CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05163626Updated Jul 24, 2023

Combined Aerobic Exercise and Cognitive Training in Seniors at Increased Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

An interventional study of Combined aerobic exercise and cognitive training program in Alzheimer Disease, sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-24.

Sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to investigate the effect of a long-term combined aerobic exercise and cognitive training program on cognitive function and blood exosomal synaptic protein levels in seniors at increased risk for Alzheimer's Disease.

Read the detailed description

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia in people older than 65 years worldwide. The neuropathological changes of AD occur decades before the onset of cognitive impairment, suggesting that early identification and timely intervention may postpone the clinical progress. In addition to its characteristic amyloid β and tau pathology, AD is also marked by synaptic dysfunction. Abnormal synaptic protein levels, such as growth associated protein 43 (GAP43), neurogranin, synaptotagmins, and synaptosome associated protein 25 (SNAP25) have been observed in the brain tissue and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Blood neuro-exosomal synaptic proteins have emerged as promising predictors for AD and cognitive decline. Particularly, the investigators previously reported a combination of blood neuro-exosomal protein (GAP43, neurogranin, SNAP25, and synaptotagmin 1) can predict AD 5 to 7 years before the clinical onset.

Both physical exercise and cognitive training have been demonstrated to improve cognitive function in AD and to exert a protective effect against developing dementia in the normal aging population. Furthermore, cognitive stimulation is an established modulator of synaptic plasticity and physical exercise might regulate synapse functional and structural change. However, whether cognitive training and physical exercise can alter exosomal synaptic protein levels and the relationship of biomarker changes to cognitive function in those seniors at increased risk for AD remain unclear.

In this study, the investigators aim to

  1. assess the effects of a long-term combined aerobic exercise and cognitive training program on cognitive function and the predictive biomarkers (blood neuro-exosomal synaptic proteins: GAP43, neurogranin, SNAP25, and synaptotagmin 1) in seniors at increased risk of AD with abnormally decreased levels of the biomarkers.
  2. determine the relationship of biomarker changes with cognitive function in these people.
  3. confirm the predictive value of the blood neuro-exosomal synaptic proteins for AD in a longitudinal setting.
02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • aerobic exercise
  • exosome
  • synaptic protein
  • biomarker
  • prevention
  • cognitive training
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,678 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 872 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 70 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing is the lead sponsor of 346 studies on the registry; 217 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Mandarin-speaking subjects.
  • Not clinically demented.
  • Meeting the cutoff values of MMSE and CDR.
  • With low levels of blood neuro-exosomal synaptic proteins (GAP43\<1983pg/ml, synaptotagmin 1\<431pg/ml, neurogranin\<1433pg/ml, SNAP25\<448pg/ml)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Had major neurologic diagnosis (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, stroke, encephalitis, and epilepsy) or other condition that might impair cognition or confound assessments.
  • Had a history of psychotic episodes or had major depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score > 24 points).
  • Had severe systemic diseases, such as tumors, cardiovascular or orthopedic disorders that can affect the ability to perform the proposed intervention tasks.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Combined aerobic exercise and cognitive training program

    Behavioral: Combined aerobic exercise and cognitive training program

  • No intervention
    Standard health counseling at baseline

Interventions

  • BehavioralCombined aerobic exercise and cognitive training program

    Participants will take part in a combined aerobic exercise and cognitive training program. The program will include moderate cycling exercise and cognitive game resolving at the same time. The tasks will be instructed and supervised by a fitness expert and a trained clinical neuropsychologist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in cognitive function over time as assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    MoCA will be performed to evaluate the cognition of participants at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7. The score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating better cognition.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  2. Change in cognitive function over time as assessed by Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)

    MMSE will be performed to evaluate the cognition of participants at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7. The score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating better cognition.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  3. Change in cognitive function over time as assessed by Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)

    CDR will be performed to evaluate the cognition of participants at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7. The score ranges from 0 to 18, with higher values indicating worse cognition.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  4. Change in cognitive function over time as assessed by Verbal Fluency Test

    Verbal Fluency Test will be performed to evaluate the semantic memory function of participants at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7. Participants are asked to produce as many animals as possible within 1 minute. The score is the number of animals, with higher scores indicating better cognition.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  5. Change in cognitive function over time as assessed by Digit Span Test-Forward and Backward

    Digit Span Tests will be performed to evaluate the working memory of participants at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7. The total scores are twelve for each test, with higher values indicating better cognition.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  6. Change in cognitive function over time as assessed by Trail-Making Test Parts A and B (TMT-A and TMT-B)

    TMT-A and TMT-B will be performed to evaluate the executive function of participants at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7. Scoring is based on time taken to complete the test (e.g., 35 seconds yielding a score of 35), with lower scores indicating better cognition.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  7. Change in cognitive function over time as assessed by Boston Naming Test (BNT)

    BNT will be performed to evaluate the language function of participants at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7. The score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating better cognition.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  8. Change in cognitive function over time as assessed by the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF)

    ROCF will be performed to evaluate the visuospatial function and other cognition domains of participants at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7. Participants are asked to produce a complicated line drawing, with higher scores indicating better cognition.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  9. Change in cognitive function over time as assessed by California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT)

    CVLT will be performed to evaluate the memory function of participants at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7. Participants are asked to finish immediate recall, delayed recall, and delayed recognition tasks in the test, with higher scores indicating better cognition.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in concentrations of blood neuro-exosomal GAP43 over time

    Concentrations of blood neuro-exosomal GAP43 will be evaluated at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7, and measured in pg/ml.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  2. Changes in concentrations of blood neuro-exosomal neurogranin over time

    Concentrations of blood neuro-exosomal neurogranin will be evaluated at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7, and measured in pg/ml.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  3. Changes in concentrations of blood neuro-exosomal SNAP25 over time

    Concentrations of blood neuro-exosomal SNAP25 1 will be evaluated at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7, and measured in pg/ml.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  4. Changes in concentrations of blood neuro-exosomal synaptotagmin1 over time

    Concentrations of blood neuro-exosomal synaptotagmin1 will be evaluated at the enrollment and year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7, and measured in pg/ml.

    Time frame: baseline time, year 1, year 3, year 5, year 7

  5. The area under curve of the blood neuro-exosomal synaptic proteins (GAP43, neurogranin, SNAP25, and synaptotagmin1) for the accurate diagnosis of AD

    The area under curve is used to show the ability of the blood neuro-exosomal synaptic proteins (GAP43, neurogranin, SNAP25, and synaptotagmin1) to diagnose AD. The value of area under curve is higher, then the ability of the blood neuro-exosomal synaptic proteins to diagnose AD is stronger.

    Time frame: up to 7 years

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jia L, Zhu M, Kong C, Pang Y, Zhang H, Qiu Q, Wei C, Tang Y, Wang Q, Li Y, Li T, Li F, Wang Q, Li Y, Wei Y, Jia J. Blood neuro-exosomal synaptic proteins predict Alzheimer's disease at the asymptomatic stage. Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Jan;17(1):49-60. doi: 10.1002/alz.12166. Epub 2020 Aug 10. PubMed 32776690 ↗
  • Jia L, Quan M, Fu Y, Zhao T, Li Y, Wei C, Tang Y, Qin Q, Wang F, Qiao Y, Shi S, Wang YJ, Du Y, Zhang J, Zhang J, Luo B, Qu Q, Zhou C, Gauthier S, Jia J; Group for the Project of Dementia Situation in China. Dementia in China: epidemiology, clinical management, and research advances. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Jan;19(1):81-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30290-X. Epub 2019 Sep 4. PubMed 31494009 ↗
  • Chatzi C, Zhang Y, Hendricks WD, Chen Y, Schnell E, Goodman RH, Westbrook GL. Exercise-induced enhancement of synaptic function triggered by the inverse BAR protein, Mtss1L. Elife. 2019 Jun 24;8:e45920. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45920. PubMed 31232686 ↗
  • Lopez-Ortiz S, Valenzuela PL, Seisdedos MM, Morales JS, Vega T, Castillo-Garcia A, Nistico R, Mercuri NB, Lista S, Lucia A, Santos-Lozano A. Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Dec;72:101479. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101479. Epub 2021 Sep 30. PubMed 34601135 ↗
  • He Z, Gao Y, Alhadeff AL, Castorena CM, Huang Y, Lieu L, Afrin S, Sun J, Betley JN, Guo H, Williams KW. Cellular and synaptic reorganization of arcuate NPY/AgRP and POMC neurons after exercise. Mol Metab. 2018 Dec;18:107-119. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Sep 12. PubMed 30292523 ↗
  • Chapman SB, Aslan S, Spence JS, Hart JJ Jr, Bartz EK, Didehbani N, Keebler MW, Gardner CM, Strain JF, DeFina LF, Lu H. Neural mechanisms of brain plasticity with complex cognitive training in healthy seniors. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Feb;25(2):396-405. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht234. Epub 2013 Aug 28. PubMed 23985135 ↗
  • Hill NT, Mowszowski L, Naismith SL, Chadwick VL, Valenzuela M, Lampit A. Computerized Cognitive Training in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;174(4):329-340. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030360. Epub 2016 Nov 14. PubMed 27838936 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05163626
Lead sponsor
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 20, 2021
Start date
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2034 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2023

Study contacts

Longfei Jia, MD,PhD
Contact
longfei@mail.ccmu.edu.cn
+86 10 83199456
Longfei Jia, MD,PhD
principal investigator · Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion