invasive method. Adding the FFRct analysis to the anatomical assessment of CCTA is expected to reduce the number of patients being referred to ICA where no signs of hemodynamically significant stenosis are found on ICA.
In the Netherlands, annually 180.000 new patients present with stable chest pain - the most common symptom of coronary artery disease (CAD) [1]. Stable chest pain has a 1.5% 1-year mortality and 0.7% incidence of myocardial infarction [2]. The "Kennisagenda" of the Dutch Societies of Radiology and Cardiology include CAD diagnosis as a top 10 priority.
Patients with stable chest pain enter a diagnostic pathway to detect or exclude significant coronary stenosis which is defined as > 50% luminal narrowing.
The "Verbetersignalement pijn op de borst" published by the Zorginstituut, advocates that the diagnosis should be based on a single non-invasive first line test.
Based on the National Institute for Health and Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, the Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is a good option as the first line test in low to intermediate risk patients.
CCTA is the most sensitive non-invasive technique available, but only provides anatomical information. CCTA has an excellent negative predictive value (99%), therefore CCTA can accurately rule out CAD. However the positive predictive value is moderate (64%). Hence, anatomically significant stenoses on CCTA often turn out not to be hemodynamically significant on ICA .
Patients with significant anatomical stenosis on CCTA are often referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) to confirm the presence of a stenosis and subsequent revascularization of hemodynamically significant stenoses. To determine the latter, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements can be performed during ICA. In FFR, the pressure drop across an anatomical stenosis is measured, yielding a numerical value between 0 and 1, with 1 being normal and 0.80 considered a significant stenosis.
As with all invasive procedures, ICA is associated with morbidity, mortality, patient discomfort, time and costs. Due to the moderate specificity of CCTA, many patients referred for ICA turn out to not have hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis (28-41%) in Dutch populations.
To reduce the percentage of patients referred for ICA without significant CAD, the FFRct can be useful. FFRct is a non-invasive method that uses the already acquired CCTA images to calculate coronary FFR values as they would be expected if measured invasively.
Based on data of two randomised trials conducted in the Netherlands, around 20% of patients with chest pain referred for CCTA have at least 50% anatomical coronary stenosis on CCTA . Prior FFRct studies involved populations of different countries, with different risk and work-up There are no prospective data on the real-world use of FFRct in the Dutch population of stable chest pain patients with stenosis on CCTA. The effect of FFRct in reducing unnecessary ICA or other non-invasive tests compared to CCTA alone in the Dutch health care situation is unknown. Evidence in the specific Dutch situation and population is needed to evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness in the Dutch healthcare system.
The FUSION study is a randomized controlled trial which will investigate the impact of adding the FFRct analysis in the diagnostic pathway of stable chest pain on the rate of unnecessary ICA's.
388 studies on the registry are indexed under Chest Pain; 67 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 528 is above the median of 147 across 204 interventional studies indexed under Chest Pain.
Browse Chest Pain studies →Erasmus Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 478 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The people in this group receive an FFRct analysis, which will be included in the treatment plan. If the FFRct analysis shows that there are there is no significant narrowing in your case, then in principle no invasive examination (heart catheterization) performed. If the analysis indicates a significant narrowing, then an invasive cardiac catheterization will usually be required are carried out. The final treatment plan will always be reviewed by your doctor tailored to your individual situation
Other: FFRct analysis
The people in this group receive the regular treatment. This is usually an invasive cardiac catheterization. The additional FFRct analysis is also included in this group, but it is not included in the treatment plan.
Software analysis of Cardiac CT to show extent of pericardial stenoses
Rate of unnecessary ICA
Unnecessary ICA is defined as any ICA without hemodynamically significant CAD. The leading indicator for the evaluation of significant CAD is the functional measurement (FFR/iFR). If functional measurements are not available, then significant CAD is indicated by quantitative coronary angiography or ultimately by visual estimation (eyeballing).
Time frame: 90 days
Rate of unnecessary ICA
Unnecessary ICA is defined as any ICA without hemodynamically significant CAD. The leading indicator for the evaluation of significant CAD is the functional measurement (FFR/iFR). If functional measurements are not available, then significant CAD is indicated by quantitative coronary angiography or ultimately by visual estimation (eyeballing).
Time frame: 1 year
Rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE)
Including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularisation,
Time frame: 90 days; 1 year
Number of additional non-invasive tests for coronary artery disease (CAD) assessment
Time frame: 90 days; 1 year
Number of coronary revascularisations (planned/unplanned)
Time frame: 90 days; 1 year
Rate of cardiovascular death
Time frame: 90 days; 1 year
Rate of complications during and after ICA
Time frame: 90 days; 1 year
Rate of non-fatal stroke
Time frame: 90 days; 1 year
EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ5D5L) to measure quality of life
The scale used is the EQ5D5L index with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 1. Higher score means that there is a higher impact on health-related quality of life.
Time frame: 90 days; 1 year
Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) to quantify patients' symptoms of angina and the extent to which their angina affects their quality of life
The SAQ is a self-report instrument with 19 items that, when scored according to the author's recommendations, yields five subscale scores: physical limitation, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, and disease perception. The possible range of scores for each of the five subscales is 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: 90 days; 1 year
36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) to measure quality of life
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability.
Time frame: 90 days; 1 year
Cost-effectiveness
Calculated using the total costs (in euros) of the initial diagnostic tests, any additional tests or treatments for coronary artery disease, hospital admissions for suspected cardiac events and other costs that can be attributed to possible coronary artery disease.
Time frame: 1 year
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Jul 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2025, 44 months after the start.
Of 86 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Chest Pain, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 44 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 88 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.