An observational study in Meningitis/Encephalitis, sponsored by QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-17.
Sponsored by QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc (part of QIAGEN) · Observational
Study for performance evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx® Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in comparison with other chosen comparator methods.
This multicenter study aims to evaluate the performance of QIAstat-Dx Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel with another validated comparator method.
381 studies on the registry are indexed under Meningitis; 33 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1,524 is above the median of 346 across 98 observational studies indexed under Meningitis.
Browse Meningitis studies →QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
First submitted after QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc became part of QIAGEN.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Subjects (adults and children) with signs and symptoms of meningitis and/or encephalitis
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The performance of QIAstat-Dx® Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel will be evaluated in comparison with another validated comparator method, followed by bidirectional sequencing using residual specimens of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) obtained by lumbar puncture from subjects with signs and symptoms of meningitis and/or encephalitis.
PPA
positive percentage agreement
Time frame: 6 months
NPA
negative percentage agreement
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: No — all samples are residual and anonymized
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.