CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05173948Updated Dec 30, 2021

The Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Kinesio taping and Conventional physical therapy in Chronic Low-back Pain, sponsored by University of Tabuk. Completed at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-30.

Sponsored by University of Tabuk · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2019, registered Nov 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of Kinesio taping (KT) with Conventional Physical therapy (CPT) - Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Supervised Exercise therapy and CPT in the management of CLBP.

Read the detailed description

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common causes of chronic disability which leads to major social and economic consequences. The role and effectiveness of the Kinesio taping (KT) and Conventional Physical therapy (CPT) are evident from the existing literature but no comparison was found on the combination of other physical therapy techniques such as supervised exercise therapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) with CLBP in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Low-back Pain

Keywords

  • Low back pain
  • Chronic
  • Kinesio taping
  • TENS
  • Exercises
03

In context

Back Pain

2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 1,941 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Tabuk is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Pain caused by mechanical/nonspecific low back pain.
  • Degeneration of the spine and intervertebral disc.
  • The visual analog scale of pain 4 and above
  • Low back pain for at least three months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physical therapy treatment is taken in the past 6 months period
  • Previous spinal surgery with fixation
  • Structural anomalies
  • Spinal cord compression
  • Severe osteoporosis
  • Acute infections
  • Severe cardiovascular or metabolic diseases
  • Pregnant women
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Kinesio taping and Conventional Physical therapy

    Kinesio taping with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Supervised Exercise therapy

    Other: Kinesio taping · Device: Conventional physical therapy

  • Experimental
    Conventional Physical therapy

    Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Supervised Exercise therapy

    Device: Conventional physical therapy

Interventions

  • OtherKinesio taping

    Kinesio taping: The tape is measured from the sacrum to the 12th thoracic vertebra with forwarding flexion of the trunk. The base is affixed to the insertion in the resting position. The muscle is elongated and the base anchored with skin displacement. The tape is then affixed with 10% stretch paravertebrally over the muscle bundles up to T12. The tape is rubbed with the muscle in the elongated state.

  • DeviceConventional physical therapy

    Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device settings, such as the frequency of 80 Hz, the pulse width of 100 µs, and symmetrical biphasic waveform. Four mediums sized (2 × 2 cm) carbon-impregnated rubber cutaneous electrodes were placed bilaterally in a standard dermatomal pattern over the most painful lumbar region. The current intensity was increased up to the patient's perception of paraesthesia. The supervised exercise therapy management consisted of stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, gluteal and hamstring muscles, and strengthening exercises for the abdominal and back muscles. Three sets of stretching exercises, each involving a 30-sec hold and 30-sec of rest repeated three times, were performed in three sessions per week over four weeks. One set of strengthening exercises, consisting of 10 repetitions with a 5-sec hold, was performed in three sessions per week over four weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical Pain Rating Scale

    Pain, for the Average pain intensity over the last week was measured on a numerical pain rating scale, where 0 represented no pain and 10 represented the worst pain possible

    Time frame: Six weeks

  2. Modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire

    Disability were measured using the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI) which is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate functional physical disability

    Time frame: Six weeks

  3. Lumbar range of motion-Modified Schober test

    Lumbar flexion range of motion were measured by using modified Schober method

    Time frame: Six weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Tabuk
    Tabuk, North West 71491, Saudi Arabia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pakkir Mohamed SH, Al Amer HS, Nambi G. The effectiveness of Kinesio taping and conventional physical therapy in the management of chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2023 Jan;42(1):233-244. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06352-3. Epub 2022 Sep 1. PubMed 36045306 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 30, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05173948
Lead sponsor
University of Tabuk
Responsible party
Shahul Hameed Pakkir Mohamed (Assistant Professor, University of Tabuk) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 30, 2021
Start date
Jun 15, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2020
Completion
Aug 30, 2020
Last update
Dec 30, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion